RESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In this Perspective we share the personal story of a 33-year-old patient diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer and her journey through fertility preservation, surrogacy, and eventually motherhood, highlighting misconceptions about fertility preservation in this population. RECENT FINDINGS: There are nearly 1 million women under the age of 50 diagnosed and living with cancer in the USA. These patients are met with life-altering decisions, including those that may limit their reproductive ability. While there have been tremendous advances and advocacy in the field of oncofertility, there has been limited focus on patients with advanced stage or metastatic cancer. We describe five key misconceptions surrounding fertility preservation in patients with advanced stage cancer, offering a review of the literature and our approach to challenging topics like desiring fertility preservation in the face of Stage 4 disease, the safety and timing of ovarian stimulation during cancer treatment, and passing away following fertility preservation. We review the importance of assessing perceptions of fertility preservation in patients with metastatic cancer and highlight the lack of research in this area as a call to action.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Preservación de la Fertilidad , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Preservación de la Fertilidad/métodos , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Inducción de la OvulaciónRESUMEN
We determine the time to first live birth for female partners of males after a cancer diagnosis. Our group performed a retrospective, population-based, age-matched cohort study of Utah male residents diagnosed with cancer at age 18 years or later between 1956 and 2013 (exposed) matched to male Utah residents without cancer diagnosis (unexposed). Using stratified Cox proportional hazard models, we adjusted for race, ethnicity and number of live births prior to cancer diagnosis, to estimate the effect of time to a partner live birth following cancer diagnosis. Our study cohort included 19,303 men diagnosed with cancer (exposed) and 93,608 age-matched men without cancer diagnoses (unexposed). Exposed men were less likely to have a live birth prior to first cancer diagnosis (60.7% vs. 65.4%, p < 0.001) and after first cancer diagnosis (10.9% vs. 12.2%, p < 0.001) compared to unexposed men. Exposed men had a fertility hazard rate that was 31% lower after cancer diagnosis date than unexposed men (HR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.65-0.72). This was most profound for men aged 18-30 years (HR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.55-0.63). Male cancer survivors have a 31% lower female partner live birth rate after cancer diagnosis. These findings are important for patient counselling regarding fertility preservation at the time of cancer diagnosis.
Asunto(s)
Supervivientes de Cáncer , Neoplasias , Adolescente , Tasa de Natalidad , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Nacimiento Vivo/epidemiología , Masculino , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Utah/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In this secondary analysis of the TAmoxifen or Letrozole in Estrogen Sensitive tumors (TALES) trial, we aimed to investigate if concurrent administration of letrozole vs. tamoxifen vs. no added treatment affects hormonal composition and size of stimulated ovarian follicles. METHODS: TALES is a randomized controlled trial of IVF stimulation for estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer patients stimulated with gonadotropins and administered concurrent tamoxifen 20 mg or letrozole 5 mg. We analyzed estradiol (E2), testosterone (T), progesterone (P4), follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), and anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH). We used ANOVA/Kruskal-Wallis, logistic, and linear regression models to examine differences in follicular hormone levels, size, and mature oocyte yield between trial arm. RESULTS: We included data from total 246 follicles (94 letrozole, 82 tamoxifen, and 70 control) from 123 unique participants. E2 was lower (letrozole 187.4, tamoxifen 1026.0, control 821.5 ng/mL, p < 0.01) and T was higher (letrozole 2489, tamoxifen 571, and control 504 ng/mL, p < 0.03) in the letrozole group compared to tamoxifen and control groups, while other hormone levels and follicle size were similar across groups. There were no significant differences in hormone concentrations within the follicle between tamoxifen and control arms. On multivariate logistic regression, there was no significant association of mature oocyte yield by follicle size, hormone levels, or trial arm. CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent administration of letrozole with gonadotropins affects follicular E2 and T concentrations compared to tamoxifen/control. Tamoxifen was not associated with any differences in hormone concentrations within the follicle. Mature oocyte yield was similar across groups.
Asunto(s)
Hormona Folículo Estimulante , Tamoxifeno , Femenino , Estradiol , Gonadotropinas , Letrozol/uso terapéutico , Folículo Ovárico , Tamoxifeno/uso terapéutico , HumanosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The field of oncofertility has maintained an important focus on improving access, yet standardized practices are lacking. To assess how female cancer patients are provided oncofertility care, we sought to determine provider-level differences and whether there are physician or practice characteristics that predict these variations. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was sent to SREI members. The survey included fifteen questions about physician practice characteristics and oncofertility cryopreservation protocols. Topics included ovarian stimulation protocols, fertilization techniques, stage of embryo cryopreservation, routine use of pre-implantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A), and ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC). Statistical analyses assessed whether practice setting, geographic region, time in practice, and mandatory state insurance coverage had effects on cryopreservation protocols. RESULTS: A total of 141 (17%) from diverse REI practice backgrounds completed the survey. The median number of new female oncofertility consults per year was 30 (range 1 to 300). Providers in academic settings treated more patients (median 40 vs. 15, p < 0.001). Providers in academic settings more often use gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (85% vs. 52%, p < 0.001) and perform OTC (41% vs. 4%, p < 0.001). Providers in academic practices were less likely to perform intracytoplasmic sperm injection in every cycle (37% vs. 55%, p = 0.032) and less likely to usually advise PGT-A (21% vs. 36%, p = 0.001). Mandated state insurance coverage had no effect on oncofertility practices. CONCLUSION: Oncofertility practices vary among providers. Factors such as practice setting and region may affect the services provided. We do not yet know the best practices in oncofertility patients, and future research is needed.
Asunto(s)
Preservación de la Fertilidad , Neoplasias , Estudios Transversales , Criopreservación , Femenino , Preservación de la Fertilidad/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Neoplasias/terapia , Semen , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To investigate if breast cancer stage and grade affect fertility preservation outcomes. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study that included premenopausal women with breast cancer undergoing fertility preservation diagnosed between January 2011 and January 2019. The primary outcome measure was the number of mature oocytes (MII) per antral follicle count (AFC). Secondary outcome measures included total oocytes retrieved, total mature oocytes retrieved, and greater than 10 mature oocytes preserved. Univariate and multivariate models were used to assess the association of low vs. high stage (low stage I-II and high stage III-IV) and grade I vs. grade II/III with each outcome, with adjustment for confounders. RESULTS: A total of 267 premenopausal breast cancer patients undergoing fertility preservation were included in our study, with the majority presenting with low stage (N = 215, 80.5%), grade II/III (N = 235, 88.1%) disease. Baseline AFC, total gonadotropin dose, days of stimulation, and follicles [Formula: see text] 13 mm on the day of trigger did not differ by stage or grade. After adjusting for age, BMI, and baseline AFC, we found that the mean MII per AFC did not differ by stage (1.0 vs. 1.1, P = 0.3) or grade (1.0 vs. 1.0, P = 0.92). Similarly, total oocytes retrieved, total MII retrieved, and percentage of patients who were able to preserve greater than 10 MII did not differ by breast cancer stage or grade (all P > 0.2). CONCLUSION: Breast cancer grade and stage do not impact ovarian stimulation or fertility preservation outcome.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Preservación de la Fertilidad , Neoplasias de la Mama/complicaciones , Criopreservación , Femenino , Humanos , Recuperación del Oocito , Oocitos , Inducción de la Ovulación , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: We sought to characterize severe obstetric morbidity among women who are gestational carriers compared to other patients. METHODS: This was a population-based study comparing gestational carrier pregnancies to non-surrogate pregnancies (non-surrogate IVF pregnancies, all non-gestational carrier pregnancies, and a cohort of matched controls) delivering in Utah between 2009 and 2018, using birth certificate data. Our primary outcome was a composite of severe morbidity, including death, ICU admission, eclampsia, HELLP syndrome, transfusion, and unplanned hysterectomy. Our secondary outcomes were cesarean delivery (CD) and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. RESULTS: During the study period, 361 gestational carrier pregnancies and 509,015 other pregnancies resulted in live births. Severe morbidity was less common among gestational carrier pregnancies than IVF pregnancies (1.7% versus 5.5%, odds ratio [OR] 0.29, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.12-0.70), but was not different when compared to all other pregnancies (1.0%, OR 1.61, 95% CI 0.72-3.60), or a cohort of matched controls (1.0%, OR 1.37, 95% CI 0.55-3.40). CD was less common among gestational carrier pregnancies than IVF pregnancies, but not different than all other pregnancies or matched controls. While frequency of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy was lower among gestational carrier pregnancies than IVF pregnancies, it was higher than all other women who delivered and comparable to matched controls. CONCLUSION: Severe obstetric morbidity is uncommon among gestational carrier pregnancies. Women who are gestational carriers are at lower risk of morbidity and CD than others who conceive through IVF and do not appear to be at increased risk compared to matched controls.
Asunto(s)
Fertilización In Vitro , Morbilidad , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Adulto , Cesárea , Femenino , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/genética , Complicaciones del Embarazo/fisiopatología , Resultado del Embarazo/epidemiología , Resultado del Embarazo/genética , Madres Sustitutas , Utah/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Multifetal gestation is more frequent among gestational carrier pregnancies than non-surrogacy IVF pregnancies. We aimed to evaluate the association between multifetal gestation and obstetric and neonatal morbidity among gestational carrier pregnancies. METHODS: Pooled cross-sectional study of birth certificate data from gestational carrier pregnancies in Utah from 2009 to 2018. Our primary outcome was a composite of severe obstetric morbidity; secondary outcomes included cesarean delivery (CD), hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, preterm birth (PTB), and a neonatal morbidity composite. Logistic regression was utilized to compare odds of these outcomes between gestational carrier pregnancies with and without multifetal gestation. RESULTS: A total of 361 gestational carrier pregnancies resulted in the delivery of 435 neonates during the study period. Of these, 284 were singleton pregnancies, and 77 were multifetal, a multifetal gestation rate of 21.3%. Baseline demographic characteristics did not differ between singleton and multifetal gestations. Multifetal gestation was not associated with higher rates of severe obstetric morbidity (odds ratio [OR] 1.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.34-10.39). Multifetal gestation was associated with increased odds of neonatal morbidity (OR 9.49, 95% CI 5.35-15.83); PTB < 37, 34, and 32 weeks (OR 21.88, 95% CI 11.64-41.12; OR 11.67, 95% CI 5.25-25.91; OR 8.79, 95% CI 3.41-22.68); and CD (OR 4.82, 95% CI 2.81-8.27). CONCLUSION: Severe obstetric morbidity did not differ between singleton and multifetal gestations among gestational carrier pregnancies. However, multifetal gestation was associated with increased odds of neonatal morbidity, CD, and PTB. This information may be useful when counseling prospective gestational carriers and intended parents.
Asunto(s)
Parto Obstétrico/métodos , Muerte Fetal , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Embarazo Múltiple , Madres Sustitutas/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Treatment of Asherman syndrome (AS) presents a significant clinical challenge. Based on our in vitro data showing that PRP could activate endometrial cell proliferation and migration, we hypothesized that intrauterine infusion of autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) may improve endometrial regeneration and fertility outcomes in patients with moderate-severe AS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subjects with moderate-severe AS were randomized to PRP or saline control administered following hysteroscopic adhesiolysis. Due to relative inability to randomize patients to the control group, after initial randomization of 10 subjects (6 in PRP and 4 in control groups), the remainder were prospectively enrolled in PRP group (n = 9), with 11 historic controls added to control group, for a total of 30 subjects (PRP n = 15; saline control n = 15). Right after hysteroscopy, 0.5-1 mL of PRP or saline was infused into the uterus via a Wallace catheter, followed by estrogen therapy. The primary outcomes were changes in endometrial thickness (EMT, checked in 3 weeks) and in menstrual flow; secondary outcomes were pregnancy and live birth rates. EMT and menstrual bleeding pattern were assessed before and after the intervention. Pregnancy was assessed over a 6-month period. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in age, gravidity/parity, cause of AS, preoperative menses assessment, AS hysteroscopy score, and intrauterine balloon placement between the groups. There was no statistically significant difference (p = 0.79) in EMT pre-PRP infusion for control (5.7 mm, 4.0-6.0) and study arm (5.3 mm, 4.9-6.0). There was no statistically significant change (p = 0.78) in EMT after PRP infusion (1.4 mm, - 0.5-2.4) vs saline (1.0 mm, 0.0-2.5). Patients tolerated the procedure well, with no adverse effects. There was no difference in the predicted likelihood of pregnancy (p = 0.45) between the control (0.67, 0.41-0.85) and study arm (0.53, 0.29-0.76). CONCLUSIONS: PRP was well accepted and tolerated in AS patients. However, we did not observe any significant EMT increase or improved pregnancy rates after adding PRP infusion, compared to standard treatment only. The use of intrauterine PRP infusion may be a feasible option, and its potential use must be tested on a larger sample size of AS patients.
Asunto(s)
Implantación del Embrión , Transferencia de Embrión , Fertilización In Vitro/métodos , Ginatresia/terapia , Nacimiento Vivo/epidemiología , Plasma Rico en Plaquetas/citología , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Adulto , Tasa de Natalidad , California/epidemiología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Ginatresia/patología , Humanos , Histeroscopía , Menstruación , Proyectos Piloto , Embarazo , Índice de Embarazo , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Método Simple Ciego , Trasplante AutólogoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: As the paradigm shifts towards improving cancer survivorship, an important concern for reproductive-aged women diagnosed with cancer is how their disease and its treatment will affect their future fertility. We sought to characterize pregnancy attempts and outcomes in breast cancer patients following chemotherapy. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study of women diagnosed with breast cancer seen between 2010 and 2019. A questionnaire was administered following cancer treatment with questions regarding oncologic and reproductive history and attempts and method of conception. RESULTS: Of 181 participants, 46 (25.4%) attempted to conceive following chemotherapy. Thirty-five patients (76.1%) had return of ovarian function. Of those, 34 patients (mean age 32.8 years) first attempted to conceive by intercourse, and 22 (64.7%) became pregnant, resulting in 17 live births. Of the remaining 12 who did not successfully conceive through intercourse, eight went on to try other methods, resulting in five additional pregnancies and one live birth. Twelve patients (mean age 34.6 years) proceeded directly to ART; of those, eight (66.7%) became pregnant, resulting in six live births. CONCLUSION: In breast cancer patients with return of ovarian function after chemotherapy, half were able to conceive by intercourse alone. In order to maximize reproductive potential in patients who have return of ovarian function, providers should offer natural conception as a reasonable option prior to the use of cryopreserved tissue. For those who did not attempt to conceive on their own, the use of pre-treatment cryopreserved eggs or embryos had a high likelihood of success.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Preservación de la Fertilidad/métodos , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas , Adulto , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Criopreservación , Femenino , Fertilización , Humanos , Nacimiento Vivo , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Ovario/fisiología , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo , Estudios Prospectivos , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to determine whether fertility preservation (FP) with oocyte/embryo cryopreservation is associated with differences in disease-free survival (DFS). METHODS: This retrospective study included patients aged 18 to 45 who were diagnosed with invasive breast cancer between 2007 and 2017 and were seen for FP consultation at a university fertility center before cancer treatment. The primary endpoint, DFS, was defined as the time from FP consultation until patients developed a locoregional recurrence, distant metastasis, a contralateral breast tumor, or a new primary malignancy. DFS was compared for FP versus no FP using Kaplan-Meier survival estimates and Cox proportional-hazard regression analysis. RESULTS: The study included 329 women, with 207 (63%) in the FP group and 122 (37%) in the no FP group. Patients who underwent FP had more aggressive initial disease profiles than those in the no FP group. In addition, they were younger (35 vs 37 years; P = .009), more often had stage II or III disease (67% vs 55%; P = .03), and had higher rates of requiring chemotherapy (77% vs 65%; P = .01). Over a median follow-up of 43 months, the rates of DFS were similar among patients in the FP group and the no FP group (93% vs 94%, respectively; hazard ratio [HR] 0.7; 95% CI, 0.3-1.7). Positive ER status (79% vs 83%; P = .38), neoadjuvant chemotherapy (41% vs 48%; P = .32), ER-positive DFS (HR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.1-1.6), and neoadjuvant chemotherapy DFS (HR, 1.4; 95% CI, 0.2-9.1) were similar in the FP and no FP groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: At a median follow-up of 43 months, FP appears unlikely to affect DFS, even in the setting of tumors with positive ER status or treatment with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (in which the tumor remains in situ during FP).
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Criopreservación/métodos , Preservación de la Fertilidad/efectos adversos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Fertilidad/genética , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Terapia Neoadyuvante/métodos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Oocitos/crecimiento & desarrollo , Oocitos/trasplante , Derivación y Consulta , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
The 5 principal reasons a patient may consider fertility preservation are: treatment for cancer that may affect fertility, treatment for nonmalignant medical conditions that may affect fertility, planned indications, planned gender-affirming hormone therapy or surgery, or in the setting of genetic conditions that may increase the risks of premature ovarian insufficiency or early menopause. This paper will focus on describing who may consider preserving their fertility, how to provide the best clinical evaluation of those seeking fertility preservation, and current and future fertility preservation techniques. Last, we will highlight a need to continue to expand access to fertility preservation technologies.
Asunto(s)
Preservación de la Fertilidad , Menopausia Prematura , Neoplasias , Insuficiencia Ovárica Primaria , Femenino , Fertilidad , Humanos , Insuficiencia Ovárica Primaria/prevención & controlRESUMEN
STUDY QUESTION: Does a breast cancer diagnosis impact ovarian function in the setting of fertility preservation? SUMMARY ANSWER: Ovarian reserve and ovarian stimulation outcomes are similar in patients with a new diagnosis of breast cancer and patients undergoing elective fertility preservation. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Prior studies, with small study populations, lack of controlling for individual differences in ovarian reserve and infertile controls, have reported conflicting outcomes for cancer patients undergoing ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This retrospective cohort analysis included 589 patients undergoing ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation between 2009 and 2015. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Women with a recent breast cancer diagnosis (n = 191) and women desiring elective fertility preservation (n = 398) underwent ovarian stimulation with an antagonist protocol at an academic medical center. The aromatase inhibitor letrozole was administered to breast cancer patients with estrogen-sensitive disease. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Baseline antral follicle count (AFC) was not different between the breast cancer patients and controls (15.4 ± 10.4 [mean ± SD] vs 15.4 ± 10.0, P = NS), even after categorization by age. Total (19.4 ± 0.9 [mean ± SEM] vs 17.0 ± 0.5, P = NS) and mature (MII) oocytes retrieved (13.7 ± 0.7 vs 13.2 ± 0.4, P = NS), adjusted for age, BMI and total gonadotropin dose, were also similar between the two groups. Letrozole use was associated with a decreased maturity rate (MII/total oocytes retrieved) compared to elective cryopreservation (0.71 ± 0.01 vs 0.77 ± 0.01, P < 0.001), although the mature oocyte yield [MII/AFC] was comparable (1.01 ± 0.06 vs 0.93 ± 0.03, P = NS). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The single center design may impact generalizability. Additionally, the lack of subsequent embryo and pregnancy data is an inherent weakness. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: In females, a breast cancer diagnosis does not impact gonadal function as measured by AFC or ovarian stimulation outcomes. Breast cancer patients should be counseled that their response to ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation is similar to that of patients undergoing elective oocyte cryopreservation. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): None. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Preservación de la Fertilidad/métodos , Reserva Ovárica , Inducción de la Ovulación/métodos , Adulto , Criopreservación/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
STUDY QUESTION: Is random start ovarian stimulation associated with delays in initiation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer? SUMMARY ANSWER: Among women who complete fertility preservation (FP) consultation, random start ovarian stimulation is unlikely to delay time to initiation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy start. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is now a widely accepted treatment modality for operable breast cancer and random start ovarian stimulation is an increasingly-utilized modality for FP. While conventional ovarian stimulation does not appear to delay starting adjuvant chemotherapy, the relationship between random start ovarian stimulation and neoadjuvant chemotherapy start is not well-understood. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Cross-sectional study of all women seen between from January 2011 to April 2017 for FP consultation prior to starting neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: A chart-review was performed. Study inclusion criteria were female sex; age 18-45; non-metastatic breast cancer diagnosis; underwent FP consultation; underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Referrals for FP evaluation came from a regional referral base of oncology clinics. Various time-points related to cancer diagnosis, FP or chemotherapy were obtained from medical record review. We compared time-points between those who underwent ovarian stimulation for FP versus those who did not using T-tests and linear modeling. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: A total of 89 women who had FP consultation prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy were identified. Sixty-seven percent underwent ovarian stimulation prior to cancer treatment and 33% did not. Women who underwent ovarian stimulation were similar in parity and clinical cancer stage to those who did not. Overall, the average time from cancer diagnosis to chemotherapy start was similar between the group that did undergo ovarian stimulation and those who did not (38.1 ± 11.3 versus 39.4 ± 18.5 days, P = 0.672). Those that underwent ovarian stimulation were referred 9.4 ± 6.8 days after diagnosis versus 17.9 ± 15.3 days for those who did not undergo ovarian stimulation (P < 0.001). LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: Retrospective study with potential for selection bias among those who underwent ovarian stimulation versus those who did not. Reasons for caution include the possibility of unmeasured differences among those who did and did not undergo ovarian stimulation, including: patients' and providers' perceptions of the urgency to start chemotherapy, ongoing oncology work-up and treatment planning, FP decision-making, and the pursuit of second and third opinions. The difference in time from referral to FP consultation may have also influenced patients' decisions about whether to undergo ovarian stimulation. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: In this study, FP with random start ovarian stimulation was not associated with a delay cancer treatment in the neoadjuvant setting, so long as there was a prompt FP referral. Patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy should be informed of these findings to avoid unnecessary anxiety due to concern for delays. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This study was supported by departmental research funding within the University of California, San Francisco Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences. There are no conflicts of interest to declare.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Preservación de la Fertilidad/métodos , Terapia Neoadyuvante/métodos , Inducción de la Ovulación/métodos , Adulto , Neoplasias de la Mama/complicaciones , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios Transversales , Toma de Decisiones , Femenino , Preservación de la Fertilidad/efectos adversos , Humanos , Terapia Neoadyuvante/efectos adversos , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tiempo de TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Unlike infertility, patients presenting for fertility preservation (FP) are often using combined hormonal contraceptives (CHC). We studied whether long-term (≥6 months) CHC use is associated with reversible suppression of antral follicle count (AFC). METHODS: This is a longitudinal study of FP cycles from 2012 to 2016. We studied three groups: those without CHC exposure (NO CHC), those with CHC usage with a CHC break (BREAK), and without a break (NO BREAK) prior to ovarian stimulation. We assessed ovarian reserve by AFC at initial consultation and discussed the possibility of CHC suppression of AFC. Patients chose between ovarian stimulation with no CHC break versus ovarian stimulation after a CHC break. AFC was measured serially in the BREAK group. We assessed whether AFC suppression was reversed in the BREAK group. Total oocyte yield was compared among the NO CHC, BREAK, and NO BREAK groups. T tests, ANOVA, and linear/logistic regressions were used. RESULTS: Seven hundred forty-three women underwent FP. Twenty-one percent (n = 154) were taking long-term CHC (≥6 months). AFC suppression was more likely with CHC use (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.1-2.4, P = 0.011). The BREAK group (n = 79) stopped CHC for an average of 4 months. AFC improvement started at 1 month and plateaued at approximately 6- to 7-month break. The BREAK group had approximately twice as many oocytes per initial AFC as NO BREAK (2.8 ± 3.8 vs. 1.4 ± 0.9, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: When women present for FP on CHC, AFC may be suppressed. A CHC break of several months is associated with an increase in AFC and a potential improvement in overall egg yield.
Asunto(s)
Preservación de la Fertilidad/métodos , Infertilidad/fisiopatología , Oocitos/crecimiento & desarrollo , Folículo Ovárico/crecimiento & desarrollo , Adulto , Anticonceptivos Hormonales Orales/administración & dosificación , Anticonceptivos Hormonales Orales/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Infertilidad/inducido químicamente , Oocitos/efectos de los fármacos , Folículo Ovárico/efectos de los fármacos , Reserva Ovárica/efectos de los fármacos , Ovario/efectos de los fármacos , Ovario/crecimiento & desarrollo , Inducción de la Ovulación/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This study seeks to examine the relation between sociodemographic characteristics and the utilization of fertility preservation services in reproductive age women diagnosed with cancer. METHODS: A total of 1041 women diagnosed with cancer between the ages of 18 and 40 years responded to a retrospective survey on demographic information and reproductive health history. Five cancer types were included: leukemia, Hodgkin disease, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, breast cancer, and gastrointestinal cancer. Nine hundred eighteen women reported treatment with potential to affect fertility (chemotherapy, pelvic radiation, pelvic surgery, or bone marrow transplant). Student t test, linear regression, and multivariate logistic regression were used where appropriate to determine the relation between sociodemographic characteristics and the odds of using fertility preservation services. RESULTS: Sixty-one percent of women were counseled on the risk of cancer treatment to fertility by the oncology team. Overall, 4% of women pursued fertility preservation. In multivariate analysis, women who had not attained a bachelor's degree (odds ratio [OR], 0.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.5-0.9) were less likely to be counseled. Trends also suggested possible disparities in access to fertility preservation with age older than 35 years (OR, 0.1; 95% CI, 0.0-1.4) or previous children (OR, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.1-1.1) at diagnosis. Disparities in access to fertility preservation based on ethnicity and sexual orientation were also observed. CONCLUSIONS: Sociodemographic health disparities likely affect access to fertility preservation services. Although awareness of fertility preservation has improved in the past decade, an unmet need remains for reproductive health counseling and fertility preservation in reproductive age women diagnosed with cancer.
Asunto(s)
Preservación de la Fertilidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Neoplasias , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/etnología , Neoplasias de la Mama/radioterapia , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Recolección de Datos , Femenino , Fertilidad/efectos de los fármacos , Fertilidad/efectos de la radiación , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/etnología , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/radioterapia , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/cirugía , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/etnología , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/radioterapia , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/cirugía , Humanos , Leucemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Leucemia/etnología , Leucemia/radioterapia , Leucemia/cirugía , Linfoma no Hodgkin/tratamiento farmacológico , Linfoma no Hodgkin/etnología , Linfoma no Hodgkin/radioterapia , Linfoma no Hodgkin/cirugía , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias/etnología , Neoplasias/radioterapia , Neoplasias/cirugía , Grupos Raciales , Salud Reproductiva , Estudios Retrospectivos , Conducta Sexual , Factores Socioeconómicos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The post-treatment quality of life (QOL) impacts of receiving precancer-treatment infertility counseling and of pursuing fertility preservation have not been described in large-scale studies of reproductive age women with cancer. METHODS: In total, 1041 women who were diagnosed between ages 18 and 40 years responded to a retrospective survey and reported whether they received infertility counseling before cancer treatment and whether they took action to preserve fertility. Five cancer types were included: leukemia, Hodgkin disease, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, breast cancer, and gastrointestinal cancer. Validated QOL scales were used: the Decision Regret Score, the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS), and the brief World Health Organization QOL questionnaire. RESULTS: Overall, 560 women (61%) who received treatment that potentially could affect fertility were counseled by the oncology team, 45 (5%) were counseled by fertility specialists, and 36 (4%) took action to preserve fertility. Pretreatment infertility counseling by a fertility specialist and an oncologist resulted in lower regret than counseling by an oncologist alone (8.4 vs 11.0; P < .0001). The addition of fertility preservation (6.6 vs 11.0; P < .0001) also was associated with even lower regret scores than counseling by an oncologist alone. Further improvements also were observed in SWLS scores with the addition of fertility specialist counseling (23.0 vs 19.8; P = .09) or preserving fertility (24.0 vs 19.0; P = .05). CONCLUSIONS: Receiving specialized counseling about reproductive loss and pursuing fertility preservation is associated with less regret and greater QOL for survivors, yet few patients are exposed to this potential benefit. Women of reproductive age should have expert counseling and should be given the opportunity to make active decisions about preserving fertility.
Asunto(s)
Consejo , Preservación de la Fertilidad , Fertilidad , Neoplasias/psicología , Calidad de Vida , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias/fisiopatología , Satisfacción del Paciente , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The authors sought to describe the age-specific impact of infertility and early menopause after chemotherapy among reproductive age women with cancer. METHODS: A total of 1041 women diagnosed with cancer between the ages of 18 and 40 years responded to a retrospective survey on reproductive health history. Five cancer types were included: leukemia, Hodgkin disease (HD), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), breast cancer, and gastrointestinal(GI) cancer. Survey questions addressed acute ovarian failure (cessation of menses after treatment), early menopause (menopause before 45 years old), and infertility (failed conception). Logistic regression was used to determine the proportions of acute ovarian failure and infertility based on age at diagnosis. Censored data methods were used to determine the probability of early menopause. RESULTS: Six hundred twenty women received chemotherapy alone. The percentage reporting acute ovarian failure was 8%, 10%, 9%, and 5% for HD, NHL, breast cancer, and GI cancer, respectively. Acute ovarian failure increased significantly with age at diagnosis (P < .05). In subjects not reporting acute ovarian failure, the incidence of infertility was at least 40% at age 35 years and increased significantly with age at diagnosis in HD and breast cancer (P < .05). The estimated probability of early menopause was at least 25% at age 30 years and increased significantly with younger age at diagnosis in HD, NHL, and GI cancer (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: For patients to receive appropriate counseling, it is important that they understand the potential increased risk of infertility and early menopause beyond that of acute ovarian failure. These findings can provide improved, age-specific counseling regarding reproductive impairment for young women diagnosed with cancer.
Asunto(s)
Infertilidad Femenina/inducido químicamente , Menopausia Prematura/efectos de los fármacos , Insuficiencia Ovárica Primaria/inducido químicamente , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , RiesgoRESUMEN
Objective: To investigate the impact of chemotherapy on the uterus. Design: Cross-sectional pilot study. Setting: Single university fertility clinic. Patients: Twelve patients with a history of alkylating agent chemotherapy exposure after Hodgkin lymphoma (cancer) vs. 12 normally menstruating women (controls). Interventions: The inclusion criteria were age of 18-45 years and consent for endometrial biopsy. The exclusion criteria were the absence of the uterus, completed pelvic radiation, uterine or cervical cancer, and metastatic cancer. Each participant underwent endometrial biopsy and pelvic ultrasound. All study visits were conducted in the late proliferative phase of the menstrual cycle. Main Outcome Measures: Uterine volume, blood flow, endometrial thickness, histology, deoxyribonucleic acid methylation pattern, and relative ribonucleic acid (RNA) expression level during the same phase of the menstrual cycle. Results: In the study group, visits were conducted at a median of 31.5 (13.5-42.5) months after chemotherapy. The median uterine volume among cancer survivors was 36 (11.3-67) cm3, and that of the general population controls was 39 (13-54) cm3. On histologic examination, there were no cytologic or architectural atypia. The RNA-sequencing analysis revealed poor clustering of both control and treatment samples. However, we identified 3 differentially expressed genes on RNA-sequencing, but there was no concordance found among the differentially expressed genes and deoxyribonucleic acid methylation changes suggesting most likely false-positive results. Conclusions: Approximately 2.5 years after chemotherapy, a time at which several survivors of Hodgkin lymphoma may resume family-building, endometrial thickness and endometrial histology were not significantly affected by a history of alkylating agent chemotherapy exposure.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To define the live birth rates in a large, population-based study of the most common reproductive-age cancers in women. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Population-based study. PATIENTS: Female cancer patients diagnosed with cancer at age 18 years old or older between 1952-2014 (n = 17,952) were compared to fertility of non-cancer controls (n = 89,436). INTERVENTIONS: Live births in cancer survivors were compared with those in healthy, age-matched controls. Cases and controls were matched in the ratio of 5:1 for birth year, birthplace (Utah, yes/no), and follow-up time in Utah. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Rate of at least one live birth, reported as an incidence rate ratio (IRR). RESULTS: Of all cancer survivors, 3,127 (17.4%) had at least 1 live birth after treatment in comparison to 19,405 healthy, age-matched controls (21.7%) with the same amount of time exposure for attempting pregnancy. Breast cancer was the most common cancer type (23.1% of patients in cohort). Compared with age-matched, healthy controls, IRR of live birth was 0.69 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.67-0.70) for all cancer types, 0.25 (95% CI, 0.20-0.33) for leukemia, 0.40 (95% CI, 0.28-0.59) for gastrointestinal cancers, 0.44 (95% CI, 0.41-0.48) for breast cancer, 0.53 (95% CI, 0.47-0.59) for central nervous system cancers, and 0.57 (95% CI, 0.44-0.73) for soft tissue cancers. With all cancer types stratified by age at diagnosis, IRR for live births in cancer survivors aged >41 years at diagnosis was 0.48 (95% CI, 0.44-0.52); IRR was 0.64 (95% CI, 0.61-0.67) in the group aged 31-40 years and 0.71 (95% CI, 0.69-0.74) in the group aged 18-30 years after their cancer treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Cancer and its treatment were associated with lower live birth rates when comparing women with cancer vs. age-matched, healthy controls.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To explore the role of reproductive travel (travel to another state or country for reproductive services) for intended parents at the time of delivery of gestational carrier pregnancies and to analyze the sociodemographic characteristics of those who build families through gestational surrogacy. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of births involving gestational surrogacy in Utah from 2009 to 2018. Data were obtained from birth certificates. State and country of residence were collected for intended parents, and the legal climates of these locations were assessed by reviewing laws at the time. Sociodemographic characteristics were compared among intended parents, parents with pregnancies resulting from assisted reproductive technology (ART) without gestational surrogacy, and parents with spontaneous pregnancies. RESULTS: A total of 361 gestational carrier pregnancies resulted in the birth of at least one liveborn neonate during the study period, involving 715 intended parents. Additionally, 50,434 parents delivered children after nonsurrogacy ART, and 950,460 parents delivered children after spontaneous fertilization. Many intended parents (17.2%) lived in countries outside of the United States, the majority of which (69.9%) had laws against surrogacy. Of those who lived within the United States, 57.4% lived outside of Utah, but only 15.9% lived in states that banned compensated surrogacy. Statutes in Utah support compensated and uncompensated gestational surrogacy. Intended parents were significantly older than parents with both nonsurrogacy ART pregnancies and spontaneous pregnancies (median age 38, 31, and 29 years, respectively) and had higher levels of education; 70.2% of intended parents had a bachelor's degree or above, compared with 48.2% of parents with nonsurrogacy ART pregnancies and 33.1% of parents with spontaneous pregnancies. DISCUSSION: A majority of intended parents live outside of Utah, which may be an important consideration for health care professionals caring for women with gestational carrier pregnancies. However, most intended parents live in places that do not have laws banning surrogacy, suggesting that there may be other reasons that intended parents travel for delivery.