Autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for the treatment of multiple sclerosis.

INTRODUCTION: Autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) has been performed for severe multiple sclerosis (MS) refractory to standard therapy with increasing frequency worldwide. However, experience in Asia employing this modality in MS has been limited. In this review, we explored the pathophysiology of autoimmunity and the underlying rationale for auto-HSCT in treating autoimmune diseases including MS, as well as existing published pre-clinical and clinical data. We aimed thereby to better understand the utility of treating MS with auto-HSCT and the feasibility of this procedure in Singapore. METHODS: A Medline search was performed with the terms "haematopoietic stem cell transplantation", "multiple sclerosis" and "autoimmune diseases" from 1996 to 2005. Both original papers and review articles were considered. MAIN FINDINGS: The majority of publications were from Europe or the United States and most clinical series from single centres had relatively small numbers of patients. Worldwide, the number of patients reported has been less than 300 since 1997. Existing data support the feasibility and promise of this procedure and ongoing Phase III trials may serve to confirm this initial experience. CONCLUSION: Pre-clinical and early clinical data support the rationale for immunoablative therapy for autoimmune disorders. Auto-HSCT for severe MS is a feasible procedure and can be safely performed in centres with experience managing HSCT patients.

Outpatient-based therapy of oral fludarabine and subcutaneous alemtuzumab for asian patients with relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Background. Intravenous alemtuzumab and fludarabine are effective in combination for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), but require hospital visits for intravenous injection. We performed a pilot study to assess the safety and efficacy of outpatient-based oral fludarabine with subcutaneous alemtuzumab (OFSA) for the treatment of relapsed/refractory CLL. Results. Depending on their response, patients were given two to six 28-day cycles of subcutaneous alemtuzumab 30 mg on days 1,3, and 5 and oral fludarabine 40 mg/m(2)/day for 5 days. Median patient age was 74. The lymphocyte counts of all five patients fell after the 1st cycle of treatment and reached normal/low levels on completion of 2 to 6 cycles of therapy. Platelet counts and hemoglobin were unaffected. All five patients achieved complete hematological remission, while two attained minimal residual disease negativity on 4-color flow cytometry. Conclusions. Our OFSA regimen was effective in elderly Asian patients with relapsed/refractory CLL, and it should be investigated further.

Impact of postgrafting immunosuppressive regimens on nonrelapse mortality and survival after nonmyeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant using the fludarabine and low-dose total-body irradiation 200-cGy.

The development of nonmyeloablative (NM) hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) has extended the potential curative treatment option of allografting to patients in whom it was previously contraindicated because of advanced age or comorbidity. Acute and chronic graft versus host disease (GVHD) and its consequent nonrelapse mortality (NRM), remains the major limitation of NM HCT. In this report, we analyzed the outcome of 67 patients (median age, 45 years) with hematologic diseases receiving NM conditioning with fludarabine 90 mg/m(2) and total body irradiation (TBI) 200-cGy, followed by filgrastim-mobilized peripheral blood stem cell transplant from HLA identical (n = 61), 5/6 antigen-matched related (n = 1), 6/6 antigen-matched unrelated (n = 3), and 5/6 antigen-matched unrelated (n = 2) donors. The first cohort of 21 patients were given cyclosporine (CSP) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) as postgrafting immunosuppression, whereas the subsequent cohort was given additional methotrexate (MTX) and extended duration of CSP/MMF prophylaxis in an attempt to reduce graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Sixty-four (95%) patients engrafted and 3 (5%) had secondary graft failure. Myelosuppression was moderate with neutrophil counts not declining below 500/microL in approximately 25% of patients, and with more than half of the patients not requiring any blood or platelet transfusion. The 2-year cumulative interval (CI) of grade II-IV, grade III-IV acute GVHD and chronic GVHD were 49%, 30%, and 34%, respectively. The 2-year probability of NRM, overall (OS), and progression-free (PFS) survival were 27%, 43%, and 28%, respectively. GVHD-related death accounted for 85% of NRM. Compared with patients receiving CSP/MMF, patients receiving extended duration of CSP/MMF with additional MTX in postgrafting immunosuppression had a significantly lower risk of grade III-IV acute GVHD (CI 20% versus 52%; P = .009) and NRM (CI at 2 years: 11% versus 62%; P < .001), without any significant adverse impact on the risk of relapse (CI at 2 years: 59% versus 33%; P = .174) Subgroup analysis of a cohort of patients given MTX/CSP/MMF showed that patients with "standard risk" diseases (n = 21) had a 3-year OS and PFS of 85% and 65%, respectively. This compares favorably to the 41% (P = .02) and 23% (P = .03) OS and PFS, respectively, in patients with "high-risk" diseases (n = 25). In conclusion, the addition of MTX onto the current postgrafting immunosuppression regimen with extended CSP/MMF prophylaxis duration provides more effective protection against severe GVHD, and is associated with more favorable outcome in patients receiving NM fludarabine/TBI conditioning than in patients receiving fludarabine/TBI conditioning with CSP and MMF without MTX.