RESUMEN
In this study, we evaluated the implementation of a second-tier genetic screening test using an amplicon-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel in our laboratory during the period of 1 September 2021 to 31 August 2022 for the newborn screening (NBS) of six conditions for inborn errors of metabolism: citrullinemia type II (MIM #605814), systemic primary carnitine deficiency (MIM #212140), glutaric acidemia type I (MIM #231670), beta-ketothiolase deficiency (#203750), holocarboxylase synthetase deficiency (MIM #253270) and 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA lyase deficiency (MIM # 246450). The custom-designed NGS panel can detect sequence variants in the relevant genes and also specifically screen for the presence of the hotspot variant IVS16ins3kb of SLC25A13 by the copy number variant calling algorithm. Genetic second-tier tests were performed for 1.8% of a total of 22,883 NBS samples. The false positive rate for these six conditions after the NGS second-tier test was only 0.017%, and two cases of citrullinemia type II would have been missed as false negatives if only biochemical first-tier testing was performed. The confirmed true positive cases were citrullinemia type II (n = 2) and systemic primary carnitine deficiency (n = 1). The false positives were later confirmed to be carrier of citrullinemia type II (n = 2), carrier of glutaric acidemia type I (n = 1) and carrier of systemic primary carnitine deficiency (n = 1). There were no false negatives reported. The incorporation of a second-tier genetic screening test by NGS greatly enhanced our program's performance with 5-working days turn-around time maintained as before. In addition, early genetic information is available at the time of recall to facilitate better clinical management and genetic counseling.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patient registries are crucial for rare disease management. However, manual registry construction is labor-intensive and often not user-friendly. Our goal is to establish Hong Kong's first computer-assisted patient identification tool for rare diseases, starting with inborn errors of metabolism (IEM). METHODS: Patient data from 2010 to 2019 was retrieved from electronic databases. Through big data analytics, patient data were filtered based on specific IEM-related biochemical and genetic tests. Clinical notes were analyzed using a rule-based natural language processing technique called regular expression. The algorithm classified each extracted paragraph as "IEM-related" or "not IEM-related." Pathologists reviewed the paragraphs for curation, and the algorithm's performance was evaluated. RESULTS: Out of 46,419 patients with IEM-related tests, the algorithm identified 100 as "IEM-related." After pathologists' validation, 96 cases were confirmed as true IEM, with 1 uncertain case and 3 false positives. A secondary ascertainment yielded a sensitivity of 92.3% compared to our previously published IEM cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Our artificial intelligence approach provides a novel method to identify IEM patients, facilitating the creation of a centralized, computer-assisted rare disease patient registry at the local and national levels. This data can potentially be accessed by multiple stakeholders for collaborative research and to enhance healthcare management for rare diseases.