Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 33
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Psychooncology ; 31(7): 1221-1229, 2022 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35226385

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Although fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) has been conceptualized as a multidimensional construct with emotional and cognitive components, little work has distinguished or assessed both components. Further, most existing research has not included intimate partners of cancer patients, although they also experience FCR. This study aimed to (1) determine whether FCR is better conceptualized as a singular or multidimensional construct at the within-person level over time and (2) model the corresponding trajectories in patients and their partners. METHODS: Female early stage breast cancer patients and their partners (N = 78 couples) completed up to five assessments over the first year post-diagnosis tapping both emotional and cognitive elements of FCR. Multilevel confirmatory factor analysis was used to evaluate FCR's factor structure, and multivariate latent growth curve modeling was used to estimate trajectories of emotional and cognitive FCR. RESULTS: FCR was best conceptualized as two distinct but related emotional and cognitive factors. In patients and partners, emotional FCR decreased over the first year post-diagnosis on average, while cognitive FCR did not change over time. CONCLUSIONS: Findings support the conceptualization of FCR as a multidimensional construct and underscore the potential importance of distinguishing emotional and cognitive components of FCR in future research.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Neoplasias de la Mama/psicología , Enfermedad Crónica , Cognición , Miedo/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/psicología , Trastornos Fóbicos
2.
J Trauma Stress ; 35(6): 1684-1695, 2022 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36039506

RESUMEN

This study examined the impact of a history of head injury (HHI) on posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression symptoms in active duty military personnel following group and individual cognitive processing therapy (CPT). Data for these secondary analyses were drawn from a clinical trial comparing group and individual CPT. Service members (N = 268, 91.0% male) were randomized to 12 sessions of group (n = 133) or individual (n = 135) CPT. Most participants (57.1%) endorsed a deployment-related HHI, 92.8% of whom reported currently experiencing symptoms (CES) related to the head injury (i.e., HHI/CES). Patients classified as non-HHI/CES demonstrated large, significant improvements in PTSD symptom severity in both individual and group therapy, ds = 1.1, p < .001. Patients with HHI/CES status showed similar significant improvements when randomized to individual CPT, d = 1.4, p < .001, but did not demonstrate significant improvements when randomized to group CPT, d = 0.4, p = .060. For participants classified as HHI/CES, individual CPT was significantly superior to group CPT, d = 0.98, p = .003. Symptoms of depression improved following treatment, with no significant differences by treatment delivery format or HHI/CES status. The findings of this clinical trial subgroup study demonstrate evidence that group CPT is less effective than individual CPT for service members classified as HHI/CES. The results suggest that HHI/CES status may be important to consider in selecting patients for group or individual CPT; additional research is needed to confirm the clinical implications of these findings.


Asunto(s)
Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual , Traumatismos Craneocerebrales , Personal Militar , Psicoterapia de Grupo , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático , Veteranos , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Personal Militar/psicología , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/terapia , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/psicología , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/métodos , Psicoterapia de Grupo/métodos , Veteranos/psicología , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Ann Behav Med ; 55(3): 192-202, 2021 03 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32608472

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Withholding cancer-related concerns from one's partner (protective buffering) and feeling that one's partner is inaccessible or unresponsive to such disclosure (social constraints) are two interpersonal interaction patterns that separately have been linked to poorer adjustment to cancer. PURPOSE: Guided by the Social-Cognitive Processing Model, we examined the joint effects of social constraints and protective buffering on fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) in survivors and spouses. Social constraints and protective buffering were hypothesized to emerge as independent predictors of higher FCR. METHODS: Early-stage breast cancer survivors and spouses (N = 79 couples; 158 paired individuals) completed up to five repeated measures of FCR, social constraints, protective buffering, and relationship quality during the year postdiagnosis. A second-order growth curve model was estimated and extended to test the time-varying, within-person effects of social constraints and protective buffering on a latent FCR variable, controlling for relationship quality. RESULTS: As hypothesized, greater social constraints and protective buffering significantly (p < .05) predicted higher concurrent FCR at the within-person level, controlling for global relationship quality and change in FCR over time. The fixed effects were found to be similar for both survivors and spouses. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that interaction patterns resulting in inhibited disclosure are associated with greater FCR for both survivors and spouses, consistent with the Social-Cognitive Processing Model. This work adds to the growing body of research highlighting the social context of FCR.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/psicología , Supervivientes de Cáncer/psicología , Revelación , Miedo/psicología , Relaciones Interpersonales , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/psicología , Esposos/psicología , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Psicológicos , Teoría Psicológica
4.
J Trauma Stress ; 34(4): 757-763, 2021 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33715221

RESUMEN

Cognitive processing therapy (CPT) is a gold-standard treatment for adults with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). However, adolescents may also benefit from CPT, particularly when existing evidence-based treatments for adolescents are unavailable or not a good fit. In this program evaluation study, community-based therapists participating in training delivered a modular version of CPT to 32 adolescents (age range: 14-17 years) and 174 adults recruited at their sites (overall sample: 81.1% female, 59.7% White, 31.6% Black, 21.6% Hispanic, 2.9% American Indian/Alaskan Native, 1.9% Asian, and 9.7% other race). The same protocol was used for adolescents as adults. Treatment outcomes, including treatment completion status, number of sessions needed, and PTSD and depression symptom change, were compared between groups. In total, 47.1% of adults versus 71.9% of adolescents completed treatment. Among completers, there was no between-group difference in the number of attended sessions, RR = 1.04, 95% CI [0.88, 1.23], p = .576. Overall, in the full intent-to-treat sample (i.e., completers and noncompleters), large symptom reductions were observed for PTSD, b = -3.27, SE = 0.17, p < .001, d = 1.22; and depression, b = -0.82, SE = 0.07, p < .001, d = 0.84. There were no differences in the rate of change for adolescents versus adults regarding PTSD, b = -0.15, SE = 0.48, p = .759; or depression, b = -0.20, SE = 0.14, p = .181. These findings suggest that CPT is a viable treatment option for adolescents, who benefited from treatment and completed treatment at a high rate.


Asunto(s)
Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Hispánicos o Latinos , Humanos , Masculino , Procesos Mentales , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/terapia , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
J Trauma Stress ; 33(5): 634-642, 2020 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33007149

RESUMEN

In response to COVID-19, continued workforce training is essential to ensure that evidence-based treatments are available on the frontline to meet communities' ongoing and emerging mental health needs. However, training during a pandemic imposes many new challenges. This paper describes a multisite training and implementation pilot program, facets of which allowed for continued training despite the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent social distancing guidelines. This virtual facilitated learning collaborative in Written Exposure Therapy, an evidence-based treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder, included virtual workshop training, phone-based clinical consultation, implementation-focused video calls for program leadership, and program evaluation. Data are presented about program enrollees and patient impact following the onset of COVID-19-related social distancing restrictions. Challenges, successes, and practical guidance are discussed to inform the field regarding training strategies likely to be durable in an uncertain, dynamic healthcare landscape.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/psicología , Educación a Distancia/organización & administración , Terapia Implosiva/educación , Neumonía Viral/psicología , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/terapia , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/métodos , Humanos , Pandemias , Desarrollo de Programa/métodos , SARS-CoV-2 , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/psicología , Escritura
6.
J Trauma Stress ; 33(4): 371-379, 2020 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32400911

RESUMEN

The global outbreak of COVID-19 has required mental health providers to rapidly rethink and adapt how they provide care. Cognitive processing therapy (CPT) is a trauma-focused, evidence-based treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder that is effective when delivered in-person or via telehealth. Given current limitations on the provision of in-person mental health treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic, this article presents guidelines and treatment considerations when implementing CPT via telehealth. Based on lessons learned from prior studies and clinical delivery of CPT via telehealth, recommendations are made with regard to overall strategies for adapting CPT to a telehealth format, including how to conduct routine assessments and ensure treatment fidelity.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/psicología , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/métodos , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/terapia , Telemedicina/métodos , Humanos , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/psicología
7.
J Trauma Stress ; 32(2): 330-336, 2019 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30892748

RESUMEN

Military-affiliated individuals (i.e., active duty personnel and veterans) exhibit high rates of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Although existing evidence-based treatments for PTSD, such as cognitive processing therapy (CPT), have demonstrated effectiveness with military-affiliated patients, there is evidence to suggest these individuals do not benefit as much as civilians. However, few studies have directly compared the effects of PTSD treatment between civilian and military-affiliated participants. The current study compared treatment outcomes of military-affiliated and civilian patients receiving CPT. Participants with PTSD who were either civilians (n = 136) or military-affiliated (n = 63) received CPT from community-based providers in training for CPT. Results indicated that military-affiliated participants were equally likely to complete treatment, Log odds ratio (OR) = 0.14, p = .648. Although military-affiliated participants exhibited reductions in PTSD, B = -2.53, p < .001; and depression symptoms, B = -0.65, p < .001, they experienced smaller reductions in symptoms relative to civilians: B = 1.15, p = .015 for PTSD symptoms and B = 0.29, p = .029 for depression symptoms. Furthermore, variability estimates indicated there was more variability in providers' treatment of military-affiliated versus civilian participants (i.e., completion rates and symptom reduction). These findings suggest that military-affiliated patients can be successfully retained in trauma-focused treatment in the community at the same rate as civilian patients, and they significantly improve in PTSD and depression symptoms although not as much as civilians. These findings also highlight community providers' variability in treatment of military-affiliated patients, providing support for more military-cultural training.


Spanish Abstracts by Asociación Chilena de Estrés Traumático (ACET) El impacto del estatus militar en los resultados de la terapia de procesamiento cognitivo en la comunidad TERAPIA DE PROCESAMIENTO COGNITIVO Y ESTATUS MILITAR Los individuos afiliados a los militares (es decir, personal en servicio activo y veteranos) exhiben altas tasas de trastorno de estrés postraumático (TEPT). Si bien los tratamientos basados ​​en la evidencia existentes para el TEPT, como la terapia de procesamiento cognitivo (CPT en sus siglas en inglés), han demostrado ser efectivos con los pacientes afiliados a las fuerzas armadas, existen evidencias que sugieren que estas personas no se benefician tanto como los civiles. Sin embargo, pocos estudios han comparado directamente los efectos del tratamiento de TEPT entre participantes civiles y afiliados a los militares. El presente estudio comparó los resultados del tratamiento de los pacientes civiles y afiliados a los militares que recibieron CPT. Participantes con TEPT que eran civiles (n = 136) o afiliados a los militares (n = 63) recibieron CPT de proveedores comunitarios en entrenamiento de CPT. Los resultados indicaron que los participantes afiliados a las fuerzas armadas tenían la misma probabilidad de completar el tratamiento, razón de probabilidades de registro (OR) = 0.14, p = .648. Aunque los participantes afiliados a los militares mostraron reducciones en el TEPT, B = -2.53, p <.001; y los síntomas de depresión, B = - 0.65, p <.001, experimentaron reducciones más pequeñas en los síntomas en relación con los civiles: B = 1.15, p = .015 para los síntomas de TEPT y B = 0.29, p = .029 para los síntomas de depresión. Además, las estimaciones de variabilidad indicaron que había una mayor variabilidad en proveedores de tratamiento de los participantes afiliados a los militares en comparación con los civiles (es decir, las tasas de finalización y la reducción de los síntomas). Estos hallazgos sugieren que los pacientes afiliados a las fuerzas armadas pueden ser retenidos con éxito en el tratamiento centrado en el trauma en la comunidad al mismo ritmo que los pacientes civiles, y mejoran significativamente en los síntomas de TEPT y depresión, aunque no tanto como los civiles. Estos hallazgos también resaltan la variabilidad de los proveedores comunitarios en el tratamiento de los pacientes afiliados a las fuerzas armadas, brindando apoyo para una mayor capacitación de la cultura militar.


Asunto(s)
Personal Militar/psicología , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/terapia , Veteranos/psicología , Adulto , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Salud Comunitaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cooperación del Paciente , Adulto Joven
8.
Psychol Trauma ; 2024 Mar 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38546592

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Anger is one of the most prevalent concerns among individuals with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and is often a residual symptom following PTSD treatment. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine how effective trauma-focused PTSD psychotherapies are in reducing anger. METHOD: The study was reported according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. This study conducted a systematic review of studies that reported the effect of trauma-focused treatments on anger outcomes. Additionally, a meta-analysis was conducted with a subset of studies that used randomized controlled trials (RCTs) methodologies to compare trauma-focused PTSD treatments to nontrauma-focused and control conditions. RESULTS: The systematic review included 16 studies with a total of 1,846 participants. In 11 of the studies, there was a significant decrease in an anger dimension following treatment. Eight studies with 417 total participants met inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis yielded a pooled effect size of PTSD treatment on anger of Hedges's g = 0.33. CONCLUSION: Overall, trauma-focused treatments for PTSD significantly improve anger, but the magnitude of change is small-to-medium. Additional research is needed to determine how best to maximize anger outcomes following trauma-focused treatment or determine if and when targeted anger treatment is needed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

9.
Psychol Trauma ; 2023 Apr 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37104773

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Cognitive processing therapy (CPT) is an evidence-based psychotherapy for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD); however, little is known about how interrelationships between PTSD symptoms change over the course of treatment. The current study examined baseline, midtreatment, and posttreatment PTSD symptom networks during CPT for PTSD. METHOD: Adults with PTSD (n = 107) received 12 sessions of CPT as part of a randomized trial. Self-reported PTSD symptoms were assessed at pretreatment, midtreatment, and posttreatment, and network analysis was used to examine the interrelationships between symptoms at these three timepoints. Linear regression was conducted to examine whether any baseline symptoms or midpoint symptoms predicted overall treatment change. RESULTS: In the baseline PTSD network, feelings of detachment and feeling upset at reminders of the trauma were central to the symptom network. These symptoms were no longer central at midtreatment, possibly suggesting that CPT quickly reduces the importance of these symptoms. These findings were consistent with regression results that, after accounting for multiple comparisons, high baseline scores of feeling upset at trauma reminders predicted later treatment change. At the conclusion of treatment, strong negative emotions were the most central symptom and may be most important in maintaining or lowering other PTSD symptoms at the conclusion of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Though replication is necessary, these findings offer insights into identifying which symptoms may be most predictive of treatment outcomes and the course by which CPT reduces PTSD symptoms. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

10.
Psychol Trauma ; 15(5): 748-756, 2023 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34726451

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Written Exposure Therapy (WET) for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) has been shown to be efficacious in clinical trials; however, research is needed to determine WET's effectiveness in clinical practice settings. Additionally, research is needed to understand whether patient characteristics or treatment delivery format moderate outcomes. METHOD: Patient outcomes (n = 277) were assessed as part of a multisite training and implementation program in the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). During treatment, patients completed self-report measures of PTSD, depression, and functional impairment. Patient characteristics (i.e., demographics, psychiatric comorbidity, trauma type) and treatment delivery format (i.e., telehealth vs. in-person) were assessed as treatment moderators. RESULTS: Intent-to-treat analyses indicated that WET was effective in reducing PTSD symptoms (d = .84), depression symptoms (d = .47), and functional impairment (d = .36) during treatment. Approximately one quarter of patients dropped out of treatment prematurely. No moderators of PTSD treatment outcome were observed; however, telehealth delivery was associated with lower dropout. CONCLUSIONS: WET was an effective approach across a range of patient characteristics in this sample of veterans with PTSD. WET was also effective whether delivered in-person or via telehealth. WET is a promising treatment option for veteran patients in VA clinical care settings. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).


Asunto(s)
Terapia Implosiva , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático , Telemedicina , Veteranos , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/psicología , Veteranos/psicología , Resultado del Tratamiento , United States Department of Veterans Affairs
11.
Psychol Serv ; 20(4): 820-830, 2023 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36074601

RESUMEN

Participant training alone is typically insufficient to ensure adoption of a new treatment. This study provides preliminary data on a pilot program that implemented written exposure therapy (WET) through a virtual facilitated learning collaborative (VFLC) that combined clinician training with implementation support. Ninety-five mental health clinicians from Veterans Health Administration clinics enrolled in the VFLC. Clinicians received 6 hr of training in WET plus weekly group consultation on training cases for 12-16 weeks. Clinic leaders participated in monthly group calls with facilitators to develop and track implementation plans, address barriers, and share resources. Clinicians completed the Perceived Characteristics of Intervention Scale and Implementation Climate Scale before training and after consultation, and the Intention Scale for providers after the program. Clinicians' positive perceptions of WET increased over time, t(85) = -8.80, p < .001, d = 0.95, and changes were moderated by how much reduction in symptoms their patients experienced, t(151) = -2.13, p = .035. The implementation climate for WET also improved over time, t(85) = -3.55, p < .001, d = 0.36. Consistent with the theory of planned behavior, clinicians' intention to continue using WET after training was influenced by their perceptions and attitudes about WET, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control. The VFLC model was feasible and associated with increases in clinicians' and leaders' support for using WET. Patient outcomes predicted the amount of change in clinicians' perceptions about WET. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).


Asunto(s)
Terapia Implosiva , Humanos , Salud Mental
12.
Drug Alcohol Depend Rep ; 8: 100174, 2023 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37753347

RESUMEN

Background: Shame and guilt are key emotions known to amplify trauma-related symptoms in veterans. Maintenance of symptoms is facilitated by avoidance behaviors, such as substance use. However, limited research has examined the associations between shame, guilt, and substance use in daily life. Methods: The current study sought to examine the cross-lagged association between shame, guilt, and substance use. Forty veterans completed 28 days of experience sampling reporting on their current emotional experiences and use of substances. Results: Results suggest a reciprocal relationship among shame and guilt and substance use, such that shame and guilt separately predicted subsequent substance use, and substance use predicted subsequent shame and guilt. Conclusions: These results highlight the dynamic relationship among shame, guilt, and substance use and suggest the potential value of conceptualizing these clinical targets as mutually reinforcing to inform integrative intervention strategies that can interrupt the in-the-moment cascade of negative consequences.

13.
Psychol Trauma ; 15(3): 386-393, 2023 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35679210

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: A common concern is whether individuals with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and hazardous drinking will respond to PTSD treatment or need a higher dose. In a sample of active-duty military, we examined the impact of hazardous drinking on cognitive processing therapy (CPT) outcomes and whether number of sessions to reach good end-state or dropout differed by drinking status. METHOD: Participants included 127 service members participating in a clinical trial of variable-length CPT. The Quick Drinking Screen was used to characterize drinking. Participants were categorized as treatment responders when they reached good end-state (<20 on the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5) or nonresponders if they completed 24 sessions or 18 weeks of treatment without good end-state. Survival analyses were used to compare time to dropout or good end-state between those with and without hazardous drinking. RESULTS: Those with hazardous drinking were as likely as those without to reach good end-state and no more likely to drop out. There were no differences in number of sessions to reach good end-state or dropout. On a gold-standard assessment, those with hazardous drinking evidenced more PTSD symptom reduction than those without. The overall proportion of participants with hazardous drinking decreased (30.7% to 18.6%), as did mean number of drinks per drinking day and drinks on the heaviest drinking day among those initially drinking hazardously. CONCLUSIONS: Results support using CPT for military personnel with PTSD and hazardous drinking and indicate that those with hazardous drinking can benefit from PTSD treatment without additional treatment sessions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).


Asunto(s)
Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual , Personal Militar , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático , Veteranos , Humanos , Personal Militar/psicología , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/psicología , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/métodos , Manual Diagnóstico y Estadístico de los Trastornos Mentales , Lista de Verificación , Veteranos/psicología
14.
Trauma Violence Abuse ; 24(5): 2936-2952, 2023 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36062896

RESUMEN

Military service members and veterans (SMVs) are at risk for self-directed violence, including nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI). While NSSI is an important construct worthy of independent study, it is understudied among SMVs and, when included in research, typically examined in the context of suicide risk. Consequently, lifetime prevalence rate estimates of NSSI among SMVs vary. This Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses systematic review and meta-analysis estimated the average lifetime NSSI prevalence among SMVs and explored demographic and methodological factors that may account for observed variability. Based on a search of Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and Web of Science, 47 samples from 42 articles across five countries met inclusion criteria. Results revealed an average NSSI lifetime prevalence rate of 15.76% among SMVs. Significantly higher prevalence rates were observed among clinical (28.14%) versus community (11.28%) samples and studies using interviews to assess NSSI (23.56%) versus self-report (13.44%) or chart review (7.84%). Lifetime prevalence increased as publication year increased and decreased as sample size increased. In contrast to prior literature, prevalence rates were comparable between active-duty SMVs, and studies collecting data anonymously versus those that did not. Lifetime prevalence was not moderated by age, gender, race, country, primary research focus, quality of NSSI operationalization, or whether NSSI methods were assessed. Findings suggest NSSI is a pervasive problem among military personnel, particularly within clinical settings, highlighting the need for systematic assessment of this important but understudied clinical phenomenon among SMVs. Further research is necessary to elucidate additional risk factors for NSSI among SMVs, including trauma exposure.


Asunto(s)
Personal Militar , Conducta Autodestructiva , Veteranos , Humanos , Prevalencia , Ideación Suicida , Conducta Autodestructiva/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo
15.
J Psychosom Res ; 170: 111351, 2023 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37178469

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is associated with elevated risk of coronary heart disease (CHD); however, the effects of PTSD treatment on CHD biomarkers is unknown. This study examined whether cognitive processing therapy (CPT) improves 24-hourheart rate variability (HRV), a predictor of CHD mortality. METHODS: Individuals between the ages of 40 and 65 years with PTSD (n = 112) were randomized to receive 12 sessions of CPT or a Waiting List (WL) intervention comprised of 6 weekly telephone checks of emotional status. The primary outcome variable was 24-hour HRV estimated from the standard deviation of all normal R-R intervals (SDNN); secondary outcomes were the root mean square of successive differences between heart beats (RMSSD), low-frequency HRV (LF-HRV) and high-frequency HRV (HF-HRV). Secondary outcomes also included 24-hour urinary catecholamine excretion, plasma C-reactive protein (CRP), and flow-mediated dilation (FMD) of the brachial artery. For outcomes, linear mixed longitudinal models were used to estimate mean differences (Mdiff). RESULTS: Participants randomized to the CPT group did not show improved SDNN (Mdiff = 9.8; 95%CI, -2.7 to 22.3; p = 0.12), the primary outcome variable, but showed improved RMSSD (Mdiff = 3.8; 95% CI, 0.5 to 7.1; p = 0.02), LF- HRV (Mdiff =0.3; 95% CI, 0.1 to 0.5; p = 0.01), and HF-HRV (Mdiff = 0.3; 95% CI, 0.0 to 0.6; p = 0.03) compared to WL. There were no differences between groups in catecholamine excretion, FMD, or inflammatory markers. CONCLUSION: Treating PTSD may not only improve quality of life but may also help ameliorate heightened CHD risk characteristics of PTSD.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático , Humanos , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/terapia , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/etiología , Calidad de Vida , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo de Enfermedad Cardiaca , Frecuencia Cardíaca/fisiología
16.
Eur J Psychotraumatol ; 14(2): 2222608, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37350229

RESUMEN

Background: This study was an examination of the puzzling finding that people assessed for symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) consistently score higher on the self-report PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) than the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5). Both scales purportedly assess PTSD severity with the same number of items, scaling, and scoring range, but differences in scores between measures make outcomes difficult to decipher.Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine several possible psychometric reasons for the discrepancy in scores between interview and self-report.Method: Data were combined from four clinical trials to examine the baseline and posttreatment assessments of treatment-seeking active duty military personnel and veterans.Results: As in previous studies, total scores were higher on the PCL-5 compared to the CAPS-5 at baseline and posttreatment. At baseline, PCL-5 scores were higher on all 20 items, with small to large differences in effect size. At posttreatment, only three items were not significantly different. Distributions of item responses and wording of scale anchors and items were examined as possible explanations of the difference between measures. Participants were more likely to use the full range of responses on the PCL-5 compared to interviewers.Conclusions: Suggestions for improving the congruence between these two scales are discussed. Administration of interviews by trained assessors can be resource intensive, so it is important that those assessing PTSD severity are afforded confidence in the equivalence of their assessment of PTSD regardless of the assessment method used.


The purpose of this study was to examine two commonly used measures of posttraumatic stress disorder, the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS-5), an interview measure, and the PTSD Checklist (PCL-5), a self-report measure, to explore discrepancies in scores.Both measures have the same number of items and range of scores assessing the identical 20 symptoms of PTSD, yet higher scores are reported on the PCL-5.It appears that the differences in wording of the anchors may contribute to discrepancies in scoring.Addressing these problems would allow for a better match in scoring between scales.


Asunto(s)
Personal Militar , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático , Veteranos , Humanos , Manual Diagnóstico y Estadístico de los Trastornos Mentales , Autoinforme , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/diagnóstico , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/terapia
17.
Contemp Clin Trials ; 119: 106839, 2022 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35760338

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Smoking is a prevalent concern among Veterans, especially those with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Despite the availability of interventions for smoking cessation, these treatments have not been as effective among Veteran populations, particularly Veterans with PTSD. The present study seeks to describe the methods of a randomized clinical trial examining the efficacy of CPT-SMART, a multidimensional treatment combining cognitive processing therapy (CPT) for PTSD, smoking cessation counseling, pharmacotherapy, and contingency management (CM) compared to a yoked comparison group. METHODS: One hundred twenty Veterans with PTSD who smoke cigarettes will be enrolled. All participants will receive CPT in addition to counseling and pharmacotherapy for smoking cessation. Participants will be randomized to the CPT-SMART condition, which includes monetary reinforcement that is contingent on bioverification of smoking abstinence (i.e., contingency management), or a yoked comparison with monetary reinforcement matched to the participant to whom they are yoked. The primary outcome is bioverified smoking abstinence at the 6-month follow-up appointment. CONCLUSION: If shown efficacious, a combined PTSD and smoking treatment plus incentive-based approach for smoking could be implemented into specialty PTSD programs. The positive public health impact of reducing smoking among Veterans with PTSD could be enormous as it would prevent significant smoking-related morbidity and mortality.


Asunto(s)
Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual , Cese del Hábito de Fumar , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático , Veteranos , Humanos , Dispositivos para Dejar de Fumar Tabaco , Resultado del Tratamiento
18.
J Affect Disord ; 292: 424-429, 2021 09 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34144367

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Identifying and enhancing protective beliefs is essential in reducing suicide risk among military-affiliated individuals. The goal of this study was to examine if specific reasons for living impact the relationship between PTSD and suicidal cognitions among military-affiliated individuals in primary care settings. METHODS: Participants included 2,685 U.S. military personnel and their adult beneficiaries recruited from primary care clinics. Participants completed the Primary Care Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Screen, Suicide Cognitions Scale, and Brief Reasons for Living Inventory. RESULTS: Responsibility to family and survival and coping beliefs-were related to suicidal cognitions with higher levels associated with less suicidal cognitions and a weaker relationship between PTSD and suicidal cognitions. By contrast, fear of suicide and fear of social disapproval were associated with more suicidal cognitions, and the link between positive PTSD screen and suicidal cognitions was stronger for individuals with higher levels of fear of social disapproval. Moral objection did not predict suicidal cognitions and did not moderate the relationship between PTSD and suicidal cognitions. LIMITATIONS: The limitations of the study include that measures were done in primary care and brief screeners were often used. Additionally, the study is cross-sectional in nature, whereas some of the symptoms and outcome variables likely fluctuate over time. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest not all reasons for living are not equally influential and, among military-affiliated individuals with a positive PTSD screen, bolstering reasons for living related to responsibility to family and survival and coping skills could be particularly impactful in reducing suicide cognitions.


Asunto(s)
Personal Militar , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático , Adulto , Cognición , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Atención Primaria de Salud , Factores de Riesgo , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/diagnóstico , Ideación Suicida
19.
J Psychiatr Res ; 138: 264-271, 2021 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33872963

RESUMEN

Suicidal ideation (SI) is a prevalent issue in the veteran population. A number of factors have been identified as risk factors for suicidal ideation (SI) in veterans, including suicide attempts, depression, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and drug use. However, clinicians' ability to predict suicide is poor, particularly given the interplay between various factors such as previous suicide attempts. As such, there is a gap in our knowledge of which factors most saliently predict suicide risk and which should be targets for interventions designed to lower SI. Network analysis, a method allowing for an examination of how variables relate within the context of a network of factors, may bridge this gap by simultaneously evaluating the interrelationships between risk factors for suicide in veterans. Current study used network analysis and data from 2268 Iraq/Afghanistan-era military veterans to examine the relationships between suicidal ideation and several factors related to suicide risk, such as past suicide attempts, PTSD symptoms, depression, drug use, trauma exposure. Partial correlation network results showed suicidal ideation to be strongly related to depression, with smaller connections to past suicide attempts and anger. Additionally, past suicide attempts was strongly related to history of childhood trauma and weakly related to problematic drug use and PTSD symptoms. These results offer valuable information for both predicting suicide risk and differentiating targets for interventions lowering suicide risk in veterans.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático , Veteranos , Campaña Afgana 2001- , Afganistán , Humanos , Irak , Guerra de Irak 2003-2011 , Factores de Riesgo , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/epidemiología , Ideación Suicida
20.
J Psychiatr Res ; 135: 47-51, 2021 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33445060

RESUMEN

Veterans have high rates of suicide, and nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI) is one of the strongest predictors of suicide risk; however, there is presently little known about antecedents of NSSI that might inform intervention efforts. Accumulating research suggests that anger and hostility play an important role in NSSI, but whether these emotions precede and predict NSSI is currently unknown. The aim of the current study was to examine the temporal relationships between anger/hostility and NSSI urges and behavior among veterans diagnosed with NSSI disorder. Our hypothesis was that angry/hostile affect would predict subsequent NSSI urge and engagement, but not vice versa. Forty veterans with NSSI disorder completed a 28-day ecological momentary assessment study with three daily prompts to report on their affect and NSSI urges and engagement. Multilevel cross-lagged path modeling was used to determine the direction of effects between angry/hostile affect and NSSI urges and engagement over time. Consistent with our hypothesis, results indicated that the lagged effects of angry/hostile affect on subsequent NSSI urge and engagement were significant, whereas the lagged effects of NSSI urge and engagement on angry/hostile affect were not significant. Findings highlight the importance of assessing and treating anger among veterans who engage in NSSI.


Asunto(s)
Conducta Autodestructiva , Veteranos , Ira , Evaluación Ecológica Momentánea , Emociones , Humanos , Conducta Autodestructiva/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA