Low-dose sublingual zolpidem tartrate is associated with dose-related improvement in sleep onset and duration in insomnia characterized by middle-of-the-night (MOTN) awakenings.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of low-dose, sublingual zolpidem tartrate when taken during a scheduled middle-of-the-night (MOTN) awakening in subjects with insomnia characterized by difficulty returning to sleep following MOTN awakenings. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 3-way crossover study. METHODS: Each treatment period consisted of 2 consecutive nights of dosing separated by a washout of 5 to 12 days. Subjects were awakened 4 h after lights out, dosed with sublingual zolpidem tartrate (3.5 mg or 1.75 mg) or placebo, kept awake for 30 min, and then returned to bed for an additional 4 h. Sleep parameters were assessed by polysomnography (PSG) and post-sleep questionnaires. SETTING: Five sleep laboratories. PARTICIPANTS: Adults (24 males, 58 females, mean age 45.9 y) with a diagnosis of DSM-IV primary insomnia and a history of prolonged MOTN awakenings. Baseline difficulties with MOTN awakenings were confirmed by a 10-day screening sleep diary and PSG screening. RESULTS: Low-dose sublingual zolpidem tartrate demonstrated significant dose-related decreases in latency to persistent sleep and total sleep time (P < 0.001) compared to placebo after MOTN dosing. All subject reports paralleled PSG observations. Neither dose showed next-morning impairment on the DSST or ratings of sleepiness. The 3.5-mg dose produced improvements in reports of sleep quality (P < 0.001), ability to function, and level of refreshed sleep (P < 0.05 for both dosages) compared to placebo. Sublingual zolpidem tartrate lozenges were generally safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose sublingual zolpidem tartrate may be suitable for treatment of patients who have difficulty resuming sleep after MOTN awakenings.

Effect of gaboxadol on sleep in adult and elderly patients with primary insomnia: results from two randomized, placebo-controlled, 30-night polysomnography studies.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of gaboxadol in the treatment of adult and elderly patients with primary insomnia. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, 30-night, polysomnography studies. SETTING: Sleep laboratory. PATIENTS: Primary insomnia, 18-64 y (adult study), or > or =65 y (elderly study). INTERVENTIONS: Adult study: gaboxadol 15 mg (GBX15; N = 148), 10 mg (GBX10; N = 154), or placebo (N = 156); elderly study: GBX10 (N = 157), gaboxadol 5 mg (GBX5; N = 153), or placebo (N=176). MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Primary endpoints were wake after sleep onset (WASO) and latency to persistent sleep (LPS). Slow wave sleep (SWS) was a secondary endpoint. Analyses were based on the change from baseline for the average of nights 1/2, and nights 29/30, and compared gaboxadol versus placebo. Exploratory endpoints included patient's subjective assessment of total sleep time (sTST), WASO (sWASO), time to sleep onset (sTSO), and number of awakenings (sNAW); these analyses were based on weekly means. 1) Adult study. GBX15 significantly (P < or = 0.05) improved WASO through nights 29/30 but had no significant effects on LPS. No significant differences were seen for GBX10 versus placebo on WASO or LPS. GBX15 and GBX10 enhanced SWS. GBX15 significantly improved sTST, sWASO, sTSO, and sNAW at weeks 1 and 4. 2) Elderly study. GBX10 significantly improved WASO through nights 29/30; a significant improvement was also seen for GBX5 at nights 1/2 but this was not maintained through nights 29/30. GBX10 significantly improved LPS at nights 1/2 but the improvement was not maintained through nights 29/30; no significant differences were seen for GBX5 versus placebo on LPS. GBX10 and GBX5 enhanced SWS. GBX10 significantly improved sTST at week 1, and sTST, sWASO, and sNAW at week 4. Gaboxadol was generally well tolerated in both studies. CONCLUSIONS: The maximum studied doses of gaboxadol (GBX15 in adult patients and GBX10 in elderly patients) were effective at enhancing objective polysomnography measures of sleep maintenance and SWS, and also some subjective sleep measures, over 30 nights but had little or no effects on sleep onset. The clinical relevance of the enhancement of SWS by gaboxadol is unclear.

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) changes in bariatric surgery patients undergoing rapid weight loss.

BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common condition in morbidly obese patients, with the reported prevalence ranging from 12-78%. There is increasing recognition of the need to diagnose and treat/manage OSA both preoperatively and postoperatively. Nasal CPAP is the preferred treatment of OSA; however, weight loss is associated with a reduction in required pressures. We evaluated the CPAP pressure requirements in a group of patients undergoing rapid weight loss following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. METHODS: 15 patients who had been diagnosed with OSA before surgery were retrospectively evaluated. All patients had demonstrated compliance on home CPAP therapy, were minimally 3 months post-surgery and had follow-up reports that their CPAP was less effective. We obtained data on age, sex, weight, BMI, and apnea/hypopnea index (AHI). Optimal CPAP pressure was obtained initially through attended in-laboratory complex polysomnography. Follow-up CPAP pressure was obtained using an auto-titrating PAP device at home. These data were used to evaluate the pressure changes that accompanied weight loss. RESULTS: This group of patients had lost an average of 44.5 +/- 19.4 kg. Four patients had achieved their goal weight. Their starting CPAP pressures averaged 11 +/- 3.0 cm H2O, with a range of 7-18 cm H2O. Follow-up CPAP pressures averaged 9 +/- 2.7 cm H2O, with a range of 4-12 cm H2O, representing an overall reduction of 18%. The subgroup of patients who had achieved goal weight had a pressure reduction of 22% (9 +/- 2.0 to 7 +/- 1.0 cm H2O). CONCLUSION: CPAP pressure requirements change considerably in bariatric surgery patients undergoing rapid weight loss. Auto-titrating PAP devices have promise for facilitating the management of CPAP therapy during this time. Consideration should also be given to the use of autotitrating PAP units as the treatment of choice in these patients.

Effect of oral JZP-110 (ADX-N05) treatment on wakefulness and sleepiness in adults with narcolepsy.

BACKGROUND: JZP-110 is a wake-promoting agent with dopaminergic and noradrenergic activity. METHODS: This double-blind, crossover study, randomized adults with narcolepsy with or without cataplexy (N = 33) to placebo or JZP-110 at 150 mg/day (weeks 1 and 3) increased to 300 mg/day (weeks 2 and 4). Patients had to have baseline Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) scores ≥10 and mean sleep latencies ≤10 min on the Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT). Efficacy end points included MWT sleep latency and ESS, and the percentage of patients improved on the Clinical Global Impression of Change. RESULTS: Patients were primarily male (57.6%) and white (69.7%), with a mean (standard deviation) age of 37.1 (12.4) years. At two weeks, the change in the mean MWT sleep latency was 11.8 min longer with JZP-110 than with placebo (P = 0.0002); JZP-110 resulted in greater changes in sleep latency on each MWT trial (P <0.001). For ESS, JZP-110 was more efficacious relative to placebo after 1 (P <0.0001) and two weeks (P = 0.0002); final ESS scores were 10.8 with JZP-110 and 15.2 with placebo, changes of -6.7 and -2.4, respectively. JZP-110 was generally well tolerated; the most common adverse events with JZP-110 were nausea (12%), noncardiac chest discomfort (9.1%), and headache (9.1%). CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of JZP-110 for impaired wakefulness and excessive sleepiness was observed at 150-300 mg/day and as early as one week after initiating treatment (Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT01485770).

Eszopiclone for insomnia associated with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate efficacy and safety of eszopiclone compared with placebo in children and adolescents with insomnia associated with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). METHODS: A 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluated efficacy and safety of high- or low-dose eszopiclone (1 or 2 mg in children aged 6-11 years, 2 or 3 mg in children ages 12-17 years), given every evening, in 486 patients with ADHD-related insomnia. The primary efficacy variable was change in latency to persistent sleep from baseline to week 12, based on polysomnography. Key secondary measures were polysomnography-measured wake time after sleep onset, Clinical Global Impression Parent/Caregiver and Child scales, and the Conners' ADHD rating scales. The safety of eszopiclone was further studied over 1 year of open-label treatment in 55 patients who completed the double-blind study, and 249 patients with no previous eszopiclone exposure. RESULTS: Neither low-dose nor high-dose eszopiclone significantly reduced latency to persistent sleep compared with placebo after 12 weeks of treatment. Secondary outcomes were considered nonsignificant based on the hierarchical statistical analysis plan. The most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events over 12 weeks with eszopiclone were headache, dysgeusia, and dizziness. The study results demonstrated that eszopiclone was well tolerated over 1 year of treatment, with 11.2% of patients discontinuing open-label treatment because of an adverse event. CONCLUSIONS: Eszopiclone (up to 3 mg) failed to reduce latency to persistent sleep on polysomnography after 12 weeks in children aged 6 to 17 years with ADHD-related insomnia. Eszopiclone was well tolerated in the 1-year study.

A randomized, double-blind, single-dose, placebo-controlled, multicenter, polysomnographic study of gabapentin in transient insomnia induced by sleep phase advance.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of single doses of gabapentin 250 and 500 mg on polysomnographic (PSG) and participant-reported sleep measures in a 5-h phase advance insomnia model. METHODS: Adults reporting occasional disturbed sleep received gabapentin 500 mg (n = 125), 250 mg (n = 125), or placebo (n = 127) 30 min prior to bedtime and were in bed from 17:00 to 01:00, ∼5 h before their habitual bedtime. Sleep was assessed by PSG, post-sleep questionnaire, and the Karolinska Sleep Diary (KSD). Next-day residual effects (Digit Symbol Substitution Test [DSST] and Stanford Sleepiness Scale [SSS]) and tolerability were assessed. RESULTS: Demographics were comparable among groups. Among PSG endpoints, wake after sleep onset (primary endpoint) (135.7 [placebo], 100.7 [250 mg], and 73.2 [500 mg] min) was significantly lower and total sleep time (TST) (311.4, 356.5, and 378.7 min) significantly greater in both gabapentin groups versus placebo. Latency to persistent sleep was not significantly different among groups. Percent slow wave sleep (12.6%, 15.4%, and 17.0%, respectively) was significantly greater and percent stage 1 (15.1%, 11.8%, and 10.8%, respectively) significantly lower relative to placebo. Gabapentin was associated with significantly higher values of KSD Sleep Quality Index and reported TST versus placebo; no other reported outcomes were significant. Neither gabapentin dose produced evidence of next-day residual effects as measured by DSST and SSS. Adverse events were infrequent (< 5%). CONCLUSION: Participants with occasional disturbed sleep treated with gabapentin showed significantly longer sleep duration and greater depth (versus placebo) in response to a phase advance manipulation known to disrupt sleep maintenance.

A multicenter evaluation of oral pressure therapy for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the impact of a novel noninvasive oral pressure therapy (OPT) (Winx®, ApniCure) system on polysomnographic measures of sleep-disordered breathing, sleep architecture, and sleep stability in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A 4-week, multicenter, prospective, open-label, randomized, crossover, first-night order of control vs treatment, single-arm trial was conducted in five American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) - accredited sleep clinics and one research laboratory. Sixty-three subjects (analysis cohort) were studied from a screening cohort of 367 subjects. The analysis cohort was 69.8% men, ages 53.6±8.9 years (mean±SD), body mass index of 32.3±4.5kg/m(2), with mild to severe OSA. At treatment initiation, subjects received random assignment to one night with and one without (control) treatment, and they were assessed again following 28 nights of treatment. Breathing and sleep architecture were assessed each night based on blind scoring by a single centralized scorer using AASM criteria. RESULTS: Average nightly usage across the take-home period was 6.0±1.4h. There were no severe or serious device-related adverse events (AEs). Median apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) was 27.5 events per hour on the control night, 13.4 events per hour on the first treatment night, and 14.8 events per hour after 28days of treatment. A clinically significant response (treatment AHI ⩽10/h and ⩽50% of control values) was seen in 20 of the 63 subjects evaluated. Rapid eye movement percentage (REM%) was significantly increased, and N1%, stage shifts to N1 sleep, overall stage shifts, total awakenings, and arousals per hour were all significantly reduced at both treatment nights compared to controls. Mean Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS) was significantly reduced from 12.1 to 8.6 (Cohen d effect size, 0.68) in those untreated for two or more weeks prior to OPT study participation and remained unchanged in subjects who directly switched from continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy to OPT. CONCLUSION: Clinically significant improvements in sleep quality and continuity, AHI, ODI, ESS, and overall clinical status were achieved in an easily identified subgroup. OPT was safe and well-tolerated and nightly usage was high.

Effect of pregabalin on sleep in patients with fibromyalgia and sleep maintenance disturbance: a randomized, placebo-controlled, 2-way crossover polysomnography study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of pregabalin on polysomnographic (PSG) measures of sleep and patient-rated sleep, tiredness, and pain in fibromyalgia patients. METHODS: We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 2-period crossover PSG study. Patients ages ≥18 years with fibromyalgia satisfied subjective and objective sleep disturbance criteria prior to randomization. Eligible patients were randomized (1:1) to pregabalin (300-450 mg/day) or placebo for crossover period 1, and vice versa for period 2. Each crossover period comprised a dose-adjustment and dose-maintenance phase, with a 2-week taper/washout between periods. In-laboratory PSGs were recorded during 2 consecutive nights at screening and at the end of each crossover period. The primary end point was the difference in sleep maintenance defined by PSG-recorded wake after sleep onset (WASO; minutes) between 4 weeks of treatment with pregabalin and with placebo. Other PSG measures; patient-rated sleep, tiredness, and pain; and tolerability were assessed. RESULTS: Of 119 patients randomized (103 women [86.6%], mean age 48.4 years), 102 (85.7%) completed both periods. Patients treated with pregabalin showed a reduction in PSG-determined WASO versus treatment with placebo (week 4 difference: -19.2 minutes [95% confidence interval (95% CI) -26.7, -11.6]; P < 0.0001). Pain score improved (decreased) with pregabalin versus placebo treatment at all 4 weeks (week 4 difference: -0.52 [95% CI -0.90, -0.14]; P = 0.0084). Modest (ρ = <0.3) but significant correlations were found between PSG sleep assessments and ratings of pain and sleep quality. Frequently reported all-causality adverse events (pregabalin versus placebo) were: dizziness (30.4% versus 9.9%), somnolence (20.5% versus 4.5%), and headache (8.9% versus 8.1%). CONCLUSION: Patients with fibromyalgia treated with pregabalin had statistically significant and meaningful improvements in sleep, as assessed by PSG. Patients with fibromyalgia also reported decreased daily pain. Pregabalin was well tolerated.

Tasimelteon for insomnia.

INTRODUCTION: Insomnia is a prevalent disorder with nearly 50% of the US adult population reporting insomnia symptoms during the past year and 10 - 15% reporting chronic insomnia. In addition, insomnia is a frequent comorbidity with depression, anxiety and pain, as well as other medical and psychiatric disorders. Tasimelteon is a melatonin receptor agonist developed by Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. and later licensed to Vanda Pharmaceuticals in 2004. It is being developed for the treatment of sleep disorders, including insomnia and mood disorders. AREAS COVERED: The nature and prevalence of insomnia are described in this review, along with the current pharmacological treatments for the disorder. Summaries of the available pharmacological and clinical data for tasimelteon are also provided. A Medline search using the terms tasimelteon, melatonin and insomnia was undertaken to assess the current literature on these topics. EXPERT OPINION: While the few clinical trials of the medication have been promising, much more extensive testing, along with more detailed reporting of the drug's pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, is needed before tasimelteon can be considered a worthwhile addition to the available treatments for insomnia. In particular, testing of the drug's effectiveness in treating maintenance insomnia, as well as tests of its long-term effectiveness and safety, is much needed.

