Chemotherapy of advanced gastric cancer.

Gastric cancer is the second most frequent cancer in the world. Approximately 84% of patients with gastric cancer will have advanced disease and median survival of these patients without chemotherapy is only 3-4 months. "Classical" chemotherapy regimens, mainly CF (cisplatin plus infusional 5FU) and ECF (cisplatin plus infusional 5FU plus Epirubicin) obtain responses in 20-40% of the patients and improve quality of life. Nevertheless, duration of these responses is short with very few complete responses. Median time to tumor progression (TTP) with these regimens is only about 4-5 months and median survival does not exceed 7-10 months. Moreover, benefit seems to be limited to patients with good performance status and treatment toxicity and discomfort are not negligible, specially that of regimens with cisplatin or infusional 5FU. Trying to improve these results, the incorporation of new drugs has been explored. Among the new combinations, the more developed ones are those with Docetaxel (DCF), oxaliplatin (EOX, FLO), Capecitabine (EOX, cisplatin-Xeloda) and irinotecan (ILF). We have final results from Phase III trials that suggest that all these regimens could have a role in the treatment of these patients but survival is still very poor and toxicity remains important. It would be interesting to investigate other new combinations and the incorporation of drugs directed against new therapeutic targets in this setting. It would be of utmost interest that these clinical trials would also explore clinical and molecular prognostic and predictive factors.

Long term results of a phase II trial of induction chemotherapy with uracil-ftegafur (UFT), vinorelbine and cisplatin (UFTVP) followed by radiotherapy concomitant with UFT and carboplatin (RT/UFTJ) in non-resectable locally advanced (stage IV-B) squamous cell head and neck carcinoma and peripheral blood stem cell support (PBSCS) with febrile neutropenia.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the response of advanced squamous cell head and neck carcinoma to a combination of induction chemotherapy and radiotherapy. METHODS: We present long-term results of a phase II trial of Induction Chemotherapy with UFT 200 mg/m(2) p.o. days 1 to 21, Vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) i.v. days 1 and 8 and Cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) i.v. day 1 (UFTVP) each 21 days for 4 courses, followed by Radiotherapy concomitant with UFT 100 mg/m(2) p.o. daily and Carboplatin AUC = 0.5 i.v. weekly (RT/UFTJ) in patients (pts) with Non-Resectable Locally Advanced (Stage IV-B) Squamous Cell Head and Neck Carcinoma (IV-B-SCHNC). Primary endpoint was Complete Response to induction UFTVP and secondary endpoints were Disease Free Status Rate after locoregional treatment and long-term Overall Survival. Between 1994 and 1997, 32 pts were included. RESULTS: Complete Response to Induction UFTVP was 59% (95% CI: 48%-70%). Main toxicity of UFTVP was G 3,4 neutropenia (94% of pts; 25% developed febrile neutropenia and 1 of this pts dead). After Induction Chemotherapy with UFTVP, 30 pts received radiotherapy and 25 of them received concomitant Carboplatin and UFT (RT/UFTJ): main toxicity was mucositis (G3-4: 72%) and one patient died during RT/UFTJ because pneumonia. Twenty-five pts (78%) were alive and disease free at the end of the whole treatment. Actuarial 5 year Overall survival is 32%. CONCLUSION: Although toxicity is important, this approach has interesting activity and deserves further investigation.

Long-term results of a phase II trial of induction chemotherapy with uracil-ftegafur (UFT), vinorelbine, and cisplatin (UFTVP) followed by radiotherapy concomitant with UFT and carboplatin (RT/UFTJ) in a primary site preservation setting for resectable locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of larynx and hypopharynx.

OBJECTIVE: We present long-term results of a phase II trial of induction chemotherapy (IC) with uracilftegafur (UFT) 200 mg/m orally days 1 to 21, vinorelbine 25 mg/m intravenously (IV) days 1 and 8, and cisplatin 100 mg/m IV day 1 (UFTVP) each for 21 days for 4 courses, followed by radiotherapy concomitant with UFT 100 mg/m orally daily and carboplatin (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.5 IV weekly) (RT/ UFTJ), without surgery to the primary site if response, in patients (pts) with resectable locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx and hypopharynx. The primary endpoint was clinical complete response (CR) to induction UFTVP, and secondary endpoints were long-term overall survival (OS) and survival with primary site preservation (SPP). RESULTS: Between 1994 and 1997, 37 pts were included. CR to IC was 54% (95% confidence interval [CI] 43-65%). Main toxicity of UFTVP was G 3,4 neutropenia (73% of pts, 16% developed febrile neutropenia). After IC, primary site was treated with RT in 29 pts: 20 of them received RT/UFTJ (main toxicity mucositis G 3,4 70%). No pt died during treatment. Actuarial 5-year OS and SPP were 57% and 37%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This approach has significant activity and acceptable toxicity for achieving promising long-term OS and SPP and deserves further investigation.

Current situation of Panitumumab, Matuzumab, Nimotuzumab and Zalutumumab.

EGFR overexpression usually correlates with a more advanced disease stage, a poorer prognosis and a worse chemotherapy response. EGFR expression increase has been observed in many tumours. For all the aforementioned reasons, EGFR inhibition can be considered an attractive approach in cancer treatment. One strategy has been receptor inhibition of extracellular domain using monoclonal antibodies. Cetuximab is the most developed one and there is plenty information on the literature about its current status. In this review we focus on other EGFR monoclonal antibodies under clinical development. The more developed one is Panitumumab. Its clinical development is taking place very quickly and it has mainly been studied in colorectal cancer showing promising results. There are also other interesting drugs such as Matuzumab, Nimotuzumab and Zalutumumab.