Comparative Study of the Efficacy of Autologous Tooth Bone Powder and Inorganic Bovine Bone Powder on the Repair of Jaw Defects.

Context: The main pathological features of jaw cysts are bone defects. Obtaining autologous bone for transplantation repair has been associated with postoperative complications, and the amount of bone that dentist can collect is limited. Studies have found that autologous tooth bone powder is safe and has good bone-formation ability and stability. Objective: The study intended to examine the efficacy of implantation of autologous tooth bone powder and inorganic bovine bone powder, after marsupialization and second-stage curettage for large jaw cysts that dentist can't directly remove by surgery in clinical practice. Design: The research team designed a prospective randomized controlled trial. Setting: The study took place in the Head and Neck Surgery Department at Chongqing University Cancer Hospital in Chongqing, China. Participants: Participants were 60 patients at the hospital between 2016 and 2018 who had mandibular cysts that surgical operation couldn't directly remove by surgery in clinical practice. Intervention: At 4 months after curettage, the research team randomly divided participants into three groups: (1) an intervention group who received implants of autologous tooth bone powder into the bone defects, (2) a positive control group who received implants of inorganic bovine bone powder, and (3) a negative control group who received no implants of any material. Outcome Measures: The research team performed: (1) periodontal probing at a fixed anatomical point for the intervention and both control groups postintervention at one day and 4 months after surgery and recorded the changes in probing depth and (2) computed tomography (CT) scans at baseline one day before and postintervention at 4 months after the implantation to determine changes in the bone mineral density and compared them among the three groups. Results: The change in the height of the intervention group's fixed anatomical point postintervention at 4 months after surgery was significantly smaller than that of the positive control group (P < .05). In the CT scan analysis, the differences between the intervention and negative control groups and between the positive and negative control groups were statistically significant (P < .05); however, the difference between the intervention and positive control groups wasn't significant (P > .05). Conclusions: Autologous tooth bone powder and inorganic bovine bone powder can effectively repair bone defects caused by large jaw cysts and that the repaired effect may be better than that of spontaneous osteogenesis. The autologous tooth bone powder was associated with lower levels of bone loss than those seen with use of inorganic bovine bone powder.

Traditional Chinese Medicine in Cancer Care: An Overview of 5834 Randomized Controlled Trials Published in Chinese.

BACKGROUND: Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) is widely integrated into cancer care in China. An overview in 2011 identified 2384 randomized and non-randomized controlled trials (RCTs, non-RCTs) on TCM for cancer published in the Chinese literature. This article summarizes updated evidence of RCTs on TCM for cancer care. METHODS: We searched 4 main Chinese databases: China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Scientific Journal Database, SinoMed, and Wanfang. RCTs on TCM used in cancer care were analyzed in this bibliometric study. RESULTS: Of 5834 RCTs (477 157 cancer patients), only 62 RCTs were indexed in MEDLINE. The top 3 cancers treated were lung, stomach, and breast cancer. About 4752 RCTs (81.45%) tested TCM combined with conventional treatment, and 1082 RCTs (18.55%) used TCM alone for treating symptoms and side-effects. Herbal medicine was the most frequently used TCM modality (5087 RCTs; 87.20%). The most frequently reported outcome was symptom improvement (3712 RCTs; 63.63%) followed by quality of life (2725 RCTs; 46.71%), and biomarkers (2384 RCTs; 40.86%). The majority of RCTs (4051; 69.44%) concluded there were beneficial effects using either TCM alone or TCM plus conventional treatment compared with conventional treatment. CONCLUSION: Substantial randomized trials demonstrated different types/stages of cancer were treated by various TCM modalities, alone or in combination with conventional medicine. Further evaluation on the effects and safety of TCM modalities focusing on outcomes such as quality of life is required.

[Effect of decompression combined with curettage and autogenous bone cement implantation on large cysts of the jaw].

Decompression and curettage can result are effective as treatments for large jaw cysts, which are common diseases in the clinic. Based on a treatment used in a previous study, this paper proposes a "three-step method" to treat large jaw cyst and repair the bone defect by decompression, curettage, and autologous dental bone powder implantation. This paper introduces the processes and key points of the operation involved in the abovementioned method.

Efficacy comparison between primary total laryngectomy and nonsurgical organ-preservation strategies in treatment of advanced stage laryngeal cancer: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to provide a pooled analysis of controlled trials comparing long-term survival after primary laryngectomy and primary organ preservation methods in patients with T3-4 laryngeal cancer. METHODS: We performed random-effects meta-analyses on overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and locoregional control (LRC). RESULTS: Fifteen studies met the selection criteria including 6288 patients (2696 patients who underwent primary laryngectomy and 3592 patients who underwent primary nonsurgical organ preservation therapy). There was a significant difference between the groups with respect to OS (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.57-0.89, P = .003). However, a subgroup analysis found OS was not significantly worse for patients with T3 laryngeal cancer who received primary organ preservation compared with patients who underwent primary laryngectomy (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.45-2.03, P = .91). There was no significant difference for DFS (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.39-1.04, P = .07) in two groups. Patients with laryngeal cancer who underwent primary laryngectomy had a better DSS (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.25-0.88, P = .02) and LRC (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.390.80, P = .001) than patients who underwent primary nonsurgical organ preservation therapy. CONCLUSION: Our results support total laryngectomy for patients with T4 laryngeal cancer and show that primary organ preservation for laryngeal cancer has no advantage and also did not decrease the rate of OS in patients with T3 laryngeal cancer when compared with primary total laryngectomy.