[Vestibular Schwannoma: Factors in Therapy Decision-Making]. / Vestibularisschwannom: Faktoren bei der Therapieentscheidung.

The treatment of vestibular schwannomas (VS) has always posed a challenge for physicians. Three essential treatment principles are available: wait-and-scan, surgery, and stereotactic radiotherapy. In addition to the type of treatment, decisions must be made regarding the optimal timing of therapy, the combination of different treatment modalities, the potential surgical approach, and the type and intensity of radiation. Factors influencing the therapy decision include tumor location and size or stage, patient age, comorbidities, symptoms, postoperative hearing rehabilitation options, patient preferences, and, not least, the experience of the surgeons and the personnel and technical capabilities of the clinical site. This article begins with a brief overview of vestibular schwannomas, then outlines the fundamental interdisciplinary treatment options, and finally discusses the ENT (ear, nose, and throat)-relevant factors in the therapy decision.

ChatGPT's quiz skills in different otolaryngology subspecialties: an analysis of 2576 single-choice and multiple-choice board certification preparation questions.

PURPOSE: With the increasing adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) in various domains, including healthcare, there is growing acceptance and interest in consulting AI models to provide medical information and advice. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of ChatGPT's responses to practice quiz questions designed for otolaryngology board certification and decipher potential performance disparities across different otolaryngology subspecialties. METHODS: A dataset covering 15 otolaryngology subspecialties was collected from an online learning platform funded by the German Society of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, designed for board certification examination preparation. These questions were entered into ChatGPT, with its responses being analyzed for accuracy and variance in performance. RESULTS: The dataset included 2576 questions (479 multiple-choice and 2097 single-choice), of which 57% (n = 1475) were answered correctly by ChatGPT. An in-depth analysis of question style revealed that single-choice questions were associated with a significantly higher rate (p < 0.001) of correct responses (n = 1313; 63%) compared to multiple-choice questions (n = 162; 34%). Stratified by question categories, ChatGPT yielded the highest rate of correct responses (n = 151; 72%) in the field of allergology, whereas 7 out of 10 questions (n = 65; 71%) on legal otolaryngology aspects were answered incorrectly. CONCLUSION: The study reveals ChatGPT's potential as a supplementary tool for otolaryngology board certification preparation. However, its propensity for errors in certain otolaryngology areas calls for further refinement. Future research should address these limitations to improve ChatGPT's educational use. An approach, with expert collaboration, is recommended for the reliable and accurate integration of such AI models.

Impact of COVID-19-Mediated Olfactory Loss on Quality of Life.

INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 can be associated with a variety of longer-lasting impairments that can have a significant impact on patients' quality of life (QoL). While this is well described in the literature for limitations in lung capacity or permanent headaches, there is little research on the impact of olfactory dysfunction in the context of COVID-19 on patients' QoL. METHODS: In 65 patients with a history of COVID-19, the present olfactory ability was assessed using the Sniffin' Sticks test. In addition, olfactory QoL was assessed by the Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders. Self-assessment was performed with visual analogue scales. The data were compared with the results obtained in healthy individuals and in patients with hyposmia due to other viral infections. RESULTS: The QoL of COVID-19 patients was significantly lower compared to the healthy control group. Even recovered subjects whose olfaction had already returned to the normal range still had a reduced QoL. The severity of the olfactory impairment correlated with the reduction in QoL. However, the olfactory QoL of COVID-19 patients was not worse than that of patients' olfactory loss due to other viral infections. Patients with parosmia had reduced QoL and rated their situation worse than patients without parosmia. CONCLUSION: QoL appears to be impaired in patients with long-lasting COVID-19 olfactory disorders several months after overcoming acute symptoms, even if olfaction has normalized. However, the impairment is not more pronounced than in patients with other postviral olfactory disorders of the same duration.

[Predatory journals in otorhinolaryngology]. / Raubtier-Journale im HNO-Fachgebiet.

BACKGROUND: Pseudo-scientific predatory journals have been making a commercially lucrative business with scientific manuscripts for many years misusing the "open access" model by offering a fast and uncomplicated publication of scientific manuscripts in return for publication fees. The question arises as to whether the specialty field of otorhinolaryngology has already been infiltrated by this bad practice. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A pseudo-scientific fake manuscript was sent to 20 journals in which the journal title indicated an otorhinolaryngological content. Half of the journals were traditional otorhinolaryngology journals, which publish a print edition and which are mainly financed by subscriptions and advertisements. The other half were journals that published exclusively according to the "open access" model. Various parameters of the journals and of the review process were evaluated. RESULTS: All 10 traditional ORL journals refused to publish the fake manuscript. Among the journals that published exclusively according to the "open access" model, there was one rejection of the manuscript, while 2 journals recommended a revision and 7 journals accepted the manuscript directly for publication. CONCLUSION: Predatory publishers and journals are also active in the field of otorhinolaryngology. Especially at journals that publish articles exclusively "open access" for a publication or processing fee, scientific authors should be careful and check the seriousness of the journal in advance by using recommended hints and tools.

[Otolaryngology-knowledge among ORL-physicians: An analysis of the quiz questions in the ORL-App]. / HNO-Wissen bei HNO-Ärzten: Eine Analyse der Quizfragen in der HNO-App.

BACKGROUND: The ORL-App, a smartphone app for further education and training for ORL doctors and those interested in ORL, complements existing offers in medical education and training. The principle of game-based e-learning can open up new perspectives in times of digitalisation and pandemic. The heart of the app is a large ORL quiz, in which app users compete against each other. This paper analyses the performance of app users in the quiz module, taking into account the questions' categories and the users' level of education. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospectively, an evaluation of the quiz questions was carried out for the first 24 months after the introduction of the app. There were 3593 different questions to choose from in 16 different categories. Based on the level of training, a distinction was made between doctors in further training, specialists, senior physicians, chief physicians and professors in the field of ORL. In addition, data on students and non-medical staff were available. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in the level of knowledge of the users considering the level of training. The group of doctors in further training (n = 1013) represented the largest group, with an average of 244 questions per user and 65.1% of the questions answered correctly. They thus achieved a significantly better answer rate than the group of specialists (n = 566), who were able to answer 61.0 % of the questions correctly. CONCLUSION: The game-based form of training through the quiz-part of the ORL-App seems to be particularly attractive for doctors in further training. In addition, this user group achieved better answer rates than the specialists.

[Is Flying or Diving risky after cochlear implantation? Examination in a pressure chamber]. / Ist Fliegen oder Tauchen riskant für CI-Träger? ­ Untersuchungen in einer Druckkammer.

OBJECTIVE: Complications after cochlear implantation are relatively rare but patients are asked to follow certain behavioral rules. Until now there is no evidence if pressure changes that occur during flying and diving are safe for patients after cochlear implantation. For example, no recommendation exists for SCUBA- diving activities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a hypo-/hyperbaric pressure chamber patients after cochlear implantation were exposed to a standardized profile of decompression and compression simulating a flight in a common airplane and a dive. Pre and after the exposure in the pressure chamber, ENT examination and a control of impedances of the cochlear implant were performed. Additionally, patients filled in a questionnaire about complaints they had experienced in the pressure chamber or after. RESULTS: A total of 11 subjects (17 ears with CI) were examined in the pressure chamber. 2/3 of the subjects stated that they had slight complaints during the examination. Only in one patient the measurement needed to be stopped due to pain. Seven patients showed a vascular injection of the malleus in ear microscopy. In none of the patients there was a subjective change in hearing after the examination. Objective measurements of the impedance did not show relevant changes. CONCLUSION: The exposure of cochlear implanted patients to overpressure and underpressure in a pressure chamber did not result in any significant deviation of the impedances, so that no further adjustment was necessary. Since there are no certified in vivo studies on pressure changes while diving and flying with a cochlear implant, further studies are required in order to be able to adequately advise CI patients about diving and flying.

Round window accessibility during cochlear implantation.

OBJECTIVE: To assess data regarding round window (RW) visibility and surgical approaches in cochlear implant cases, and to describe and analyze surgical steps relevant for the RW approach in cochlear implantation. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective clinical study. METHODS: A questionnaire was completed by surgeons after each of altogether 110 cochlear implantations. Round window membrane (RWM) visibility was graded according to the St Thomas Hospital (STH) classification. RESULTS: Performing different surgical steps during the preparation of the RW niche, the RWM could be fully exposed (STH Type I) in 87%. A RW approach could be used for electrode insertion in 89% of the adult and 78% of the pediatric cases. The distribution of RW types differed significantly between adults and children. Drilling of the superior bony lip was the surgical step most frequently needed in adult as well as pediatric cases to obtain optimal RW exposure. CONCLUSION: In children, optimized surgical exposure of the RW niche resulted in only 52% full RWM visibility; whereas in adults, this could be achieved in 87%. The facial nerve (FN) had to be exposed at the level of the posterior tympanotomy in more than 70% of pediatric cases with full RWM visibility; while in adult cases with 100% visibility, such specific exposure was necessary in only 33%. Thus, surgical preparation of the RW niche seems to be more demanding in children than in adults.

Results of a national web-based survey on the SARS-CoV-2 infectious state of otorhinolaryngologists in Germany.

PURPOSE: SARS-CoV-2 is detected on the mucosa of the upper airways to a high degree. In the course of the COVID-19 pandemic, otorhinolaryngologists (ORL) are assumed to be at high risk due to close contact with the mucosa of the upper airways. No data are yet available providing evidence that ORLs have an increased risk of infection. METHODS: German ORLs were invited via e-mail through the German Society of ORL, Head and Neck Surgery and the German ENT Association to participate in a web-based survey about infection with SARS-CoV-2 and development of COVID-19. Data of infections and concomitant parameters in German ORLs were collected and compared to the total number of infections in Germany. RESULTS: Out of 6383 German ORLs, 970 (15%) participated. 54 ORLs reported testing positive for SARS-CoV-2. Compared to the total population of Germany, ORLs have a relative risk of 3.67 (95% CI 2.82; 4.79) of contracting SARS-CoV-2. Domestic quarantine was conducted in 96.3% of cases. Two individuals were admitted to hospital without intensive care. No casualties were reported. In 31 cases, the source of infection was not identifiable whereas 23 had a clear medical aetiology: infected patients: n = 5, 9.26%; medical staff: n = 13, 14.1%. 9.26% (n = 5) of the identified cases were related to contact to infected family members (n = 3), closer neighbourhood (n = 1) or general public (n = 1). There was no identified increased risk of infection due to performing surgery. CONCLUSION: German ORLs have an almost 3.7-fold risk of contracting SARS-CoV-2 compared to the population baseline level. Appropriate protection appears to be necessary for this occupational group.

Follow-up of a national web-based survey on the SARS-CoV-2 infectious state of otorhinolaryngologists in Germany.

PURPOSE: The SARS-CoV­2 pandemic has affected the health and practice of otorhinolaryngologists (ORLs) for over 1 year. Follow-up data of a national survey with German ORLs were evaluated regarding differences between the two waves of the pandemic. METHODS: As in the initial survey, German ORLs were addressed via e­mail through the German Society of ORL, Head and Neck Surgery and the German ENT Association. All ORLs afflicted with SARS-CoV­2 were invited to participate in a web-based survey. General data on infections and concomitant parameters were evaluated. RESULTS: Since the start of the pandemic, 129 ORLs reported testing positive for SARS-CoV­2 in Germany. The ORLs infected during the first wave had a relative risk (RR) of 4.07 (95% CI: 3.20; 5.19) of contracting SARS-CoV­2. During the second wave, the RR decreased to 0.35 (95% CI: 0.28; 0.45). The availability of personal protective equipment (PPE) increased from the first to the second wave along with an increased perception of protection in the professional environment. The source of infection shifted from infections via medical staff during the first wave to patients and household exposure during the second wave. Regular medical practice was resumed by clinicians and general practitioners in the second wave. Nevertheless, a proportionally lower infection rate was observed compared with the German population as a whole. CONCLUSION: The data reflect a unique long-term survey of ORLs during the pandemic. Differences in the source of infection were seen between the first and second wave, confirming the need for appropriate PPE for medical professionals working in high-risk environments. Further strategies to reduce the risk of infection include consistent testing for SARS-CoV­2 in healthcare professionals, patients, and the general public as well as vaccination of high-risk medical groups.

[Updated S2k AWMF guideline on obstructive sialadenitis]. / Aktualisierte AWMF-S2k-Leitlinie zur obstruktiven Sialadenitis.

The update of this guideline was an important step to define standards for the use of sialendoscopy and other emerging minimally invasive techniques for the therapy of sialolithiasis and other obstructive salivary gland diseases. The current actualization was necessary to adapt the diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms to the current scientific knowledge. In this article they are presented in a shortened version with a focus on conservative therapeutic measures which are especially relevant for daily practice.

[The COVID-19 pandemic and otolaryngology: What it comes down to?] / Die COVID-19-Pandemie und das HNO-Fachgebiet: Worauf kommt es aktuell an?

Here, we review the most recent findings on the effects COVID-19 pandemic for the work of otolaryngologists. The role of anosmia and hyposmia as a potential COVID-19 related symptom is presented. We discuss the clinical management of all ENT patients, but especially of COVID-19 patients from the ENT perspective. The impact of the infection on the ENT examination and ENT surgery is summarized.

[Smell disorders at COVID-19 - the current level of knowledge]. / Riechstörungen bei COVID-19 ­ aktueller Wissensstand.

Early reports of SARS-CoV-2 infections only rarely mentioned smell and taste disorders. Several studies, particularly from Europe and the USA, have now confirmed these symptoms as an early key feature of COVID-19. About 70 % of patients seem to experience a reduction of smell and taste in the course of the disease, with most of the studies published to date based on questionnaires and anamnestic data. Validated smell tests have so far only been used in a few studies. A distinction between taste and taste disorders, i. e. a distinction between retronasal aroma taste and the olfactory system from the dysfunction of taste capsules and the further cranial nerves, was mostly not made in the studies available to date. Some reports associate olfactory disorders with a milder clinical course. At the same time, the olfactory system via the olfactory bulb represents an entry point into the central nervous system, and an olfactory disorder could be a predisposing factor for central neurological symptoms. The clinical significance of smell and taste disorders in COVID-19 patients is currently still unclear. Further open questions concern the exact prevalence and the prognosis, so that overall higher quality studies with validated smell tests and larger numbers of patients are required.

Analyse und Management von postoperativen Schmerzen nach Sialendoskopie.

OBJECTIVE: Sialendocopy is a minimal-invasive technique used for the diagnosis and treatment of salivary gland diseases. The minimal-invasive character of sialendoscopy can be modified by using different surgical techniques. This is why both general and local anaesthesia are applied to perform this procedure and can be of great influence regarding the postoperative pain of those patients. The following study was performed to investigate the level of postoperative pain after sialendoscopy and its pain management. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 103 patients who were treated with a sialendoscopy of the parotid gland or submandibular gland in local anaesthesia between 2013-2015 were included in the study. The postoperative pain level was evaluated at rest and during periods of stress on the day of surgery and the first and second day after surgery. The pain level was analysed according to the numeric rating scale (NRS 0-10), which is used in the QUIPS project (Quality improvement of postoperative pain). RESULTS: The pain level on the day of surgery was 0,9 ± 1,9 at rest and 0,7 ± 1,4 during periods of stress. On the first postoperative day, pain levels of 1,2 ± 1,8 at rest and 0,9 ± 1,9 during stress were evaluated. On the second day after surgery there was a decrease of pain with a level of 0,75 ± 1,6 at rest and 0,73 ± 1,5 during stress. The analgesic therapy that was mostly used was Metamizol and Ibuprofen. 37,9 % of all patients received analgesic therapy on the day of surgery whereas on the first day after surgery only 26,2 % of all patients and on the second day after surgery only 12,6 % received pain medication. CONCLUSION: Sialendoscopy of the parotid gland and the submandibular gland is associated with moderate postoperative pain, which can be managed by using non-opioid analgesic therapy.

Long-Term Outcomes of Vibroplasty Coupler Implantations to Treat Mixed/Conductive Hearing Loss.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term safety and performance of four different vibroplasty couplers (round window, oval window, CliP and Bell coupler) in combination with an active middle ear implant. METHODS: This was a multicentre, prospective, long-term study including 5 German hospitals. Thirty adult subjects suffering from conductive or mixed hearing loss were initially enrolled for the study, 24 of these were included in the final analysis with up to 36 months of postsurgical follow-up data. Bone conduction and air conduction were measured pre- and postoperatively to evalu ate safety. Postoperative aided sound field thresholds and Freiburger monosyllable word recognition scores were compared to unaided pre-implantation results to confirm performance. Additional speech tests compared postoperative unaided with aided results. To determine patient satisfaction, an established quality-of-life questionnaire developed for conventional hearing aid usage was administered to all subjects. RESULTS: Mean postoperative bone conduction thresholds remained stable throughout the whole study period. Mean functional gain for all couplers investigated was 38.5 ± 11.4 dB HL (12 months) and 38.8 ± 12.5 dB HL (36 months). Mean word recognition scores at 65 dB SPL increased from 2.9% in the unaided by 64.2% to 67.1% in the aided situation. The mean postoperative speech reception in quiet (or 50% understanding of words in sentences) shows a speech intelligibility improvement at 36 months of 17.8 ± 12.4 dB SPL over the unaided condition. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) improved by 5.9 ± 7.2 dB SNR over the unaided condition. High subjective device satisfaction was reflected by the International Inventory for Hearing Aids scored very positively. CONCLUSION: A significant improvement was seen with all couplers, and audiological performance did not significantly differ between 12 and 36 months after surgery.

Cochlear implantation using the underwater technique: long-term results.

INTRODUCTION: The opening of the round window and the insertion of the electrode array into the scala tympani during cochlear implant surgery can lead to a pressure shock of the delicate inner ear structures. By filling the tympanic cavity with Ringer Solution during these surgical steps (underwater technique), the hydrostatic pressure of the fluid acts as a smooth pressure stabilizer, avoiding a pressure shock of the inner ear structures. The aim of this retrospective study was to present long-term results of this new method of cochlear implantation in underwater technique. METHODS: Altogether, 47 implantations in 43 patients with residual hearing at the frequencies 250, 500 and 1000 Hz in the unaided preoperative pure tone audiometry were included. A cochlear implantation via round window with a conventional full-length electrode was performed in underwater technique. Changes of residual hearing 7 weeks and 24 months after surgery were analyzed. RESULTS: Overall postimplant hearing preservation 7 weeks after implantation was achieved in 22 ears (47%). Subsequent follow-up was performed on average 24 months after surgery (range 12 months-4.2 years) in all patients. At this late postoperative evaluation, preservation of hearing was recorded in 18 ears (38%). Neither the follow-up time nor the type of electrode had a significant impact on the postoperative hearing loss. CONCLUSION: The underwater technique is an atraumatic cochlear implantation technique with hearing preservation rates comparable to results in literature and a very small hearing preservation decline rate over time even when using full-length CI electrodes.

The Positive Effect of Sialendoscopy with Irrigation Lavage for Sialadenitis without Sialolithiasis or Stenosis.

AIMS: The aim of the study was to evaluate different irrigation solutions during sialendoscopy to reduce complaints caused by sialodochitis. METHODS: The investigators designed and implemented a retrospective study composed of 94 patients with sialodochitis but no sialolithiasis or relevant stenosis of the salivary duct system. Three different irrigations (normal saline, cortisone single-shot, and cortisone) were used. After the sialendoscopy, the patients were asked about the current status of the affected salivary gland, and the quantity and quality of the gland swelling/inflammation over a follow-up period of 11.6 months (6-24 months). RESULTS: At the time of follow-up, 41 patients (43.6%) no longer had any complaints with the salivary gland in question. In 75.5% of the patients, a satisfying result was achieved. In total, only 3 patients needed submandibulectomy in the course of the study due to persistent complaints. The outcome showed no statistical differences between the mean of the 3 groups (p = 0.149). CONCLUSION: Sialendoscopy with flushing/lavage seems to be a good treatment option for patients with sialodochitis lacking sialolithiasis. The results of this study suggest that the type of irrigation used during sialendoscopy seems to be secondary.

Surgical anatomy and pathology of the middle ear.

Middle ear surgery is strongly influenced by anatomical and functional characteristics of the middle ear. The complex anatomy means a challenge for the otosurgeon who moves between preservation or improvement of highly important functions (hearing, balance, facial motion) and eradication of diseases. Of these, perforations of the tympanic membrane, chronic otitis media, tympanosclerosis and cholesteatoma are encountered most often in clinical practice. Modern techniques for reconstruction of the ossicular chain aim for best possible hearing improvement using delicate alloplastic titanium prostheses, but a number of prosthesis-unrelated factors work against this intent. Surgery is always individualized to the case and there is no one-fits-all strategy. Above all, both middle ear diseases and surgery can be associated with a number of complications; the most important ones being hearing deterioration or deafness, dizziness, facial palsy and life-threatening intracranial complications. To minimize risks, a solid knowledge of and respect for neurootologic structures is essential for an otosurgeon who must train him- or herself intensively on temporal bones before performing surgery on a patient.

Multicenter Clinical Trial of Vibroplasty Couplers to Treat Mixed/Conductive Hearing Loss: First Results.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of round window (RW), oval window (OW), CliP and Bell couplers for use with an active middle ear implant. METHODS: This is a multicenter, long-term, prospective trial with consecutive enrollment, involving 6 university hospitals in Germany. Bone conduction, air conduction, implant-aided warble-tone thresholds and Freiburger monosyllable word recognition scores were compared with unaided preimplantation results in 28 moderate-to-profound hearing-impaired patients after 12 months of follow-up. All patients had previously undergone failed reconstruction surgeries (up to 5 or more). In a subset of patients, additional speech tests at 12 months postoperatively were used to compare the aided with the unaided condition after implantation with the processor switched off. An established quality-of-life questionnaire for hearing aids was used to determine patient satisfaction. RESULTS: Postoperative bone conduction remained stable. Mean functional gain for all couplers was 37 dB HL (RW = 42 dB, OW = 35 dB, Bell = 38 dB, CliP = 27 dB). The mean postoperative Freiburger monosyllable score was 71% at 65 dB SPL. The postimplantation mean SRT50 (speech reception in quiet for 50% understanding of words in sentences) improved on average by 23 dB over unaided testing and signal-to-noise ratios also improved in all patients. The International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA)quality-of-life questionnaire was scored very positively by all patients. CONCLUSION: A significant improvement was seen with all couplers, and patients were satisfied with the device at 12 months postoperatively. These results demonstrate that an active implant is an advantage in achieving good hearing benefit in patients with prior failed reconstruction surgery.

Is there a difference between active opening of the Eustachian tube in a hypobaric surrounding compared to a hyperbaric surrounding?

INTRODUCTION: The Eustachian tube (ET) is the key to pressure equalization between the middle ear and ambient pressure. To date, little is known about differences of the opening mechanisms under hyper- or hypobaric conditions. Aim of this study was to compare standard ET opening parameters during standardized hypo- and hyperbaric exposures. METHODS: Thirty healthy participants were exposed to a standardized profile of decompression and compression (SPDC) in a hypo-/hyperbaric pressure chamber. Impedance, expressed as tympanic membrane compliance, was recorded at intervals during the excursions from 1 atmosphere absolute (atm abs) to 0.8 and 1.2 atm abs respectively. Parameters for tubal opening were obtained during SPDC: ET opening pressure (ETOP), ET opening duration (ETOD) and ET opening frequency (ETOF), hypobaric (Phase 1) and hyperbaric (Phase 2) data were compared. RESULTS: Mean value for Valsalva maneuver ETOP was 40.10 ± 19.02 mbar in Phase 2 vs. 42.82 ± 21.75 mbar in Phase 1. For ETOD it was 2.80 ± 2.09 seconds in Phase 2 vs. 2.51 ± 1.90 seconds in Phase 1. For swallowing, mean value for ETOP was 33.47 ± 14.50 mbar in Phase 2 vs. 28.44 ± 14.04 in Phase 1. ETOD was 0.82 ± 0.60 seconds in Phase 2 vs. 0.76 ± 0.55 seconds in Phase 1. There was no statistical significance for ETOP, ETOD and ETOF between the two phases. CONCLUSION: No statistical significant difference was evident for active pressure equalization (Valsalva and swallowing) between a hyperbaric setting (dive) and a hypobaric setting (flight) in healthy subjects.

Do the blinds smell better?

If people lose a sense organ, there is thought to be an increase in the remaining sensory functions. Previous studies showed ambiguous results on this topic. In a prospective matched pair case-control study on 46 blind and 46 normal-sighted subjects, the olfactory performance was examined using the Sniffin' Sticks Test [threshold-discrimination-identification (TDI) test], determining the olfactory threshold, the identification and the discrimination performance. There was no significant difference between the groups. Neither the overall olfactory performance (TDI score) nor any of its subtests did correlate with the vision or with the duration of blindness. The study could not detect any superior smell abilities of blind subjects as compared to sighted subjects.