Challenges of palliative care identified by stakeholders in resource-limited settings: A multi-regional study in Kazakhstan.

INTRODUCTION: In Kazakhstan, a country of 19 million residents, more than 100,000 patients need palliative care. Since at least one family member is usually involved in the care of a terminal patient, more than 200,000 people would benefit from high-quality palliative care services in the country. However, with only 45 physicians and 101 nurses attending to 1925 palliative beds, Kazakhstan seeks to develop palliative services that meet the national needs in resource-limited settings and international standards. The objectives of this study are to explore the challenges faced by stakeholders involved in palliative care in Kazakhstan and to subsequently provide recommendations that can guide policymakers towards further developing palliative care services in the country. METHODS: This cross-sectional descriptive study collected narrative data with in-depth interviews from n= 29 palliative stakeholders (family caregivers n= 12, healthcare professionals =12, administrators n= 5) across five regions of Kazakhstan. Verbatim transcripts of interviews were analyzed using content analysis to identify needs and challenges of stakeholders involved in palliative care. RESULTS: Our analysis identified seven main challenges of palliative care stakeholders: high out-of-pocket expenditures; lack of mobile palliative care services for home-based care; severe shortages of opioids to prevent pain suffering; poor formal palliative care education; absence of practical skills training for family caregivers; lack of awareness about palliative care in the society, and lack of state support. CONCLUSION: Implementation of national palliative care strategies and policies require a large-scale coordinated involvement of all stakeholders. Our recommendations are based on the idea that coordinated, targeted, and tailored stakeholder engagement is preferred to a one-size-fits-all strategy.

Improving palliative care outcomes in remote and rural areas of LMICs through family caregivers: lessons from Kazakhstan.

Approximately 60 million people require palliative care worldwide, and nearly 80% of them live in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Providing palliative care in remote and rural areas of LMICs requires special consideration to ensure equitable access to healthcare. This perspective aims to deliver pragmatic, context-oriented policy recommendations designed to improve palliative care outcomes in Kazakhstan by capitalizing on existing resources and considering its unique geopolitical and sociocultural context. With approximately half of the population in Kazakhstan residing in remote and rural regions, the provision of healthcare services - specifically palliative care - mandates particular attention to ensure equal access to high-quality care. To understand challenges of implementing palliative care in remote and rural regions of Kazakhstan and to propose tailored solutions, 29 key stakeholders, including family caregivers, health professionals, and palliative care administrators, were identified in five regions of Kazakhstan. The main challenges encountered by family caregivers include lack of palliative care skills, the need for home-based care from mobile services, and high out-of-pocket expenditures. The challenges highlighted by healthcare providers and administrators were the lack of formal education in palliative care, shortage of opioids, and limited societal awareness and state support. Based on challenges elaborated from stakeholders and existing literature in palliative care and family caregiving, this perspective advocates against replicating the strategies implemented in high-income countries. Family caregivers play a critical role in implementing affordable and efficient palliative care in resource-limited settings. Enhancing their competencies through digital training and increasing access to palliative care services through mobile teams are tailored and localized solutions that address specific challenges in Kazakhstan. It is postulated that these recommendations may find utility in other LMICs, potentially benefiting nearly 48 million individuals who require these services.

Cost-Effectiveness of Hospice Palliative Care for Patients With Cancer and Family Caregivers: A Multicenter Study in Kazakhstan.

OBJECTIVES: In Kazakhstan, palliative care is offered through hospices, cancer centers, general hospitals, and mobile teams to approximately 107 000 patients in need. As a country with a transitional economy and a newly implemented social healthcare insurance system, Kazakhstan seeks a cost-effective allocation of limited resources for end-of-life care. This study aimed to assess cost-effectiveness of hospice-based palliative care for patients with cancer compared with the current standard of care provided in cancer centers across the country and, thereby, provide a better understanding for policy making regarding palliative care. METHODS: A total of 182 family caregivers were recruited, 104 from 3 hospices and 78 from 3 palliative care units of cancer centers. Patients' state of health and family caregivers' burden were assessed with the Palliative Outcome Scale and the Zarit Burden Interview. Direct medical and nonmedical costs and family caregivers' out-of-pocket expenses associated with palliative care were collected. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analysis was conducted by generating 1000 resamples using bootstrapping with Monte-Carlo simulation. RESULTS: After 14 days of inpatient palliative care, patients' mean Palliative Outcome Scale score was 2.5 points better in the hospice group than the cancer center group. Family caregiver burden was 4.5 points better in the hospice group. Mean treatment costs were $31 lower for the hospice group. There was a statistically significant correlation between the total cost of treatment and patients' quality of life (r = 0.58). Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that hospice-based care has better outcomes and lower costs than care provided in cancer centers in 80% of tested scenarios. CONCLUSION: Hospice-based palliative care is cost-effective compared with the care provided in palliative units of cancer centers in resource-limited settings in Kazakhstan.

Challenges for Developing Palliative Care Services in Resource- Limited Settings of Kazakhstan.

Background: Approximately 40 million people in need of palliative care worldwide, while 80% of them live in low- and middle-income countries. Kazakhstan, a low-to middle-income country with a reforming healthcare system, is committed to improving quality and accessibility of care for its 100,000 terminal patients in need of palliative care. Policy Options and Recommendations: To join the group of countries where palliative care is available, accessible, and affordable, Kazakhstan must integrate palliative services into the mainstream healthcare system at all levels, from primary healthcare to hospices, and from major cities to remote villages. Based on the evidence thoroughly collected directly from the Ministry of Health, authors propose a feasible set of recommendations regarding palliative policy, pain relief, infrastructure, workforce, and education, which could be implemented in LMICs beyond Kazakhstan. Conclusion: This study presents an analysis of challenges, recent developments, and needs of palliative care in Kazakhstan, including funding, policy, workforce, education, and infrastructure, providing an evidence base and recommendations for future development of palliative care in Kazakhstan and in other LMICs.

Early integration of palliative care into oncological care: a focus on patient-important outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Globally, cancer remains one of the leading causes of mortality. Palliative care is designed to meet a range of cancer patients' priority issues, including the management of pain and other cancer-associated symptoms. Routine palliative care envisages the provision of not just medical therapy, but also psychological support, social support and spiritual assistance. What constitutes the best model for palliative care remains a matter of debate. AIM: This review was undertaken with the aim to discuss different aspects of early integration of palliative care into oncological care, with a focus on patient-important outcomes. METHODS: A comprehensive search of publications was conducted with a focus on integrative palliative care for incurable cancer patients. For this purpose, the following databases and search engines were used: Scopus, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Research Gate, Google Scholar, eLIBRARY and Cyberleninka. RESULTS: A comprehensive approach with early integration of different medical services appears to be the most promising. Integrative palliative care is best provided via specialised interdisciplinary teams, given that all members maintain systemic communications and regularly exchange information. This model ensures that timely and adequate interventions are provided to address the needs of patients. CONCLUSION: Further research is needed to pinpoint the most optimal strategies to deliver palliative care and make it as tailored to the patient's demands as possible.

Evaluating Pain Management Practices for Cancer Patients among Health Professionals: A Global Survey.

Background: Cancer incidence in the world is predicted to increase in the next decade. While progress has been in diagnosis and treatment, much still remains to be done to improve cancer pain therapy, mainly in underserved communities in low-income countries. Objective: To determine knowledge, beliefs, and barriers regarding pain management in both high- and low-income countries (according to the WHO classification); and to learn about ways to improve the current state of affairs. Design: Descriptive survey. Setting/Subjects: Fifty-six countries worldwide; convenience sample of 1639 consisted of 36.8% physicians; 45.1% nurses, and 4.5% pharmacists employed in varied settings. Results: Improved pain management services are key elements. Top barriers include religion factors, lack of appropriate education and training at all levels, nonadherence to guidelines, patients' reluctance to report on pains, over regulation associated with prescribing and access to opioid analgesics, fear of addiction to opioids, and lack of discussions around prognosis and treatment planning. Conclusion: The majority of patients with cancer in low-income countries are undertreated for their pain. Promoting cancer pain accredited program of training and education on pain management for physicians and nurses is crucial, as well as advocating policymakers and the public at large.

Global Survey of the Roles, Satisfaction, and Barriers of Home Health Care Nurses on the Provision of Palliative Care.

Background: The World Health Assembly urges members to build palliative care (PC) capacity as an ethical imperative. Nurses provide PC services in a variety of settings, including the home and may be the only health care professional able to access some disparate populations. Identifying current nursing services, resources, and satisfaction and barriers to nursing practice are essential to build global PC capacity. Objective: To globally examine home health care nurses' practice, satisfaction, and barriers, regarding existing palliative home care provision. Design: Needs assessment survey. Setting/Subjects: Five hundred thirty-two home health care nurses in 29 countries. Measurements: A needs assessment, developed through literature review and cognitive interviewing. Results: Nurses from developing countries performed more duties compared with those from high-income countries, suggesting a lack of resources in developing countries. Significant barriers to providing home care exist: personnel shortages, lack of funding and policies, poor access to end-of-life or hospice services, and decreased community awareness of services provided. Respondents identified lack of time, funding, and coverages as primary educational barriers. In-person local meetings and online courses were suggested as strategies to promote learning. Conclusions: It is imperative that home health care nurses have adequate resources to build PC capacity globally, which is so desperately needed. Nurses must be up to date on current evidence and practice within an evidence-based PC framework. Health care policy to increase necessary resources and the development of a multifaceted intervention to facilitate education about PC is indicated to build global capacity.

Palliative Care in Kazakhstan.

In Kazakhstan, like most ex-Soviet Union countries palliative care began in the late 1990s with the opening of the Almaty Hospice in 1999. Since that time, several palliative care services have opened in urban centers, but there is little coverage in rural areas. Palliative care has grown because of the collaborative work of Parliament leaders, Ministry of Health, local governments officials, Public Health Higher School, National Center for Health Development, academic medical institutions, oncology and palliative care experts, NGOs, Soros Foundation Kazakhstan, and international experts. A National Palliative Care Strategy provides the legislative framework that mandates the components of palliative that must be available at no cost for patients living with cancer. Palliative care courses are provided in several of the medical universities and nursing schools with practical training in local hospices who also offer seminars each year to practicing health care professionals. There is no "palliative care" or "palliative medicine" specialty in the national classifier of specialties. There are a number of palliative care specialists who participated in various training courses outside Kazakhstan. Oral morphine is not registered or available in the country, and patients must depend on injectable opioids or patches. Going forward, additional policies, increased public awareness, education of health care professionals, access to oral opioids, and more inpatient, home care, and day care services are needed.