Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Am J Emerg Med ; 34(8): 1556-60, 2016 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27292601

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although surgical intervention is the favorable treatment modality for perforated peptic ulcer, nonsurgical treatment is another option. The aim of this study is to analyze the results of conservative treatment for perforated peptic ulcer. METHODS: Between 2003 and 2014, 403 patients were admitted to our hospital for perforated peptic ulcer, and 383 patients underwent surgery, whereas 20 were allocated to conservative treatment. The results of nonsurgical intervention in these patients were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: The overall mortality rate of conservative treatment was 40%. Eleven patients remained hospitalized less than 2 weeks; among them, patients with a high (≥IV) American Society of Anesthesiologists class at admission had higher mortality than those with a low (

Asunto(s)
Tratamiento Conservador/métodos , Úlcera Duodenal/complicaciones , Úlcera Péptica Perforada/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Úlcera Duodenal/diagnóstico , Úlcera Duodenal/terapia , Endoscopía Gastrointestinal , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/tendencias , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Úlcera Péptica Perforada/diagnóstico , Úlcera Péptica Perforada/etiología , Radiografía Abdominal , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA