Cytomegalovirus serologic matching in deceased donor kidney allocation optimizes high- and low-risk (D+R- and D-R-) profiles and does not adversely affect transplant rates.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a major cause of infection-related morbidity and mortality in kidney transplantation. The most significant risk for developing CMV infection after transplant depends upon donor (D) and recipient (R) CMV serostatus. In 2012, our Organ Procurement Organization (OPO) began a novel pretransplant CMV prevention strategy via matching deceased kidney donors and recipients by CMV serostatus. Prior to the matching protocol, our distribution of seropositive and seronegative donors and recipients was similar to the United States at large. After the matching protocol, high-risk D+R- were reduced from 18.5% to 2.9%, whereas low-risk D-R- were increased from 13.5% to 24%. There was no adverse effect on transplant rates and no differential effect on waiting times for R+ vs R- after the protocol was implemented. This protocol could be implemented on a regional or national level to optimize low and high-risk CMV seroprofiles and potentially improve CMV-related outcomes in kidney transplantation.

De novo thrombotic microangiopathy in two kidney transplant recipients from the same deceased donor: A case series.

Thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) is a recognized and serious complication of renal transplantation. Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS), a subset of TMA, occurs in the setting of dysregulation of the alternative complement pathway and can cause disease in native kidneys as well as recurrence in allografts. De novo TMA represents a classification of TMA post-transplant in the absence of clinical or histopathological evidence of TMA or aHUS in the native kidney. De novo TMA is a more heterogeneous syndrome than aHUS and the pathogenesis and risk factors for de novo TMA are poorly understood. The association between calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) and de novo TMA is controversial. Anti-complement blockade therapy with eculizumab is effective in some cases, but more studies are needed to identify appropriate candidates for therapy. We present two cases of de novo TMA occurring immediately in recipients from the same deceased donor and provoking the question of whether deceased donor-related factors could represent risks for developing de novo TMA.