A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of armodafinil for excessive sleepiness in patients with treated obstructive sleep apnea and comorbid depression.

OBJECTIVE: Treatment of excessive sleepiness in the context of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) may be particularly difficult in those with depression because depression and/or antidepressant medications may cause sleepiness and fatigue in addition to that due to the OSA. This study evaluating armodafinil, a nonamphetamine wakefulness-promoting medication, is the first trial for treatment of excessive sleepiness in patients with treated OSA and comorbid depression. METHOD: Men and women with OSA diagnosed using International Classification of Sleep Disorders criteria being treated with continuous positive airway pressure and comorbid major depressive disorder or dysthymic disorder according to DSM-IV-TR criteria were enrolled into a 12-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study between September 2007 and March 2009 at 60 outpatient sites. Patients maintained on stable monotherapy with a serotonergic antidepressant and with a 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score < 17 received placebo or armodafinil (target dose: 200 mg once daily). Coprimary outcomes were the proportion of patients with at least minimal improvement on the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) as related to excessive sleepiness and mean change from baseline in Maintenance of Wakefulness Test mean sleep latency at final visit; the key secondary outcome was mean change in the Epworth Sleepiness Scale score. RESULTS: 249 patients were enrolled: 125 in the armodafinil group and 124 in the placebo group. The proportion of patients with at least minimal improvement on the CGI-C was statistically significantly greater in the armodafinil group (69%) compared with the placebo group (53%, P = .012). Mean (SD) increase in Maintenance of Wakefulness Test sleep latency was numerically but not significantly greater following armodafinil (2.6 [7.1] min) versus placebo (1.1 [7.6] min, P = .30) treatment. Mean decrease in Epworth Sleepiness Scale score was greater in the armodafinil group (-6.3 [4.8]) than in the placebo group (-4.8 [4.9], nominal P = .003). Headache, dry mouth, and insomnia were the most common adverse events occurring with armodafinil treatment. There was no clinically significant effect on depression in either group as measured by the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self-Report 16. CONCLUSIONS: Armodafinil significantly improved overall clinical condition related to excessive sleepiness as rated by the CGI-C and was well tolerated in patients with treated OSA and comorbid depression. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00518986.

Armodafinil: a new treatment for excessive sleepiness.

BACKGROUND: Armodafinil is a wake-promoting agent developed by Cephalon that was approved in mid-2007 for the treatment of excessive sleepiness associated with narcolepsy, obstructive sleep apnea and shift work disorder. It is the R-enantiomer of the compound modafinil. Like modafinil, the mechanism of action for armodafinil is not fully characterized. OBJECTIVE: To determine what data are available to support the potential use of armodafinil in clinical settings. METHODS: There are limited data on armodafinil available in the public domain, particularly in regard to chemistry and pharmacokinetics/dynamics. Data were reviewed from refereed journals, scientific presentations, and published labeling. RESULTS/CONCLUSION: Clinical trials demonstrated efficacy and safety profiles that were similar to those of the parent compound with wake promotion sustained throughout the day. The longer duration of effect has the potential for improved patient response and compliance but this will require further study. The primary commercial challenge may be the future availability of generic modafinil.

Efficacy and tolerability of indiplon in transient insomnia.

OBJECTIVE: The efficacy of indiplon was evaluated by polysomnography (PSG) in an experimental model of transient insomnia consisting of the first night effect combined with a 2-hour phase advance. METHODS: Healthy volunteers age 21-64 years (N=593; 62% female; mean +/- SEM) years, 32 +/- 0.39) were randomized to double-blind treatment with a single nighttime dose of indiplon (10 mg or 20 mg) or placebo. PSG assessments included latency to persistent sleep (LPS, primary endpoint) and total sleep time (TST); self-report assessments included sleep quality (SQ); next day residual effects were evaluated by the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), Symbol Copying Test (SCT), and a Visual Analog Scale of sleepiness (VAS). RESULTS: LPS mean (+/- SEM) values were significantly reduced on indiplon 10 mg (21.2 +/- 1.5 minutes) and indiplon 20 mg (16.8 +/- 1.1 minutes) compared to placebo (33.1 +/- 2.5 minutes; p < 0.0001 for both comparisons to placebo). TST mean (+/- SEM) values were significantly increased on indiplon 10 mg (414.5 +/- 3.9 minutes) and indiplon 20 mg (423.5 +/- 3.1 minutes) compared to placebo (402.9 +/- 3.9 minutes; p <0.005 for the 10 mg dose; p < 0.0001 for the 20 mg dose). SQ was also significantly improved on both doses. There were no differences between indiplon and placebo on next day DSST, SCT, or VAS. CONCLUSIONS: Indiplon was effective in inducing sleep, increasing sleep duration, and improving overall sleep quality without next day residual effects in healthy volunteers in a model of transient insomnia.

Efficacy and tolerability of modified-release indiplon in elderly patients with chronic insomnia: results of a 2-week double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Indiplon is a nonbenzodiazepine GABA potentiator, which exhibits pharmacologic selectivity for GABA(A) receptors containing the alpha1 subunit. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a 15-mg nightly dose of modified-release indiplon tablets in elderly patients with primary insomnia characterized by sleep-maintenance difficulties. METHODS: Two hundred twenty-nine elderly patients, aged 65 to 85 years, who met Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition criteria for primary insomnia were randomly assigned to 2 weeks of nightly treatment with either indiplon, 15 mg, or placebo in a double-blind, parallel-group design. Daily sleep diaries were completed to collect patient reports of subjective total sleep time, wake time after sleep onset, number of awakenings after sleep-onset, latency to sleep onset, and sleep quality. Patient global impression ratings of various parameters of sleep were assessed on a weekly basis. RESULTS: The least square mean total sleep time was significantly improved with indiplon versus placebo at week 1 (377 +/- 4 min vs. 328 +/- 4 min; p < .0001) and week 2 (373 +/- 5 min vs. 337 +/- 5 min; p < .0001). Indiplon also significantly improved subjective wake after sleep onset, subjective number of awakenings after sleep onset, subjective sleep-onset latency, sleep quality, and patient global impression ratings of sleep at both weeks 1 and 2. The number and severity of adverse events and rates of discontinuation due to adverse effects were comparable in the indiplon and placebo groups. CONCLUSIONS: In elderly patients with primary insomnia characterized by sleep-maintenance difficulty, indiplon, 15 mg, was well tolerated and significantly improved all patient-reported measures of sleep during 2 weeks of treatment.

Wireless CPAP patient monitoring: accuracy study.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and reproducibility of a novel method for transmitting continuous positive airway pressure treatment (CPAP) compliance and usage data. Using wireless and Internet technology to transmit/receive clinical data, we examined and compared these data to the same data collected using a traditional flow generator-to-PC interface. Previously diagnosed patients were given commercially available flow generators to use in the home setting for a 30-day period. They then returned to transmit these data to a base site as well as to download the same data to a floppy disk for comparative purposes. The study took place at a freestanding sleep disorders center in Atlanta, Georgia, and two HME providers in Buffalo, New York, and Boston, Massachusetts. The patients comprised 21 adults who had been previously diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea; there were 7 stable CPAP users with at least 1 year on therapy and 14 new users. Data were collected on CPAP units with an integrated computer chip that collects compliance data defined as mask-on duration. Fourteen subjects used a flow generator that collected additional efficacy data such as apnea-hypopnea index. The study confirmed 100% agreement between data sets transmitted wirelessly and the same data set downloaded onsite across all six clinical parameters. This study demonstrates the reliability of this wireless technology for transmitting compliance and efficacy data in both new and established users of CPAP. Potential benefits of this technology include advanced compliance and efficacy along with a potential reduction in health-care costs.