Conduction time around the mitral valve annulus has the potential to rule out postablation perimitral atrial tachycardia.

INTRODUCTION: It would be helpful in determining ablation strategy if the occurrence of perimitral atrial tachycardia (PMAT) could be predicted in advance. We investigated whether estimated perimitral conduction time (E-PMCT), namely, twice the time between coronary sinus (CS) pacing and the ensuing wave-front collision at the opposite side of the mitral annulus, correlated with the cycle length of PMAT and could predict future PMAT. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively (retrospective cohort) and prospectively (validation cohort) investigated atrial fibrillation patients who had received pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and in whom left atrial maps had been created during CS pacing. We calculated their E-PMCT. PMAT was observed either by provocation or during follow-up in 25, AT other than PMAT was observed in 24 (non-PMAT AT group), and 53 patients never displayed any AT (no-AT group) in the retrospective cohort. In the PMAT group of the retrospective cohort, a strong positive correlation was observed between the PMAT CL and E-PMCT (r = .85, p < 0.001). PMAT was never induced nor observed in patients with E-PMCT less than 176 ms, and the best cut-off value for PMAT was 180 ms by receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis. In the validation cohort of 76 patients, the cut-off value of the E-PMAT less than 180 ms predicted noninducibility of PMAT, with a sensitivity of 78.6%, specificity of 100%, positive predictive value of 100%, and negative predictive value of 25.0%. CONCLUSION: Short E-PMCT may predict noninducibility of PMAT and guide a less invasive ablation strategy.

Can the QRS morphology of outflow tract ventricular arrhythmia change when right bundle branch block emerges during sinus rhythm?

BACKGROUND: QRS morphology can change during ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) with the appearance of bundle branch block (BBB). METHODS: We retrospectively investigated 195 consecutive patients who underwent an initial ablation of VA. The study inclusion criteria were VAs that were successfully ablated in the outflow tract (OT) and in whom right bundle branch block (RBBB) was induced by catheter manipulation close to the His bundle area during sinus rhythm, before any radiofrequency application. We analyzed the QRS morphology of the VAs with and without RBBB during sinus beats. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients (age 59 ± 17 years, female 14) developed RBBB at some point during their procedure. The successful ablation sites of the VAs were the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) in 12 patients, pulmonary artery in one, left coronary cusp in five, right coronary cusp in three, right-left cusp junction in two, and great cardiac vein in two. QRS-morphology change was observed in five (20%) cases. The successful ablation sites in that group were the left coronary cusp in three cases, right coronary cusp in one, and RVOT septum in one. The QRS duration of the VAs increased during RBBB. CONCLUSIONS: There are some cases of OT-VAs in which the QRS waveform changes with the appearance of catheter induced RBBB. We need to be aware that when QRS morphology changes during an OT-VA ablation, it does not necessarily mean that the origin or exit of the VA has changed.

Difference in radiofrequency ablation profile between during sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation: Considerations in this era of high-power short-duration strategy.

Background: The concept of ablation index (AI) was introduced to evaluate radiofrequency (RF) ablation lesions. It is calculated from power, contact force (CF), and RF duration. However, other factors may also affect the quality of ablation lesions. To examine the difference in RF lesions made during sinus rhythm (SR) and atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods: Sixty patients underwent index pulmonary vein isolation during SR (n = 30, SR group) or AF (n = 30, AF group). All ablations were performed with a power of 50 W, a targeted CF of 5-15 g, and AI of 400-450 using Thermocool Smarttouch SF. The CF, AI, RF duration, temperature rise (Δtemp), impedance drop (Δimp), and the CF stability of each ablation point quantified as the standard deviation of the CF (CF-SD) were compared between the two groups. Results: A total of 3579 ablation points were analyzed, which included 1618 and 1961 points in the SR and the AF groups, respectively. Power, average CF, RF duration per point, and the resultant AI (389 ± 59 vs. 388 ± 57) were similar for the two rhythms. However, differences were seen in the CF-SD (3.5 ± 2.2 vs. 3.8 ± 2.1 g, p < .01), Δtemp (3.8 ± 1.3 vs. 4.0 ± 1.3°C, p < .005), and Δimp (10.3 ± 5.8 vs. 9.4 ± 5.4 Ω, p < .005). Conclusions: Despite similar AI, various RF parameters differed according to the underlying atrial rhythm. Ablation delivered during SR demonstrated less CF variability and temperature increase and greater impedance drop than during AF.