Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract ; 12(4): 870-879, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38237858

RESUMEN

The Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) recommends that short-acting ß2-agonist (SABA) monotherapy should no longer be prescribed, and that as-needed combination inhaled corticosteroids (ICS)-formoterol is the preferred reliever therapy in adults and adolescents with mild asthma. These recommendations are based on the risks of SABA monotherapy, the evidence that ICS-formoterol reliever therapy markedly decreases the occurrence of severe asthma exacerbations compared with SABA reliever therapy alone, and because ICS-formoterol reliever therapy has a favorable risk/benefit profile compared with maintenance ICS plus SABA reliever therapy. Data supporting the use of combination ICS-albuterol reliever therapy in mild asthma are more limited, but there are studies that inform its use in this population. In this review, we compare, using a pros and cons format, the (1) long-term safety and efficacy of ICS-formoterol reliever therapy versus SABA reliever therapy alone, (2) long-term safety and efficacy of ICS-albuterol reliever therapy versus SABA reliever therapy alone, (3) immediate bronchodilator effects of ICS-formoterol versus SABA alone, and (4) clinical and regulatory factors that may inform reliever therapy prescription decisions. By presenting the evidence of these reliever inhaler options, we hope to inform the reader while also calling for necessary future effectiveness and implementation research.


Asunto(s)
Antiasmáticos , Asma , Adulto , Adolescente , Humanos , Antiasmáticos/uso terapéutico , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Asma/epidemiología , Broncodilatadores/uso terapéutico , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Fumarato de Formoterol/uso terapéutico , Albuterol/uso terapéutico , Administración por Inhalación , Budesonida/uso terapéutico , Etanolaminas/uso terapéutico
2.
J Crit Care ; 82: 154782, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38522373

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Telemedicine Critical Care (TCC) improves adherence to evidence based protocols associated with improved mortality among patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). We sought to evaluate the relationship between hospital availability of TCC and outcomes among patients receiving IMV. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study of 66,522 adults who received IMV for non-postoperative acute respiratory failure at 318 non-federal hospitals in New York, Massachusetts, Maryland, and Florida in 2018. Hospital-level TCC availability was ascertained from the 2018 American Hospital Association Annual Survey. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included the composite of tracheostomy or reintubation and duration of IMV. We used two-level hierarchical multivariable regression models to investigate the association between TCC availability and outcomes. RESULTS: 20,270 (30.5%) patients were admitted into 89 TCC-available hospitals. There was no difference between TCC and non-TCC-available hospitals in mortality (odds ratio [OR] 0.94, 99% confidence interval [CI] 0.84-1.05), composite of tracheostomy or reintubation (OR 0.95 [0.82-1.11], or duration of IMV (OR 0.95 [0.83-1.09]). There was no difference in outcomes among the subgroup of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital TCC availability was not associated with improved outcomes among patients receiving IMV.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Críticos , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Respiración Artificial , Telemedicina , Humanos , Respiración Artificial/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Masculino , Estudios Transversales , Persona de Mediana Edad , Telemedicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Cuidados Críticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Traqueostomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/terapia , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/mortalidad , Estados Unidos , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Adulto , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos
3.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39137254

RESUMEN

Background: Social distancing early in the COVID-19 pandemic helped mitigate viral spread and protect vulnerable populations. Broad availability of vaccines allowed social re-integration, but effects on mental health, social determinants of health, and attitudes among individuals with COPD, who are high-risk for adverse outcomes following COVID-19 infection, are unknown. Methods: Participants in the Losartan Effects on Emphysema Progression (LEEP) trial were recruited into an ancillary study from May-November 2020. Study coordinators administered telephone questionnaires to evaluate respiratory symptoms (COPD Assessment Test [CAT]), anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 [GAD-7]) and depressive (Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ-8]) symptoms, social isolation, instrumental support, and attitudes and actions related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Generalized estimating equation models evaluated changes in patient-reported scores from the period before vaccine availability (pre-vaccine, May-December 2020) to the post-vaccine period (May 2021-September 2022). Results: Of 157 enrolled participants, 138 were interviewed during both periods. Compared with the pre-vaccine period, severe respiratory symptoms (CAT>20) were higher in the post-vaccine period (odds ratio [OR] 1.36, 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 1.00-1.85), as were moderate anxiety symptoms (GAD-7≥10; OR 1.65, 95%CI: 1.11-2.46) and moderate depressive symptoms (PHQ-8≥10; OR 1.77, 95%CI: 1.22-2.55). Social isolation improved, though not significantly, and instrumental support was unchanged. In the post-vaccine period compliance with COVID-19 mitigation strategies remained high and governmental healthcare entities were viewed as trustworthy by fewer respondents. Conclusion: Despite a trend towards less social isolation following broad availability of COVID-19 vaccines, individuals with COPD reported worse symptoms, and greater anxiety and depressive symptoms compared to the pre-vaccine period.

4.
Chest ; 165(4): 775-784, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38123124

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Bronchial thermoplasty (BT) is a treatment for patients with poorly controlled, severe asthma. However, predictors of treatment response to BT are defined poorly. RESEARCH QUESTION: Do baseline radiographic and clinical characteristics exist that predict response to BT? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted a longitudinal prospective cohort study of participants with severe asthma receiving BT across eight academic medical centers. Participants received three separate BT treatments and were monitored at 3-month intervals for 1 year after BT. Similar to prior studies, a positive response to BT was defined as either improvement in Asthma Control Test results of ≥ 3 or Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire of ≥ 0.5. Regression analyses were used to evaluate the association between pretreatment clinical and quantitative CT scan measures with subsequent BT response. RESULTS: From 2006 through 2017, 88 participants received BT, with 70 participants (79.5%) identified as responders by Asthma Control Test or Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire criteria. Responders were less likely to undergo an asthma-related ICU admission in the prior year (3% vs 25%; P = .01). On baseline quantitative CT imaging, BT responders showed less air trapping percentage (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.82-0.99; P = .03), a greater Jacobian determinant (OR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.05-2.11), greater SD of the Jacobian determinant (OR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.04-3.26), and greater anisotropic deformation index (OR, 3.06; 95% CI, 1.06-8.86). INTERPRETATION: To our knowledge, this is the largest study to evaluate baseline quantitative CT imaging and clinical characteristics associated with BT response. Our results show that preservation of normal lung expansion, indicated by less air trapping, a greater magnitude of isotropic expansion, and greater within-lung spatial variation on quantitative CT imaging, were predictors of future BT response. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT01185275; URL: www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov.


Asunto(s)
Asma , Termoplastia Bronquial , Humanos , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Termoplastia Bronquial/efectos adversos , Termoplastia Bronquial/métodos , Estudios Longitudinales , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
5.
NEJM Evid ; 2(10): EVIDe2300179, 2023 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38320185

RESUMEN

Asthma researchers have long recognized that abnormal mucus production and clearance play a role in the pathophysiology of asthma.1 Mucus plugs are known to be common in patients with severe asthma, and mucus plug scores, for which higher scores indicate more severe plugging, are directly correlated with airflow obstruction and markers of eosinophilic airway inflammation (i.e., higher scores or marker levels are associated with more severe obstruction). Other work has shown that mucus plugs were associated with distal deficits in regional ventilation as delineated by hyperpolarized gas magnetic resonance imaging.2,3.


Asunto(s)
Obstrucción de las Vías Aéreas , Asma , Eosinofilia , Humanos , Obstrucción de las Vías Aéreas/complicaciones , Moco/fisiología , Asma/complicaciones , Pulmón/patología , Eosinofilia/complicaciones , Terapia Biológica
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA