The influence of sex, ethnicity, and CYP2B6 genotype on bupropion metabolism as an index of hepatic CYP2B6 activity in humans.

The effects of sex, ethnicity, and genetic polymorphism on hepatic CYP2B6 (cytochrome P450 2B6) expression and activity were previously demonstrated in vitro. Race/ethnic differences in CYP2B6 genotype and phenotype were observed only in women. To identify important covariates associated with interindividual variation in CYP2B6 activity in vivo, we evaluated these effects in healthy volunteers using bupropion (Wellbutrin SR GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC) as a CYP2B6 probe substrate. A fixed 150-mg oral sustained-release dose of bupropion was administered to 100 healthy volunteers comprising four sex/ethnicity cohorts (n = 25 each): Caucasian men and Caucasian, African American, and Hispanic women. Blood samples were obtained at 0 and 6 hours postdose for the measurement of serum bupropion (BU) and hydroxybupropion (HB) concentrations. Whole blood was obtained at baseline for CYP2B6 genotyping. To characterize the relationship between CYP2B6 activity and ethnicity, sex, and genotype when accounting for serum BU concentrations (dose-adjusted log(10)-transformed), analysis of covariance model was fitted in which the dependent variable was CYP2B6 activity represented as the log(10)-transformed, metabolic ratio of HB to BU concentrations. Several CYP2B6 polymorphisms were associated with CYP2B6 activity. Evidence of dependence of CYP2B6 activity on ethnicity or genotype-by-ethnicity interactions was not detected in women. These results suggest that CYP2B6 genotype is the most important patient variable for predicting the level of CYP2B6 activity in women, when measured by the metabolism of bupropion. The bupropion metabolic ratio appears to detect known differences in CYP2B6 activity associated with genetic polymorphism, across different ethnic groups. Prospective studies will be needed to validate the use of bupropion as a probe substrate for clinical use.

Nelarabine: a novel purine antimetabolite antineoplastic agent.

BACKGROUND: Nelarabine was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in October 2005 for the treatment of T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) and T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma (T-LBL) that has not responded to or has relapsed after treatment with at least 2 chemotherapy regimens. OBJECTIVES: This article reviews the pharmacology, mechanism of action, and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of nelarabine. Also reviewed are nelarabine's clinical efficacy in T-ALL, T-LBL, and other hematologic malignancies; its toxicity profile, dosage, and administration; and areas of ongoing and future research. METHODS: Relevant literature was identified through searches of MEDLINE (1966-April 2007), International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970-April 2007), and the American Society of Hematology database (2003-2006) using the terms nelarabine, Arranon, 506U78, and 2-amino-6-methoxypurine arabinoside. The reference lists of the identified articles were searched for additional sources. Product information obtained from the manufacturer of nelarabine was consulted, as were the FDA reviews of nelarabine. All identified publications were considered, and those meeting the objectives of this review were included. RESULTS: Nelarabine, a soluble prodrug of 9-beta-D- arabinofuranosylguanine (ara-G), is a novel purine antimetabolite antineoplastic that preferentially accumulates in T-cells. Ara-G is rapidly phosphorylated in T-cells to ara-G triphosphate (ara-GTP), which exerts cytotoxic effects. Renal elimination of ara-G is decreased in patients with mild to moderate renal impairment; however, no dose adjustment is recommended. Accumulation of ara-GTP occurs in T-cells in a dose-dependent manner, leading to preferential cytotoxicity. Nelarabine has activity in T-cell malignancies, as evaluated in 2 Phase I and 5 Phase II studies. It received accelerated approval from the FDA based on the resuits of 2 Phase II trials, one in pediatric patients (PGAA 2001) and the other in adults (CALGB 19801). In PGAA 2001, patients with T-ALL in first relapse (n = 33) had an objective response rate of 55% (16 with a complete response [CR] and 2 with a partial response [PR]), and those with T-ALL in second relapse (n = 30) had an objective response rate of 27% (7 CR and 1 PR). Among patients with central nervous system-positive T-ALL or T-cell non-Hodgkins lymphoma (T-NHL) (n = 21), 33% had an objective response (5 CR and 2 PR); among patients with T-ALL or T-NHL with extramedullary relapse (n = 22), 14% had a PR. CALGB 19801 included 39 adult patients with T-cell malignancies, of whom 7 (18%) had a CR and an additional 2 (5%) had a CR without full hematologic recovery. The recommended dose of nelarabine in adults is 1500 mg/m(2) IV given over 2 hours on days 1, 3, and 5, repeated every 21 days; the recommended dose in pediatric patients is 650 mg/m(2) IV given over 1 hour for 5 consecutive days, repeated every 21 days. Dose-limiting toxicities observed in the Phase I and II trials included central and peripheral neurotoxicity. Symptoms of central neurotoxicity included somnolence, seizures, dizziness, confusion, and ataxia; symptoms of peripheral neurotoxicity included paresthesias, pain in the extremities, and peripheral neuropathy. CONCLUSIONS: Nelarabine is indicated for the treatment of T-ALL and T-LBL that has not responded to or has relapsed after treatment with at least 2 chemotherapy regimens. Objective response rates in Phase II clinical trials of nelarabine have ranged from 11% to 60%. Use of nelarabine is limited by potentially severe neurotoxicity.

Patient-specific factors affecting patient-controlled analgesia dosing.

A study was conducted to evaluate the effect of characteristics patients' gender, age, weight, height, and body surface area, as well as the concurrent or recent use of opioids, ethanol and tobacco, on opioid dose requirements during administration of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). Data were collected retrospectively from the medical records of 150 patients who underwent open cholecystectomies during an 18 month period at one institution. Demonstrable inter-patient variability in patterns of PCA use was observed. The results of the study demonstrate that during the first 48 hours of PCA therapy, patient age, height, weight, body surface area, gender, smoking, alcohol use, and preoperative opioid use may have significant influence on opioid analgesic use (p < 0.05). The data support the hypothesis that patient-specific factors may contribute to the variability observed in patients' PCA analgesic dose requirements, and these factors should be considered when selecting a proper demand (bolus) dose for PCA therapy.

A phase I and pharmacologic study of the combination of bortezomib and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in patients with refractory solid tumors.

PURPOSE: Pre-clinical studies combining the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib with anthracyclines have shown enhanced anti-tumor activity. We conducted a phase I trial of bortezomib and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) in patients with refractory solid tumors. METHODS: Patients received bortezomib, 0.9-1.5 mg/m(2), on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of every 21-day cycle, along with PLD, 30 mg/m(2), on day 4. The goals were to determine the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and to investigate pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions of the combination. RESULTS: A total of 37 patients with four median prior therapies were treated. Frequent grade 1-2 toxicities included fatigue, nausea, thrombocytopenia, anemia, neutropenia, constipation, myalgias, and peripheral neuropathy. DLTs included grade 3 nausea and vomiting in 1 of 6 patients receiving bortezomib at 1.2 mg/m(2), and grade 3 nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea in 1 of 6 patients receiving bortezomib at 1.5 mg/m(2). Grade 3 toxicities in later cycles included hand-foot syndrome, thrombocytopenia, anemia, neutropenia, nausea, diarrhea, and abdominal pain. Because of frequent dose-delays, dose-reductions, and gastrointestinal toxicity at the 1.4 and 1.5 mg/m(2) levels, bortezomib at 1.3 mg/m(2) and PLD at 30 mg/m(2) are recommended for further testing. Among 19 patients with breast cancer, four had evidence of a clinical benefit. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies did not show any significant interactions between the two drugs. CONCLUSIONS: A regimen of bortezomib, 1.3 mg/m(2) on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 with PLD, 30 mg/m(2), on day 4 of a 21-day cycle, was safe in this study, and merits further investigation.

Phase 1 trial of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in patients with advanced hematologic malignancies.

Proteasome inhibitors, a novel class of chemotherapeutic agents, enhance the antitumor efficacy of anthracyclines in vitro and in vivo. We therefore sought to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities of bortezomib and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PegLD). Bortezomib was given on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 from 0.90 to 1.50 mg/m2 and PegLD on day 4 at 30 mg/m2 to 42 patients with advanced hematologic malignancies. Grade 3 or 4 toxicities in at least 10% of patients included thrombocytopenia, lymphopenia, neutropenia, fatigue, pneumonia, peripheral neuropathy, febrile neutropenia, and diarrhea. The MTD based on cycle 1 was 1.50 and 30 mg/m2 of bortezomib and PegLD, respectively. However, due to frequent dose reductions and delays at this level, 1.30 and 30 mg/m2 are recommended for further study. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies did not find significant drug interactions between these agents. Antitumor activity was seen against multiple myeloma, with 8 of 22 evaluable patients having a complete response (CR) or near-CR, including several with anthracycline-refractory disease, and another 8 having partial responses (PRs). One patient with relapsed/refractory T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) achieved a CR, whereas 2 patients each with acute myeloid leukemia and B-cell NHL had PRs. Bortezomib/PegLD was safely administered in this study with promising antitumor activity, supporting further testing of this regimen.