Outcome measures after medial ulnar collateral ligament reconstructions in a military population.

BACKGROUND: Medial ulnar collateral ligament (MUCL) reconstruction outcomes are well described in competitive throwers but not in nonthrowers. This investigation elucidated epidemiologic variables, functional outcomes, and prognostic factors after MUCL reconstruction in young active patients. METHODS: United States military service members undergoing MUCL reconstruction were isolated using the Management Analysis and Reporting Tool (M2) database from 2009 to 2016. Demographics, injury characteristics, and surgical variables were extracted. Multivariate analysis was performed, discerning variables predictive of postoperative functional outcomes, complications, and reoperation. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients met inclusion criteria, and 47% participated in throwing sports. Of these, 36.4% reported a throwing mechanism of injury (MOI), 60.6% reported an acute trauma MOI, 59% reported preoperative ulnar nerve symptoms, and 39.4% experienced symptoms postoperatively. At final follow-up, average Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) and Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) scores were 10.8 ± 16.2 and 87.6 ± 17.1, respectively. A total of 86.4% reported no disability (DASH < 30), and 83.3% experienced good or excellent outcomes (MEPS >74). Age < 30 years, dominant arm injury, competitive throwing history, and throwing MOI correlated with improved DASH and MEPS scores, push-up count, postoperative pain and instability, and rates of ulnar nerve symptoms (P < .05). Psychiatric diagnosis and preoperative stiffness and instability were associated with lower outcome scores (P < .05). Ulnar nerve interventions did not correlate with presence or absence of postoperative ulnar nerve symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: MUCL reconstruction demonstrates a high good-to-excellent outcome rate and low complication and revision rates in young active individuals with intense upper extremity demands. Nonthrowing MOIs and psychiatric pathology are associated with postoperative complications and poorer outcomes.

Orthopaedic and Plastic Surgery Training Differences Manifested in the Analysis of Distal Radius Fracture Fixation.

All patients undergoing open reduction and internal fixation of a distal radius fracture (DRF) between the years 2010 and 2015 were isolated from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Patient demographics, respective surgical volume, outcome variables, and complications were extracted. The primary outcomes were surgical time, hospital length of stay, and unplanned reoperation. A total of 6691 patients were included in the study, the majority of whom were treated by orthopaedic surgeons. While there were no significant differences in baseline demographics between the patients treated by orthopaedic and plastic surgeons, the overall operative time was significantly less for DRFs fixed by orthopaedic surgeons. While there was a significant difference for extra-articular fractures, this difference increased significantly for complex intra-articular fractures. Additionally, hospital length of stay was significantly shorter for patients treated by orthopaedic surgeons. To produce well-rounded, technically skilled surgeons, plastic surgery programs should incorporate fixation principles into their training programs. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 28(1):53-57, 2019).

Open reduction-internal fixation versus intramedullary nailing for humeral shaft fractures: an expected value decision analysis.

BACKGROUND: Previous randomized controlled studies and meta-analyses have failed to collectively favor either open reduction-internal fixation (ORIF) or intramedullary nailing (IMN) fixation. The purpose of our investigation was to elucidate the optimal decision between ORIF and IMN for acute traumatic operative humeral shaft fractures through an expected value decision analysis. METHODS: We performed an expected value decision analysis and sensitivity analysis to elucidate the difference between ORIF and IMN fixation for patients with acute traumatic humeral shaft fractures. We surveyed 100 consecutive, randomly selected volunteers for their outcome preferences. Outcomes included union, delayed union, major complications, minor complications, and infection. A literature review was used to establish probabilities for each of these respective outcomes. A decision tree was constructed and a fold-back analysis was performed to find an expected patient value for each treatment option. RESULTS: The overall patient expected values for ORIF and IMN were 12.7 and 11.2, respectively. Despite artificially decreasing the rates of major complications, infection, delayed union, and nonunion each to 0% for IMN fixation (sensitivity analysis), ORIF continued to maintain a greater overall patient expected value (12.7 vs. 11.4, 11.2, 11.2, and 12.1, respectively). Only if the rate of nonunion after ORIF was increased from 6.1% to 16.8% did the overall expected outcome after ORIF equal that of IMN (11.2). CONCLUSION: Our expected value decision analysis demonstrates that patients favor ORIF over IMN as the optimal treatment decision for an acute traumatic humeral shaft fracture.

Functional outcomes following lateral ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction for symptomatic posterolateral rotatory instability of the elbow in an athletic population.

HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this investigation was to characterize the functional and surgical outcomes following lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL) reconstruction for posterolateral rotatory instability in an athletic population. METHODS: All US military service members who underwent LUCL reconstruction between 2008 and 2013 were identified. A retrospective chart review was performed, and the prospective Mayo Elbow Performance Score and QuickDASH (short version of Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire) score were obtained. The primary outcomes were return to preinjury activity and resolution of symptoms. RESULTS: We identified 23 patients with a mean age of 31.6 ± 7.2 years (range, 19-46 years), and 87% were men. A history of instability and/or dislocation was reported by 11 patients (48%), and 8 patients (35%) had undergone prior elbow surgery. At final follow-up of 4.6 ± 1.8 years (range, 2.2-7.6 years), all patients demonstrated significant decreases in pain (average pain score, 4 vs 1.34) with resolution of instability and achieved a functional arc of motion. After surgical reconstruction, 83% were able to return to prior activity, whereas 4 patients (17%) underwent medical separation, including 3 with elbow disability precluding continued service (13%). Overall 83% of patients reported good to excellent outcomes by the Mayo Elbow Performance Score, and 96% of patients reported no significant disability by the QuickDASH disability evaluation. Postoperatively, 4 patients (17%) experienced complications, with 3 (13%) requiring reoperation. CONCLUSION: Although the diagnosis and surgical management of isolated LUCL injury are relatively infrequent, LUCL reconstruction for posterolateral rotatory instability offers a reliable return to preinjury level of function among active individuals with intense upper extremity demands. However, although function reliably improves, the rate of perioperative complications is greater than 15%.

The Shift to Same-Day Outpatient Joint Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Hip and knee arthroplasties length of stay continues to shorten after advances in perioperative and intraoperative management, as well as financial incentives. Some authors have demonstrated good results with outpatient arthroplasty, but safety and general feasibility of such procedures remain unclear. Our hypothesis is that outpatient arthroplasty would demonstrate higher readmission and complication rates than inpatient arthroplasty. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of all publications on outpatient arthroplasty between January 1, 2000 and June 1, 2016. Included publications had to demonstrate a specific outpatient protocol and have reported perioperative complications and unplanned readmissions. Patient demographics, surgical variables, and protocol details were recorded in addition to complications, readmission, and reoperation. RESULTS: Ten manuscripts accounting for 1009 patients demonstrated that 955 (94.7%) were discharged the same day as planned, with the majority of failures to discharge being secondary to pain, hypotension, and nausea. There were no deaths and only 1 major complication. Only 20 patients (1.98%) required reoperation and 20 (1.98%) had readmission or visited the emergency room within 90 days of their operation. In the 2 series recording patient outcomes, 80% and 96% of patients reported that they would choose to undergo outpatient arthroplasty again. CONCLUSION: For carefully selected patients with experienced surgeons in major centers, outpatient arthroplasty may be a safe and effective procedure. Although our data is promising, further study is required to better elucidate the differences between inpatient and outpatient arthroplasty outcomes.

Predictors of Acute Complications Following Traumatic Upper Extremity Amputation.

Current literature is deficient in its description of acute complications following major traumatic upper extremity amputations (UEAs). This study sought to identify acute complications following major UEAs by the 2009-2012 National Trauma Databank to extract demographics, comorbidities, concomitant injuries, and surgical characteristics for major traumatic UEA patients. Multivariate analyses identified significant predictors of mortality and major systemic complications. Major traumatic upper extremity amputations were identified in 1190 patients. Major systemic complications occurred in 13% of patients and most often involved pulmonary (7.4%) or renal (4.7%) systems. Overall in-hospital mortality rate was 11%. Male sex, prehospital systolic blood pressure less than 90, Injury Severity Score > 16, and initial Glasgow Coma Scale > 8 were risk factors for complications or in-hospital mortality. Acute replantation was performed in 0.12%. Systemic complications following major traumatic UEA typically affect the pulmonary system. Injury or patient-dependent factors did not influence acute treatment with revision amputation versus replantation. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 27(2):113-118, 2018).

Radial Head Arthroplasty in the Active Duty Military Service Member With Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up.

PURPOSE: Radial head arthroplasty (RHA) is a viable treatment for complex radial head fracture. Whereas elbow stability and function is typically restored at short- to mid-term follow-up, the outcome in higher-demand populations is not well defined. We sought to characterize the functional and occupational outcomes following RHA in an active duty military population with intense upper extremity demands. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of all U.S. military service members undergoing primary RHA from 2010 and 2013 with a minimum of 2-year follow-up. Patient-based, injury-related, and surgical variables were extracted from the military-wide electronic medical record. Functional and occupational outcomes including pain, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire were recorded. The primary outcomes of interest were the rate and level of return to upper extremity activity. Secondary outcome measures included return to duty, complications, and revision surgery. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were included with average age 31 years and median 37 months' follow-up. Ten were Mason III, 6 were part of a terrible triad injury, and the remainder were fracture-dislocations. At an average follow-up of 3.7 years, 15 patients returned to active military duty, and 9 resumed their regular upper extremity military function. At the time of final follow-up, the average DASH score was 13. Seven patients returned to their usual level of sport and exercise, 6 at a reduced level, and 6 did not resume physical exercises secondary to pain or stiffness. Sixteen adverse outcomes among 14 patients included symptomatic heterotopic ossification (5 of 19) and neurological sequelae (4 of 19). Three elected to have a revision procedure at an average of 13 months for heterotopic ossification or loosening. CONCLUSIONS: Among active patients with radial head fractures treated with RHA, three-quarters will return to active duty military service, push-ups, and sport; however, half may report an adverse outcome unrelated to the prosthesis and only about half of patients will return to their preinjury level of function. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

The Success of Hip Arthroscopy in an Active Duty Population.

PURPOSE: To examine the outcomes of arthroscopic treatment of the hip in a young, active military population. Specifically, the ability to return to duty was the prime indicator of success. In addition, an objective evaluation of various demographic and surgery-related variables was performed to identify predictors for success or failure of treatment in this military population. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was undertaken to ascertain the results of hip arthroscopy at a single academic military medical center. A total of 206 patients underwent 223 hip arthroscopies during a 13-year period (2000-2013). Of these, 159 patients met the inclusion criteria, which included active duty military service and at least 12-month follow-up. Veterans Affairs Beneficiaries, active duty dependents, and those with less than 12 months of follow-up were excluded. Surgeries were performed by 1 of 5 fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeons. Data were collected from the Armed Forces Health Longitudinal Technology Application, Electronic profiling system, and Physical Evaluation Board. RESULTS: A total of 159 patients were available for the study, 102 males and 57 females. The average age of the patients overall was 30.9 ± 8.3 years (range, 18-52 years). Junior enlisted, which is considered entry level, made up 64.2% of the subjects. The most common diagnosis was femoroacetabular impingement, and the most common procedure performed was acetabuloplasty. Twenty-two percent of patients underwent evaluation by the medical retention board after hip arthroscopy and were separated from military service. Seventy-eight percent of soldiers were maintained on active duty after hip arthroscopy. The overall complication rate was 15.7%, with a major complication rate of 1.25% defined as femoral neck fracture, abdominal compartment syndrome, osteonecrosis, deep vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolus, and septic arthritis. Univariate analysis of risk factors showed the presence of a complication to be a significant predictor for failure to return to active duty (odds ratio [OR] 4.04, P = .0035) as was senior noncommissioned officer rank (OR 0.20, P = .0347). Multivariate analysis showed only the presence of a complication to be a significant predictor for failure to return to active duty (OR 3.71, P = .0083). CONCLUSIONS: Hip arthroscopy in a military population is effective in treating multiple causes and retaining soldiers on active duty status. Complications of any kind from surgery or postoperatively are significant predictors of medical separation and may warrant earlier initiation of a medical evaluation board. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic case series.

The Rising Incidence of Degenerative and Posttraumatic Osteoarthritis of the Knee in the United States Military.

BACKGROUND: This investigation sought to quantify incidence rates (IRs) and risk factors for primary and secondary (ie, posttraumatic) osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee in an active military population. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of United States military active duty servicemembers with first-time diagnosis of primary (International Classification of Disease, 9th Edition code: 715.16) and secondary (International Classification of Disease, 9th Edition code: 715.26) OA of the knee between 2005 and 2014 using the Defense Medical Epidemiology Database. IRs and 95% CIs were expressed per 1000 person-years, with stratified subgroup analysis adjusted for sex, age, race, military rank, and branch of military service. Relative risk factors were evaluated using IR ratios and multiple regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 21,318 cases of OA of the knee were identified among an at-risk population of 13,820,906 person-years for an overall IR of 1.54 per 1000 person-years, including 19,504 cases of primary (IR: 1.41) and 1814 cases of secondary OA (IR: 0.13). The IRs of both primary and secondary OA increased significantly from 2005 to 2014. Increasing age (P < .0001); black race (P < .001); senior military rank (P < .0001); and Army, Marines, and Air Force services (P < .0001) were significantly associated with an increased risk for knee OA. CONCLUSION: This study is the first large-scale report of knee OA in a young athletic population. An increasing incidence and several risk factors for knee OA were identified, indicating a need for better preventative strategies and forecasting the increased anticipated demands for knee arthroplasty among US military servicemembers.

Occupational Outcomes and Return to Running After Operative Management of Lisfranc Injuries in a High-Demand Population.

Background: Literature evaluating outcomes following operative fixation of Lisfranc injuries has demonstrated high rates of chronic disability, particularly in those returning to prior levels of physical function. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the occupational outcomes and return to running after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) or arthrodesis for Lisfranc fracture-dislocations in a moderate- to high-demand military cohort. Methods: All active-duty servicemembers undergoing ORIF or primary arthrodesis (Current Procedural Terminology 28615 and 28730, respectively) for confirmed Lisfranc fracture-dislocations (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes 838.03 or 838.13) with minimum 2-year follow-up were isolated from the Military Health System. Demographic and surgical variables were recorded. Return to military function, return to running, perioperative morbidity, and rates of reoperation for complication were the outcomes of interest. Univariate analysis followed by multivariate logistic regression determined the association between patient demographics, type of fracture fixation (ie, ORIF vs arthrodesis) and functional outcomes, including medical separation. Results: Among Lisfranc injuries, 64 patients underwent ORIF while 6 underwent primary arthrodeses with a mean age of 28.1 years. At mean follow-up of 3.5 years (range, 2.0-6.3 years), 20% of servicemembers underwent medical separation due to limitations related to their injuries. body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m2 (OR 17.67; 95% CI, 3.69-84.53) and Army or Marines service branch (OR 3.86; 95% CI, 1.08-13.86) were significant independent predictors for medical separation. Among servicemembers undergoing ORIF or primary arthrodeses, 69% returned to occupationally required daily running during the follow-up period. Servicemembers with a BMI <30 kg/m2 were more likely to return to running (OR 13.14, 95% CI, 2.50-69.19). Radiographic evidence of posttraumatic Lisfranc osteoarthritis occurred in 10 (16%) servicemembers who underwent internal fixation, and 82% of ORIF patients underwent implant removal. Conclusions: At mean 3.5-year follow-up, 80% of servicemembers undergoing ORIF or primary arthrodeses for Lisfranc injuries remained on active duty or successfully completed their military service, and 69% were able to resume occupationally required daily running. Surgeons should preoperatively counsel patients with these injuries on the possibility of persistent long-term disability.Levels of Evidence: Level IV: Retrospective series.

The Burden of Fingertip Trauma on the US Military.

Fingertip injuries in the military are common and often hinder the fighting force and support personnel. Injuries range from small subungual hematomas to proximal finger amputations. Treatment modalities are dictated by injury patterns, anatomic considerations, and the need to return to duty. Nail bed injuries should be repaired when possible and exposed bone or tendon is treated with appropriate soft tissue coverage. If soft tissue coverage is unobtainable, revision amputation should be performed with attention given to maintaining as much finger length as possible. Antibiotics may not be required, however they are often utilized in the deployed setting.

Return to Weightbearing and High-Impact Activities Following Jones Fracture Intramedullary Screw Fixation.

BACKGROUND: Although the benefit of primary intramedullary (IM) screw fixation of fifth metatarsal Jones fractures in athletes is clear, limited data support its use in conventional patient populations. This study evaluated radiographic and functional outcomes following primary IM screw fixation in a series of Jones fractures to determine if similar excellent outcomes were achievable. METHODS: We reviewed the data of 32 consecutive patients who underwent Jones fracture primary IM screw fixation by a single surgeon. Demographic risk factors of interest (age, gender, tobacco use, pertinent medical comorbidities, military service status, and prior nonoperative management) were collected prospectively. Primary outcomes included times to return to full weightbearing, radiographic union, and resumption of high-impact or restriction-free activities. Complications including reoperations were recorded. Categorical data are reported as frequencies, and statistical means with P values are reported for continuous variables. Mean age for the 32 patients was 33.4 years. RESULTS: All 32 fractures healed uneventfully, and at mean follow-up time of 24.2 months, overall patient-reported satisfaction was 100%. Overall mean postoperative outcomes are as follows: 3.7 weeks return to full weightbearing, 10.8 weeks to radiographic union, and 13.0 weeks to resumption of restriction-free activities. Among the risk factors assessed, only preoperative peripheral vascular disease (PVD) and/or diabetes mellitus (DM) and active duty military service resulted in significantly increased and decreased time to resumption of restriction-free activities, respectively, but did not impact overall weightbearing or union times. Patient age, gender, and tobacco use had no effects on radiographic or functional outcomes. CONCLUSION: Primary IM screw fixation was a safe, reliable option for all appropriate operative candidates with Jones fractures and may result in similar early weightbearing, osseous healing, and expeditious return to full activities consistently reported in high-level athletes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.

Outcomes and Predictors of Postoperative Pain Improvement Following Particulated Juvenile Cartilage Allograft Transplant for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus.

BACKGROUND: Particulated juvenile cartilage allograft transfer (PJCAT) is an emerging treatment option for management of osteochondral lesions of the talus (OCLTs). This series reports on outcomes and identifies predictors for success following PJCAT for isolated OCLTs. METHODS: We reviewed 33 consecutive patients who underwent PJCAT by a single surgeon from 2013 to 2017. Preoperative demographic factors (age, body mass index [BMI], tobacco use, behavioral health comorbidity, and ankle pain visual analog score [VAS]) and OCLT morphologic data were collected. Outcomes included postoperative improvements in VAS and American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) score and clinical success/failure. Results of 7 second-look arthroscopies and complications are provided. Categorical data are reported as frequencies, and statistical means with P values are reported for continuous variables. We had a mean 3.5 years of follow-up. RESULTS: Improvement in ankle pain VAS following isolated PJCAT was 51% (P < .001). For the first 16 consecutive patients in whom complete AOFAS scores were available, 40% (P < .001) improvement occurred. Presence of 1 or more behavioral health diagnoses was a risk factor for decreased pain relief, while moderate to severe preoperative pain (VAS >5.9) predicted improved postoperative pain relief. Age, BMI, tobacco use, and OCLT morphology did not affect outcomes. CONCLUSION: For treatment of large, high-stage OCLTs, PJCAT resulted in 40% to 50% improvement in ankle pain and disability within 3.5 years. The results may be better in patients with moderate to severe preoperative pain but worse in those with preexisting behavioral health diagnoses. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective case series.

Biomechanical comparison of a novel C1 posterior U-construct with four other techniques in a C1-C2 fixation model.

BACKGROUND: Compare the biomechanical stability of a novel "U" posterior cervical fixation construct to four other posterior cervical atlantoaxial fixation constructs. METHODS: Eight fresh frozen human cadaver spines were tested after a simulated odontoid fracture, and following stabilization with each construct. RESULTS: All constructs significantly decreased flexion-extension and axial rotation compared to the destabilized spine. The U construct provided significantly more axial stability than the Brooks wire technique. CONCLUSION: The novel U construct demonstrated comparable biomechanical stability to the existing constructs in all three planes of motion with the exception of axial rotation, in which it was inferior to TAS.

Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) versus ORIF and primary subtalar arthrodesis for complex displaced intraarticular calcaneus fractures: An expected value decision analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the optimal patient-oriented treatment between open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with or without primary subtalar arthrodesis (PSTA) for patients with displaced intraarticular calcaneus fractures (DIACFs, OTA 82-C3 and C4). DESIGN: Expected value decision analysis. SETTING: Academic military treatment facility. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred randomly selected volunteers. INTERVENTION: Hypothetical clinical scenario involving ORIF versus ORIF with PSTA. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Decision analysis was used to elucidate the superior treatment option based on expected patient values, composed of: the product of the average outcome probabilities established by previously published studies and the average ascribed patient utility values for each outcome probability. One-way sensitivity analysis was performed to quantify the amount of change required for the inferior treatment to equal or surpass the superior option. RESULTS: Expected values for ORIF and ORIF with PSTA were 8.96 and 18.06, respectively, favoring ORIF with PSTA. One-way sensitivity analysis was performed by artificially decreasing the rate of secondary fusion following isolated ORIF thus increasing its overall expected value. Adjusting the rate of secondary fusion to 0%, the expected value of ORIF with PSTA nearly doubled that of ORIF (18.06 vs 9.45). Similarly, when adjusting the moderate and severe complication rates following ORIF with PSTA to 100%, the expected value of ORIF with PSTA still exceeded that of ORIF (15.45 vs 8.96, and 13.52 vs 8.96, respectively). CONCLUSION: Expected value decision analysis favors ORIF with PSTA as the optimal treatment for complex DIACF.

Accuracy of radiographic determination of the posterior femoral wall integrity in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of radiographs in determining integrity of the posterior femoral cortex following ACL reconstruction. METHODS: Fifty adult volunteers undergoing primary arthroscopic transtibial ACL reconstructions were prospectively enrolled into this study. Plain radiographs and fine-cut CT of the operative knee were obtained post-operatively. Three blinded orthopaedic surgeons were asked to measure the distance from the femoral tunnel to the posterior cortex on lateral radiographs. Inter/intra-observer reliabilities were assessed with the interclass correlation coefficient. The true measurement of the posterior wall was determined on CT. For each, a measurement was made at the aperture, 5 mm, and 10 mm along the tunnel. Plain radiographic measurements were compared to the CT measurement of back wall using a paired t-test. RESULTS: All measurements made on the lateral radiograph were significantly different from those from the respective CT scans for each surgeon (p < 0.0001) at all points. When radiographic measurements were compared to CT at the level of the intra-articular aperture, 29 subjects showed violation of the posterior cortex, with only one being identified on plain films. At 5 mm, 7 subjects demonstrated posterior cortical violation, and none were identified on lateral radiographs. The posterior cortex remained intact in all cases at 10 mm. CONCLUSION: Lateral radiographs of the knee are insufficient for evaluation of the posterior cortical integrity following primary ACL reconstruction. Direct visualization of the femoral tunnel remains the gold standard for evaluation of the posterior wall and may be supplemented by CT scan if there remains concern over graft fixation.

Perilunate Dislocations and Perilunate Fracture Dislocations in the U.S. Military.

Background Perilunate dislocations and perilunate fracture dislocations (PLDs/PLFDs) are rare and often associated with poor outcomes. Heretofore, these outcomes have not been evaluated in a high-demand military population. Questions/Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes in a young, active population after sustaining PLD/PLFD injuries. Patients and Methods We retrospectively reviewed the U.S. military service members who underwent surgical treatment for a PLD/PLFD (Current Procedural Terminology codes 25695 and 25685) between June 1, 2010, and June 1, 2014 through the Military Health System Management Analysis and Reporting Tool (M2) database, capturing patients with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Patient characteristics and outcomes were gathered; however, radiographic analysis was not possible. Results In this study, 40 patients (40 wrists) were included with an average follow-up of 47.8 months. The average age was 28.8 years. Twenty-two injuries (55%) were PLFD and 22 (55%) cases involved the nondominant extremity. On initial presentation, 11 (27.5%) were missed and 50% of patients were presented with acute carpal tunnel syndrome. Range of motion (ROM) was 74% and grip strength was 65% compared with the contralateral wrist; 78% reported pain with activity and only 55% remained on active duty status at final follow-up. Injuries to the nondominant extremity were significantly more likely to experience a good to excellent outcome and regained a more ROM. Patients with ligamentous PLD had less pain at rest and were more likely to return to sport. Conclusion Worse outcomes can be expected for PLD/PLFD of the dominant extremity, transscaphoid PLFD, greater arc injuries, and those undergoing pinning alone. A high-demand patient may expect worse functional results with a higher degree of limitation postoperatively. Level of Evidence The level of evidence is therapeutic IV.

Outcomes Following Carpal Tunnel Release in Patients Receiving Workers' Compensation: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a common occupational pathology, representing a high percentage of workers' compensation (WC) claims. METHODS: The literature was reviewed for all studies evaluating CTS outcomes including WC patients between 1993 and 2016. A total of 348 articles were identified; 25 of which met inclusion and exclusion criteria. A systematic review was generated; patient demographics, outcomes, and complications were recorded. Weighted averages were calculated for the demographic and outcome data. Categorical data such as complications were pooled from the studies and used to determine the overall complication rate. Statistical significance was determined between WC and non-WC cohorts when applicable with the chi-square statistic. RESULTS: The WC cohort included 1586 wrists, and the non-WC cohort included 2781 wrists. The WC cohort was younger and more often involved the dominant extremity. The WC cohort was less likely to have appropriate physical exam findings confirming diagnosis and electrodiagnostic studies. WC patients took almost 5 weeks longer to return to work, were 16% less likely to return to preinjury vocation, and had lower Standard Form (SF)-36 scores. Finally, WC patients had nearly 3 times the number of complications and nearly twice the rate of persistent pain. CONCLUSIONS: WC patients undergoing carpal tunnel release (CTR) fare poorly as compared with non-WC patients in nearly every metric. Higher rates of postoperative pain with delayed return to work can be anticipated in a WC cohort. In addition, WC patients receive suboptimal preoperative workup, and it is possible that unnecessary surgery is being completed in these cases. These findings are important to consider when treating the WC patient with CTS.

Functional Outcomes Following Surgical Management of Femoral Neck Stress Fractures.

The Military Health System Management Analysis and Reporting Tool was queried to identify all active duty US military service members who underwent operative fixation of femoral neck stress fractures from 2011 to 2012. A total of 13 patients with 17 femoral neck stress fractures met the inclusion criteria. Average patient age was 23.8±5.1 years, and 62% were women. At a mean 26-month follow-up, approximately one-half (46%) of the young military recruits were able to return to their preoperative activity level. Two (11%) required reoperation. Increased time to diagnosis and to subsequent fixation was associated with a greater risk of poor outcomes resulting in medical separation. [Orthopedics. 2017; 40(3):e395-e399.].