"Lockdown-thrombosis"-an unexpected problem of the COVID-19 pandemic?

Seated immobility thromboembolism syndrome (SIT) is the association of prolonged seated immobility with increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). The advent of COVID-19 resulted in implementation of lockdowns to curb its spread. This resulted in compulsory work from home and minimization of outdoor activities. Consequently, this would have likely led to increased prolonged sitting and reduced mobility. Few case reports and studies have observed an increase in VTE incidence during the lockdown period. We likewise performed a clinical audit of our weekly thrombosis clinic cases and revealed three cases of VTE associated with prolonged sitting during Singapore's COVID-19 lockdown. Notably, all had other minor VTE risk factors in addition to prolonged sitting. All cases had intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolism and were given extended anticoagulation. With the pandemic still ongoing, periodic lockdown and quarantine measures may continue to be imposed. While the overall VTE risk conferred by prolonged seated immobility associated with lockdown measures is likely to be small, this risk can be easily mitigated and possibly prevented by simply staying mobile.

Risk factors and predictors of treatment responses and complications in immune thrombocytopenia.

Management of adult patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is often unsatisfactory, due to variable efficacy of treatment, risk of life-threatening bleeding if disease control is poor, and side effects associated with treatment. Lack of data on the platelet count threshold associated with bleeding and infection risk associated with ITP treatment limits risk/benefit clinical decision making. We reviewed medical records of all ITP patients who were admitted to our hospital between 2012 and 2017 to evaluate the platelet count threshold for bleeding, infection burden associated with treatment, and real-world efficacy of second-line treatment. We demonstrated fair discrimination between platelet count and occurrence of bleeding, with 15 × 109/L being the optimal cut-off for predicting any bleeding while 20 × 109/L had the highest negative predictive value for severe bleeding. In multivariable analyses, patients who were treated with corticosteroids for at least 2 months were 5.3 times as likely to have an infection. In addition, rituximab response was strongly associated with response to frontline corticosteroids and infection was associated with older age ≥ 65 years and corticosteroid dependence. If corticosteroids are initiated, physicians should aim for the shortest duration of treatment before switching to effective second-line agents for hemostatic platelet counts.

Hope, bias and survival expectations of advanced cancer patients: A cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE: Many patients with advanced illness are unrealistically optimistic about their prognosis. We test for the presence of several cognitive biases, including optimism bias, illusion of superiority, self-deception, misattribution, and optimistic update bias, that could explain unrealistically optimistic prognostic beliefs among advanced cancer patients and quantifies the extent to which hope exacerbates these biases. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was administered to 200 advanced cancer patients with physician-estimated prognoses of one year or less. Hope was measured using the Herth Hope Index (HHI). Hypotheses were tested using linear and logistic regressions and a structural-equation model. RESULTS: Results are consistent with the presence of optimism bias, illusion of superiority, self-deception, and misattribution. All of these biases are amplified by higher levels of hope. Each 1-point higher HHI is associated with a 6% (OR: 1.06; 95% CI: 1.01-1.11) greater odds of believing their illness is curable, a 0.33-year (95% CI: 0.17-0.49) longer expected survival, a 6% (OR: 1.06; 95% CI: 1.02-1.11) higher probability of believing that survival outcomes are better than the average patient, a 5% higher odds of believing primary intent of treatment is curative (OR: 1.05; 95% CI: 1.00-1.10), and a 12% (OR: 1.12; 95% CI: 1.05-1.17) higher odds of believing they are well-informed. Mediation analyses revealed that hope significantly mediates the effect of mental-well-being and loneliness on expected survival. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest advanced cancer patients succumb to several cognitive biases which are exacerbated by greater levels of hope. As a result, they are susceptible to possible over-treatment and regret.

Low incidence of venous thrombosis but high incidence of arterial thrombotic complications among critically ill COVID-19 patients in Singapore.

BACKGROUND: Arterial and venous thrombosis are reported to be common in critically ill COVID-19 patients. METHOD AND RESULTS: This is a national multicenter retrospective observational study involving all consecutive adult COVID-19 patients who required intensive care units (ICU) admission between 23 January 2020 and 30 April 2020 in Singapore. One hundred eleven patients were included and the venous and arterial thrombotic rates in ICU were 1.8% (n = 2) and 9.9% (n = 11), respectively. Major bleeding rate was 14.8% (n = 16). CONCLUSIONS: Critically ill COVID-19 patients in Singapore have lower venous thromboembolism but higher arterial thrombosis rates and bleeding manifestations than other reported cohorts.

Risk factors for pregnancy-associated venous thromboembolism in Singapore.

OBJECTIVES: Pregnancy-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE), including deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), is associated with increased risk of maternal mortality and morbidity. This study aimed to assess potential risk factors for pregnancy-associated VTE. METHODS: In this case-control study, women with pregnancy-associated VTE were identified via International Classification of Diseases codes and included if they had been objectively diagnosed with VTE during pregnancy or within six weeks postpartum, from 2004 to 2016, at KK Women's and Children's Hospital or Singapore General Hospital in Singapore. Controls, i.e. pregnant women without VTE, were selected from a prospective longitudinal study. The odds ratio (OR) for VTE was computed for a range of maternal and obstetric factors. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: From 2004 to 2016, 89 cases of pregnancy-associated VTE and 926 controls were identifed and analysed using logistic regression. The most significant risk factors for pregnancy-associated VTE were smoking (OR 5.44, p=0.0002) and preterm delivery (OR 5.06, p=0.023). Malay race, multiparity, non-O blood group and caesarean section, were also identified to be of higher risk. These risk factors should be useful in the development of thromboprophylaxis strategies for pregnancy and the postpartum period, especially in Singapore.

Epidemiology of pregnancy-associated pulmonary embolism in South Asian multi-ethnic country: Mortality trends over the last four decades.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the cumulative incidence, time of occurrence and risk factors of pregnancy-associated pulmonary embolism (PE) in Singapore, and to review the maternal mortality ratio of PE over the last four decades. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: In this retrospective epidemiology review, women with pregnancy-associated PE were identified via International Classification of Diseases codes and included if they had been objectively diagnosed on imaging with PE during pregnancy or within 6 weeks postpartum from 2004 to 2016 at KK Women's and Children's Hospital (KKH) and Singapore General Hospital (SGH) in Singapore. The medical records were reviewed and the time of occurrence of confirmed PE cases and risk factors for PE were noted. RESULTS: There were 18 PE cases out of 174 708 deliveries, of which two were fatal, giving a cumulative incidence of PE at 1.03 per 10 000 deliveries and a mortality rate of 11.1%. The maternal mortality ratio is 1.14 per 100 000 deliveries, the lowest compared to that of the previous three decades (2.5-4.9 per 100 000 deliveries). Majority of PE (66.7%) occurred during the first 2 weeks postpartum. Cumulative incidence of postpartum PE was four times more in caesarean section compared to vaginal delivery at 1.58 per 10 000 deliveries and 0.40 per 10 000 deliveries, respectively. CONCLUSION: Although the cumulative incidence of pregnancy-associated PE in Singapore is low, it is comparable to the United Kingdom (UK) and United States (US). Risk assessment and thromboprophylaxis have decreased PE mortality significantly during this period.

Financial difficulties are associated with greater total pain and suffering among patients with advanced cancer: results from the COMPASS study.

BACKGROUND: The Universal Health Coverage goals call for access to affordable palliative care to reduce inequities in "total pain" and suffering. To achieve this, a patient-centred understanding of these inequities is required. AIM: To assess association of total pain and suffering (i.e. physical, psychological, social, and spiritual health outcomes) and perceived health care quality with financial difficulties among stage IV solid malignancy patients. DESIGN: Using baseline data from the COMPASS cohort study, we assessed total pain and suffering including physical (physical and functional well-being, pain, symptom burden), psychological (anxiety, depression, emotional well-being), social (social well-being), and spiritual (spiritual well-being, hope) outcomes and perceived health care quality (physician communication, nursing care, and coordination/responsiveness). Financial difficulties were scored by assessing patient perception of the extent to which their resources were meeting expenses for their treatments, daily living, and other obligations. We used multivariable linear/logistic regression to test association between financial difficulties and each patient-reported outcome. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Six hundred stage IV solid malignancy patients in Singapore. RESULTS: Thirty-five percent reported difficulty in meeting expenses. A higher financial difficulties score was associated with worse physical, psychological, social, spiritual outcomes, and lower perceived quality of health care coordination and responsiveness (i.e. greater total pain and suffering) (all p < 0.05). These associations persisted after adjustment for socio-economic indicators. CONCLUSION: Results identify advanced cancer patients with financial difficulties to be a vulnerable group with greater reported total pain and suffering. A holistic patient-centred approach to care at end-of-life may help meet goals for Universal Health Coverage.

Role of platelets in thrombin generation amongst patients with non-transfusion-dependent thalassaemia.

Non-transfusion-dependent thalassaemia (NTDT) is associated with a hypercoagulable state with thrombotic risk highest after splenectomy. Various mechanisms have been proposed. Although an antiplatelet agent is commonly recommended as thromboprophylaxis in NTDT, the role of platelets contributing to this hypercoagulable state is not well-defined. This study aims to evaluate the role of platelets contributing to hypercoagulability in NTDT patients using thrombin generation (TG). Platelet-rich (PRP) and platelet-poor plasma (PPP) were collected from NTDT patients (n = 30) and normal controls (n = 20) for TG measurement and compared. Controls had higher endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) in PPP (1204.97 nM.min vs 911.62 nM.min, p < 0.001) and PRP (1424.23 nM.min vs 983.99 nM.min, p < 0.001) than patients. Patients' mean normalized ETP ratio [{PRP ETP (patient)/PPP ETP (patient)}/{mean PPP ETP (controls)/mean PPP ETP (controls)}], demonstrated that the presence of platelet does not alter ETP (mean ratio 0.97, 95% CI 0.93-1.02, equivalence defined as 10%). Types of thalassaemia, splenectomy, and severity of liver iron overload did not significantly influence patients' ETP in PPP and PRP by multivariate analysis. Platelets did not increase the TG potential of NTDT patients. Instead of being hypercoagulable, our NTDT patients were hypocoagulable by ETP measurement, although this could not be conclusively demonstrated to correlate with their iron overloading state giving rise to reduced synthesis of coagulation factors. The guideline recommendations for thromboprophylaxis with antiplatelet agents in similar NTDT patients should be re-examined.

DOACs - advances and limitations in real world.

The group of new oral anticoagulants or NOACs, now termed direct oral anticoagulants or DOACs, with their favourable results from large scale phase III clinical trials, represent a major advancement and expanded armamentarium in antithrombotic therapy. Dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban are now in clinical routine use for prevention and treatment of arterial and venous thrombotic diseases as addressed in their clinical trials. Usage of the DOACs is expected to increase as clinicians gain more experience and reassurance with data from the real world studies which are generally consistent with that from clinical trials. Development of specific antidotes in management of bleeding complications and development of coagulation assays for their plasma levels will further boost the confidence in the DOACs. Nonetheless, there are still limitations associated with the DOACs. Many patients in need of anticoagulant therapy for indications not studied in the clinical trials will not be eligible for treatment with a DOAC. Conditions where more data is required include DOACs use in the paediatric age group, patients with atrial fibrillation and valvular heart disease, thrombosis associated with the anti-phospholipid syndrome and cancer associated thrombosis. The affordability and access to these drugs may pose an issue for many patients under healthcare systems not providing for these medications. With four new anticoagulants coming onboard very quickly, the focus has shifted to the practical approach and management in real life as many clinicians are not yet familiar with the DOACs. Clinicians need to be educated on how to manage this new class for drugs, from choosing the appropriate drug to prevention and managing bleeding complications as a lack of knowledge and understanding in these drugs will lead to inappropriate use and compromise on patient safety.

Patient-reported health preferences of anticoagulant-related outcomes.

Strokes can have a catastrophic impact on patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL). In addition to warfarin, two novel oral anticoagulants, i.e., dabigatran and rivaroxaban, have been approved to prevent strokes. This study aimed to use direct measures to elicit patient-reported utilities (i.e., preferences) for anticoagulant-related outcomes. A cross-sectional survey was administered to 100 patients taking warfarin in an anticoagulation clinic. Utilities for six long-term and four short-term anticoagulant-related health states were elicited by the visual analogue scale (VAS) and standard gamble (SG) methods. Health states with the highest SG-derived mean utility values were "well on rivaroxaban" (mean ± SD = 0.90 ± 0.15), "well on warfarin" (0.86 ± 0.17), and "well on dabigatran" (0.83 ± 0.18). Approximately half of the patients considered major ischemic stroke (-1.57 ± 6.77) and intracranial hemorrhage (-1.99 ± 6.98) to be worse than death. The percentages of patients who considered a particular health state worse than death ranged from 0 to 55 % among various health states assessed. The VAS had similar findings. Good logical consistency was observed in both VAS- and SG-derived utility values. Ischemic stroke and intracranial hemorrhage had a significant impact on patients' HRQoL. Greater variation in patients' preferences was observed for more severely impaired health states, indicating the need for individualized medical decision-making. In this study, both long-term and short-term health states were included in the utility assessment. The findings of this study can be used in cost-utility analysis of future anticoagulation therapies.

Cost-effectiveness of dabigatran and rivaroxaban compared with warfarin for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of dabigatran and rivaroxaban compared with warfarin for the prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) in Singapore. METHODS: A Markov model was constructed to compare the lifetime costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of dabigatran 110 and 150 mg, rivaroxaban 20 mg and adjusted-dose warfarin from the perspective of the Singapore healthcare system, using clinical data from published studies, utilities from a patient-reported survey and costs from hospital databases. The target population was a hypothetical cohort of 65-year-old AF patients with no contraindications to anticoagulation. RESULTS: In the base-case analysis, the QALYs were 8.75 with warfarin, 8.73 with dabigatran 110 mg, 8.82 with dabigatran 150 mg, and 9.33 with rivaroxaban. The costs were Singapore dollar (SG$) 34,648 for warfarin, SG$54,919 for dabigatran 110 mg, SG$50,484 for dabigatran 150 mg and SG$51,975 for rivaroxaban. The ICER of rivaroxaban versus warfarin was SG$29,697 (US$26,727) per QALY. Rivaroxaban and warfarin had extended dominance over the high-dose dabigatran. The low-dose dabigatran was dominated by warfarin. Deterministic sensitivity analyses showed that the ICER of rivaroxaban versus warfarin was sensitive to cost of rivaroxaban and utilities for rivaroxaban and warfarin. Probability sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the probability of rivaroxaban being the optimal choice was 97.8% and 99.5% at a willingness-to-pay threshold of SG$65,000 (US$58,500) and SG$130,000 (US$117,000) per QALY, respectively. CONCLUSION: Rivaroxaban may be a cost-effective alternative to warfarin for the prevention of stroke in patients with AF in Singapore.

The relationship between hope, medical expenditure and survival among advanced cancer patients.

Introduction: Among those with advanced illness, higher levels of hope may offer physiological benefits. Yet, greater levels of hope may also encourage aggressive treatments. Therefore, higher levels of hope may lead to greater healthcare utilization, higher expenditure, and longer survival. We test these hypotheses among patients with advanced cancer. Methods: A secondary data analysis from a cross-sectional survey of 195 advanced cancer patients with high mortality risk linked to subsequent healthcare utilization (outpatient, day surgeries, non-emergency admissions), health expenditures, and death records. The survey collected data on hope, measured generally by the Herth Hope Index (HHI) and more narrowly by two questions on illness-related hope. Generalized linear regression and Cox models were used to test our hypotheses. Results: 142 (78%) survey participants died during the period of analysis, with close to half (46%) doing so within a year of the survey. Contrary to expectation, HHI scores did not have a significant association with healthcare utilization, expenditure or survival. Yet, illness-related hope, defined as those who expected to live at least 2 years, as opposed to the likely prognosis of 1 year or less as determined by the primary treating oncologist, had 6.6 more planned hospital encounters (95% CI 0.90 to 12.30) in the 12-months following the survey and 41% lower mortality risk (hazard ratio: 0.59, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.99) compared to those who were less optimistic. Secondary analysis among decedents showed that patients who believed that the primary intent of their treatment is curative, had higher total expenditure (S$30,712; 95% CI S$3,143 to S$58,282) in the last 12 months of life than those who did not have this belief. Conclusion: We find no evidence of a relationship between a general measure of hope and healthcare utilization, expenditure, or survival among advanced cancer patients. However, greater illness-related hope is positively associated with these outcomes.

Efficacy and safety of low dose, weight-based subcutaneous enoxaparin protocol in recurrent arteriovenous access thrombosis.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a short-term, low dose, weight-based subcutaneous enoxaparin protocol (SEP) in maintaining the patency of arteriovenous (AV) access with recurrent thrombosis. METHODS: Prospective follow-up of 25 patients who presented to a tertiary institution with recurrent AV access thrombosis and treated with anticoagulation according to SEP following successful thrombectomy. Patency and safety outcomes of SEP were studied. RESULTS: The participants were 66.4 ± 10.2 years old and predominantly male (60%) and of Chinese ethnicity (72%). The AV accesses had a median age of 1.4 (0.6, 5.6) years with 60% being non-autogenous arteriovenous access while 40% were autogenous arteriovenous access. Thrombolytic agents (urokinase (72%) or alteplase (28%)) were used in all procedures while adjunct thrombectomy device was used in only four procedures. The mean dose of enoxaparin was 36.0 ± 8.2 mg or 0.64 ± 0.1 mg/kg/day for a mean duration 30.0 days (Interquartile range: 27.5, 31.0). One patient developed minor bleeding episode. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that the mean thrombosis-free survival pre- versus post-SEP adoption was 27.3 (95% CI 17.9-36.7) versus 183.5 (95% CI 100.1-266.9) days (p < 0.001). After adjusting for the type of thrombolytic agent, use of adjunct thrombectomy device, cutting balloon, drug-coated balloon, and stent graft, SEP remained a significant factor associated with longer thrombosis-free patency (HR 0.166: 95% CI 0.070-0.392, p < 0.001). DISCUSSION: SEP appears to be a feasible and safe thromboprophylaxis method to improve thrombosis-free patency for AV access with recurrent thrombosis.

Accuracy incentives and framing effects to minimize the influence of cognitive bias among advanced cancer patients.

Many patients with advanced illness have unrealistic survival expectations, largely due to cognitive biases. Studies suggests that when people are motivated to be accurate, they are less prone to succumb to these biases. Using a randomized survey design, we test whether offering advanced cancer patients (n = 200) incentives to estimate their prognosis improves accuracy. We also test whether presenting treatment benefits in terms of a loss (mortality) rather than a gain (survival) reduces willingness to take up a hypothetical treatment. Results are not consistent with the proposed hypotheses for either accuracy incentives or framing effects.

A correlation of thrombin generation assay and clot waveform analysis in patients on warfarin.

OBJECTIVES: Thrombin generation assays and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT)-based clot waveform analysis (CWA), are some examples of global coagulation assays. Each modality evaluates different aspects of the clot forming process to globally define haemostasis with exclusive measurement parameters. Data on CWA are emerging, but its performance against other haemostatic assays is yet to be ascertained. This study evaluates the correlation between aPTT-based CWA and CAT parameters across a range of INR in warfarin-treated patients. PATIENTS/METHODS: A prospective study consisting of patients on warfarin anticoagulation with varying INR levels. CWA and CAT were performed for the study subjects. RESULTS: 54 samples were included covering an INR range from 1.33-6.89, with a mean of 4.31 +/- 1.13. For CAT parameters, endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) and peak thrombin were assessed. Both unadjusted and adjusted (adjusted for final plateau transmittance) aPTT-based CWA were evaluated for parameters min1 (maximum velocity), min2 (maximum acceleration) and max2 (maximum deceleration). Peak thrombin showed significant correlation with all CWA parameters (min1: r = 0.435, P<0.001; min2: r = 0.485, P<0.001; max2: r = 0.578, P<0.001; adjusted min1: r = 0.734, P<0.001, adjusted min2: r = 0.693, P<0.001; adjusted max2: r = 0.751, P<0.001). ETP correlated significantly with all CWA parameters except unadjusted min1 (min1: r = 0.235, P = 0.087; min2: r = 0.326, P = 0.016; max2: r = 0.437, P<0.001; adjusted min1: r = 0.610, P<0.001, adjusted min2: r = 0.563, P<0.001; adjusted max2: r = 0.642, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: We demonstrated a modest correlation between CAT and CWA parameters. Adjusted CWA improved this correlation. These findings provide additional understanding of CWA and it's role in the evaluation of global haemostatic function.

Safe and effective treatment of venous Thromboembolism associated with Cancer: focus on direct Oral Anticoagulants in Asian patients.

Cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) poses a significant disease burden and the incidence in Asian populations is increasing. Anticoagulation is the cornerstone of treatment, but can be challenging due to the high bleeding risk in some cancers and the high risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with malignancies. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are well established as first-choice treatments for VTE in non-cancer patients, offering a more convenient and less invasive treatment option than low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). Asian patients have exhibited comparable efficacy and safety outcomes with other races in trials of DOACs for VTE in the general population. Although no specific data are available in Asian patients with CAT, results from randomized controlled trials of apixaban, edoxaban, or rivaroxaban versus the LMWH, dalteparin, indicate that DOACs are a reasonable alternative to LMWH for anticoagulation in Asian patients with CAT. This is further supported by analyses of real-world data in Asian populations demonstrating the efficacy and safety of DOACs in Asian patients with CAT. Apixaban, edoxaban, or rivaroxaban are recommended in the most recently updated international guidelines as first-line therapy for CAT in patients without gastrointestinal or genitourinary cancers and at low risk of bleeding. An increased risk of major gastrointestinal bleeding was evident with edoxaban or rivaroxaban, but not apixaban, versus dalteparin in the clinical trials, suggesting that apixaban could be a safe alternative to LMWH in patients with gastrointestinal malignancies. Determining the optimal anticoagulant therapy for patients with CAT requires careful consideration of bleeding risk, tumor type, renal function, drug-drug interactions, financial costs, and patients' needs and preferences.

Awareness of venous thromboembolism among patients with cancer: Preliminary findings from a global initiative for World Thrombosis Day.

BACKGROUND: Cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (CAT) has detrimental impact on patients' clinical outcomes and quality of life. Data on CAT education, communication, and awareness among the general cancer population are scanty. METHODS: We present the preliminary results of an ongoing patient-centered survey including 27 items covering major spheres of CAT. The survey, available in 14 languages, was promoted and disseminated online through social networks, email newsletters, websites, and media. RESULTS: As of September 20, 2022, 749 participants from 27 countries completed the survey. Overall, 61.8% (n = 460) of responders were not aware of their risk of CAT. Among those who received information on CAT, 26.2% (n = 56) were informed only at the time of CAT diagnosis. Over two thirds (69.1%, n = 501) of participants received no education on signs and symptoms of venous thromboembolism (VTE); among those who were educated about the possible clinical manifestations, 58.9% (n = 119) were given instructions to seek consultation in case of VTE suspicion. Two hundred twenty-four respondents (30.9%) had a chance to discuss the potential use of primary thromboprophylaxis with health-care providers. Just over half (58.7%, n = 309) were unaware of the risks of bleeding associated with anticoagulation, despite being involved in anticoagulant-related discussions or exposed to anticoagulants. Most responders (85%, n = 612) valued receiving CAT education as highly relevant; however, 51.7% (n = 375) expressed concerns about insufficient time spent and clarity of education received. CONCLUSIONS: This ongoing survey involving cancer patients with diverse ethnic, cultural, and geographical backgrounds highlights important patient knowledge gaps. These findings warrant urgent interventions to improve education and awareness, and reduce CAT burden.

Epidemiology of Cancer-Associated Thrombosis in Asia: A Systematic Review.

The epidemiology of cancer associated thrombosis (CAT) in Asia is less well-studied and differs from that in the western countries. Here, we systematically examine population based and hospital-based studies reported between 1995 and 2020 to understand the epidemiology of CAT in Asia. From population-based studies, the estimated incidence of VTE in cancer patients was 1.85-9.88 per 1,000 person-years. The incidence of CAT in Asia is significantly higher than non-cancer associated VTE in the general population and cancer is perhaps the most important risk factor for VTE. Hospital-based studies were heterogeneous in study designs and reveal a wide range of prevalence of VTE among cancer patients at 0.5-44.6% while the cancer prevalence rates among VTE patients ranged from 6.1 to 65.5%. The cancer sites most associated with VTE and risk factors were similar between Asian and Western studies. CAT has a major impact on the survival of patients with cancer in Asia, but thromboprophylaxis is not commonly practiced and validated risk assessment tools are lacking. This study highlights the urgent need for large multinational epidemiological studies in Asia to establish the true burden of CAT and to guide appropriate prevention strategies.

Clinical and laboratory features of hypercoagulability in COVID-19 and other respiratory viral infections amongst predominantly younger adults with few comorbidities.

COVID-19 caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) and other respiratory viral (non-CoV-2-RV) infections are associated with thrombotic complications. The differences in prothrombotic potential between SARS-CoV-2 and non-CoV-2-RV have not been well characterised. We compared the thrombotic rates between these two groups of patients directly and further delved into their coagulation profiles. In this single-center, retrospective cohort study, all consecutive COVID-19 and non-CoV-2-RV patients admitted between January 15th and April 10th 2020 were included. Coagulation parameters studied were prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time and its associated clot waveform analysis (CWA) parameter, min1, min2 and max2. In the COVID-19 (n = 181) group there were two (1.0 event/1000-hospital-days) myocardial infarction events while one (1.8 event/1000-hospital-day) was reported in the non-CoV-2-RV (n = 165) group. These events occurred in patients who were severely ill. There were no venous thrombotic events. Coagulation parameters did not differ throughout the course of mild COVID-19. However, CWA parameters were significantly higher in severe COVID-19 compared with mild disease, suggesting hypercoagulability (min1: 6.48%/s vs 5.05%/s, P < 0.001; min2: 0.92%/s2 vs 0.74%/s2, P = 0.033). In conclusion, the thrombotic rates were low and did not differ between COVID-19 and non-CoV-2-RV patients. The hypercoagulability in COVID-19 is a highly dynamic process with the highest risk occurring when patients were most severely ill. Such changes in haemostasis could be detected by CWA. In our population, a more individualized thromboprophylaxis approach, considering clinical and laboratory factors, is preferred over universal pharmacological thromboprophylaxis for all hospitalized COVID-19 patients and such personalized approach warrants further research.

Discordance Between Advanced Cancer Patients' Perceived and Preferred Roles in Decision Making and its Association with Psychological Distress and Perceived Quality of Care.

OBJECTIVE: We investigated patient-reported roles of families, physicians, and patients themselves in treatment decision making and whether discordance between perceived and preferred roles is associated with psychological distress and perceived quality of care among patients with cancer. METHODS: We analyzed cross-sectional survey data from 599 adults with stage IV solid malignancy in Singapore. Stuart-Maxwell tests were used to compare patients' perceived and preferred roles in decision making. Types of discordance were categorized as follows: involvement at a lesser level than preferred, involvement at a greater level than preferred, and no change in patient involvement. Ordinary least squares regressions examined the associations between types of discordance and patient outcomes, controlling for patient characteristics. RESULTS: Discordance between perceived and preferred roles was observed in 16% of patients. Amongst patients with discordance, 33% reported being involved at a lesser level than they preferred, 47% reported being involved at a greater level than they preferred, and 19% reported discordance where level of patient involvement did not change. Multivariable analyses showed that lesser involvement than preferred and discordance with no change in patient involvement were associated with poorer quality of physician communication (ß = - 9.478 [95% confidence interval {CI} - 16.303 to - 2.653] and ß = - 9.184 [95% CI - 18.066 to - 0.301]) and poorer care coordination (ß = - 11.658 [95% CI - 17.718 to - 5.597] and ß = - 8.856 [95% CI - 16.744 to - 0.968]) compared with concordance. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients reported participating at their desired level. Despite this finding, our results suggest that involving patients at a lesser level than they prefer can lead to poorer perceived quality of physician communication and care coordination and that encouraging patient participation is a safe approach to minimizing poor outcomes.