RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Women are given variable information about when to recommence driving after surgery. AIMS: To assess obstetrician/gynaecologists' and midwives' knowledge, attitudes and advice about car driving after abdominal surgery including hysterectomy or caesarean section (CS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: An anonymous SurveyMonkey™ survey was distributed to accredited trainees and Fellows of the Royal Australian New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists and midwives registered with the Australian College of Midwives by email in November 2013. Demographic information, recommendations about driving, and reasoning behind these recommendations were collected. RESULTS: Nine hundred and seventy-seven clinician responses (15.8%) were analysed: 555 midwives, 92 trainees and 330 Fellows. Ninety-six percent gave advice about driving after surgery. Respondents considered pain (85.6%), medication (73.2%) and mobility (70.5%) the most important factors when advising on resumption of driving. After uncomplicated CS, 19% said they would advise a well woman that she could drive <4 weeks, 18% advised four weeks, 33% advised five to six weeks and 27% did not give a specific timeframe. Similar timeframes were given following hysterectomy. Of each professional group, trainees (49%) and midwives (48%) were more likely to advise waiting five to six weeks to resume driving compared with Fellows (9%) (P < 0.001). Although 71.5% of respondents thought that most women drove before four weeks, only 33.9% of respondents thought driving earlier than advice given was unsafe. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians frequently give advice about driving after surgery. This advice is inconsistent and many advise women not to drive for significant time periods. This study highlights the need for education and research about driving after surgery.
Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Conducción de Automóvil , Ginecología , Partería , Obstetricia , Adulto , Australia , Cesárea/efectos adversos , Consejo Dirigido , Becas , Femenino , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Histerectomía/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Limitación de la Movilidad , Nueva Zelanda , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología , Periodo Posparto , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de TiempoAsunto(s)
Combinación Buprenorfina y Naloxona/uso terapéutico , Metadona/uso terapéutico , Apnea Central del Sueño/tratamiento farmacológico , Sueño/efectos de los fármacos , Dependencia de Heroína/complicaciones , Dependencia de Heroína/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Hipoxia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Polisomnografía , Respiración/efectos de los fármacosRESUMEN
Background: Women are commonly advised to avoid driving following cesarean section (CS), however, this advice is based upon little evidence.Aims: We aimed to assess a woman's capacity to drive a car postbirth using a driving simulator to objectively examine driving behavior and competencies.Materials and methods: We conducted a pilot, prospective, randomized study from a tertiary referral hospital in Sydney, Australia. Postnatal women who were regular drivers and had given birth by vaginal delivery (VD), elective cesarean section (ElCS) or emergency cesarean section (EmCS) were randomized to early (2-3 weeks post birth) or late (5-6 weeks post birth) driver simulator testing. Driving performance was measured by reaction time to simulated impediments, awareness, attention, braking ability, traffic infringements, and accidents. Analysis was by intention to treat. Outcomes were assessed using contingency analysis via two-sample t-tests and Wilcoxen rank-sum tests.Results: 66 women were randomized and 38 attended simulator testing (57.6%; 19 early, 19 late; 8 VD, 14 ElCS, 16 EmCS). There was no difference in reaction times, driver awareness, braking times, or traffic infringements by early versus late testing (all p > .05), nor by mode of birth (p > .05) amongst the women who completed driver testing. At 7-8 weeks, all women were driving, without an accident.Conclusions: Although the study is limited by small sample size, there was no difference in driving capability by early versus late driving time since birth, nor by mode of birth. Further research is needed, but we cannot provide evidence to discourage well women from driving from 2-3 weeks post birth.
Asunto(s)
Conducción de Automóvil/normas , Periodo Posparto , Accidentes de Tránsito/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Atención , Conducción de Automóvil/estadística & datos numéricos , Concienciación , Simulación por Computador , Parto Obstétrico/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Prospectivos , Tiempo de ReacciónRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Frequent attenders to Emergency Departments (ED) often have contributing substance use disorders (SUD), but there are few evaluations of relevant interventions. We examine one such pilot assertive management service set in Sydney, Australia (IMPACT), aimed at reducing hospital presentations and costs, and improving client outcomes. METHODS: IMPACT eligibility criteria included moderate-to-severe SUD and ED attendance on ≥5 occasions in the previous year. A pre-post intervention design examined clients' presentations and outcomes 6 months before and after participation to a comparison group of eligible clients who did not engage. RESULTS: Between 2014 and 2015, 34 clients engaged in IMPACT, with 12 in the comparison group. Clients demonstrated significant reductions in preventable (p < 0.05) and non-preventable (p < 0.01) ED presentations and costs, and in hospital admissions and costs (p < 0.01). IMPACT clients also reported a significant reduction in use days for primary substance (p < 0.01). The comparison group had a significant reduction (p < 0.05) in non-preventable visits only. CONCLUSIONS: Assertive management services can be effective in preventing hospital presentations and costs for frequent ED attenders with SUDs and improving client outcomes, representing an effective integrated health approach. The IMPACT service has since been refined and integrated into routine care across a number of hospitals in Sydney, Australia.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In a previous study on severely infertile men, we observed alterations in the number of meiotic crossovers; however, it is unknown if these men also show alterations in the position of crossovers. METHODS: Spermatocytes from 15 men (5 control men and 10 infertile men) were immunostained to observe the synaptonemal complex and MLH1 foci, which localize to sites of crossovers. Fluorescent in situ hybridization was performed to identify chromosomes 13, 18 and 21. Chromosome bivalents were separated into those with single and double crossover configurations, and the distribution of MLH1 foci along each chromosome arm was calculated. The inter-focal distances on chromosome 13 and 18 bivalents with double crossovers were also calculated. RESULTS: Four of the infertile men displayed an altered MLH1 distribution on at least one of the chromosome arms studied. Of these four men, two displayed reduced rates of meiotic recombination. Only one man displayed an abnormality in crossover interference, with inter-focal distances reduced on chromosome 13 bivalents. CONCLUSIONS: Recombination defects in infertile men may include alterations in the number of crossovers, the position of crossovers or both. Alterations in both the number and position of crossovers may increase the risk of aneuploid sperm in infertile men.
Asunto(s)
Proteínas Adaptadoras Transductoras de Señales/genética , Proteínas Adaptadoras Transductoras de Señales/metabolismo , Infertilidad Masculina/genética , Proteínas Nucleares/genética , Proteínas Nucleares/metabolismo , Recombinación Genética , Espermatocitos/fisiología , Aneuploidia , Cromosomas Humanos Par 13 , Cromosomas Humanos Par 18 , Cromosomas Humanos Par 21 , Técnica del Anticuerpo Fluorescente , Humanos , Hibridación Fluorescente in Situ , Infertilidad Masculina/metabolismo , Infertilidad Masculina/fisiopatología , Masculino , Meiosis/genética , Homólogo 1 de la Proteína MutL , Complejo Sinaptonémico/metabolismoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: Transfer from methadone to buprenorphine is problematic for many opioid-dependent patients, with limited documented evidence or practical clinical guidance, particularly for the range of methadone doses routinely prescribed for most patients (>50âmg). This study aimed to implement and evaluate recent national Australian guidelines for transferring patients from methadone to buprenorphine. DESIGN AND METHODS: A multisite prospective cohort study. Participants were patients who transferred from methadone to buprenorphine-naloxone at 1 of 4 specialist addiction centers in Australia and New Zealand. Clinicians were trained in the guidelines, and medical records were reviewed to examine process (eg, transfer setting, doses, and guideline adherence) and safety (precipitated withdrawal) measures. Participants completed research interviews before and after transfer-assessing changes in substance use, health outcomes, and side effects. RESULTS: In all, 33 participants underwent transfer, 9 from low methadone doses (<30âmg), 9 from medium doses (30-50âmg), and 15 from high doses (>50âmg). The majority of high-dose transfers occurred in inpatient settings. There was reasonable guideline adherence, and no complications identified in the low and medium-dose transfers. Three high-dose transfers (20%) experienced precipitated withdrawal, and 7/33 participants (21%) returned to methadone within 1 week of attempted transfer. DISCUSSIONS AND CONCLUSIONS: Transfer is feasible in outpatient settings for those transferring from methadone doses below 50âmg; however, inpatient settings and specialist supervision is recommended for higher-dose transfers. The Australian clinical guidelines appear safe and feasible, although further research is required to optimize high-dose transfer procedures.
Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Buprenorfina/administración & dosificación , Sustitución de Medicamentos , Metadona/administración & dosificación , Tratamiento de Sustitución de Opiáceos/normas , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Australia , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nueva Zelanda , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: The Australian Treatment Outcomes Profile (ATOP) is a brief instrument that assesses a range of substance use, health and well-being measures over the past 28 days. Previously, it has been validated in general adult Australian alcohol and other drug (AOD) treatment populations. However, the increasing number of older-aged clients attending AOD treatment warrants the instrument to be validated for this population. The aim of this study was to validate the ATOP for use in older AOD populations, by comparing it with validated 'gold standard' measures used in older populations. DESIGN AND METHODS: A convenience sample of 99 participants aged ≥50 attending specialist AOD services in Sydney, Australia were administered the ATOP by a researcher, along with alcohol use (AUDIT) and health questionnaires [Physical Health Questionnaire-15, 12-item short-form Health Survey (SF-12) and Geriatric Depression Scale]. RESULTS: The ATOP items had strong agreement with the comparison instruments. The highest correlation was between the 28 days alcohol use and the AUDIT. ATOP psychological health scores highly correlated with the SF-12 mental health subscale and the Geriatric Depression Scale, and ATOP physical health scores significantly correlated with the SF-12 physical health subscale and the Physical Health Questionnaire-15. The ATOP Quality of Life score significantly correlated with all health measures. Discussion and Conclusions The ATOP has good concurrent validity with other validated substance use and health measures in an older population. Comparison with general older populations demonstrated the poorer health of this group of older AOD clients in particular.[Lintzeris N, Monds L A, Rivas G, Leung S, Withall A, Draper B. The Australian Treatment Outcomes Profile instrument as a clinical tool for older alcohol and other drug clients: A validation study. Drug Alcohol Rev 2016;35:673-677].
Asunto(s)
Salud Mental , Calidad de Vida , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/terapia , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Anciano , Australia , Consejo , Estudios Transversales , Depresión/diagnóstico , Femenino , Estado de Salud , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Centros de Tratamiento de Abuso de Sustancias , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/psicología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: The number of older clients attending drug and alcohol (D&A) services is increasing, although there is insufficient knowledge regarding service needs for this group. The aim of this study was to document the patterns of substance use, health status, cognition, social conditions, and health service utilisation of older clients in D&A treatment. DESIGN AND METHODS: A cross-sectional observational study of 99 clients aged ≥50 years (M = 55, SD = 4.5; 77% male) attending specialist D&A services (N = 30 alcohol treatment, N = 69 opioid treatment) in Sydney, Australia. Participants completed a confidential research interview. Findings were compared to aggregated data from younger opioid substitution treatment (OST) clients attending the same services (N = 214). RESULTS: Alcohol (46%), benzodiazepines (40%) and cannabis (38%) were the most commonly reported substances used in the past 4 weeks; 23% reported no recent substance use, and 17% reported using three or more drugs. Participants reported high levels of physical and mental health problems, social isolation, low levels of employment, and a third reported difficulties with daily living activities. Forty percent had been injured in a fall in the past 12 months. The mean Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-R score was 82.4 ± 9.6, with 40% performing at a level consistent with severe cognitive impairment. A significantly higher proportion of older participants used alcohol and benzodiazepines than younger clients, and older participants had significantly poorer psychological health, physical health and quality of life. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: D&A services will require strategies to address the complex physical, mental, cognitive and social problems of older clients.
Asunto(s)
Estado de Salud , Calidad de Vida , Centros de Tratamiento de Abuso de Sustancias , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiología , Actividades Cotidianas , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Alcoholismo/epidemiología , Alcoholismo/rehabilitación , Trastornos del Conocimiento/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Empleo/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nueva Gales del Sur/epidemiología , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/epidemiología , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/rehabilitación , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/rehabilitación , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Alprazolam, has been associated with disproportionate harms compared to other benzodiazepines, especially among people in opioid substitution treatment (OST). We examine the effect of the rescheduling of alprazolam in Australia, from Schedule 4 to Schedule 8 in February 2014 amongst a high-risk population of clients in OST. METHODS: OST participants who reported recent (last month) alprazolam use were recruited from three Sydney clinics. Participants (n=57) were interviewed immediately prior to rescheduling and again three months and 12 months after rescheduling. We examined self-reported patterns of drug use, drug availability, mental and physical health. A linear mixed models approach was used to analyse changes in alprazolam and other benzodiazepine use. RESULTS: Mean days of alprazolam use in the past 28 days decreased from 13.7 to 7.1 days, and mean weekly alprazolam dose decreased from 15.1mg to 6.1mg at 12 months follow-up (p=0.001). Total weekly benzodiazepine use also reduced from a mean of 222mg diazepam equivalent to 157mg (p=0.044). Other substance use did not change significantly. Reported mode of cost price of street alprazolam doubled from $5 to $10 over the 12-month period. CONCLUSION: Alprazolam rescheduling resulted in an overall reduction in alprazolam and total benzodiazepine use, without substitution with other drugs, in the short term. Unintended harms were not observed. Rescheduling appears to have been effective in reducing alprazolam use in this high-risk population.
Asunto(s)
Alprazolam/efectos adversos , Reducción del Daño , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/efectos adversos , Tratamiento de Sustitución de Opiáceos , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/rehabilitación , Mal Uso de Medicamentos de Venta con Receta/efectos adversos , Adulto , Alprazolam/administración & dosificación , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Humanos , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/administración & dosificación , Modelos Lineales , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nueva Gales del Sur , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/diagnóstico , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/psicología , Mal Uso de Medicamentos de Venta con Receta/prevención & control , Estudios Prospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
A single-blind randomized study was conducted on young (18-21 years, n = 16) and mature (25-35 years, n = 16) drivers to assess how age, combined with a modest dose of alcohol (0.7 g/kg for males and 0.6 g/kg for females), influenced performance on a driving simulator. The driving tasks included detecting the presence of a vehicle on the horizon as quickly as possible, estimating the point on the road that an approaching vehicle would have passed by the participants' vehicle (time-to-collision) and overtaking another vehicle against a steady stream of oncoming traffic. The results of the vehicle detection task showed that detection times were significantly slower with maturity, alcohol consumption and lower approaching vehicle speeds (50 kph), particularly on curved sections of road. Approaching vehicle speed was also found to significantly influence time-to-collision (TTC) judgments, such that faster approach speeds led to less underestimated (and therefore riskier) judgments of TTC than slower speeds. In the overtaking task, mature participants demonstrated impaired discrimination skills with varying approaching vehicle speeds, while young participants recorded significantly slower speeds while overtaking a vehicle, thus increasing the time that they spent in the opposing lane. In conclusion, young and mature drivers demonstrated pivotal differences in behavior in this study. Young drivers showed a greater tendency to engage in risky driving, while experienced drivers appeared to be more susceptible to perceptual influences. Overall, alcohol consumption impaired a driver's ability to divide attention, but had little effect on decision-making processes.
Asunto(s)
Accidentes de Tránsito , Intoxicación Alcohólica/fisiopatología , Conducción de Automóvil/psicología , Asunción de Riesgos , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Intoxicación Alcohólica/psicología , Atención/efectos de los fármacos , Atención/fisiología , Simulación por Computador , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Desempeño Psicomotor/efectos de los fármacos , Tiempo de Reacción/efectos de los fármacos , Medición de Riesgo , Detección de Abuso de Sustancias , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
Interstitial lung disease (ILD) classification requires a multidisciplinary review that includes input from an ILD clinician, chest radiologist, and lung pathologist. We report a case of ILD that remained unclassifiable due to discordant clinical, radiological, and pathological findings despite a thorough evaluation that included examination of explanted lung tissue. This case demonstrates that ILD can remain unclassifiable even with a complete evaluation and illustrates one approach to the management of such patients.
RESUMEN
ISSUES: Road crashes contribute significantly to the total burden of injury in Australia, with the risk of injury being associated with the presence of drugs and/or alcohol in the driver's blood. Increasingly, some of the most commonly detected drugs include prescription medicines, the most notable of these being benzodiazepines and opioids. However, there is a paucity of experimental research into the effects of prescribed psychoactive drugs on driving behaviours. APPROACH: This paper provides an overview of experimental studies investigating the effects of prescribed doses of benzodiazepines and opioids on driving ability, and points to future directions for research. KEY FINDINGS: There is growing epidemiological evidence linking the therapeutic use of benzodiazepines and opioids to an increased crash risk. However, the current experimental literature remains unclear. Limitations to study methodologies have resulted in inconsistent findings. IMPLICATIONS: Limited experimental evidence exists to inform policy and guidelines regarding fitness-to-drive for patients taking prescribed benzodiazepines and opioids. CONCLUSION: Further experimental research is required to elucidate the effects of these medications on driving, under varying conditions and in different medical contexts. This will ensure that doctors prescribing benzodiazepines and opioids are well informed, and can appropriately advise patients of the risks associated with driving whilst taking these medications.
Asunto(s)
Accidentes de Tránsito/tendencias , Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Conducción de Automóvil , Benzodiazepinas/efectos adversos , Medicamentos bajo Prescripción/efectos adversos , Accidentes de Tránsito/prevención & control , Accidentes de Tránsito/psicología , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Conducción de Automóvil/psicología , Benzodiazepinas/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Medicamentos bajo Prescripción/uso terapéutico , Desempeño Psicomotor/efectos de los fármacos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
Daytime symptoms resulting from obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) include impaired neurobehavioural performance and increased sleepiness. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) reduces these symptoms. However, even compliant users may temporarily withdraw from CPAP treatment resulting in an immediate return of OSA. It has been hypothesised that these treatment "holidays" may be associated with neurobehavioural decline. Acute administration of a wakefulness promoter during such treatment "holidays" may help maintain neurobehavioural functioning. We examined the effects of 200 mg modafinil on neurobehavioural performance in a placebo-controlled crossover trial including N = 12 OSA patients acutely removed from CPAP. Sleep-wake activity was assessed for four consecutive days on CPAP and one night off CPAP using actigraphy. During the night off, CPAP patients wore a single channel nasal airflow diagnostic device. On the morning after CPAP withdrawal, patients reported to the laboratory and were administered either modafinil (200 mg) or placebo. At 2 h post-administration, patients completed a single simulated drive of approximately 30 min with simultaneous administration of a divided attention task (STISIMtrade mark), critical flicker fusion (CFF) test and subjective sleepiness scales. After a 14-day washout, participants repeated the protocol. CPAP withdrawal was associated with a worsening of sleep efficiency and the movement and fragmentation index (MFI), compared to the on-CPAP nights (all p < or = 0.02). Modafinil did not result in a superior driving simulator performance or CFF responses the morning after CPAP withdrawal but did result in better subjective sleepiness (both p < or = 0.04) compared to placebo. These data do not support the use of modafinil for the maintenance of daytime functioning in patients with OSA who are acutely withdrawn from CPAP.