Enhancing radiotherapy effect in breast cancer with nanoparticles: A review.

Amongst all efforts for improving oncological management outcomes, nanoparticles enhanced radiation for breast cancer patient's treatment is a novel approach that has grown interest for research in the last decade. Multiple preclinical data has been published, from all around the globe; however, clinical evidence is still insufficient for implementing the method in routine practice and in disease specific management. Gold nanoparticles (AuNP), which may be among the most studed materials, account for the majority of available data; however, some new materials have also been used in preclinical settings. Without any safety data available at the moment to support an active use, dosimetric in vitro and in vivo information seems to be consistent with a very promising and hopeful panorama for clinical applications. This review evaluates existing dosimetric data in breast cancer tissue, and a probable future impact in treatment choices and patient outcomes, as further investigation is required in a clinical setting.

Changes in peripheral immune cells after intraoperative radiation therapy in low-risk breast cancer.

A detailed understanding of the interactions and the best dose-fractionation scheme of radiation to maximize antitumor immunity have not been fully established. In this study, the effect on the host immune system of a single dose of 20 Gy through intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) on the surgical bed in low-risk breast cancer patients undergoing conserving breast cancer has been assessed. Peripheral blood samples from 13 patients were collected preoperatively and at 48 h and 3 and 10 weeks after the administration of radiation. We performed a flow cytometry analysis for lymphocyte subpopulations, natural killer cells (NK), regulatory T cells (Treg) and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs). We observed that the subpopulation of NK CD56+high CD16+ increased significantly at 3 weeks after IORT (0.30-0.42%, P < 0.001), while no changes were found in immunosuppressive profile, CD4+CD25+Foxp3+Helios+ Treg cells, granulocytic MDSCs (G-MDSCs) and monocytic MDSCs (Mo-MDSCs). A single dose of IORT may be an effective approach to improve antitumor immunity based on the increase in NK cells and the non-stimulation of immunosuppressive cells involved in immune escape. These findings support future combinations of IORT with immunotherapy, if they are confirmed in a large cohort of breast cancer patients.

Changes of CD68, CD163, and PD-L1 tumor expression during high-dose-rate and pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy for cervical cancer.

PURPOSE: We hypothesized that radiation doses delivered with high-dose-rate (HDR) and pulsed-dose-rate (PDR) brachytherapy in patients with cervical cancer could trigger immune stimulation by modulating immune cells in the tumor microenvironment. The objective was to determine CD68, CD163, and PD-L1 expression in biopsies from patients with cervical cancer and to compare the effects of HDR vs. PDR brachytherapy on the expression of these proteins. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Nineteen consecutive women (mean age, 55.9 years) with histologically proven cervical cancer scheduled for brachytherapy after standard external beam irradiation therapy combined with platinum-based chemotherapy were included in a prospective study. Core tissue biopsies were obtained before radiochemotherapy (biopsy #1), after completion of radiochemotherapy and before brachytherapy (biopsy #2), and 2 weeks after completion of brachytherapy (biopsy #3). HDR or PDR brachytherapy was delivered according to availability of equipment. CD68, CD163, and PD-L1 immunohistochemical expression was estimated using a quantitative method. Conditional logistic regression models were used to assess the relationship between gene expression and time of biopsy for each brachytherapy technique. RESULTS: In relation to CD68 and CD163, statistically significant relationships between gene expression and biopsy tissue samples were not found in any of the brachytherapy techniques, although there was trend toward downexpression of CD68 and CD163 in biopsies #2 and #3 in the HDR brachytherapy cohort only. There was a significant increase in PD-L1 expression in biopsy #3 also in the HDR cohort as compared with the PDR cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Decreased CD68 and CD163 expression did not reach statistical significance, but this trend may have clinical translational potential. Overexpression of PD-L1 in tissue biopsies taken at 14 days in the HDR brachytherapy cohort may tentatively suggest that this time period would be an adequate interval for blockade of the PD-1/PD-L1 axis.