The pre-clinical absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion properties of IPI-926, an orally bioavailable antagonist of the hedgehog signal transduction pathway.

1. IPI-926 is a novel semisynthetic cyclopamine derivative that is a potent and selective Smoothened inhibitor that blocks the hedgehog signal transduction pathway. 2. The in vivo clearance of IPI-926 is low in mouse and dog and moderate in monkey. The volume of distribution is high across species. Oral bioavailability ranges from moderate in monkey to high in mouse and dog. Predicted human clearance using simple allometry is low (24 L h(-1)), predicted volume of distribution is high (469 L) and predicted half-life is long (20 h). 3. IPI-926 is highly bound to plasma proteins and has minimal interaction with human α-1-acid glycoprotein. 4. In vitro metabolic stability ranges from stable to moderately stable. Twelve oxidative metabolites were detected in mouse, rat, dog, monkey and human liver microsome incubations and none were unique to human. 5. IPI-926 is not a potent reversible inhibitor of CYP1A2, 2C8, 2C9 or 3A4 (testosterone). IPI-926 is a moderate inhibitor of CYP2C19, 2D6 and 3A4 (midazolam) with KI values of 19, 16 and 4.5 µM, respectively. IPI-926 is both a substrate and inhibitor (IC50 = 1.9 µM) of P-glycoprotein. 6. In summary, IPI-926 has desirable pre-clinical absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion properties.

Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacologic Characterization of the Dihydrotetrabenazine Isomers of Deutetrabenazine and Valbenazine.

Valbenazine and deutetrabenazine are vesicular monoamine transporter 2 (VMAT2) inhibitors approved for tardive dyskinesia. The clinical activity of valbenazine is primarily attributed to its only dihydrotetrabenazine (HTBZ) metabolite, [+]-α-HTBZ. Deutetrabenazine is a deuterated form of tetrabenazine and is metabolized to four deuterated HTBZ metabolites: [+]-α-deuHTBZ, [+]-ß-deuHTBZ, [-]-α-deuHTBZ, and [-]-ß-deuHTBZ. An open-label, crossover study characterized the pharmacokinetic profiles of the individual deuHBTZ metabolites, which have not been previously reported. VMAT2 inhibition and off-target interactions of the deuHTBZ metabolites were evaluated using radioligand binding. The only valbenazine HTBZ metabolite, [+]-α-HTBZ, was a potent VMAT2 inhibitor, with negligible affinity for off-target dopamine, serotonin, and adrenergic receptors. Following deutetrabenazine administration, [-]-α-deuHTBZ represented 66% of circulating deuHTBZ metabolites and was a relatively weak VMAT2 inhibitor with appreciable affinity for dopamine (D2S , D3 ) and serotonin (5-HT1A , 5-HT2B , 5-HT7 ) receptors. [+]-ß-deuHTBZ was the most abundant deuHTBZ metabolite that potently inhibited VMAT2, but it represented only 29% of total circulating deuHTBZ metabolites. The mean half-life of [+]-α-HTBZ (22.2 hours) was ∼3× longer than that of [+]-ß-deuHTBZ (7.7 hours). These findings are similar to studies with tetrabenazine, in that deutetrabenazine is metabolized to four deuHTBZ stereoisomers, the most abundant of which has negligible interaction with VMAT2 in vitro and appreciable affinity for several off-target receptors. In contrast, valbenazine's single HTBZ metabolite is a potent VMAT2 inhibitor in vitro with no discernible off-target activity. Determination of the effects of intrinsic/extrinsic variables on deutetrabenazine's safety/efficacy profile should incorporate assessment of the effects on all deuHTBZ metabolites.

Opicapone Pharmacokinetics and Effects on Catechol- O -Methyltransferase Activity and Levodopa Pharmacokinetics in Patients With Parkinson Disease Receiving Carbidopa/Levodopa.

OBJECTIVES: Levodopa (LD) administered with dopa decarboxylase inhibitor is predominantly metabolized in the periphery by catechol- O -methyltransferase (COMT) to 3- O -methyldopa (3-OMD). Catechol- O -methyltransferase inhibition can improve treatment outcomes by decreasing variability in circulating LD concentrations. Opicapone is a once-daily COMT inhibitor approved in the US adjunctive to carbidopa (CD)/LD in patients with Parkinson disease experiencing "OFF" episodes. This study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of once-daily opicapone 50 mg adjunctive to CD/LD in patients with stable Parkinson disease. METHODS: Once-daily opicapone 50 mg was administered the evenings of days 1 to 14. Participants were randomized to receive CD/LD (25/100 mg) every 3 or 4 hours (Q3H or Q4H). Participants received Q3H or Q4H CD/LD on days 1, 2, and 15 and their usual CD/LD regimen on other days. Serial blood samples were collected to determine plasma opicapone, LD, and 3-OMD concentrations and erythrocyte soluble COMT (S-COMT) activity. The effects of opicapone on S-COMT, LD, and 3-OMD were assessed. Mean (SD) values are presented. RESULTS: Sixteen participants were enrolled. At steady-state (day 14), opicapone Cmax (peak plasma concentration) and AUC 0-last (area under the curve-time curve) were 459 ± 252 ng/mL and 2022 ± 783 ng/mL·h, respectively. Maximum COMT inhibition was 83.4 ± 4.9% of baseline on day 14. After opicapone administration, LD total AUC, peak concentration, and trough concentration increased; peak-to-trough fluctuation index decreased. Correspondingly, 3-OMD total AUC, peak concentration, and trough concentration decreased. CONCLUSIONS: Adding once-daily opicapone 50 mg to LD resulted in marked and extended COMT inhibition, which increased systemic exposure to LD. These changes translated into higher trough concentrations and decreased peak-to-trough fluctuations for LD.

No synergistic effect of subtherapeutic doses of donepezil and EVP-6124 in healthy elderly subjects in a scopolamine challenge model.

INTRODUCTION: Donepezil is a widely used cholinesterase inhibitor in the management of Alzheimer's disease. Despite large-scaled evidence for its efficacy, elevated peripheral ACh levels often lead to side effects and are dose limiting. The present exploratory study is designed to determine the potentiation of the effects of donepezil by cotreatment with EVP-6124, an alpha-7 nicotinic agonist, to reduce scopolamine-induced cognitive deficits in healthy elderly subjects. Secondary objectives are to explore safety and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics effects of EVP-6124 alone and in combination with donepezil compared to placebo. METHODS: A phase I randomized, single-center, placebo-controlled, double-blind, five-way, partial crossover study was performed with donepezil 2.5, 5 mg or placebo combined with EVP-6124 0.3, 1, 2, 4 mg or placebo in three cohorts of healthy elderly subjects in a scopolamine (0.3 mg i.v.) challenge test. Safety, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamics outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 36 subjects completed the study. Donepezil pharmacokinetic parameters were similar with and without EVP-6124. Effective dose combinations were donepezil/EVP-6124(5/2 mg) and donepezil/EVP-6124 (5/0.3 mg) and showed improvements of the delayed recall of the Visual Verbal Learning Test (1.2; CI = 0.1-2.3) and reaction time during the two-back condition of the N-back (-42; CI = -77, -8), respectively. Overall, no marked reversal of scopolamine effects was observed. DISCUSSION: This study shows no synergistic effect of subtherapeutic doses of donepezil and EVP-6124 in a scopolamine challenge model in healthy elderly subjects. Dosing of scopolamine and the combination of donepezil and EVP-6124 requires further study.

Administration of morphine sulfate extended-release capsules via gastrostomy: dissolution study and case reports.

BACKGROUND: Patients with head and neck cancer undergoing radiation treatment develop painful mouth sores described as mucositis. There are grades I-IV of mucositis increasing in severity with grading. The aim of this study was to target patients who had painful mucositis at grade III-IV and treat their radiation-induced mucositis with gastrostomy administered morphine in an extended-release dosing form. OBJECTIVE: This study is important because many patients have breaks in radiation therapy secondary to severe painful mucositis and thus disrupt their potentially curative radiation treatment. DESIGN: The subjects were patients in a radiation clinic undergoing radiation for various head and neck cancers that had grade III-IV mucositis that was diagnosed by the clinician at the practice. The subjects were screened for mouth pain and sores when they came for radiation and they were then referred for study. The aim of the study was to measure the ability of the patient to administer the contents of the morphine extended-release capsules via gastrostomy tube was evaluated and the pain scores using a numerical rating scale (NRS). SETTING: The patients were seen in radiation oncology and screened for grade III or IV mucositis and then sent to the pain and palliative care clinic. MEASUREMENT: The measurements were to evaluate the feasibility of the patient's ability to administer the contents of the morphine extended-release capsule into the gastrostomy tube and to measure pain related to radiation-induced mucositis. The results were favorable in that the patients could self-administer the morphine using the described alternate route of administration and the pain scores reflected a trend toward pain relief by gastrostomy tube morphine delivery. However, a larger study sample will need to be investigated to determine efficacy in this type of delivery system for cancer pain relief in this population of patients undergoing radiation treatment for head and neck cancers.

Single Dose and Repeat Once-Daily Dose Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of Valbenazine in Healthy Male Subjects.

Valbenazine (VBZ) is a vesicular monoamine transporter 2 (VMAT2) inhibitor approved for the treatment of tardive dyskinesia. The safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of VBZ following single and repeat once-daily (QD) dosing were evaluated in 2 randomized, single-center, double-blind studies in healthy male subjects. In the first study, 2 cohorts of 8 subjects were administered single doses (SD) of placebo (PBO; N = 2/period) or VBZ (N = 6/period; 1, 2, 5, or 12.5 mg for Cohort 1 and 12.5, 25, 50, or 75 mg for Cohort 2) using a sequential escalation scheme. The second study consisted of 2 phases. In the initial phase, subjects were administered SD PBO (N = 2/period) or VBZ (N = 6/period; 75, 100, 125 or 150 mg) with sequential escalation. In the second phase, subjects received PBO, or 50 or 100 mg VBZ (N = 4:8:8) QD for 8 days (Cohort 1) or PBO or 50 mg VBZ (N = 6:6) QD for 8 days (Cohort 2). For both studies, plasma concentrations of VBZ and its active metabolite, NBI-98782, were determined. Safety was assessed throughout the studies. PK parameters were determined using noncompartmental methods. In both studies, VBZ was rapidly absorbed with peak concentrations typically observed within 1.5 hours. Peak NBI-98782 concentrations were typically observed at 4.0 to 9.0 hours. Terminal elimination half-life for both VBZ and NBI-98782 was ~20 hours. Across the 1 to 150 mg SD range evaluated across the studies, VBZ and NBI-98782 Cmax and AUC increased dose-proportionally from 50 to 150 mg and more than dose-proportionally from 1 to 50 mg. QD VBZ and NBI-98782 Cmax and AUC parameters were also dose-proportional between the 50 and 100 mg doses. Steady-state for both analytes appeared to be achieved by Day 8. The accumulation index was ~1.5 for VBZ and ~2.5 for NBI-98782. Peak to trough fluctuation was approximately 250% for VBZ and 70% for NBI-98782. Across both studies, NBI-98782 exposure was approximately 20%-30% that of VBZ based on molar ratios. In the first study, the maximum-tolerated dose was not achieved; headache (2 events) was the only treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) reported by more than one subject. In the second study, fatigue (4 events) was the only TEAE reported by more than one subject following SD VBZ. Following QD VBZ, the TEAEs of fatigue, insomnia, disturbance in attention, and nervousness were dose-dependent; the latter three TEAEs were considered dose-limiting. Subject withdrawals due to TEAEs were 1 each for PBO and 50 mg VBZ QD, and 3 for 100 mg VBZ QD. Clinically relevant effects on laboratory parameters, vital signs or ECGs were limited to increased CPK (SD: 1 each for 5 mg VBZ and PBO), ALT (QD: 1 each for 50 and 100 mg VBZ and PBO), and triglycerides (QD: 1 each for 50 mg VBZ and PBO). VBZ has an acceptable safety profile and predictable pharmacokinetics that result in stable concentrations of active compounds with low peak-to-trough fluctuation following once-daily dosing.

Differences in Dihydrotetrabenazine Isomer Concentrations Following Administration of Tetrabenazine and Valbenazine.

BACKGROUND: Tetrabenazine (TBZ) activity is thought to result from four isomeric dihydrotetrabenazine (HTBZ) metabolites ([+]-α-HTBZ, [-]-α-HTBZ, [+]-ß-HTBZ, [-]-ß-HTBZ). Each isomer has a unique profile of vesicular monoamine transporter 2 (VMAT2) inhibition and off-target binding. Previously published data only report total isomer (α) and (ß) concentrations. We developed a method to quantify the individual HTBZ isomers in samples from patients with Huntington's disease receiving TBZ. For comparison, concentrations of [+]-α-HTBZ, the single active metabolite shared by valbenazine (VBZ) and TBZ, were determined in samples from patients with tardive dyskinesia receiving VBZ. METHODS: A liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method was developed and validated for quantitation of the four individual HTBZ isomers. Concentrations were determined in serum from patients with Huntington's disease administered TBZ and plasma from patients with tardive dyskinesia administered VBZ once daily. RESULTS: In patients administered TBZ, [-]-α-HTBZ and [+]-ß-HTBZ were the most abundant HTBZ isomers while [-]-ß-HTBZ and [+]-α-HTBZ were present as minor metabolites. Only [+]-α-HTBZ was observed in patients administered VBZ. CONCLUSIONS: Based on relative abundance and potency, [+]-ß-HTBZ appears to be the primary contributor to VMAT2 inhibition by TBZ, a finding in contrast with the generally held assertion that [+]-α-HTBZ is the major contributor. [-]-α-HTBZ, the other abundant TBZ metabolite, has much lower VMAT2 inhibitory potency than [+]-ß-HTBZ, but increased affinity for other CNS targets, which may contribute to off-target effects of TBZ. In contrast, pharmacological activity for VBZ is derived primarily from [+]-α-HTBZ. Individual HTBZ isomer concentrations provide a more clinically relevant endpoint for assessing on- and off-target effects of TBZ than total isomer concentrations.

Progranulin Levels in Plasma and Cerebrospinal Fluid in Granulin Mutation Carriers.

BACKGROUND: Pathogenic mutations in the granulin gene (GRN) are causative in 5-10% of patients with frontotemporal dementia (FTD), mostly leading to reduced progranulin protein (PGRN) levels. Upcoming therapeutic trials focus on enhancing PGRN levels. METHODS: Fluctuations in plasma PGRN (n = 41) and its relationship with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF, n = 32) and specific single nucleotide polymorphisms were investigated in pre- and symptomatic GRN mutation carriers and controls. RESULTS: Plasma PGRN levels were lower in carriers than in controls and showed a mean coefficient of variation of 5.3% in carriers over 1 week. Although plasma PGRN correlated with CSF PGRN in carriers (r = 0.54, p = 0.02), plasma only explained 29% of the variability in CSF PGRN. rs5848, rs646776 and rs1990622 genotypes only partly explained the variability of PGRN levels between subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Plasma PGRN is relatively stable over 1 week and therefore seems suitable for treatment monitoring of PGRN-enhancing agents. Since plasma PGRN only moderately correlated with CSF PGRN, CSF sampling will additionally be needed in therapeutic trials.

Pharmacokinetic evaluation of a sprinkle-dose regimen of a once-daily, extended-release morphine formulation.

BACKGROUND: Morphine sulfate extended-release (MSER) uses a drug-delivery technology that allows once-daily dosing. It is possible to open the MSER capsule and sprinkle the contents on soft food, a potentially useful alternative to the intact capsule in patients who have difficulty swallowing. OBJECTIVE: This study compared the bioavailability of MSER and its metabolites morphine-3-glucuronide and morphine-6-glucuronide after administration of MSER in a sprinkle-dose regimen relative to an intact capsule swallowed whole. METHODS: This was a randomized, open-label, single-dose, crossover study, with a 7-day washout period between the 2 dosing days. Healthy volunteers were randomized to receive an intact 60-mg MSER capsule swallowed whole or the contents of a 60-mg MSER capsule sprinkled on applesauce. Blood samples were collected and analyzed for concentrations of morphine and its active glucuronide metabolites. Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated and bioequivalence assessed. Bioequivalence was concluded if the 90% CIs of the ratio of log-transformed values for maximum concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) were within 80% to 125%. RESULTS: Of 30 subjects enrolled, 28 completed the study and were eligible for PK evaluation. Two subjects were withdrawn for reasons unrelated to study treatment. The plasma concentration-time profiles of morphine and its metabolites were superimposable after administration of the 2 regimens. Cmax and total systemic exposure-based on AUC from time 0 to the last quantifiable concentration (AUC(last)) and AUC from time 0 to infinity (AUC(infinity))-were comparable between treatments. The 90% CIs for morphine AUC(last), AUC, and Cmax ratios were 98 to 109, 96 to 106, and 95 to 117, respectively. Similar 90% CIs were obtained for the morphine metabolites. CONCLUSION: In this study in healthy volunteers, sprinkling the entire contents of an MSER capsule onto applesauce and swallowing without chewing was bioequivalent to swallowing an intact MSER capsule.

Steady-state pharmacokinetic comparison of a new, extended-release, once-daily morphine formulation, Avinza, and a twice-daily controlled-release morphine formulation in patients with chronic moderate-to-severe pain.

Extended-release morphine formulations are widely used in the management of chronic pain. Avinza (morphine sulfate extended-release [MSER, Morphelan]) is a new, once-a-day, extended-release morphine formulation designed to reach target concentrations rapidly and maintain concentrations throughout a 24-hour period. The primary objective of this study was to compare the 24-hour steady-state pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles of morphine and its metabolites (morphine-6-glucuronide [M6G] and morphine-3-glucuronide [M3G]) following ingestion of MSER once-a-day and MS Contin (controlled-release morphine sulfate [CRM]) twice-a-day in patients with chronic moderate-to-severe pain. Ten patients with chronic moderate-to-severe pain were recruited into an open-label, multiple-dose, nonrandomized, two-period, single-center study. All patients were stabilized for a minimum of 7 days on a twice-daily dose of CRM associated with an optimal balance between pain control and side effects. Patients were then switched to the closest equivalent once-daily dose of MSER for a minimum of 10 days. Twenty-four hour steady-state PK profiles were obtained on the last day of each treatment period and additional clinical and safety assessments were performed. PK data were normalized to a 100-mg total daily dose prior to statistical analysis. Nine of the 10 patients completed the entire study. MSER and CRM demonstrated similar bioavailability (AUC) of morphine and its metabolites. Compared to CRM, MSER demonstrated a 19% lower maximum concentration (C(max)), a 66% higher minimum concentration (C(min)), and a 44% lower peak-to-trough fluctuation (%FI) over the 24-hour period. In addition, MSER maintained concentrations above 50% and 75% of the C(max) longer than CRM. Clinical efficacy and safety were comparable for MSER and CRM. Once-daily MSER approaches maximum morphine concentration more quickly, approximates maximum concentration longer, and demonstrates less fluctuation in morphine concentration during a 24-hour period than CRM dosed twice daily. The pharmacodynamic implications of this profile deserve further study.

Bioavailability of intranasal vs. rectal diazepam.

There remains an unmet medical need in the out-of-hospital management of seizure emergencies because older children and adults often refuse treatment with diazepam rectal gel due to social objections. We have previously reported that intranasal diazepam (DZP) administration is feasible, with maximum plasma concentrations (C(max)) and time to maximum concentration (T(max)) that are comparable to rectal DZP; but tolerability was poor. In the present study, the tolerability and pharmacokinetics of two investigational nasal formulations were compared with DZP rectal gel. Twelve healthy volunteers were enrolled into an active-control, double-blind, four-period, crossover pharmacokinetic and tolerability study. Three intranasal treatments (Nas-A 10mg, Nas-B 10mg and Nas-B 13.4 mg) were compared to a 10mg dose of the rectal gel. A single dose of each formulation was administered followed by at least a 14 day washout period. Blood samples for plasma DZP concentration-time characterization were collected pre-dose and at regular intervals to 240 h post-dose. Tolerability and sedation were assessed using visual analog scales. Mean DZP C(max) (±SD) was 181.8 ± 84.16, 151.3 ± 108.1 and 180.7 ± 82.1 ng/mL for Nas-A 10mg, Nas-B 10 and Nas-B 13.4 mg respectively; in comparison the C(max) for the rectal gel was 160.9 ± 109.4 ng/mL. Median T(max) was 0.75 h for all treatments. Both intranasal formulations were well tolerated and exhibited relatively rapid, but variable, absorption with bioavailability of 70-90% relative to DZP rectal gel. This study shows that the development of a well-tolerated nasal formulation is possible and that the rate and extent of absorption approximates that of DZP rectal gel. We conclude that intranasal DZP offers a viable alternative to rectal administration, but enhancement of formulations is needed to improve the extent and consistency of absorption.