Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Br J Anaesth ; 132(5): 899-910, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38423824

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The association between prenatal exposure to general anaesthesia for maternal surgery during pregnancy and subsequent risk of disruptive or internalising behavioural disorder diagnosis in the child has not been well-defined. METHODS: A nationwide sample of pregnant women linked to their liveborn infants was evaluated using the Medicaid Analytic eXtract (MAX, 1999-2013). Multivariate matching was used to match each child prenatally exposed to general anaesthesia owing to maternal appendectomy or cholecystectomy during pregnancy with five unexposed children. The primary outcome was diagnosis of a disruptive or internalising behavioural disorder in children. Secondary outcomes included diagnoses for a range of other neuropsychiatric disorders. RESULTS: We matched 34,271 prenatally exposed children with 171,355 unexposed children in the database. Prenatally exposed children were more likely than unexposed children to receive a diagnosis of a disruptive or internalising behavioural disorder (hazard ratio [HR], 1.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.23-1.40). For secondary outcomes, increased hazards of disruptive (HR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.24-1.41) and internalising (HR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.20-1.53) behavioural disorders were identified, and also increased hazards of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (HR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.22-1.43), behavioural disorders (HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.14-1.42), developmental speech or language disorders (HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.05-1.28), and autism (HR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.05-1.64). CONCLUSIONS: Prenatal exposure to general anaesthesia is associated with a 31% increased risk for a subsequent diagnosis of a disruptive or internalising behavioural disorder in children. Caution is advised when making any clinical decisions regarding care of pregnant women, as avoidance of necessary surgery during pregnancy can have detrimental effects on mothers and their children.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad , Efectos Tardíos de la Exposición Prenatal , Niño , Lactante , Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Efectos Tardíos de la Exposición Prenatal/epidemiología , Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/epidemiología , Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/etiología , Madres , Anestesia General/efectos adversos , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales
2.
Br J Anaesth ; 133(2): 334-343, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38702238

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Recent studies report conflicting results regarding the relationship between labour epidural analgesia (LEA) in mothers and neurodevelopmental disorders in their offspring. We evaluated behavioural and neuropsychological test scores in children of mothers who used LEA. METHODS: Children enrolled in the Raine Study from Western Australia and delivered vaginally from a singleton pregnancy between 1989 and 1992 were evaluated. Children exposed to LEA were compared with unexposed children. The primary outcome was the parent-reported Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL) reporting total, internalising, and externalising behavioural problem scores at age 10 yr. Score differences, an increased risk of clinical deficit, and a dose-response based on the duration of LEA exposure were assessed. Secondary outcomes included language, motor function, cognition, and autistic traits. RESULTS: Of 2180 children, 850 (39.0%) were exposed to LEA. After adjustment for covariates, exposed children had minimally increased CBCL total scores (+1.41 points; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.09 to 2.73; P=0.037), but not internalising (+1.13 points; 95% CI -0.08 to 2.34; P=0.066) or externalising (+1.08 points; 95% CI -0.08 to 2.24; P=0.068) subscale subscores. Increased risk of clinical deficit was not observed for any CBCL score. For secondary outcomes, score differences were inconsistently observed in motor function and cognition. Increased exposure duration was not associated with worse scores in any outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Although LEA exposure was associated with slightly higher total behavioural scores, there was no difference in subscores, increased risk of clinical deficits, or dose-response relationship. These results argue against LEA exposure being associated with consistent, clinically significant neurodevelopmental deficits in children.


Asunto(s)
Analgesia Epidural , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Efectos Tardíos de la Exposición Prenatal , Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Analgesia Epidural/efectos adversos , Niño , Masculino , Analgesia Obstétrica/efectos adversos , Analgesia Obstétrica/métodos , Adulto , Australia Occidental/epidemiología , Trastornos de la Conducta Infantil/epidemiología , Trastornos de la Conducta Infantil/etiología , Conducta Infantil/efectos de los fármacos , Preescolar , Trastornos del Neurodesarrollo/epidemiología
3.
Anesth Analg ; 135(4): 787-797, 2022 10 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36108191

