Determinants of hospital and one-year mortality among older patients admitted to intensive care units: results from the multicentric SENIOREA cohort.

BACKGROUND: Improving outcomes of older patients admitted into intensive care units (ICU) is a raising concern. This study aimed at determining which geriatric and ICU parameters were associated with in-hospital and long-term mortality in this population. METHODS: We conducted a prospective multicentric observational cohort study, including patients aged 75 years and older requiring mechanical ventilation, admitted between September 2012 and December 2013 into ICU of 13 French hospitals. Comprehensive geriatric assessment at ICU admission and ICU usual parameters were registered in a standardized manner. Survival was recorded and comprehensive geriatric assessment was updated after 1 year during a dedicated home visit. RESULTS: 501 patients were analyzed. 108 patients (21.6%) died during the hospital stay. One-year survival rate was 53.8% (IC 95% [49.2%; 58.2%]). Factors associated with increased in-hospital mortality were higher acute illness severity score, resuscitated cardiac arrest as primary ICU diagnosis, perception of anxiety and low quality of life by the proxy, and living in a chronic care facility before ICU admission. Among patients alive at hospital discharge, factors associated with increased 1-year mortality in multivariate analysis were longer duration of mechanical ventilation, all primary ICU diagnoses other than septic shock, a Katz-activities of daily living (ADL) score below 5 and living in a chronic care facility before ICU admission. Among the 163 survivors at 1 year who received a second comprehensive geriatric assessment, the ADL score (functional abilities) showed a significant but moderate decline over time, whereas the Mini-Zarit score (family burden) improved. No significant change in patients' place of life was observed after 1 year, and quality of life was reported as happy-to-very-happy in 88% of survivors. CONCLUSIONS: The mortality rate remains high among older ICU patients requiring mechanical ventilation. Factors associated with short- and long-term mortality combined geriatric and ICU criteria, which should be jointly evaluated in routine care. Clinical trial registration NCT01679171.

Feasibility and potential cost/benefit of routine isoflurane sedation using an anesthetic-conserving device: a prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Inhaled sedation is efficient and easily controllable; in low concentrations it causes minimal changes in the patient and very little interference with hemodynamics. Awakening after inhaled sedation is quick and predictable. The major reason inhaled sedation has not become widely used in intensive care is that no commercially available administration device has been available. METHODS: In our intensive care unit we conducted a prospective observational study to assess the feasibility, benefits, and costs of routine isoflurane sedation via the AnaConDa anesthetic-administration device. We included 15 adult patients who required > 24 hours of deep sedation. Conventional intravenous sedation (benzodiazepine and opioid) had been administered according to a sedation protocol that included a predetermined target Ramsay-scale sedation score. We then switched to inhaled isoflurane via the AnaConDa, and measured sedation efficacy, cumulative dose, and daily cost of sedation. Adverse events were prospectively defined and monitored. RESULTS: The sedation goal was reached with isoflurane in all 15 patients (P < .01, compared to the conventional sedation protocol). Hemodynamic changes were nonsignificant, and no renal or hepatic dysfunctions were observed. The frequency of meeting the sedation goal was significantly better with isoflurane than with our usual sedation protocol. With isoflurane, awakening from sedation was always

Validation of a skills assessment scoring system for transesophageal echocardiographic monitoring of hemodynamics.

OBJECTIVE: Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is increasingly used in hemodynamic monitoring in the intensive care unit. This paper describes and validates a scoring system for assessing competence in TEE performed by intensivists for this indication. DESIGN: Prospective study over an 18-month period. SETTINGS: Two medical intensive care units. METHODS: The scoring system is used to assess four aspects of TEE: quality of the views (score out of 14); semiquantitative evaluation of respiratory variations in the superior vena cava, valve regurgitation, size of the right ventricle (score out of 10); accuracy of measurement of velocity-time integrals for pulmonary and aortic flow, peak velocity of the E and A waves of mitral flow, left ventricular fractional area change (score out of 8); summary and proposed treatment (score out of 8). The scoring system was validated by using it to assess intensivists after 1 month (M1), 3 months (M3) and 6 months (M6) of training. TEE was done on a mechanically ventilated, hypotensive patient and scored by comparing the intensivist's examination with that of the expert examiner. The intensivists were divided into two groups of theoretical expertise at the start of training. RESULTS: Nineteen intensivists were evaluated. The scores at M1 for level 0 (no experience in echocardiography) and level 1 (previous experience) were, respectively, 18.5 +/- 4 and 24.7 +/- 5. The scores at M1, M3, and M6 were, respectively, 20.4 +/- 5, 30.4 +/- 5 and 35.7 +/- 3. At M6, the intensivists had performed TEE 29 +/- 10 times. CONCLUSION: The scoring system was discriminatory and sensitive to change, and could be used as a tool to assess an intensivist's mastery of TEE.

Impact of clinical guidelines to improve appropriateness of laboratory tests and chest radiographs.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of clinical guidelines to improve appropriate use of routine laboratory tests and bedside chest radiographs in a medical intensive care. DESIGN: A two-year (Period-1: 2005, Period-2: 2006), retrospective, comparative study, before and after policy implementation. PATIENTS: All consecutive patients admitted during the study periods. SETTING: A university hospital 15-bed medical ICU. INTERVENTION: Multifaceted intervention combining a daily routine prescription help-guide developed by a multidisciplinary group and displayed at patient's bedside, educational sessions and feedbacks by information on volumes of prescription. Individual adaptation to patient's clinical status was allowed by protocol. ASSESSMENT: The overall number and cost of laboratory tests and chest radiographs during Period-2 (with the help guide; from 01 to 12-2006) were compared to Period-1 (from 01 to 12-2005). RESULTS: Patients' general characteristics were similar during the two periods. A relative reduction of routine laboratory tests performance was observed per patient-ICU-day, ranging from 38 to 71.5% depending on the type of tests (P < 0.001 in all cases). For chest radiographs, a 41% relative reduction was observed between the two periods (P < 0.001). Daily ICU laboratory tests and chest radiographs cost per patient decreased from 114 to 56 euros. An overall 300,000 euros ICU cost reduction was directly related to the protocol implementation. CONCLUSION: The implementation of a laboratory tests and chest radiographs prescription protocol within our ICU induced an important cost saving.