RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Yeo's index is a novel measure of the severity of rheumatic mitral valve stenosis (MS). It is derived from the product of the mitral leaflet separation index and dimensionless index. This study aims to validate Yeo's index using a transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) three-dimensional (3D) mitral valve area (MVA) as a comparator and to compare the concordance of existing echocardiographic measures of the MVA with TEE 3DMVA. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 111 patients with rheumatic MS who underwent both transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and a TEE assessment of MS severity. Yeo's index, the MVA determined by 2D planimetry, pressure half-time (PHT) and continuity equation (CE) measured on TTE were compared with the TEE 3DMVA. With a linear correlation, Yeo's index showed the best correlation with TEE 3DMVA (r2 = 0.775), followed by 2D planimetry (r2 = 0.687), CE (r2 = 0.598) and PHT (r2 = 0.363). Using TEE 3DMVA as comparator, Yeo's index (ρc = 0.739) demonstrated the best concordance, followed by 2D planimetry (ρc = 0.632), CE (ρc = 0.464) and PHT (ρc = 0.366). When both Yeo's index and 2D planimetry suggested significant MS, the positive predictive value was high (an AUC of 0.966 and a PPV of 100.00% for severe MS, and an AUC of 0.864 and a PPV of 85.71% for very severe MS). When both measures suggested the absence of significant MS, the negative predictive value was also high (an AUC of 0.940 and an NPV of 88.90% for severe MS, and an AUC of 0.831 and an NPV of 88.71% for very severe MS). CONCLUSIONS: Yeo's index performed well in identifying severe MS when compared with TEE 3DMVA and may be a useful adjunct to existing methods of measuring MS severity. Combining it with 2D planimetry could further enhance its accuracy.
RESUMEN
Introduction: Yeo's Index, product of the mitral leaflet separation index and dimensionless index, is a novel measure of the severity of rheumatic mitral stenosis (MS). We assess Yeo's index in patients with rheumatic MS with or without mixed valve disease. Methods: In a retrospective cohort study, Yeo's index was measured in 237 cases of rheumatic MS - 124 in a transthoracic echocardiography validation cohort using mitral valve area (MVA) by pressure half-time and planimetry as comparator and 113 in a transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) validation cohort using TEE three-dimensional MVA as comparator. Patients were considered to have mixed valve disease if they had MS and concomitant mitral regurgitation or aortic valve disease. Results: There were 113 patients with isolated MS and 124 patients with mixed valve disease. Overall, Yeo's index ≤ 0.26 cm showed 93.0 % sensitivity and 87.5 % specificity for identifying severe MS (MVA ≤ 1.5 cm2). In isolated MS, Yeo's index ≤ 0.26 cm showed sensitivity of 94.6 % and specificity of 90.0 % for identifying severe MS, while in mixed valve disease sensitivity was 90.6 % and specificity 86.7 %. Overall, Yeo's index ≤ 0.15 cm showed 83.6 % sensitivity and 94.3 % specificity for very severe MS (MVA ≤ 1.0 cm2). In isolated MS, the threshold of ≤0.15 cm showed sensitivity of 84.4 % and specificity of 92.6 % for very severe MS, while in mixed valve disease sensitivity was 81.3 % and specificity 95.3 %. The presence of atrial fibrillation did not influence the performance of Yeo's index. Conclusion: Yeo's Index accurately differentiates severity of rheumatic MS with or without mixed valve disease.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Net atrioventricular compliance (Cn) can affect the accuracy of mitral valve area (MVA) assessment. We assessed how different methods of MVA assessment are affected by Cn, and if patients with abnormal Cn may be identified by clinical and/or echocardiographic parameters. METHODS: We studied 244 patients with rheumatic MS. The concordance between mitral valve area (MVA) by 2D planimetry, pressure half-time (PHT), continuity equation (CE), Yeo's index, and 3-dimensional mitral valve area assessed by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE 3DMVA) in patients with normal and abnormal Cn (Cn ≤ 4 mL/mmHg) were evaluated in the 110 patients with both transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) and transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE). Variables that were associated with abnormal Cn were validated in the remaining 134 patients with only TTE. RESULTS: Except for MVA by CE, concordance with TEE 3DMVA was poorer for all other methods of MVA assessment in patients with abnormal Cn. But, the difference in concordance was only statistically significant for MVA by PHT. Patients with MVA ≤ 1.5 cm2 by 2D planimetry and PHT ≤ 130 ms were likely to have an abnormal Cn. (specificity 98.5%). This finding was validated in the remaining 134 patients (specificity 93%). CONCLUSIONS: MVA assessment by PHT is significantly affected by Cn. Abnormal Cn should be suspected when 2D planimetry MVA is ≤1.5 cm2 together with an inappropriately short PHT that is ≤130 ms. In this scenario, MVA by PHT is inaccurate.