Pre-screening of patient-reported symptoms using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System in outpatient palliative cancer care.

OBJECTIVES: Although early palliative care is associated with a better quality of life and improved outcomes in end-of-life cancer care, the criteria of palliative care referral are still elusive. METHODS: We collected patient-reported symptoms using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) at the baseline, first and second follow-up visits. A total of 71 patients were evaluable, with a median age of 65 years, male (62%) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status distribution of 1/2/3 (28%/39%/33%) respectively. RESULTS: Twenty (28%) patients had moderate/severe symptom burden with the mean ESAS ≥ 5. Interestingly, most of the patients with moderate/severe symptom burdens (ESAS ≥ 5) had globally elevated symptom expression. While the mean ESAS score was maintained in patients with mild symptom burden (ESAS < 5; 2.7 at the baseline; 3.4 at the first follow-up; 3.0 at the second follow-up; p = .117), there was significant symptom improvement in patients with moderate/severe symptom burden (ESAS ≥ 5; 6.5 at the baseline; 4.5 at the first follow-up; 3.6 at the second follow-up; p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, advanced cancer patients with ESAS ≥ 5 may benefit from outpatient palliative cancer care. Pre-screening of patient-reported symptoms using ESAS can be useful for identifying unmet palliative care needs in advanced cancer patients.

Hyperprogressive disease during PD-1 blockade in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Investigations for programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) blockade-induced hyperprogressive disease (HPD) have not been stringently conducted in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC). We explored the occurrence of HPD and its clinical implications in patients with AGC and treated with PD-1 inhibitors. METHODS: We enrolled 169 patients with AGC and treated with either the PD-1 blockade (nivolumab or pembrolizumab; N = 112) or irinotecan monotherapy (N = 57) as a single agent. Tumour growth dynamics based on tumour growth kinetics and tumour growth rate (TGR) and time to treatment failure were analysed to define HPD. The incidence, clinical consequences and predictive markers of HPD were investigated. RESULTS: The optimal criteria for HPD were 4-fold increases in both tumour growth kinetics and TGR ratios and a 40% increase in TGR based on the analysis for patients treated with irinotecan. In total, 10.7% (12/112) of patients experienced HPD after PD-1 inhibitor treatment. Patients with HPD had both shorter progression-free survival (hazard ratio: 2.318; 95% confidence interval: 1.205-4.460) and overall survival (hazard ratio: 2.542; 95% confidence interval: 1.314-4.918) than patients with progressive disease without HPD, losing opportunities for subsequent systemic treatments. Although other variables including PD-L1 expression were not associated with the occurrence of HPD, hypoalbuminemia (<3.25 mg/dL) at baseline was significantly associated with the occurrence of HPD (P < 0.001) and inferior survival outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: HPD occurs in a proportion of patients with AGC and treated with PD-1 inhibitors. PD-1 inhibitor-induced HPD is associated with worse outcome, loss of eligibility for subsequent treatment and hypoalbuminemia, warranting further investigation.