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Some studies have found surgery and anesthesia in children to be associated with neurodevelopmental deficits, but specific reasons for this association have not been fully explored. This study evaluates intraoperative mean arterial pressure (MAP) during a single ambulatory procedure in children and subsequent mental disorder diagnoses. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was performed including children ≥28 days and <18 years of age with intraoperative electronic anesthetic records between January 1, 2009, and April 30, 2017, at our institution. Eligible children were categorized based on their mean intraoperative MAP relative to other children of the same sex and similar age: category 1 (very low): children with mean intraoperative MAP values below the 10th percentile, category 2 (low): mean MAP value ≥10th and <25th percentiles, category 3 (reference): mean MAP value ≥25th and <75th percentiles, category 4 (high): mean MAP value ≥75th and <90th percentile, and category 5 (very high): mean MAP value ≥90th percentile. International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9) and ICD, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10)-coded mental disorders were identified in hospital and outpatient claims, with a median duration of follow-up after surgery of 120 days (interquartile range [IQR], 8-774.5 days). Cox proportional hazards models evaluated the hazard ratio (HR) of time to first mental disorder diagnosis associated with intraoperative blood pressure category between the end of surgery and censoring, with the primary analysis adjusting for demographic, anesthetic, comorbidity, and procedure-type variables as potential confounders. RESULTS: A total of 14,724 eligible children who received general anesthesia for a single ambulatory surgical procedure were identified. After adjusting for all available potential confounders, when compared to the reference, there were no statistically significant differences in mental disorder diagnosis risk based on intraoperative mean MAP category. Compared to reference, children in the very low and low blood pressure categories reported HRs of 1.00 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74-1.35) and 1.10 (95% CI, 0.87-1.41) for a mental disorder diagnosis, respectively, and children in the high and very high categories reported HRs of 0.87 (95% CI, 0.68-1.12) and 0.76 (95% CI, 0.57-1.03), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Presence in a predefined mean intraoperative MAP category was not associated with subsequent mental disorder diagnoses within our follow-up period. However, the limitations of this study, including uncertainty regarding what constitutes an adequate blood pressure in children, may limit the ability to form definitive conclusions.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios , Anestésicos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/efectos adversos , Anestesia General , Presión Arterial , Presión Sanguínea , Niño , Humanos
4.
Anesth Analg ; 136(6): e33, 2023 06 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37205816
5.
J Pain Symptom Manage ; 67(5): 357-365.e15, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38278187

RESUMEN

CONTEXT: For patients with advanced cancer, high intensity treatment at the end of life is measured as a reflection of the quality of care. Use of specialist palliative care has been promoted to improve care quality, but whether its use is associated with decreased treatment intensity on a population-level is unknown. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether receipt of specialist palliative care use is associated with differences in end-of-life quality metrics in patients with metastatic cancer. METHODS: Retrospective propensity-matched cohort of patients age ≥ 65 who died with metastatic cancer in U.S. hospitals with palliative care programs that participated in the National Palliative Care Registry in 2018-2019. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to assess the impact of specialist palliative care on use of chemotherapy in the last 14 days of life, use of intensive care unit (ICU) in the last 30 days of life, use of hospice, and hospice enrollment ≥ three days. RESULTS: After 1:2 matching, our cohort consisted of 15,878 exposed and 31,756 unexposed patients. Receipt of specialist palliative care was associated with a decrease in use of chemotherapy (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.59 [0.50-0.70]) and ICU at the end of life (aHR 0.86 [0.80-0.92]), and an increase in hospice use (aHR 1.92 [1.85-1.99]) and hospice enrollment for ≥three days (aHR 2.00 [1.93-2.07]). CONCLUSION: On a population-level, use of specialist palliative care was associated with improved metrics for quality end-of-life care for patients dying with metastatic cancer, underscoring the importance of its integration into cancer care.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Paliativos al Final de la Vida , Hospitales para Enfermos Terminales , Neoplasias , Cuidado Terminal , Humanos , Cuidados Paliativos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Muerte
6.
JAMA Netw Open ; 6(6): e2317247, 2023 06 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37289458

RESUMEN

Importance: In the US, improving end-of-life care has become increasingly urgent. Some states have enacted legislation intended to facilitate palliative care delivery for seriously ill patients, but it is unknown whether these laws have any measurable consequences for patient outcomes. Objective: To determine whether US state palliative care legislation is associated with place of death from cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study with a difference-in-differences analysis used information about state legislation combined with death certificate data for 50 US states (from January 1, 2005, to December 31, 2017) for all decedents who had any type of cancer listed as the underlying cause of death. Data analysis for this study occurred between September 1, 2021, and August 31, 2022. Exposures: Presence of a nonprescriptive (relating to palliative and end-of-life care without prescribing particular clinician actions) or prescriptive (requiring clinicians to offer patients information about care options) palliative care law in the state-year where death occurred. Main Outcomes and Measures: Multilevel relative risk regression with state modeled as a random effect was used to estimate the likelihood of dying at home or hospice for decedents dying in state-years with a palliative care law compared with decedents dying in state-years without such laws. Results: This study included 7 547 907 individuals with cancer as the underlying cause of death. Their mean (SD) age was 71 (14) years, and 3 609 146 were women (47.8%). In terms of race and ethnicity, the majority of decedents were White (85.6%) and non-Hispanic (94.1%). During the study period, 553 state-years (85.1%) had no palliative care law, 60 state-years (9.2%) had a nonprescriptive palliative care law, and 37 state-years (5.7%) had a prescriptive palliative care law. A total of 3 780 918 individuals (50.1%) died at home or in hospice. Most decedents (70.8%) died in state-years without a palliative care law, while 15.7% died in state-years with a nonprescriptive law and 13.5% died in state-years with a prescriptive law. Compared with state-years without a palliative care law, the likelihood of dying at home or in hospice was 12% higher for decedents in state-years with a nonprescriptive palliative care law (relative risk, 1.12 [95% CI 1.08-1.16]) and 18% higher for decedents in state-years with a prescriptive palliative care law (relative risk, 1.18 [95% CI, 1.11-1.26]). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of decedents from cancer, state palliative care laws were associated with an increased likelihood of dying at home or in hospice. Passage of state palliative care legislation may be an effective policy intervention to increase the number of seriously ill patients who experience their death in such locations.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Paliativos al Final de la Vida , Neoplasias , Cuidado Terminal , Humanos , Femenino , Anciano , Masculino , Estudios de Cohortes , Cuidados Paliativos , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Neoplasias/terapia
7.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 69(5): 1199-1207, 2021 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33523466

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In patients with serious illness, use of specialist palliative care may result in improved quality of life, patient and caregiver satisfaction and advance care planning, as well as lower health care utilization. However, evidence of efficacy is limited for patients with dementia, particularly in the setting of an acute hospitalization. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether implementation of hospital-based specialist palliative care was associated with differences in treatment intensity outcomes for hospitalized patients with dementia. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Fifty-one hospitals in New York State that either did or did not implement a palliative care program between 2008 and 2014. Hospitals that consistently had a palliative care program during the study period were excluded. PARTICIPANTS: Hospitalized patients with dementia. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome of this study was discharge to hospice from an acute hospitalization. Secondary outcomes included hospital length of stay, use of mechanical ventilation and dialysis, and days in intensive care. Difference-in-difference analyses were performed using multilevel regression to assess the association between implementing a palliative care program and outcomes, while adjusting for patient and hospital characteristics and time trends. RESULTS: During the study period, 82,118 patients with dementia (mean (SD) age, 83.04 (10.04), 51,170 (62.21%) female) underwent an acute hospitalization, of which 41,227 (50.27%) received care in hospitals that implemented a palliative care program. In comparison to patients who received care in hospitals without palliative care, patients with dementia who received care in hospitals after the implementation of palliative care were more 35% likely to be discharged to hospice (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.35 (1.19-1.51), P < .001). No meaningful differences in secondary outcomes were observed. CONCLUSION: Implementation of a specialist palliative care program was associated with an increase in discharge to hospice following acute hospitalization in patients with dementia.


Asunto(s)
Demencia/terapia , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Cuidados Paliativos/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedad Aguda , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Resultados de Cuidados Críticos , Femenino , Implementación de Plan de Salud , Cuidados Paliativos al Final de la Vida/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Análisis Multinivel , New York , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Alta del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Análisis de Regresión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
Travel Med Infect Dis ; 40: 101943, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33279632

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Recent travel is associated with ~20% of reported Legionnaires' disease (LD) cases worldwide. METHODS: We analyzed LD cases reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) during 2015-2016. Travel-associated cases met case criteria for confirmed LD in someone who spent ≥1 night away from home during the 10 days before symptom onset. Most analyses were limited to travel-associated, public accommodation stay (TAPAS) cases. We used reported travel dates to estimate the number of TAPAS cases acquired during travel. RESULTS: Of 12,200 LD cases reported among U.S. residents, 12.3% were travel-associated; 8.7% were TAPAS. Median patient age for TAPAS cases was 61 years; 64.4% were male; 67.3% were white; 77.9% were non-Hispanic; 96.1% were hospitalized; 4.5% died. Among 887 TAPAS cases involving U.S. destinations, an estimated 29.8% were acquired during travel; 4.28 TAPAS cases were reported, and an estimated 1.10 TAPAS cases were acquired during travel, per 10,000,000 hotel room nights booked. Sixty-eight U.S. TAPAS clusters were detected. CONCLUSIONS: While acquisition during travel accounted for a relatively small proportion of all LD cases, clusters of TAPAS cases were frequently detected. Prompt notification of these cases to CDC facilitates cluster detection and expedites intervention.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de los Legionarios , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Brotes de Enfermedades , Femenino , Humanos , Enfermedad de los Legionarios/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vigilancia de la Población , Viaje , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA