Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Ophthalmology ; 131(6): 731-740, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38104666

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To establish whether Densiron 68, a heavier-than-water endotamponade agent, is an effective alternative to conventional light silicone oil in primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RD) surgery for eyes with inferior breaks in the detached retina and severe proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR). DESIGN: Cohort study of routinely collected data from the European Society of Retina Specialists and British and Eire Association of Vitreoretinal Surgeons vitreoretinal database between 2015 and 2022. PARTICIPANTS: All consecutive eyes that underwent primary rhegmatogenous RD surgery using Densiron 68 or light silicone oil as an internal tamponade agent. METHODS: To minimize confounding bias, we undertook 2:1 nearest-neighbor matching on inferior breaks, large inferior rhegmatogenous RDs, PVR, and, for visual analyses, baseline visual acuity (VA) between treatment groups. We fit regression models including prognostically relevant covariates, treatment-covariate interactions, and matching weights. We used g-computation with cluster-robust methods to estimate marginal effects. For nonlinear models, we calculated confidence intervals (CIs) using bias-corrected cluster bootstrapping with 9999 replications. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Presence of a fully attached retina and VA at least 2 months after oil removal. RESULTS: Of 1061 eyes enrolled, 426 and 239 were included in our matched samples for anatomic and visual outcome analyses, respectively. The primary success rate was higher in the Densiron 68 group (113 of 142; 80%) compared with the light silicone oil group (180 of 284; 63%), with an adjusted odds ratio of 1.90 (95% CI, 1.63-2.23, P < 0.001). We also observed a significant improvement favoring Densiron 68 of -0.26 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) in postoperative VA between the 2 groups (95% CI, -0.43 to -0.10, P = 0.002). The anatomic benefit of using Densiron 68 in eyes with inferior retinal breaks and large detachments was more pronounced among eyes with PVR grade C. We found no evidence of visual effect moderation by anatomic outcome or foveal attachment. CONCLUSIONS: Densiron achieved higher anatomic success rates and improved visual outcomes compared with conventional light silicone oil in eyes with inferior retinal pathology and severe PVR. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.


Asunto(s)
Endotaponamiento , Desprendimiento de Retina , Aceites de Silicona , Agudeza Visual , Vitrectomía , Humanos , Desprendimiento de Retina/cirugía , Desprendimiento de Retina/fisiopatología , Aceites de Silicona/administración & dosificación , Agudeza Visual/fisiología , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vitrectomía/métodos , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vitreorretinopatía Proliferativa/cirugía , Vitreorretinopatía Proliferativa/fisiopatología , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios de Seguimiento
2.
Eye (Lond) ; 37(8): 1553-1557, 2023 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35864162

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the safety and effectiveness of pre-emptive vitrectomy in eyes with severe non-fibrotic proliferative diabetic retinopathy. METHODS: A multi-centre, retrospective, observational study. Pre-emptive vitrectomy was performed in non-fibrotic diabetic eyes with a visual acuity (VA) of 20/50 or better, where there was extensive persistent neovascularisation despite prior panretinal photocoagulation, and where the fellow eye had established sight loss despite vitrectomy for tractional complications. The primary outcome measure was the VA at last visit. RESULTS: Twenty patients were included. The mean age was 39 ± 14 years. Fifteen patients were Type 1 diabetic. The median baseline VA was 20/30 and remained stable at 20/28 at last visit (median follow-up period: 24 months). Eight eyes (40.0%) developed post-operative vitreous cavity haemorrhage; 4 of which required a vitreous cavity washout procedure. There were no post-operative retinal detachments. The index eye remained the significantly better eye at all time points bar one month post-surgery. Regression of retinopathy grading was observed in all eyes. CONCLUSION: In this pilot study, we found no sight loss with pre-emptive diabetic vitrectomy. Better eye status was maintained in this high-risk group. Further study with larger number of patients and longer-term follow-up is indicated.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Retinopatía Diabética , Neovascularización Retiniana , Humanos , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vitrectomía , Neovascularización Retiniana/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Proyectos Piloto , Retinopatía Diabética/complicaciones , Retinopatía Diabética/cirugía , Coagulación con Láser/métodos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA