RESUMEN
PURPOSE: We sought to systematically assess and summarize the available literature on outcomes following coccygectomy for refractory coccygodynia. METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Data concerning patient demographics, validated patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) for pain relief, disability outcomes, complications, and reoperation rates were extracted and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 21 studies (18 retrospective and 3 prospective) were included in the quantitative analysis. A total of 826 patients (females = 75%) received coccygectomy (720 total and 106 partial) for refractory coccygodynia. Trauma was reported as the most common etiology of coccygodynia (56%; n = 375), followed by idiopathic causes (33%; n = 221). The pooled mean difference (MD) in pain scores from baseline on a 0-10 scale was 5.03 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.35 to 6.86) at a 6-12 month follow-up (FU); 5.02 (95% CI: 3.47 to 6.57) at > 12-36 months FU; and 5.41 (95% CI: 4.33 to 6.48) at > 36 months FU. The MCID threshold for pain relief was surpassed at each follow-up. Oswestry Disability Index scores significantly improved postoperatively, with a pooled MD from baseline of - 23.49 (95% CI: - 31.51 to - 15.46), surpassing the MCID threshold. The pooled incidence of complications following coccygectomy was 8% (95% CI: 5% to 12%), the most frequent of which were surgical site infections and wound dehiscence. The pooled incidence of reoperations was 3% (95% CI: 1% to 5%). CONCLUSION: Coccygectomy represents a viable treatment option in patients with refractory coccygodynia.
Asunto(s)
Cóccix , Dolor de la Región Lumbar , Cóccix/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/etiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoAsunto(s)
Insulina , Seguro de Salud , Adulto , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Gastos en SaludRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Spine aneurysmal bone cysts (ABCs) rarely occur in adults. Primary and secondary lesions may show some differences and require appropriate treatments. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the literature on adult spine ABCs. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web-of-Science were searched. Clinical-radiological features, treatments, and outcomes were analyzed and compared between primary vs secondary adult spine ABCs. RESULTS: We included 80 studies comprising 220 patients. Primary spine ABCs were more frequent (76.4%). Main symptoms were lower-back-pain (42.8%) and motor deficits (31.2%). Tumors were mostly thoracic (31.4%) or cervical (26.8%), showing lytic (70.4%) and/or cystic (52.3%) appearances. Surgical resection (79.1%) was preferred over biopsy (20.9%). Most primary ABCs underwent curettage with bone grafting (62.1%) and laminectomy (39.1%) (P < 0.001), while most secondary ABCs underwent corpectomy (51%) and spine fixation (93.9%) (P < 0.001). Radiotherapy was delivered in 58 patients (26.4%), and embolization in 37 (16.8%). Symptomatic improvement was reported in 91.8% cases, with no differences based on etiology nor extent-of-resection. Median follow-up was 28.5 months, significantly superior in secondary ABCs. Secondary ABCs had significantly higher rates of tumor recurrence (19.2%; P = 0.011) and death (5.8%; P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Surgical resection, radiotherapy, and embolization are effective in managing adult spine ABCs. Secondary tumors have worse prognoses requiring more aggressive treatments.