Polarity Therapy for cancer-related fatigue in patients with breast cancer receiving radiation therapy: a randomized controlled pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is the most frequently reported side effect of cancer and its treatment. In previous research, Polarity Therapy (PT), an energy therapy, was shown to reduce CRF in patients receiving radiation. This study reports on a small randomized clinical trial designed to collect preliminary data on the efficacy of PT compared with an active control (massage) and passive control (standard care) for CRF among cancer patients receiving radiation therapy. METHODS: Forty-five women undergoing radiation therapy for breast cancer were randomized to 1 of 3 weekly treatment conditions. Patients received standard clinical care, 3 modified massages, or 3 PT treatments. CRF and health-related quality of life (HRQL) were assessed during baseline and the 3 intervention weeks. RESULTS: TResults show CRF ratings were reduced after PT. The effect sizes for PT versus modified massage and versus standard care were small when using the primary measure of CRF (Brief Fatigue Inventory) and large when using the secondary measure of CRF (Daily CRF Diaries).The effect size was medium when assessing the benefit of PT on maintaining HRQL compared with standard care with very little difference between the PT and modified massage conditions. Patients' feedback showed that both the modified massage and PT treatments were deemed useful by radiation patients. CONCLUSION: The present pilot randomized clinical trial supports previous experimental research showing that PT, a noninvasive and gentle energy therapy, may be effective in controlling CRF. Further confirmatory studies as well as investigations of the possible mechanisms of PT are warranted.

Irradiated autologous breast reconstructions: effects of patient factors and treatment variables.

BACKGROUND: Postmastectomy irradiation often negatively impacts breast reconstruction outcomes. Further investigation is necessary to recognize factors contributing to adverse results. The purpose of this study was to (1) accurately assess the impact of radiation on autologous breast reconstruction and (2) identify patient and treatment factors affecting reconstructive outcomes. METHODS: One hundred twenty-six patients were considered after postmastectomy breast reconstruction and irradiation. The records of 76 patients were studied after excluding for radiation therapy before reconstruction, complications before irradiation, implant reconstruction, mastectomy for recurrent disease, and history of cancer. Patient demographics and comorbidities, operative details, adjuvant therapy, and treatment outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: Seventy-six patients underwent autologous microsurgical breast reconstruction. Complications occurred in 53 patients (70 percent) 7.2 +/- 6 months after irradiation; 36 cases (47 percent) required reoperation for postirradiation effects. Parenchymal complications (fat necrosis or parenchymal fibrosis) were noted in 19.7 percent, skin complications (tissue envelope retraction or hypertrophic scarring) were recorded in 30.3 percent, and general dissatisfaction (physician or patient dissatisfaction) arose in 27.6 percent of patients. Parenchymal complications were associated with smoking (odds ratio, 9.3; p = 0.03), type II diabetes mellitus (odds ratio, 8.5; p = 0.02), and age (odds ratio, 1.1; p = 0.02). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy increased the development of complications (odds ratio, 4.4; p = 0.04), particularly skin changes (odds ratio, 2.4; p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Patient-specific factors, including diabetes mellitus and smoking, increase the risk of postirradiation parenchymal changes, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with a greater than twofold increase in skin complications. Breast reconstruction followed by irradiation can be successful, but patients with specific risks should be aware of increased complication rates.

Acupressure bands are effective in reducing radiation therapy-related nausea.

Previous studies have shown that acupressure bands can reduce chemotherapy-related nausea. Patients' expectations of efficacy account for part of this outcome. We conducted a three-arm randomized clinical trial to investigate the effectiveness of acupressure bands in controlling radiation therapy-induced nausea and to test whether an informational manipulation designed to increase expectation of efficacy would enhance the effectiveness of the acupressure bands. Patients who experienced nausea at prior treatments were randomized to either standard care (Arm 1, n=29) or standard care plus acupressure bands with either neutral (Arm 2, n=30) or positive (Arm 3, n=29) information regarding the efficacy of the bands. Patients reported nausea for two days prior to randomization (baseline) and for five days following using a seven-point semantic rating scale (1=not nauseated to 7=extremely nauseated). Patients in Arms 2 and 3 combined reported greater reduction in average nausea than patients in Arm 1 (P=0.01; mean(bands)=0.70, mean(no bands)=0.10). This equates to a 23.8% decrease in nausea in the band groups compared to a 4.8% decrease in the control group, a 19% difference. The informational manipulation failed to alter efficacy expectations and there was no statistically significant difference in nausea between patients in Arms 2 and 3. Acupressure bands are an effective, low-cost, nonintrusive, well-accepted, and safe adjunct to standard antiemetic medication. An attempt to boost the efficacy of the acupressure bands by providing positive information was not successful.