Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Asunto principal
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Nat Metab ; 6(7): 1282-1293, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38951660

RESUMEN

As the microbiome field moves from descriptive and associative research to mechanistic and interventional studies, being able to account for all confounding variables in the experimental design, which includes the maternal effect1, cage effect2, facility differences3, as well as laboratory and sample handling protocols4, is critical for interpretability of results. Despite significant procedural and bioinformatic improvements, unexplained variability and lack of replicability still occur. One underexplored factor is that the microbiome is dynamic and exhibits diurnal oscillations that can change microbiome composition5-7. In this retrospective analysis of 16S amplicon sequencing studies in male mice, we show that sample collection time affects the conclusions drawn from microbiome studies and its effect size is larger than those of a daily experimental intervention or dietary changes. The timing of divergence of the microbiome composition between experimental and control groups is unique to each experiment. Sample collection times as short as only 4 hours apart can lead to vastly different conclusions. Lack of consistency in the time of sample collection may explain poor cross-study replicability in microbiome research. The impact of diurnal rhythms on the outcomes and study design of other fields is unknown but likely significant.


Asunto(s)
Microbiota , Animales , Ratones , Microbiota/genética , Masculino , Manejo de Especímenes/métodos , ARN Ribosómico 16S/genética , Factores de Tiempo , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Ritmo Circadiano/fisiología , Ritmo Circadiano/genética , Estudios Retrospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA