RESUMEN
Current guidelines recommend against systematic screening or treating asymptomatic bacteriuria (AB) among kidney transplant (KT) recipients, although the evidence regarding episodes occurring early after transplantation or in the presence of anatomical abnormalities is inconclusive. Oral fosfomycin may constitute a good option for the treatment of post-transplant AB, particularly due to the emergence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) uropathogens. Available clinical evidence supporting its use in this specific setting, however, remains scarce. We performed a retrospective study in 14 Spanish institutions from January 2005 to December 2017. Overall, 137 episodes of AB diagnosed in 133 KT recipients treated with oral fosfomycin (calcium and trometamol salts) with a test-of-cure urine culture within the first 30 days were included. Median time from transplantation to diagnosis was 3.1 months (interquartile range [IQR]: 1.1 - 10.5). Most episodes (96.4% [132/137]) were caused by gram-negative bacteria (GNB), and 56.9% (78/137) were categorized as MDR (extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales [20.4%] and carbapenem-resistant GNB [2.9%]). Rate of microbiological failure at month 1 was 40.1% (95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 31.9 - 48.9) for the whole cohort and 42.3% (95%CI: 31.2 - 54.0) for episodes due to MDR pathogens. Previous urinary tract infection (odds ratio [OR]: 2.42; 95%CI: 1.11 - 5.29; P-value = 0.027) and use of fosfomycin as salvage therapy (OR: 8.31; 95%CI: 1.67 - 41.35; P-value = 0.010) were predictors of microbiological failure. No severe treatment-related adverse event were detected. Oral fosfomycin appears to be a suitable and safe alternative for the treatment (if indicated) of AB after KT, including those episodes due to MDR uropathogens.
RESUMEN
Multicenter, prospective, observational study to compare the relative bioavailability of once-daily tacrolimus formulations in de novo kidney transplant recipients. De novo kidney transplant recipients who started a tacrolimus-based regimen were included 14 days post-transplant and followed up for 6 months. Data from 218 participants were evaluated: 129 in the LCPT group (Envarsus) and 89 in the PR-Tac (Advagraf) group. Patients in the LCPT group exhibited higher relative bioavailability (Cmin /total daily dose [TDD]) vs. PR-Tac (61% increase; P < .001) with similar Cmin and 30% lower TDD levels (P < .0001). The incidence of treatment failure was 3.9% in the LCPT group and 9.0% in the PR-Tac group (P = .117). Study discontinuation rates were 6.2% in the LCPT group and 12.4% in the PR-Tac group (P = .113). Adverse events, renal function and other complications were comparable between groups. The median accumulated dose of tacrolimus in the LCPT group from day 14 to month 6 was 889 mg. Compared to PR-Tac, LCPT showed higher relative bioavailability, similar effectiveness at preventing allograft rejection, comparable effect on renal function, safety, adherence, treatment failure and premature discontinuation rates.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón , Tacrolimus , Disponibilidad Biológica , Esquema de Medicación , Rechazo de Injerto/tratamiento farmacológico , Rechazo de Injerto/etiología , Rechazo de Injerto/prevención & control , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Estudios Prospectivos , Tacrolimus/uso terapéutico , Receptores de TrasplantesRESUMEN
The number of kidney transplant (KT) procedures with controlled donation after circulatory death (cDCD) donors has exponentially increased in Spain in recent years, with a parallel increase in donor and recipient acceptance criteria. The outcomes of cDCD-KT have been reported to be comparable to those of KT with donation after brain death (DBD) donors. However, studies in elderly recipients have yielded contradictory results. We performed a registry analysis of 852 KT recipients aged ≥65 years (575 in the DBD-KT group, 277 in the cDCD-KT group) in Catalonia, Spain. Clinical outcomes and survival were compared between DBD-KT and cDCD-KT recipients. The donor and recipient ages were similar between the two groups (71.5 ± 8.7 years for donors, 70.8 ± 4.1 years for recipients). Delayed graft function (DGF) was more frequent among cDCD-KT recipients, without a difference in the rate of primary nonfunction. The 3-year patient and death-censored graft survival rates were similar between DBD-KT and cDCD-KT recipients (78.8% vs. 76.4% and 90.3% vs. 86.6%, respectively). In multivariable analysis, previous cardiovascular disease and DGF were independent risk factors for patient death. The type of donation (cDCD vs. DBD) was not an independent risk factor for patient survival or graft loss. cDCD-KT and DBD-KT provide comparable patient and graft survival in elderly recipients.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos , Anciano , Muerte Encefálica , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Muerte , Supervivencia de Injerto , Humanos , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Donantes de TejidosRESUMEN
Oral fosfomycin may constitute an alternative for the treatment of lower urinary tract infections (UTIs) in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), particularly in view of recent safety concerns with fluroquinolones. Specific data on the efficacy and safety of fosfomycin in KTR are scarce. We performed a retrospective study in 14 Spanish hospitals including KTRs treated with oral fosfomycin (calcium and trometamol salts) for posttransplant cystitis between January 2005 and December 2017. A total of 133 KTRs developed 143 episodes of cystitis. Most episodes (131 [91.6%]) were produced by gram-negative bacilli (GNB), and 78 (54.5%) were categorized as multidrug resistant (including extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae [14%] or carbapenem-resistant GNB [3.5%]). A median daily dose of 1.5 g of fosfomycin (interquartile range [IQR]: 1.5-2) was administered for a median of 7 days (IQR: 3-10). Clinical cure (remission of UTI-attributable symptoms at the end of therapy) was achieved in 83.9% (120/143) episodes. Among those episodes with follow-up urine culture, microbiological cure at month 1 was achieved in 70.2% (59/84) episodes. Percutaneous nephrostomy was associated with a lower probability of clinical cure (adjusted odds ratio: 10.50; 95% confidence interval: 0.98-112.29; P = 0.052). In conclusion, fosfomycin is an effective orally available alternative for treating cystitis among KTRs.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Fosfomicina/administración & dosificación , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/tratamiento farmacológico , Trasplante de Riñón , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Urinarias/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración Oral , Adulto , Anciano , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Fosfomicina/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/etiología , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/etiología , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , España , Resultado del Tratamiento , Infecciones Urinarias/etiologíaRESUMEN
Tacrolimus is the cornerstone of immunosuppressive therapy after kidney transplantation. Its narrow therapeutic window mandates serum level strict monitoring and dose adjustments to ensure the optimal risk-benefit balance. This observational retrospective study analyzed the effectiveness and safety of conversion from twice-daily immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-Tac) or once-daily prolonged-release tacrolimus (PR-Tac) to the recent formulation once-daily MeltDose® extended-release tacrolimus (LCP-Tac) in 365 stable kidney transplant recipients. We compared kidney function three months before and three months after the conversion. Three months after conversion, the total daily dose was reduced ~35% (P < .0001), and improved bioavailability and stable serum LCP-Tac concentrations were observed. There was no increase in the number of patients requiring tacrolimus dose adjustments after conversion. Renal function was unaltered, and no cases of BPAR were reported. Reports of tremors, as collected in the clinical histories for each patient, decreased from pre-conversion (20.8%) to post-conversion (11.8%, P < .0001). LCP-Tac generated a cost reduction of 63% compared with PR-Tac. In conclusion, the conversion strategy to LCP-Tac from other tacrolimus formulations in stable kidney transplant patients showed safety and effectiveness in a real-world setting, confirming the data from RCTs. The specific pharmacokinetic properties of LCP-Tac could be potentially advantageous in patients with tacrolimus-related adverse events.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón , Tacrolimus , Preparaciones de Acción Retardada , Esquema de Medicación , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Use of immunosuppressive drugs is still unavoidable in kidney-transplanted patients. Since their discovery, calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) have been considered the first-line immunosuppressive agents, in spite of their known nephrotoxicity. Chronic CNI toxicity (CNIT) may lead to kidney fibrosis, a threatening scenario for graft survival. However, there is still controversy regarding CNIT diagnosis, monitoring and therapeutic management, and their specific effects at the molecular level are not fully known. Aiming to better characterize CNIT patients, in the present study, we collected urine from kidney-transplanted patients treated with CNI who (i) had a normal kidney function, (ii) suffered CNIT, or (iii) presented interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IFTA). Urinary extracellular vesicles (uEV) were enriched and the proteome was analyzed to get insight into changes happening during CNI. Members of the uroplakin and plakin families were significantly upregulated in the CNIT group, suggesting an important role in CNIT processes. Although biomarkers cannot be asserted from this single pilot study, our results evidence the potential of uEV as a source of non-invasive protein biomarkers for a better detection and monitoring of this renal alteration in kidney-transplanted patients.
Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de la Calcineurina/farmacología , Vesículas Extracelulares/metabolismo , Enfermedades Renales/prevención & control , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Proteoma/metabolismo , Adulto , Anciano , Biomarcadores/orina , Inhibidores de la Calcineurina/uso terapéutico , Ciclosporina/farmacología , Ciclosporina/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Fibrosis , Supervivencia de Injerto , Humanos , Riñón/efectos de los fármacos , Riñón/metabolismo , Riñón/patología , Enfermedades Renales/etiología , Trasplante de Riñón/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Plaquinas/orina , Proteoma/genética , Tacrolimus/farmacología , Tacrolimus/uso terapéutico , Uroplaquinas/orinaRESUMEN
Recurrence of idiopathic focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is a serious complication after kidney transplantation. FSGS relapse is suspected by a sudden increase in proteinuria but there is not an accurate noninvasive diagnostic tool to confirm this entity or to detect patients at risk. We aimed to validate the diagnostic performance of ApoA-Ib to detect FSGS relapses by measuring urinary ApoA-Ib in a retrospective cohort of 61 kidney transplanted patients (37 FSGS and 24 non-FSGS). In addition, to assess the ApoA-Ib predictive ability, ApoA-Ib was measured periodically in a prospective cohort of 13 idiopathic FSGS patients who were followed during 1 year after transplantation. ApoA-Ib had a sensitivity of 93.3% and a specificity of 90.9% to diagnose FSGS relapses, with a high negative predictive value (95.2%), confirming our previous results. In the prospective cohort, ApoA-Ib predated the recurrence in four of five episodes observed. In the nonrelapsing group (n = 9), ApoA-Ib was negative in 37 of 38 samples. ApoA-Ib has the potential to be a good diagnostic biomarker of FSGS relapses, providing a confident criterion to exclude false positives even in the presence of high proteinuria. It has also the potential to detect patients at risk of relapse, even before transplantation.
Asunto(s)
Apolipoproteína A-I/orina , Glomeruloesclerosis Focal y Segmentaria/diagnóstico , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Adulto , Biomarcadores , Femenino , Glomeruloesclerosis Focal y Segmentaria/orina , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , RecurrenciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Kidney transplantation (KTx) is the best therapeutic approach for chronic kidney diseases leading to irreversible kidney failure. Considering the origin of the graft, several studies have reported differences between living (LD) and deceased donors (DD) in graft and patient survival. These differences seem to be related to multiple factors including, donor age and time of cold ischemia among others. Many of transplanted organs come from old-aged DDs, in which pre-transplant biopsy is recommended. However, kidney biopsy has several limitations, and there is a need to develop alternatives to assess the status of a kidney before transplantation. As the analysis of urinary extracellular vesicles (uEVs) rendered promising results as non-invasive biomarkers of kidney-related pathologies, this pilot study aimed to investigate whether profiling uEVs of LDs and DDs may be of help to assess the quality of the kidney before nephrectomy. METHODS: uEVs from 5 living donors and 7 deceased donors were isolated by size-exclusion chromatography, and their protein and miRNA content were analysed by liquid chromatography followed by mass spectrometry and next generation sequencing, respectively. Then, hierarchical clustering and venn diagrams were done with Perseus software and InteractiVenn tool. Specific EVs data bases were also used for Gene Ontology analysis. RESULTS: Next generation sequencing revealed that uEVs from DDs contained less miRNAs than LDs, but most of the DD-expressed miRNAs were shared with LDs (96%). Only miR-326 (targeting the apoptotic-related Bcl2) was found significantly over-represented in LD. Focusing on the protein content, we detected a low intra-group correlation in both types of donors. Despite these differences, hierarchical clustering of either miRNA or protein data could not identify a differential profile between LDs and DDs. Of note, 90% of transplanted patients had a functional graft after a year from KTx. CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study we found that, in normo-functional grafts, minor differences in uEVs profile could not discriminate between LDs and DDs.
Asunto(s)
Vesículas Extracelulares/genética , Vesículas Extracelulares/metabolismo , Perfilación de la Expresión Génica/métodos , Riñón/fisiología , Donadores Vivos , Anciano , Biomarcadores/orina , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , MicroARNs/genética , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos Piloto , Donantes de TejidosRESUMEN
UNLABELLED: The aim of this study was to analyze the relationship between pre-transplant adiponectin (pre-ADP), abnormalities in glucose homeostasis (AGH) at three months post-transplantation, and preclinical atherosclerosis in non-diabetic patients prior to kidney transplantation (KT). METHODS: We carried out a multicenter study in 157 non-diabetic KT patients (66.5% men; age: 50±13 yr). Pre-ADP levels were analyzed using radioimmunoassay. Carotid ultrasound was performed to determine carotid intima-media thickness (c-IMT). Oral glucose tolerance test was carried out to classify patients according ADA criteria. RESULTS: Of the patients, 52.8% had AGH. Median pre-ADP was 19.5 (14-27) µg/mL. An inverse correlation was found between ADP and HOMA index (r=-0.432; p<0.001). Median c-IMT was 0.6 (0.48-0.71) mm. Significant inverse correlation existed between ADP and c-IMT on both sides (p<0.05). Patients with c-IMT >0.6 mm had more AGH (p=0.012) and lower ADP levels (p=0.02). We performed a logistic regression analysis using preclinical atherosclerosis (c-IMT ≥0.6 mm) as dependent variable and sex, age, BMI, ADP, AGH, and HOMA index as independent variables of altered c-IMT. Age, pre-ADP, and AGH were independent risk factors for elevated c-IMT. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with AGH have a greater presence of preclinical atherosclerosis. ADP has an inverse relationship with AGH and is an independent marker of preclinical atherosclerosis.
Asunto(s)
Adiponectina/sangre , Aterosclerosis/diagnóstico , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Aterosclerosis/etiología , Biomarcadores/sangre , Glucemia/análisis , Arterias Carótidas/diagnóstico por imagen , Grosor Intima-Media Carotídeo , Femenino , Homeostasis , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ultrasonografía Doppler DúplexRESUMEN
This multicenter, open, phase IIIb study assessed short-term efficacy, safety and dose adjustments in adult stable renal transplant recipients converted from tacrolimus twice-daily (BID) to once-daily (QD). Patients receiving unchanged tacrolimus BID for ≥ 12 weeks were enrolled, and after 6-weeks, converted from tacrolimus BID to QD (morning dose) on a 1 : 1 (mg : mg) total daily dose basis, for a further 12 weeks. Primary endpoint: change in steady-state creatinine clearance between treatment phases. Secondary endpoints: biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), patient and graft survival, safety. 128 patients enrolled (mean age 48.9 years; time post-transplant 48.9 months); 91 evaluated for the primary endpoint. Mean total daily dose was 0.06 mg/kg (BID) and 0.07 mg/kg (QD); 79.1% required one/no dose changes post-conversion to maintain recommended blood-trough levels; average dose increase was small (0.6-0.7 mg/day) with more dose increases in patients on the lowest tacrolimus BID doses. Renal function remained stable and non-inferiority of tacrolimus QD against tacrolimus BID was demonstrated. There were no BPAR episodes; patient and graft survival were 100%. Adverse events were few; none led to dose modifications/discontinuation. Tacrolimus BID to tacrolimus QD conversion is straightforward and does not compromise renal function in stable kidney transplant patients in the short term.
Asunto(s)
Inmunosupresores/administración & dosificación , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Trasplante de Riñón/métodos , Riñón/fisiología , Tacrolimus/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Biopsia , Preparaciones de Acción Retardada , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Rechazo de Injerto , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Kidney transplant (KT) is the best technique for renal replacement treatment in terms of survival, costs, and quality of life. Several factors have been related to health-related quality of life (HRQOL) at different times after KT. The objectives of the study were to quantify the HRQOL in a prevalent cohort of KT patients and to describe the variables that influenced HRQOL. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study of a cohort of 64 KT patients, we measured HRQOL using the 36-item Short Form Health Survey. Variables measured included the following: physical functioning, role physical (RP), bodily pain (BP), general perception of health, vitality, social functioning (SF), role emotional (RE), and mental health. Demographic and analytical variables were collected. We describe the variables that influenced HRQOL. RESULTS: A large dispersion was observed in the RP, BP, SF, and RE categories. There were no differences in values between men and women who underwent KT. Diabetes, previous dialysis, deceased donor, age, kidney function, anemia, and malnutrition were associated with worse scores. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that HRQOL in KT patients is very heterogeneous and highly polarized. The factors that influence HRQOL are multiple and need to be addressed globally. Further studies are needed to understand the factors that influence HRQOL in the long term.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón , Calidad de Vida , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Masculino , Diálisis Renal , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The number of kidney transplant (KT) recipients has increased in recent years, saturating kidney transplant visits at transplant centers (TCs). Furthermore, some patients live far from TCs, which adds displacement costs to their expenses. To solve these problems, joint follow-up of KT recipients has been initiated at TCs and referral hospitals. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study in a cohort of 64 KT recipients during joint follow-up in TCs and the Hospital Arnau de Villanova (HAV) using a survey that evaluated the displacement costs as well as the advantages and disadvantages of each. RESULTS: Distance (320 km [IQR, 300-340 km] vs 15 km [IQR, 4-60 km]; P < .001), time (240 minutes [IQR, 210-240 minutes] vs 40 minutes [IQR, 30-68 minutes]; P < .001), total economic cost per visit (60 [IQR, 50-90] vs 10 [IQR, 2-15]; P < .001), and annual CO2 emission (32.3 kg vs 1.4 kg; P < .05) were greater when patients traveled to TCs. Nephrologists at both TCs and HAV were rated positively by patients, while the displacement costs associated with travel to the TCs and the smaller size of the HAV were seen as negative aspects. Overall, 93.75% of the KT recipients preferred joint follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that joint follow-up between TCs and referral hospitals is an economic and ecological solution for follow-up in KT recipients living far away and visiting their referral hospital, which is the preferred choice for most patients.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón , Estudios Transversales , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Receptores de TrasplantesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Remdesivir is the only antiviral treatment that has been shown to be useful against SARS-CoV-2 infection. It shorts hospitalization time compared to placebo. Its effects in Kidney transplant (KT) patients are limited to some published cases. METHODS: We performed a retrospective observational study that included all KT patients admitted between August 01, 2020 and December 31, 2020 with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia who received remdesivir. The objective of this study was to describe the experience of a cohort of KT patients treated with remdesivir. DISCUSSION: A total of 37 KT patients developed SARS-CoV-2 infection, 7 of them received treatment with remdesivir. The rest of the patients did not receive the drug due to either CKD-EPI less than 30 mL/min or they did not present clinical criteria. In addition to remdesivir, all pacients received dexamethasone and anticoagulation therapy. 4 were men, the median age was 59 (53-71) years. Median time from transplantation was 43 (16-82) months. Chest X-rays of all patients showed pulmonary infiltrates and required low oxygen flow therapy upon admission, requiring high flow nasal therapy in 3 cases. Only 2 cases presented deterioration of the graft function, not requiring hemodialysis in any case, and all recovered renal function at hospital discharge. 2 patients rise up 1.5 times the liver function test. No patient died or required admission to the critical care unit. Median days of admission was 12 (9-27) days. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that the use of remdesivir could be useful in KT patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia without side effects. Additional studies are necessary with a larger number of patients to improve the knowledge of this drug in SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Asunto(s)
Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , Trasplante de Riñón , Adenosina Monofosfato/análogos & derivados , Alanina/análogos & derivados , Anticoagulantes , Antivirales/efectos adversos , Dexametasona , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oxígeno , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
Background: Remdesivir is the only antiviral treatment that has been shown to be useful against SARS-CoV-2 infection. It shorts hospitalization time compared to placebo. Its effects in kidney transplant (KT) patients are limited to some published cases. Methods: We performed a retrospective observational study that included all KT patients admitted between August 1st, 2020 and December 31st, 2020 with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia who received remdesivir.The objective of this study was to describe the experience of a cohort of KT patients treated with remdesivir. Discussion: A total of 37 KT patients developed SARS-CoV-2 infection, 7 of them received treatment with remdesivir. The rest of the patients did not receive the drug due to either CKD-EPI less than 30 mL/min or they did not present clinical criteria. In addition to remdesivir, all patients received dexamethasone and anticoagulation therapy. 4 were men, the median age was 59 (53-71) years. Median time from transplantation was 43 (16-82) months. Chest X-rays of all patients showed pulmonary infiltrates and required low-oxygen flow therapy upon admission, requiring high-flow nasal therapy in 3 cases. Only 2 cases presented deterioration of the graft function, not requiring hemodialysis in any case, and all recovered renal function at hospital discharge. 2 patients rise up 1.5 times the liver function test. No patient died or required admission to the critical care unit. Median days of admission was 12 (9-27) days. Conclusions: Our study suggests that the use of remdesivir could be useful in KT patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia without side effects. Additional studies are necessary with a larger number of patients to improve the knowledge of this drug in SARS-CoV-2 infection.
RESUMEN
Living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) is the best treatment option for end stage renal disease in terms of both patient and graft survival. However, figures on LDKT in Spain that had been continuously growing from 2005 to 2014, have experienced a continuous decrease in the last five years. One possible explanation for this decrease is that the significant increase in the number of deceased donors in Spain during the last years, both brain death and controlled circulatory death donors, might have generated the false idea that we have coped with the transplant needs. Moreover, a greater number of deceased donor kidney transplants have caused a heavy workload for the transplant teams. Furthermore, the transplant teams could have moved on to a more conservative approach to the information and assessment of patients and families considering the potential long-term risks for donors in recent papers. However, there is a significant variability in the LDKT rate among transplant centers and regions in Spain independent of their deceased donor rates. This fact and the fact that LDKT is usually a preemptive option for patients with advanced chronic renal failure, as time on dialysis is a negative independent factor for transplant outcomes, lead us to conclude that the decrease in LDKT depends on other factors. Thus, in the kidney transplant annual meeting held at ONT site in 2018, a working group was created to identify other causes for the decrease of LDKT in Spain and its relationship with the different steps of the process. The group was formed by transplant teams, a representative of the transplant group of the Spanish Society of Nephrology (SENTRA), a representative of the Spanish Society of Transplants (SET) and representatives of the Spanish National Transplant Organization (ONT). A self-evaluation survey that contains requests about the phases of the LDKT processes (information, donor work out, informed consent, surgeries, follow-up and human resources) were developed and sent to 33 LDKT teams. All the centers answered the questionnaire. The analysis of the answers has resulted in the creation of a national analysis of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats (SWOT) of the LDKT program in Spain and the development of recommendations targeted to improve every step of the donation process. The work performed, the conclusions and recommendations provided, have been reflected in the following report: Spanish living donor kidney transplant program assessment: recommendations for optimization. This document has also been reviewed by a panel of experts, representatives of the scientific societies (Spanish Society of Urology (AEU), Spanish Society of Nephrology Nursery (SEDEN), Spanish Society of Immunology (SEI/GETH)) and the patient association ALCER. Finally, the report has been submitted to public consultation, reaching ample consensus. In addition, the transplant competent authorities of the different regions in Spainhave adopted the report at institutional level. The work done and the recommendations to optimize LDKT are summarized in the present manuscript, organized by the different phases of the donation process.
Asunto(s)
Fallo Renal Crónico , Trasplante de Riñón , Supervivencia de Injerto , Humanos , Riñón , Fallo Renal Crónico/cirugía , Donadores VivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Statins are prescribed in kidney transplant recipients in order to manage dyslipidemia, a common complication in these patients. The efficacy of statins in reducing cholesterol levels has been accompanied by pleiotropic effects. Fifty-four kidney transplant patients were included in the present study, the objective of which was to ascertain the effect of 12 weeks of atorvastatin therapy (10 mg/day) on the patients' lipid profile, renal function, markers of inflammation and plasma peptide profile. METHODS: Biochemical variables were determined with a routine clinical laboratory analyzer, and the proteomic approach was based on magnetic particle-assisted sample processing coupled to mass spectrometry readout. RESULTS: Atorvastatin therapy improved the lipid profile of patients and caused significant changes in their plasma peptide profile; peptides with m/z 1063 and 1898 decreased after treatment and were identified as fragments derived from molecules involved in vascular inflammation, i.e. high-molecular-weight kininogen and complement factor C4, respectively. CONCLUSION: These findings may contribute to the growing body of evidence of the anti-inflammatory actions attributed to statins, by which these drugs could improve these patients' clinical status.
Asunto(s)
Anticolesterolemiantes/uso terapéutico , Ácidos Heptanoicos/uso terapéutico , Hipercolesterolemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Trasplante de Riñón , Fragmentos de Péptidos/sangre , Proteómica/métodos , Pirroles/uso terapéutico , Anticolesterolemiantes/administración & dosificación , Anticolesterolemiantes/farmacología , Atorvastatina , Proteína C-Reactiva/análisis , Femenino , Ácidos Heptanoicos/administración & dosificación , Ácidos Heptanoicos/farmacología , Humanos , Hipercolesterolemia/sangre , Hipercolesterolemia/etiología , Técnicas para Inmunoenzimas , Pruebas de Función Renal , Lípidos/sangre , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Peso Molecular , Estudios Prospectivos , Pirroles/administración & dosificación , Pirroles/farmacología , Espectrometría de Masa por Láser de Matriz Asistida de Ionización Desorción , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/sangreRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is based on the patient's clinical status and levels of inflammatory biomarkers. The comparative activity of these biomarkers in kidney transplant (KT) patients with COVID-19 pneumonia from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and non-SARS-CoV-2 etiologies is unknown. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical presentation and inflammatory parameters at admission of KT patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and those with non-COVID-19 pneumonia over the same period. METHODS: Biomarkers were measured and compared between KT patients with COVID-19 pneumonia (n = 57) and non-COVID-19 pneumonia (n = 20) from March 2020 to March 2021. RESULTS: Both groups showed comparable demographics. The KT patients with COVID-19 had fewer neutrophils (6824 ± 5000 vs 8969 ± 4206; P = .09) than the non-COVID group, although there was no significant difference in the lymphocyte count. Non-COVID-19 pneumonia was associated with higher d-dimer (median, 921 [interquartile range (IQR), 495-1680] vs median, 2215 [IQR, 879-3934]; P = 0.09) and interleukin-6 (median, 35 [IQR, 20-128] vs median, 222 [IQR, 38-500]; P = 0.006) levels. The ferritin level was higher in the COVID-19 group (median, 809 [IQR, 442-1,330] vs median, 377 [IQR, 276-885]; P = 0.008). In multivariable analysis, only d-dimer (hazard ratio [HR], 1; 95% confidence interval [CI],1-1.002; P = .02) and ferritin (HR, 1; 95% CI, 0.9-0.9; P = .02) increase the statistic signification. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 pneumonia in KT patients shows a different presentation of inflammatory biomarkers than other non-COVID pneumonias. It could be useful to identify KT patients with COVID-19. More detailed studies are necessary to understand the presentation of biomarkers in KT with COVID-19.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Trasplante de Riñón , Neumonía/diagnóstico , Anciano , Biomarcadores , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
The spleen is a secondary lymphoid organ with multiple functions including the removal of senescent red blood cells and the coordination of immune responses against blood-borne pathogens, such as malaria parasites. Despite the major role of the spleen, the study of its function in humans is limited by ethical implications to access human tissues. Here, we employed multiparameter flow cytometry combined with cell purification techniques to determine human spleen cell populations from transplantation donors. Spleen immuno-phenotyping showed that CD45+ cells included B (30%), CD4+ T (16%), CD8+ T (10%), NK (6%) and NKT (2%) lymphocytes. Myeloid cells comprised neutrophils (16%), monocytes (2%) and DCs (0.3%). Erythrocytes represented 70%, reticulocytes 0.7% and hematopoietic stem cells 0.02%. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are membrane-bound nanoparticles involved in intercellular communication and secreted by almost all cell types. EVs play several roles in malaria that range from modulation of immune responses to vascular alterations. To investigate interactions of plasma-derived EVs from Plasmodium vivax infected patients (PvEVs) with human spleen cells, we used size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) to separate EVs from the bulk of soluble plasma proteins and stained isolated EVs with fluorescent lipophilic dyes. The integrated cellular analysis of the human spleen and the methodology employed here allowed in vitro interaction studies of human spleen cells and EVs that showed an increased proportion of T cells (CD4+ 3 fold and CD8+ 4 fold), monocytes (1.51 fold), B cells (2.3 fold) and erythrocytes (3 fold) interacting with PvEVs as compared to plasma-derived EVs from healthy volunteers (hEVs). Future functional studies of these interactions can contribute to unveil pathophysiological processes involving the spleen in vivax malaria.
Asunto(s)
Vesículas Extracelulares , Malaria Vivax , Citometría de Flujo , Humanos , Plasmodium vivax , BazoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In kidney transplantation, fibrosis represents the final and irreversible consequence of the pathogenic mechanisms that lead to graft failure, and in the late stages it irremediably precedes the loss of renal function. The invasiveness of kidney biopsy prevents this condition from being frequently monitored, while clinical data are rather unspecific. The objective of this study was to find noninvasive biomarkers of kidney rejection. METHODS: We carried out proteomic analysis of the urinary Extracellular Vesicles (uEVs) from a cohort of kidney transplant recipients (n = 23) classified according to their biopsy-based diagnosis and clinical parameters as interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IFTA), acute cellular rejection (ACR), calcineurin inhibitors toxicity (CNIT) and normal kidney function (NKF). RESULTS: Shotgun mass spectrometry of uEV-proteins identified differential expression of several proteins among these different groups. Up to 23 of these proteins were re-evaluated using targeted proteomics in a new independent cohort of patients (n = 41) classified in the same diagnostic groups. Among other results, we found a differential expression of vitronectin (VTN) in patients displaying chronic interstitial and tubular lesions (ci and ct mean > 2 according to Banff criteria). These results were further confirmed by a pilot study using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). CONCLUSION: Urinary vitronectin levels are a potential stand-alone biomarker to monitor fibrotic changes in kidney transplant recipients in a non-invasive fashion.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón , Riñón/patología , Vitronectina , Atrofia/patología , Biomarcadores/orina , Biopsia , Femenino , Fibrosis , Rechazo de Injerto/patología , Rechazo de Injerto/orina , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos Piloto , Proteómica , Vitronectina/orinaRESUMEN
Living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) is the best treatment option for end stage renal disease in terms of both patient and graft survival. However, figures on LDKT in Spain that had been continuously growing from 2005 to 2014, have experienced a continuous decrease in the last five years. One possible explanation for this decrease is that the significant increase in the number of deceased donors in Spain during the last years, both brain death and controlled circulatory death donors, might have generated the false idea that we have coped with the transplant needs. Moreover, a greater number of deceased donor kidney transplants have caused a heavy workload for the transplant teams. Furthermore, the transplant teams could have moved on to a more conservative approach to the information and assessment of patients and families considering the potential long-term risks for donors in recent papers. However, there is a significant variability in the LDKT rate among transplant centers and regions in Spain independent of their deceased donor rates. This fact and the fact that LDKT is usually a preemptive option for patients with advanced chronic renal failure, as time on dialysis is a negative independent factor for transplant outcomes, lead us to conclude that the decrease in LDKT depends on other factors. Thus, in the kidney transplant annual meeting held at ONT site in 2018, a working group was created to identify other causes for the decrease of LDKT in Spain and its relationship with the different steps of the process. The group was formed by transplant teams, a representative of the transplant group of the Spanish Society of Nephrology (SENTRA), a representative of the Spanish Society of Transplants (SET) and representatives of the Spanish National Transplant Organization (ONT). A self-evaluation survey that contains requests about the phases of the LDKT processes (information, donor work out, informed consent, surgeries, follow-up and human resources) were developed and sent to 33 LDKT teams. All the centers answered the questionnaire. The analysis of the answers has resulted in the creation of a national analysis of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats (SWOT) of the LDKT program in Spain and the development of recommendations targeted to improve every step of the donation process. The work performed, the conclusions and recommendations provided, have been reflected in the following report: Spanish living donor kidney transplant program assessment: recommendations for optimization. This document has also been reviewed by a panel of experts, representatives of the scientific societies (Spanish Society of Urology (AEU), Spanish Society of Nephrology Nursery (SEDEN), Spanish Society of Immunology (SEI/GETH)) and the patient association ALCER. Finally, the report has been submitted to public consultation, reaching ample consensus. In addition, the transplant competent authorities of the different regions in Spain have adopted the report at institutional level. The work done and the recommendations to optimize LDKT are summarized in the present manuscript, organized by the different phases of the donation process.