RESUMEN
Leukopenia and immunity impairment usually occur during cancer therapy. Citronellol, an oil soluble compound derived from the geranium, has anticancer and antiinflammatory properties, as well as promoting wound healing. Ganoderma lucidum, Codonopsis pilosula and Angelicae sinensis are traditional Chinese herbs, all of which have proven immunomodulatory functions in laboratory-based research. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study examined whether the Chinese medicinal herb complex (CCMH; a mixture of citronellol and extracts of G. lucidum, C. pilosula and A. sinensis) improves the immune cell counts of cancer patients receiving chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. A total of 105 cancer patients receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy were enrolled. The quantities of immune cells in the blood of the subjects were determined before and after 6 weeks of cancer treatment, with either CCMH or a placebo. CCMH significantly reduced the depletion of leukocytes (14.2% compared with 28.2%) and neutrophils (11.0% compared with 29.1%). Analysis of the lymphocyte phenotype revealed that the patients receiving the placebo had reduced CD4 lymphocytes and natural killer (NK) cells than the CCMH-treated patients. Treatment with CCMH for patients receiving chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy may improve their immune function, improving their ability to fight off the cancer, as well as any secondary infections that could compromise their treatment and their health.
Asunto(s)
Medicamentos Herbarios Chinos/uso terapéutico , Inmunidad Celular/efectos de los fármacos , Monoterpenos/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Fitoterapia , Monoterpenos Acíclicos , Linfocitos T CD4-Positivos/efectos de los fármacos , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Geranium/química , Humanos , Células Asesinas Naturales/efectos de los fármacos , Recuento de Leucocitos , Masculino , Neoplasias/inmunología , Neoplasias/radioterapiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There has been no study comparing the long-term effects of ketotifen, oxatomide, and cetirizine for the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis among children. OBJECTIVE: We conducted a study to compare the efficacy of the three agents for the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis among children. METHODS: The study consisted of a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized design, comprising 69 perennial allergic rhinitis patients with mite allergy, aged 6 to 12 years, randomly assigned to 1 of 4 test treatment groups for 3 months: 19 in the cetirizine group (10 mg daily), 18 in the ketotifen group (1 mg, twice daily), 16 in the oxatomide group (1 mg/kg, twice daily), and 16 in the placebo group. We used the nasal symptom score of diary card and the Pediatric Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire and eosinophil cation protein peripheral blood total eosinophil count and immunoglobulin E level, eosinophil proportion from a nasal smear, and nasal peak expiratory flow rate to evaluate the effect of the four agents. RESULTS: Cetirizine was significantly more effective at reducing the mean rhinorrhea score compared with oxatomide for both weeks 8 and 12 (P < 0.01). Before the end of week 12, cetirizine was significantly more effective than ketotifen (P < 0.01). Cetirizine and oxatomide significantly decreased the mean Pediatric Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire score compared with the placebo for week 12 (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Cetirizine was more effective than oxatomide and ketotifen for the relief of nasal congestion and rhinorrhea, and was responsible for significantly decreasing the eosinophil representation of a posttreatment nasal smear.