Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Europace ; 26(7)2024 Jul 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38984719

RESUMEN

AIMS: To devise effective preventive measures, a profound understanding of the evolving patterns and trends in atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter (AFL) burdens is pivotal. Our study was designed to quantify the burden and delineate the risk factors associated with AF and AFL across 204 countries and territories spanning 1990-2021. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data pertaining to AF and AFL were sourced from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. The burden of AF/AFL was evaluated using metrics such as incidence, disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), deaths, and their corresponding age-standardized rates (ASRs), stratified by age, sex, socio-demographic index (SDI), and human development index (HDI). The estimated annual percentage change was employed to quantify changes in ASRs. Population attributable fractions were calculated to determine the proportional contributions of major risk factors to age-standardized AF/AFL deaths. This analysis encompassed the period from 1990 to 2021. Globally, in 2021, there were 4.48 million incident cases [95% uncertainty interval (UI): 3.61-5.70], 8.36 million DALYs (95% UI: 6.97-10.13) and 0.34 million deaths (95% UI: 0.29-0.37) attributed to AF/AFL. The AF/AFL burden in 2021, as well as its trends from 1990 to 2021, displayed substantial variations based on gender, SDI quintiles, and geographical regions. High systolic blood pressure emerged as the leading contributor to age-standardized AF/AFL incidence, prevalence, death, and DALY rate globally among all potential risk factors, followed closely by high body mass index. CONCLUSION: Our study underscores the enduring significance of AF/AFL as a prominent public health concern worldwide, marked by profound regional and national variations. Despite the substantial potential for prevention and management of AF/AFL, there is a pressing imperative to adopt more cost-effective strategies and interventions to target modifiable risk factors, particularly in areas where the burden of AF/AFL is high or escalating.


Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Aleteo Atrial , Carga Global de Enfermedades , Humanos , Fibrilación Atrial/epidemiología , Fibrilación Atrial/mortalidad , Fibrilación Atrial/economía , Aleteo Atrial/epidemiología , Masculino , Femenino , Carga Global de Enfermedades/tendencias , Anciano , Incidencia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Adulto , Años de Vida Ajustados por Discapacidad/tendencias , Medición de Riesgo , Distribución por Edad , Salud Global , Distribución por Sexo , Adulto Joven , Factores de Tiempo , Adolescente
2.
BMJ Open ; 13(7): e072334, 2023 07 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37451720

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Evidence on the association of oxidative balance score (OBS) and visceral adiposity index (VAI) with risk of ischaemic heart disease (IHD) is limited. We aimed to explore the association of OBS and VAI with risk of IHD, and then examined their potential interactive effects. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study. SETTING: The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 27 867 individuals aged more than 20 years were included in this study. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to estimate ORs and 95% CIs for the associations of OBS and VAI with risk of IHD, including coronary heart disease (CHD), heart attack and angina pectoris. RESULTS: Compared with those in the first quintile, participants with highest quintile of OBS had decreased risk of IHD (OR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.50, 0.69), CHD (OR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.52, 0.80), heart attack (OR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.43, 0.66) and angina pectoris (OR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.48, 0.82); meanwhile, those with highest quintile of VAI had increased risk of IHD (OR: 1.46, 95% CI: 1.22, 1.74), CHD (OR: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.07, 1.67), heart attack (OR: 1.55, 95% CI: 1.24, 1.94) and angina pectoris (OR: 1.40, 95% CI: 1.04, 1.87). Furthermore, we observed a stronger association between OBS and risk of IHD among participants with VAI ≥1.73 (OR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.40, 0.62). CONCLUSION: Our study found the negative association between OBS and risk of IHD, and positive association between VAI and risk of IHD. In addition, we found the interactive effects between VAI and OBS on the risk of IHD, underlining the importance of OBS in IHD prevention among participants with high VAI level.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Coronaria , Infarto del Miocardio , Humanos , Factores de Riesgo , Estudios Transversales , Encuestas Nutricionales , Adiposidad , Grasa Intraabdominal , Enfermedad Coronaria/epidemiología , Enfermedad Coronaria/complicaciones , Angina de Pecho/complicaciones , Infarto del Miocardio/complicaciones , Obesidad Abdominal/complicaciones , Obesidad Abdominal/epidemiología , Obesidad Abdominal/diagnóstico , Estrés Oxidativo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA