Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 56
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Epidemiol Infect ; 142(3): 484-93, 2014 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23806331

RESUMEN

To assess the prevalence and risk factors for colonization with Staphylococcus aureus in inmates entering two maximum-security prisons in New York State, USA, inmates (N=830) were interviewed and anterior nares and oropharyngeal samples collected. Isolates were characterized using spa typing. Overall, 50·5% of women and 58·3% of men were colonized with S. aureus and 10·6% of women and 5·9% of men were colonized with MRSA at either or both body sites. Of MSSA isolates, the major subtypes were spa type 008 and 002. Overall, risk factors for S. aureus colonization varied by gender and were only found in women and included younger age, fair/poor self-reported general health, and longer length of prior incarceration. Prevalence of MRSA colonization was 8·2%, nearly 10 times greater than in the general population. Control of epidemic S. aureus in prisons should consider the constant introduction of strains by new inmates.


Asunto(s)
Prisioneros , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Femenino , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , New York/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Staphylococcus aureus/aislamiento & purificación , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
2.
Epidemiol Infect ; 141(11): 2376-83, 2013 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23425708

RESUMEN

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteraemia cause significant morbidity and mortality in hospitalized patients. Using a nested case-control design, 204 MRSA bacteraemia cases were compared to 301 unmatched methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) bacteraemia controls and were matched 1:2 with non-infected controls. The independent risk factors for MRSA bacteraemia compared to MSSA bacteraemia were older age (P = 0·048), major organ transplant during current hospital stay (P = 0·016) and quinolone use (P = 0·016). Cases were more likely than non-infected controls to have renal failure (P = 0·003), cirrhosis (P = 0·013), and a central venous catheter (P = 0·003) after controlling for other risk factors. This large case-control study made it possible to assess risk factors for MRSA bacteraemia using two sets of controls and showed that risk factors differed greatly depending on the control group chosen. These results confirm the need for careful selection of appropriate control groups and the need to carefully adjust for underlying severity of illness.


Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia/microbiología , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Interpretación Estadística de Datos , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Masculino , Resistencia a la Meticilina , Oportunidad Relativa , Proyectos de Investigación , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Virulencia
3.
J Hosp Infect ; 99(2): 139-144, 2018 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29111352

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Adult long-term care (LTC) facilities have high rates of antibiotic use, raising concerns about antimicrobial resistance. Few studies have examined antibiotic use in paediatric LTC facilities. AIM: To describe antibiotic use in three paediatric LTC facilities and to describe the factors associated with use. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted from September 2012 to December 2015 in three paediatric LTC facilities. Medical records were reviewed for demographics, healthcare-associated infections (HAIs), antimicrobial use and diagnostic testing. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors for antibiotic use. The association between susceptibility testing results and appropriate antibiotic coverage was determined using Chi-squared test. FINDINGS: Fifty-eight percent (413/717) of residents had at least one HAI, and 79% (325/413) of these residents were treated with at least one antibiotic course, totalling 2.75 antibiotic courses per 1000 resident-days. Length of enrolment greater than one year, having a neurological disorder, having a tracheostomy, and being hospitalized at least once during the study period were significantly associated with receiving antibiotics when controlling for facility (all P < 0.001). Diagnostic testing was performed for 40% of antibiotic-treated HAIs. Eighty-six percent of antibiotic courses for identified bacterial pathogens (201/233) provided appropriate coverage. Access to susceptibility testing was not associated with appropriate antibiotic choice (P = 0.26). CONCLUSION: Use of antibiotics in paediatric LTC facilities is widespread. There is further need to assess antibiotic use in paediatric LTC facilities. Evaluation of the adverse outcomes associated with inappropriate antibiotic use, including the prevalence of resistant organisms in paediatric LTC facilities, is critical.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infección Hospitalaria/diagnóstico , Infección Hospitalaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Utilización de Medicamentos , Hospitales Pediátricos , Cuidados a Largo Plazo , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto Joven
4.
J Hosp Infect ; 66(1): 6-14, 2007 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17276546

RESUMEN

Compliance with hand hygiene is widely recognized as the most important factor in preventing transmission of infection to patients in health care settings. However, there is no standardized method for measuring compliance. The three major methods used are direct observation, self-report and indirect measurement of hand hygiene product usage. This review discusses the methods of compliance monitoring and the advantages and drawbacks of each.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Adhesión a Directriz , Desinfección de las Manos/normas , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Control de Infecciones/normas , Gestión de Riesgos/métodos
5.
J Hosp Infect ; 66(2): 101-8, 2007 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17320242

RESUMEN

Attempts to address the growing problem of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) and their impact on healthcare systems have historically relied on infection control policies that recommend good hygiene through standard and enhanced precautions (e.g. barrier precautions and patient isolation). In order for infection control strategies to be effective, however, healthcare workers' behaviour must be congruent with these policies. The purposes of this systematic review were to evaluate studies testing the effectiveness of interventions aimed at changing healthcare workers' behaviour (in reducing HAIs) and to summarize the findings of the studies with the highest quality scores. A total of 33 published studies met the inclusion criteria and were evaluated. Four of these earned a study quality score of > or =80%. In all four significant reductions in HAI or colonization rates were reported. Behavioural interventions used in these high quality studies included an educational programme (in four), the formation of a multi-disciplinary quality improvement team (three), compliance monitoring and feedback (two), and a mandate to sign a hand hygiene requirement statement (one). In all 33 studies, bundles of two to five interventions were employed, making it difficult to determine the effectiveness of individual interventions. The usefulness of "care bundling" has recently been recognized and recommended by the Institute for Healthcare Improvement. Considering the multi-factorial nature of the HAI problem and the logistical and ethical difficulties of applying the randomized clinical trial approach to infection control research, it may be necessary to study interventions as sets of practices.


Asunto(s)
Control de la Conducta , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Humanos
6.
J Hosp Infect ; 92(4): 349-62, 2016 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26549480

RESUMEN

Standard precaution (SP) adherence is universally suboptimal, despite being a core component of healthcare-associated infection (HCAI) prevention and healthcare worker (HCW) safety. Emerging evidence suggests that patient safety climate (PSC) factors may improve HCW behaviours. Our aim was to examine the relationship between PSC and SP adherence by HCWs in acute care hospitals. A systematic review was conducted as guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis. Three electronic databases were comprehensively searched for literature published or available in English between 2000 and 2014. Seven of 888 articles identified were eligible for final inclusion in the review. Two reviewers independently assessed study quality using a validated quality tool. The seven articles were assigned quality scores ranging from 7 to 10 of 10 possible points. Five measured all aspects of SP and two solely measured needlestick and sharps handling. Three included a secondary outcome of HCW exposure; none included HCAIs. All reported a statistically significant relationship between better PSC and greater SP adherence and used data from self-report surveys including validated PSC measures or measures of management support and leadership. Although limited in number, studies were of high quality and confirmed that PSC and SP adherence were correlated, suggesting that efforts to improve PSC may enhance adherence to a core component of HCAI prevention and HCW safety. More clearly evident is the need for additional high-quality research.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Adhesión a Directriz , Personal de Salud , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Seguridad del Paciente , Humanos
7.
Am J Med ; 70(3): 641-5, 1981 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7211897

RESUMEN

Conversion of an intensive care unit (ICU) from an open unit to isolation rooms permitted study of patient care practices, colonization and infection in both settings. Air sampling and observation of patient care practices included 99 of 410 open unit patients (168 patient-hours during nine months) and 68 of 1,022 isolation room patients matched on the basis of risk factors for infection and staff contact (113 patient-hours during 12 months). Number and type of interactions between staff and patients, and frequency of handwashing and its relationship to patient-staff interactions were recorded. All ICU patients were monitored daily for signs of and selected risk factors for infection, and material for culture for six surveillance organisms was obtained every four days. Numbers of persons interacting with a patient hour were 6.1 +/- 3.5 in the open units and 4.9 +/- 2.8 in the isolation rooms (0.05 less than P less than 0.10). Frequency of handwashing did not increase significantly in the unit providing convenient sinks, occurring in an observed to expected ratio of only 24 percent. Over-all rates of infection in the open unit and isolation rooms were 15.0 and 13.4, respectively. Half of the infections occurring in patients with complete cultures obtained on admission were caused by organisms colonizing the patient upon admission to the ICU. The isolation rooms did not appear to reduce nosocomial acquisition (P = 0.168, Mantel-Haenszel) of the six surveillance organisms. We conclude that many patient-staff interactions in an ICU are not followed by handwashing, and that the new unit design had no apparent effect upon the frequency of handwashing or over-all incidence of colonization and infection in the ICU.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Aisladores de Pacientes , Microbiología del Aire , Infección Hospitalaria/transmisión , Humanos , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales , Aislamiento de Pacientes
8.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 9(5): 189-93, 1988 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3372988

RESUMEN

The composition and antibiotic sensitivity pattern of bacteria recovered from the hands of nurses and physicians in two service units of a major teaching hospital were compared with those found in a control population. Significant differences in the composition of bacteria were found in dermatology and oncology unit personnel. Staphylococcus aureus was recovered from 31% of dermatology nurses and 37% of dermatology physicians compared with 20% of oncology nurses, 15% of oncology physicians, and 17% of controls. Oncology personnel had a significantly higher carriage of gram-negative bacteria, yeasts, and multiple antibiotic-resistant, aerobic coryneforms (group JK bacteria). Both dermatology and oncology nursing personnel were colonized by organisms resistant to multiple antibiotics. Methicillin resistance was found in 26% and 66% of the staphylococci recovered from dermatology and oncology nurses respectively. Flora from physicians on the two units had sensitivity patterns similar to controls.


Asunto(s)
Mano/microbiología , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Personal de Hospital , Dermatología , Humanos , Oncología Médica
9.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 11(3): 139-43, 1990 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2313083

RESUMEN

To test the effects of four surgical scrub products on colonizing hand flora, 60 healthy adult volunteers were assigned by block randomization (12 subjects per group) to use one of the following formulations: 70% ethyl alcohol with 0.5% chlorhexidine gluconate (ALC); a liquid detergent base containing 1% triclosan (TRI); a liquid detergent base containing 4% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG); a liquid detergent base containing 7.5% povidone-iodine (PI); or a nonantimicrobial liquid soap (control). Using standard protocol, subjects performed a surgical scrub daily for five consecutive days. Hand cultures were obtained at baseline and on test days 1 and 5 immediately after the scrub and following four hours of gloving. After the first and last scrubs, ALC, CHG and PI resulted in significant reductions in colonizing flora when compared to the control. Additionally, by day 5 ALC was associated with an almost 3-log reduction as compared to an approximate 1.5-log reduction for CHG and PI and less than a 1-log reduction of TRI and the control (p = .009). After four hours of gloving on both days 1 and 5, microbial counts on hands of subjects using ALC, TRI and CHG were significantly lower than counts for the control (p less than .001), whereas there was no significant difference in counts between the PI and control groups (p = .41). Skin assessment by study subjects rated products from least to most harsh as follows: control, TRI, CHG, ALC and PI p = .00001). It was concluded that ALC could be an efficacious and acceptable alternative for surgical scrubbing.


Asunto(s)
Etanol , Desinfección de las Manos/métodos , Éteres Fenílicos , Povidona Yodada , Povidona , Triclosán , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Comportamiento del Consumidor , Etanol/efectos adversos , Femenino , Mano/microbiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estados Unidos
10.
Am J Infect Control ; 9(4): 112-9, 1981 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10283847

RESUMEN

The hand floras of 103 hospital personnel and 50 controls were studied over a mean of 35 days. One or more of 22 species of gram-negative bacteria (GNB) were found to be carried persistently on the hands of 22 (21%) hospital personnel and 40 (80%) controls (age-adjusted relative risk (RR) 3.2; p less than 0.001). Males were significantly more often carriers than females (age-adjusted RR 1.8; p less than 0.01), and persons who washed hands less than eight times per day were significantly more likely to persistently carry the same species of GNB on the hands than those who washed more than eight times per day (group-adjusted RR 2.4: p less than 0.001). Predominant organisms from both groups were species of Acinetobacter (45%) and Klebsiella-Enterobacter (39%). Twenty-one percent of 541 nosocomial infections over a 7-month period in the study institution were caused by species found on personnel hands. The same distribution of species types between hospital personnel and controls indicated that handwashing regimens used by hospital personnel were reducing numbers of organisms without shifting the ecologic balance of bacterial populations on the hands. It was concluded that such organisms are much more prevalent on normal skin than generally thought.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Bacterias Aerobias Gramnegativas , Personal de Hospital , Desinfección de las Manos , Humanos , Washingtón
11.
Am J Infect Control ; 29(6): 383-8, 2001 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11743485

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To describe and analyze trends in hygiene-related advertisements and examine potential social and regulatory changes that might be associated with these trends. METHODS: From 1940 to 2000, advertisements in January issues of 2 widely read magazines were analyzed every fifth year, and 2 additional magazines only available from 1960 to 2000 were also analyzed every fifth year. In a content analysis, the total number of advertisements were determined and specific advertisements were grouped into categories (personal hygiene, dishwashing, laundry, and house cleaning) and further examined for the presence of 4 key claims (aesthetics, health effects, time-saving, and microbial effects). RESULTS: From 1940 to 2000 for all magazines combined, 10.4% of the advertisements were devoted to hygiene products. After 1960 there were significantly fewer hygiene advertisements as compared with 1940 to 1955, and there was a significant increase after 1980 (P <.00001). Throughout all 6 decades, most advertisements related to personal hygiene. There were no significant differences over time in the proportion of advertisements that made claims related to health, microbial effects, or aesthetics, but significantly more advertisements before 1960 made time-savings claims (P =.009). CONCLUSIONS: This content analysis reflects a cyclical attention in consumer advertising to personal and home hygiene products during the past 6 decades, with a waning of interest in the decades from 1960 to 1980 and an apparent resurgence of advertisements from 1985 to 2000. The potential contributions of federal regulatory bodies and societal changes (e.g., new marketing strategies and options, product development, new and re-emerging infectious diseases, increasing concern about antimicrobial resistance, and increasing recognition that infectious diseases are unlikely to be eradicated) to these marketing trends are discussed.


Asunto(s)
Publicidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Agencias Gubernamentales/legislación & jurisprudencia , Higiene , Publicaciones Periódicas como Asunto , Publicidad/clasificación , Humanos , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos
12.
Am J Infect Control ; 26(3): 245-53, 1998 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9638287

RESUMEN

No single intervention has been successful in improving and sustaining such infection control practices as universal precautions and handwashing by health care professionals. This paper examines several behavioral theories (Health Belief Model, Theory of Reasoned Action and Theory of Planned Behavior, self-efficacy, and the Transtheoretic Model) and relates them to individual factors, also considering interpersonal and organizational factors. Further, this article includes recommendations of individual and organizational components to be addressed when planning a theoretically based intervention for improving infection control practices. A hypothetic framework to enhance handwashing practice is proposed.


PIP: This article reviews the Health Belief Model, the Theories of Reasoned Action and of Planned Behavior, self-efficacy, and the Transtheoretic Model to determine the application of these theories to attempts to improve infection control practices in the health professions. After a brief introduction, the article offers background information on compliance (the degree to which a person adheres to advice) as it pertains to hand-washing and the use of gloves. This review indicates that interventions to improve compliance must combine institutional and personal variables. Next, the article summarizes the four theoretical frameworks and studies that have sampled various components of the frameworks. The discussion notes that none of the theories consistently predicts behaviors but that constructs some of the theories hold in common (self-efficacy, beliefs, perceived health threat, cues, attitudes, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control, intention, and the stages and processes of change) can be integrated into an intervention to improve infection control practices. A further hypothetical intervention is suggested that addresses individual and organizational components.


Asunto(s)
Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Desinfección de las Manos , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Modelos Teóricos
13.
Am J Infect Control ; 25(1): 3-10, 1997 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9057937

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Few interventions to influence handwashing have had measurable effects. This prospective quasi-experimental study was designed to address predisposing, enabling, and reinforcing factors to improve frequency of handwashing. METHODS: Over a 12-month time period, a multifaceted intervention including focus group sessions, installation of automated sinks, and feedback to staff on handwashing frequency was implemented in one intensive care unit; a second unit served as a control. Dependent variables observed were handwashing frequency and self-reported practices and opinions about handwashing. Study phases included baseline, three phases of about 2 months each in duration in which sink automation was incrementally increased, and follow-up 2 months after intervention. RESULTS: During 301 hours of observation, 2624 handwashings were recorded. Proportion of times hands were washed varied by indication, ranging from 38% before invasive procedures to 86% for dirty-to-clean procedures (p < 0.00001). Although there were some significant differences between experimental and control units in handwashing during the study, these differences had returned to baseline by the 2-month follow-up. There were no significant differences in self-reported practices and opinions from before to after intervention nor between units. CONCLUSIONS: Intensive intervention, including feedback, education, and increased sink automation, had minimal long-term effect on handwashing frequency.


Asunto(s)
Desinfección de las Manos , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/educación , Análisis de Varianza , Automatización , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Grupos Focales , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Estudios Prospectivos , Estadísticas no Paramétricas
14.
Am J Infect Control ; 19(3): 156-61, 1991 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1907439

RESUMEN

The microbial flora of 60 vase water samples from cut flowers obtained from several environments, including a hospital, were examined in this study. Forty-one different bacterial species were identified, including 12 species of Pseudomonas. The mean total aerobic bacterial count per 500 ml of vase water was 4.5 x 10(8) organisms, and high levels of antibiotic resistance were found. To ascertain the origin of the bacteria found on the flowers as well as their growth patterns, natural cut flowers were compared with sterilized cut flowers in tap water over time. Although the density of organisms was similar, the flora in vase water of sterilized flowers consisted almost entirely of aerobic spore formers while mixed flora of gram-negative bacteria, staphylococci, aerobic spore formers, and fungi were isolated from natural flowers. Our results indicate that the multiply-resistant microbial flora found in vase water is indigenous to flowers, rather than originating from the environment in which they are placed, and that such water is a reservoir of large numbers of multiresistant organisms.


Asunto(s)
Bacterias/aislamiento & purificación , Plantas/microbiología , Microbiología del Agua , Farmacorresistencia Microbiana , Hospitales , Humanos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/aislamiento & purificación
15.
Am J Infect Control ; 18(2): 70-6, 1990 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2337257

RESUMEN

The antimicrobial effectiveness of four hand-wash products for health care personnel included three liquid soaps that contained 4% chlorhexidine gluconate, 1% triclosan, or no antiseptic ingredient, respectively, and a 30% w/w ethyl alcohol-impregnated hand wipe. These products were evaluated for reduction in bacterial counts on hands after extended use of 15 handwashes per day for 5 consecutive days. The order of greatest to least log reduction among products at the end of the 5-day test period was chlorhexidine gluconate (2.01), triclosan (1.52), alcohol wipe (0.04), and control soap (0.03). Skin condition before and after handwash was assessed for each treatment group. Subjects reported less skin irritation with alcohol wipes than with the two antiseptic products. Repeated washing with alcohol wipes results in reductions in bacterial colony counts comparable with nonmedicated soap, sufficient to prevent transmission of pathogens by the hands in most situations that arise in nonacute health care settings. This evidence, in addition to increased user acceptability reported by the subjects who used alcohol wipes, suggests that alcohol wipes are an acceptable alternative to soap-and-water handwashing in nonacute health care settings.


Asunto(s)
Clorhexidina/análogos & derivados , Desinfección/métodos , Etanol , Dermatosis de la Mano/terapia , Desinfección de las Manos/métodos , Éteres Fenílicos , Jabones , Esterilización/métodos , Tensoactivos , Triclosán , Adulto , Recuento de Colonia Microbiana , Femenino , Desinfección de las Manos/normas , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Tiempo
16.
Am J Infect Control ; 20(2): 65-72, 1992 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1590601

RESUMEN

The handwashing practices and bacterial hand flora of 62 pediatric staff members of a teaching hospital in Lima, Peru, were studied. Handwashing followed patient contact 29.3% of the time (204/697 contacts). Mean duration was 14.5 seconds, and significant differences in practices were found by unit (rehydration or neonatal intensive care), type of staff member (nurses or physicians), and type and duration of patient contact. Mean count of colony-forming units was log10 5.87 +/- 0.41, with significant differences in density of flora found between patient care and kitchen staffs. There was no significant effect of handwashing on counts of colony-forming units. Significant differences were also found by unit and by staff position with regard to species isolated and antimicrobial resistance of isolates. A more efficacious and cost-effective form of hand hygiene and a more prudent use of antimicrobial agents are indicated.


Asunto(s)
Desinfección de las Manos/normas , Mano/microbiología , Personal de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Recuento de Colonia Microbiana , Países en Desarrollo , Farmacorresistencia Microbiana , Hospitales con 300 a 499 Camas , Unidades Hospitalarias/normas , Unidades Hospitalarias/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales de Enseñanza/normas , Hospitales de Enseñanza/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal/normas , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermería Pediátrica/normas , Enfermería Pediátrica/estadística & datos numéricos , Perú , Factores de Tiempo
17.
Am J Infect Control ; 26(5): 513-21, 1998 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9795681

RESUMEN

In a prospective observational study of 40 nurses (20 with diagnosed hand irritation and 20 without), nurses with damaged hands did not have higher microbial counts (P = .63), but did have a greater number of colonizing species (means: 3.35 and 2.63, P = .03). Although numbers were small, nurses with damaged hands were significantly more likely to be colonized with Staphylococcus hominis (P = .03). Fifty-nine percent of S hominis isolates from nurses with damaged hands were resistant to methicillin compared with 27% of isolates from those with healthy skin (P = .14). Twenty percent of nurses with damaged hands were colonized with Staphylococcus aureus compared with none of the nurses with normal hands (P = .11). Nurses with damaged hands were also twice as likely to have gram-negative bacteria (P = .20), entercocci (P = .13), and Candida (P = .30) present on the hands. Antimicrobial resistance of the coagulase-negative staphylococcal flora (with the exception of S hominis) did not differ between the 2 groups, nor did a trend toward increasing resistance exist when compared with other studies during the past decade. Skin moisturizers and protectant products were used almost universally by nurses at work, primarily products brought from home. Efforts to improve hand condition are warranted because skin damage can change microbial flora. Such efforts should include assessment or monitoring of hand care practices, formal institutional policy adoption and control of use of skin protectant products or lotions, and prudent use of latex gloves or more widespread use of powder-free and nonlatex products.


Asunto(s)
Bacterias/aislamiento & purificación , Dermatosis de la Mano/microbiología , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital , Piel/microbiología , Adulto , Bacterias/crecimiento & desarrollo , Recuento de Colonia Microbiana , Dermatitis Profesional/microbiología , Femenino , Desinfección de las Manos , Humanos , Registros Médicos , Mid-Atlantic Region , Persona de Mediana Edad
18.
J Hosp Infect ; 54(4): 310-5, 2003 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12919763

RESUMEN

This prevalence study was conducted to compare the counts, types and antimicrobial resistance profiles of bacterial flora on the hands of individuals in the community to that of nurses at a nearby university teaching hospital, with an intense hand hygiene regimen. Hand cultures were obtained from 204 individuals during a home visit and 119 nurses in two neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). The mean total log counts of organisms were 5.73 and 5.24 for the homemakers [defined as the person (usually the mother) who is the primary person responsible for arranging childcare, cooking, cleaning etc] and nurse hands, respectively (P<0.0001). Significantly more homemakers had Acinetobacter lwoffii, Enterobacter cloacae, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, P. fluorescens/putida, and Staphylococcus aureus on their hands compared with the nurses (all P<0.05). However, significantly more nurses had Enterococcus faecalis, S. epidermidis, and S. warneri on their hands (P<0.05). Of note, the hands of nurses harboured significantly more S. epidermidis strains resistant to amoxicillin/clavulanate, cefazolin, clindamycin, erythromycin, and oxacillin and S. warneri resistant to amoxicillin/clavulanate, cefazolin, clindamycin, and oxacillin (P<0.05). Surprisingly, significantly more trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole-resistant S. epidermidis and ciprofloxacin-resistant S. warneri was recovered from the hands of homemakers (P<0.05). This study demonstrates differences in prevalence, bacterial composition and antimicrobial resistance of hand flora of hospital personnel compared with homemakers. Moreover, the hands of homemakers may serve as community reservoirs for antimicrobial resistant strains of clinical importance.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Bacterianas/microbiología , Portador Sano/microbiología , Mano/microbiología , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal , Madres , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital , Adulto , Infecciones Bacterianas/epidemiología , Infecciones Bacterianas/prevención & control , Portador Sano/epidemiología , Portador Sano/prevención & control , Recuento de Colonia Microbiana , Reservorios de Enfermedades/estadística & datos numéricos , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/microbiología , Femenino , Desinfección de las Manos , Hospitales Universitarios , Humanos , Infecciones por Klebsiella/microbiología , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Madres/estadística & datos numéricos , Ciudad de Nueva York/epidemiología , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Vigilancia de la Población , Prevalencia , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/microbiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología
19.
Heart Lung ; 22(5): 459-62, 1993.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8226011

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine the extent to which two types of infusion devices, the heparin lock and a needleless valve device, allowed the persistence of inoculated microorganisms. DESIGN: Experiment. SETTING: Clinical microbiology laboratory. OUTCOME MEASURES: Bacterial counts in infusion devices. INTERVENTION: Five of each type of device were inoculated with approximately 10(5) colony-forming units of a strain of Staphylococcus epidermidis and Enterobacter aerogenes and tested for growth at seven time intervals, from 10 minutes to 72 hours after inoculation. RESULTS: Both strains of bacteria were present in each device at every time interval tested, including 72 hours after inoculation. CONCLUSIONS: Bacteria introduced into a heparin lock or valve device may be isolated for prolonged periods of time. This suggests that if such devices are contaminated during use, they may be a potential source of infection. The risk of infection should be one major consideration in risk and benefit deliberations when choosing new products.


Asunto(s)
Catéteres de Permanencia , Heparina/administración & dosificación , Bombas de Infusión , Klebsiella pneumoniae/crecimiento & desarrollo , Piel/microbiología , Staphylococcus epidermidis/crecimiento & desarrollo , Recuento de Colonia Microbiana , Contaminación de Equipos , Humanos , Agujas , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo
20.
Heart Lung ; 29(4): 298-305, 2000.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10900068

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Changes in skin flora have been reported among hospitalized and critically ill patients, but little is known about whether these changes are associated with hospitalization or with chronic, serious illness. The purpose of this survey was to compare skin flora of chronically ill outpatients and inpatients. METHODS: Aerobic skin flora of forearm and midsternum of 250 patients in an intensive care unit and 251 outpatients was sampled by contact plates. RESULTS: Mean colony-forming units were 160.6, forearm; 229. 4, sternum (P <.000). In logistic regression analysis, patients in the medical intensive care unit were significantly more likely to have high counts on the arm (odds ratio, 2.48; 95% confidence interval: 1.34-4.43; P =.004), and blacks were significantly more likely to have higher counts on the sternum when compared with other ethnic groups (odds ratio, 1.92; confidence interval: 1.18-3.11; P =. 009). No differences were noted between inpatients or outpatients in prevalence of methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus, but inpatients were more likely to carry methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (arm, P =.007; sternum, P =.02). Outpatients had a higher prevalence of micrococci and gram-negative bacteria at both skin sites (all P <.01) and yeast at the sternal site (P =.007). CONCLUSIONS: This comparison provides data to differentiate between effects of hospitalization and effects of chronic illness on skin flora.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Crónica , Piel/microbiología , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Meticilina/uso terapéutico , Resistencia a la Meticilina , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Staphylococcus aureus/aislamiento & purificación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA