Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin Exp Nephrol ; 2024 Jun 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38879735

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although vaccination has been reported to reduce the morbidity and severity of COVID-19 infection in patients with kidney disease, gross hematuria is frequently reported following vaccination in patients with IgA nephropathy. We investigated the frequency of gross hematuria following COVID-19 vaccination and its effect on renal function in IgA nephropathy patients. METHODS: Adverse reactions after two or more COVID-19 vaccine doses were investigated in 295 IgA nephropathy patients attending Osaka Cty general hospital from September 2021 to November 2022. We compared differences in background characteristics and other adverse reactions between groups with and without gross hematuria after vaccination, and examined changes in renal function and proteinuria. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients (9.5%) had gross hematuria. The median age of patients with and without gross hematuria was 44 (29-48) and 49 (42-61) years, respectively, indicating a significant difference. The percentage of patients with microscopic hematuria before vaccination differed significantly between those with (65.2%) and without (32%) gross hematuria. Adverse reactions, such as fever, chills, headache and arthralgia, were more frequent in patients with gross hematuria. There was no difference in renal functional decline after approximately 1 year between patients with and without gross hematuria. We also found no significant changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate or proteinuria before and after vaccination in the gross hematuria group. However, some patients clearly had worsening of renal function. CONCLUSIONS: While COVID-19 vaccination is beneficial, care is required since it might adversely affect renal function in some patients.

2.
J Cardiol Cases ; 26(3): 173-177, 2022 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36091608

RESUMEN

We report the case of a patient with metastatic cardiac tumor who presented with chest pain and electrocardiographic changes mimicking acute inferior myocardial infarction. An 84-year-old man who had undergone lung cancer surgery one year earlier was referred to emergency outpatient visit because of chest pain. His 12-lead electrocardiography (ECG) showed ST-segment elevation in the inferior leads with reciprocal ST-segment depression in the precordial and lateral leads, which was initially interpreted as inferior acute myocardial infarction. By emergency coronary angiography, however, there was no significant stenosis or occlusion in the right coronary artery or the left circumflex artery. In echocardiographic examinations after admission, a large mass was found in the area corresponding to the infero-posterior wall of the left ventricle, which had been detected only by positron emission tomography with computed tomography six months earlier. He died one month after admission. Pathological autopsy revealed a tumor of 8 × 5 cm size in the myocardium of the posterior to inferior wall of the left ventricle, and diagnosed as cardiac metastasis from lung cancer. ECG changes with ST-segment elevation, in particular persistent ST-elevation in the absence of Q waves, can be a sign for tumor invasion of the heart. Learning objective: It is necessary to consider the possibility of myocardial metastasis when a patient with malignancy presents with acute myocardial infarction-like electrocardiography findings. Besides, in this case, positron emission tomography with computed tomography (PET-CT) had detected an abnormal accumulation in the left ventricle earlier than when the tumor was pointed out by echocardiography. Multimodality imaging including PET-CT could help physicians to make the early and accurate diagnosis of metastatic cardiac tumor.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA