RESUMEN
The circadian system, a vital temporal regulator influencing physiological processes, has implications for cancer development and treatment response. Our study assessed circadian timing's impact on whole-brain radiotherapy outcomes in brain metastases for personalized cancer therapy insights. The aim of the study was to evaluate circadian influence on radiation treatment timing and its correlation with clinical outcomes and to identify patient populations benefiting from interventions synchronizing circadian rhythms, considering subgroup differences and potential disparities. An IRB-approved retrospective analysis of 237 patients undergoing whole-brain radiotherapy for brain metastases (2017-2021), receiving over 80% of treatments in the morning or afternoon, was performed. Survival analyses utilized Kaplan-Meier curves. This was a single-institution study involving patients receiving whole-brain radiotherapy. Demographic, disease, and socioeconomic parameters from electronic medical records were collected. Morning treatment (n = 158) showed a trend toward improved overall survival vs. afternoon (n = 79); the median survival was 158 vs. 79 days (p = 0.20, HR = 0.84, CI95% 0.84-0.91). Subgroup benefits for morning treatment in females (p = 0.04) and trends in controlled primary disease (p = 0.11) and breast cancer metastases (p = 0.08) were observed. Black patients exhibited diminished circadian influence. The present study emphasized chronobiological factors' relevance in brain metastases radiation therapy. Morning treatment correlated with improved survival, particularly in specific subgroups. Potential circadian influence disparities were identified, laying a foundation for personalized cancer therapy and interventions synchronizing circadian rhythms for enhanced treatment efficacy.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: A novel form of lung function imaging has been developed that uses 4-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) data to generate lung ventilation images (4DCT-ventilation). Functional avoidance uses 4DCT-ventilation to reduce doses to functional lung with the aim of reducing pulmonary side effects. A phase 2, multicenter 4DCT-ventilation functional avoidance clinical trial was completed. The purpose of this work was to quantify changes in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for patients treated with functional avoidance and determine which metrics are predictive of PRO changes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with locally advanced lung cancer receiving curative-intent radiation therapy were accrued. Each patient had a 4DCT-ventilation image generated using 4DCT data and image processing. PRO instruments included the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) questionnaire administered pretreatment; at the end of treatment; and at 3, 6, and 12 months posttreatment. Using the FACT-Trial Outcome Index and the FACT-Lung Cancer Subscale results, the percentage of clinically meaningful declines (CMDs) were determined. A linear mixed-effects model was used to determine which patient, clinical, dose, and dose-function metrics were predictive of PRO decline. RESULTS: Of the 59 patients who completed baseline PRO surveys. 83% had non-small cell lung cancer, with 75% having stage 3 disease. The median dose was 60 Gy in 30 fractions. CMD FACT-Trial Outcome Index decline was 46.3%, 38.5%, and 26.8%, at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. CMD FACT-Lung Cancer Subscale decline was 33.3%, 33.3%, and 29.3%, at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. Although an increase in most dose and dose-function parameters was associated with a modest decline in PROs, none of the results were significant (all P > .053). CONCLUSIONS: The current work presents an innovative combination of use of functional avoidance and PRO assessment and is the first report of PROs for patients treated with prospective 4DCT-ventilation functional avoidance. Approximately 30% of patients had clinically significant decline in PROs at 12 months posttreatment. The study provides additional data on outcomes with 4DCT-ventilation functional avoidance.