Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
Prev Chronic Dis ; 11: E78, 2014 May 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24809364

RESUMEN

How can a community of practice help further the practical application of cancer control research? In 2011, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) launched an online community of practice, Research to Reality (R2R). R2R aims to infuse evidence-based strategies into communities by engaging researchers and practitioners in a joint approach to research dissemination. To measure community growth and engagement, NCI measures data across 3 program domains: content, interaction, and activity. NCI uses Web analytics, usability testing, and content analyses to manage and evaluate R2R. As of December 2013, R2R had more than 1,700 registered members. More than 500 researchers and practitioners register for the monthly cyber-seminars, and 40% return each month. R2R hosts more than 15,500 page views and 5,000 site visits in an average month. This article describes the process of convening this online community and quantifies our experiences to date.


Asunto(s)
Relaciones Comunidad-Institución , Práctica Clínica Basada en la Evidencia , Difusión de la Información/métodos , Internet/estadística & datos numéricos , Transferencia de Tecnología , Humanos , Relaciones Interprofesionales , National Cancer Institute (U.S.) , Investigadores , Estados Unidos
2.
Prev Chronic Dis ; 11: E24, 2014 Feb 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24556250

RESUMEN

In 2011, the National Cancer Institute launched the Research to Reality (R2R) Pilot Mentorship Program to enhance mentees' core evidence-based public health (EBPH) competencies. In this article, we describe the program and its evaluation results and the program's ability to improve participants' EBPH competencies and appropriateness of program components. Program evaluation consisted of a pre/post program competency questionnaire and interviews with mentees, mentors, mentees' supervisors, and program staff. Mentees reported the same or higher rating in every competency at end of the program, with average increase of 0.6 points on a 4-point scale; the greatest improvements were seen in policy development/program planning. Mentorship programs are a promising strategy to develop EBPH competencies, provide guidance, and disseminate and adapt evidence-based interventions within real-world context.


Asunto(s)
Agentes Comunitarios de Salud/educación , Promoción de la Salud/organización & administración , Mentores , Neoplasias/prevención & control , Investigación Biomédica , Conducta Cooperativa , Toma de Decisiones , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Humanos , Relaciones Interprofesionales , National Cancer Institute (U.S.) , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Estados Unidos
3.
Cancer Causes Control ; 21(12): 2049-57, 2010 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21072580

RESUMEN

The articles in this monograph illustrate the progress and successes of comprehensive cancer control (CCC) since our 2005 publication. The strides made in CCC demonstrate the energy and commitment of this nationwide movement to reduce the burden of cancer for all people. The purpose of this conclusion paper is to discuss the future of CCC, which promises a new emphasis on policy, primary prevention, public health, evidence-based interventions, and global health supported by advanced communication tools.


Asunto(s)
Atención Integral de Salud/tendencias , Atención a la Salud/tendencias , Neoplasias/prevención & control , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S./legislación & jurisprudencia , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S./organización & administración , Medios de Comunicación , Atención Integral de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Atención a la Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Práctica Clínica Basada en la Evidencia/legislación & jurisprudencia , Práctica Clínica Basada en la Evidencia/métodos , Práctica Clínica Basada en la Evidencia/tendencias , Reforma de la Atención de Salud , Implementación de Plan de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Implementación de Plan de Salud/organización & administración , Implementación de Plan de Salud/tendencias , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/tendencias , Humanos , Prevención Primaria/legislación & jurisprudencia , Prevención Primaria/organización & administración , Prevención Primaria/tendencias , Estados Unidos
4.
Cancer Causes Control ; 21(12): 2033-40, 2010 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21046447

RESUMEN

The goal of cancer control research is "to generate basic knowledge about how to monitor and change individual and collective behavior and to ensure that knowledge is translated into practice and policy rapidly, effectively, and efficiently" (Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences in Cancer control framework and synthese rationale, 2010). Research activities span the cancer control continuum from prevention to early detection and diagnosis through treatment and survivorship (Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences in Cancer control framework and synthese rationale, 2010). While significant advancements have been made in understanding, preventing and treating cancer in the past few decades, these benefits have yielded disproportionate results in cancer morbidity and mortality across various socioeconomic and racial/ethnic subgroups (Ozols et al in J Clin Oncol, 25(1):146-1622, 2007). It has been a high priority since the beginning of the Comprehensive Cancer Control (CCC) movement to utilize research in the development and implementation of cancer plans in the states, tribes and tribal organizations, territories and US Pacific Island Jurisdictions. Nevertheless, dissemination and implementation of research in coalition activities has been challenging for many programs. Lessons learned from programs and coalitions in the implementation and evaluation of CCC activities, as well as resources provided by national partners, can assist coalitions with the translation of research into practice.


Asunto(s)
Investigación Biomédica/organización & administración , Federación para Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Oncología Médica/organización & administración , Neoplasias/prevención & control , Investigación Biomédica/legislación & jurisprudencia , Atención Integral de Salud/métodos , Atención Integral de Salud/organización & administración , Atención a la Salud , Práctica Clínica Basada en la Evidencia , Federación para Atención de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Implementación de Plan de Salud/métodos , Implementación de Plan de Salud/organización & administración , Humanos , Oncología Médica/legislación & jurisprudencia , Oncología Médica/métodos , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/mortalidad , Neoplasias/terapia , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Islas del Pacífico
6.
J Cancer Educ ; 22(1 Suppl): S18-25, 2007.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17571996

RESUMEN

The National Cancer Institute's (NCI's) Cancer Information Service (CIS) provides cancer information to the public via 1-800-4-CANCER, a smoking quitline, and online. The 2003 National User Survey assessed satisfaction and outcomes among users contacting NCI's CIS by telephone and LiveHelp, an instant messaging service. Ninety-five percent of respondents were very satisfied/satisfied and 88% said their expectations had been met/exceeded. Users reported increased knowledge and self-efficacy. Most had discussed CIS information with a health professional or planned to do so. Of those who contacted CIS about smoking/tobacco use, 14% had quit and 35% cut back. The CIS provides a highly valued, effective service for patients and health professionals.


Asunto(s)
Acceso a la Información , Comportamiento del Consumidor , Educación en Salud/normas , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud , Servicios de Información , National Institutes of Health (U.S.) , Neoplasias , Adulto , Recolección de Datos , Bases de Datos como Asunto , Femenino , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estados Unidos
7.
J Cancer Educ ; 22(1 Suppl): S35-40, 2007.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17571999

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The National Cancer Institute's (NCI's) Cancer Information Service (CIS) Partnership Program involves collaboration with over 900 organizations and coalitions serving minority and medically underserved populations. Cancer Information Service collaborations are categorized into three types: networking, educational program, and program development partnerships. METHODS: A survey of CIS partnership organizations (n = 288). RESULTS: Most respondents reported that partnerships with CIS are collaborative and make good use of their organization's skills and resources, and most perceive that the benefits of partnership outweigh any drawbacks. More than one-quarter say partnerships have not done a good job evaluating collaborative activities. Results vary among three types of partnerships. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of the CIS Partnership Program presents an opportunity to examine how a large-scale and multi-faceted partnership effort has been implemented, how it is evaluated, and initial indicators of program success. Organizations, health professionals, and community leaders interested in effective partnerships can use these findings to strengthen collaborations and maximize outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Acceso a la Información , Conducta Cooperativa , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud , Grupos Minoritarios , National Institutes of Health (U.S.) , Neoplasias , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Comportamiento del Consumidor , Recolección de Datos , Escolaridad , Humanos , Área sin Atención Médica , Desarrollo de Programa , Estados Unidos
8.
J Cancer Educ ; 22(1 Suppl): S26-34, 2007.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17571998

RESUMEN

The Cancer Information Service (CIS) of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) added e-mail and instant chat to its telephone service (1-800-4-CANCER, 1-877-44U-QUIT). While most CIS contacts are still via telephone, internet contacts have increased from 9000 in 2001 to over 20,000 in 2006. The NCI leveraged 30 years of CIS telephone experience to understand the needs of Internet information seekers. Online users are more likely to contact CIS on behalf of someone else. Instant chat users are younger and more educated than telephone users. They report high satisfaction levels, increased knowledge, and other positive effects from their interactions. Patients and their families can benefit from awareness of CIS online services and health care providers can be confident in directing them to CIS.


Asunto(s)
Acceso a la Información , Comportamiento del Consumidor , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud , Servicios de Información/organización & administración , Internet , National Institutes of Health (U.S.) , Neoplasias , Adolescente , Adulto , Bases de Datos como Asunto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA