Contraceptive and Infertility Target DataBase: a contraceptive drug development tool for targeting and analysis of human reproductive specific tissues†.

The long and challenging drug development process begins with discovery biology for the selection of an appropriate target for a specific indication. Target is a broad term that can be applied to a range of biological entities such as proteins, genes, and ribonucleic acids (RNAs). Although there are numerous databases available for mining biological entities, publicly available searchable, downloadable databases to aid in target selection for a specific disease or indication (e.g., developing contraceptives and infertility treatments) are limited. We report the development of the Contraceptive and Infertility Target DataBase (https://www.citdbase.org), which provides investigators an interface to mine existing transcriptomic and proteomic resources to identify high-quality contraceptive/infertility targets. The development of similar databases is applicable to the identification of targets for other diseases and conditions.

Male Contraceptive Development: Update on Novel Hormonal and Nonhormonal Methods.

BACKGROUND: Development of new methods of male contraception would address an unmet need for men to control their fertility and could increase contraceptive options for women. Pharmaceutical research and development for male contraception was active in the 1990s but has been virtually abandoned. The Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) has supported a contraceptive development program since 1969 and supports the majority of hormonal male contraceptive development. Nonhormonal methods are also in development but are at earlier stages. CONTENT: Several hormonal male contraceptive agents have entered clinical trials. Single-agent products being evaluated include dimethandrolone undecanoate, 11ß-methyl-nortestosterone dodecyl carbonate, and 7α-methyl-19-nortestosterone. A contraceptive efficacy trial of Nestorone® gel and testosterone gel in a single application will begin in 2018. Potential nonhormonal methods are at preclinical stages of development. Many nonhormonal male contraceptive targets that affect either sperm production or sperm function have been identified. Targeted pathways include the retinoic acid pathway, bromodomain and extraterminal proteins, and pathways for Sertoli cell-germ cell adhesion or sperm motility. Druggable targets include CatSper, the sperm Na+/K+-exchanger, TSSK, HIPK4, EPPIN, and ADAMs family proteins. Development of a procedure to reversibly block the vas deferens (initially developed in India in the 1980s) is undergoing early stage research in the US under the trade name Vasalgel™. SUMMARY: NICHD has supported the development of reversible male contraceptive agents. Other organizations such as the World Health Organization and the Population Council are pursuing male contraceptive development, but industry involvement remains dormant.

Impact of Eligibility Criteria on Participant Enrollment for a Randomized Clinical Trial of Gonorrhea Treatment.

BACKGROUND: High rates of failure to qualify for clinical trial participation increase time and cost required for study completion. Identification of remediable reasons for prescreen failure can help reduce prescreen failure rates and improve study cost effectiveness. METHODS: Reasons for prescreen failure to qualify for participation in a phase 2 randomized clinical trial of treatment of uncomplicated urogenital gonorrhea were collected from prescreening logs. Reasons were categorized based on whether the reason was that the subject failed to meet eligibility criteria or declined participation. Subjects who failed prescreening but could have been enrolled under protocol amendments were used to estimate potential cost savings had enrollment completed sooner. RESULTS: Over 88% (1373/1554) of potential study candidates were not enrolled. The majority (68.8%) of nonenrolled subjects failed prescreening due to not meeting eligibility criteria, whereas 31.0% declined to participate. The most common reasons for failure to qualify were having only nonurogenital gonorrhea (16.4%), limited time (13.1%), and being on antiretroviral therapy (7.5%). Potential cost savings if protocol amendments affecting eligibility had been instituted earlier were estimated at US $127,500. CONCLUSIONS: Careful attention to reasons for prescreen failure can inform clinical trial protocol development to address trial design features that may impact successful enrollment. More efficient subject enrollment can result in substantial cost savings.

Update on Novel Hormonal and Nonhormonal Male Contraceptive Development.

BACKGROUND: The advent of new methods of male contraception would increase contraceptive options for men and women and advance male contraceptive agency. Pharmaceutical R&D for male contraception has been dormant since the 1990s. The Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) has supported a contraceptive development program since 1969 and supports most ongoing hormonal male contraceptive development. Nonhormonal methods are in earlier stages of development. CONTENT: Several hormonal male contraceptive agents have entered clinical trials. Novel single agent products being evaluated include dimethandrolone undecanoate, 11ß-methyl-nortestosterone dodecylcarbonate, and 7α-methyl-19-nortestosterone. A contraceptive efficacy trial of Nestorone®/testosterone gel is underway. Potential nonhormonal methods are at preclinical stages of development. Many nonhormonal male contraceptive targets that affect sperm production, sperm function, or sperm transport have been identified. SUMMARY: NICHD supports development of reversible male contraceptive agents. Other organizations such as the World Health Organization, the Population Council, and the Male Contraception Initiative are pursuing male contraceptive development, but industry involvement remains limited.

Comparison of metabolic effects of the progestational androgens dimethandrolone undecanoate and 11ß-MNTDC in healthy men.

BACKGROUND: Dimethandrolone (DMA) and 11ß-methyl-19-nortestosterone (11ß-MNT) are two novel compounds with both androgenic and progestational activity that are under investigation as potential male hormonal contraceptives. Their metabolic effects have never been compared in men. OBJECTIVE: Assess for changes in insulin sensitivity and adiponectin and compare the metabolic effects of these two novel androgens. MATERIALS/METHODS: In two clinical trials of DMA undecanoate (DMAU) and 11ß-MNT dodecylcarbonate (11ß-MNTDC), oral prodrugs of DMA and 11ß-MNT, healthy men received drug, or placebo for 28 days. Insulin and adiponectin assays were performed on stored samples. Mixed model analyses were performed to compare the effects of the two drugs. Student's t test, or the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test as appropriate, was used to evaluate for an effect of active drug versus placebo. RESULTS: Class effects were seen, with decrease in HDL-C and SHBG, and increase in weight and hematocrit, with no statistically significant differences between the two compounds. No changes in fasting glucose, fasting insulin, or HOMA-IR were seen with either compound. There was a slight decrease in adiponectin with DMAU that was not seen with 11ß-MNTDC. An increase in LDL-C was seen with 11ß-MNTDC but not with DMAU. DISCUSSION: There were no significant changes in insulin resistance after 28 days of oral administration of these novel androgens despite a mild increase in weight. There may be subtle differences in their metabolic impacts that should be explored in future studies. CONCLUSION: Changes in metabolic parameters should be carefully monitored when investigating androgenic compounds.

Acceptability of the oral hormonal male contraceptive prototype, 11ß-methyl-19-nortestosterone dodecylcarbonate (11ß-MNTDC), in a 28-day placebo-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine men's satisfaction with and the potential acceptability of 11ß-methyl-19-nortestosterone dodecylcarbonate (11ß-MNTDC) when used for 28 days as an experimental, once-daily, oral hormonal male contraceptive (HMC). STUDY DESIGN: We surveyed participants from a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 1 clinical trial, examining their experience with and willingness to use daily oral 11ß-MNTDC for male contraception. RESULTS: Of 42 trial participants, 40 (30 11ß-MNTDC, 10 placebo) completed baseline and end-of-treatment surveys. Based on a 28-day experience, few cited any baseline concerns about safety and drug adherence. Following treatment, nearly three-quarters (72.5%) of participants reported satisfaction with the study drug and nearly all (92.5%) would recommend the method to others. More than half of participants would be willing to pay for the study drug (62.5%) and indicated that the method exceeded initial expectations (53.9%). Nearly 90% reported that taking the pill was easy to remember and did not interfere with their daily routines. Approximately one-third of participants reported bothersome side effects (37% 11ß-MNTDC vs. 20% placebo, p = 0.45). Given the option, 42% of participants would prefer a daily HMC pill over injectable regimens or a daily topical gel. CONCLUSION: A majority of participants in this short-term trial of daily oral 11ß-MNTDC reported satisfaction with the regimen, would recommend it to others, and would pay to use the drug as HMC despite some bothersome side effects. IMPLICATIONS: Oral 11ß-MNTDC would be an acceptable and preferable method among men desiring reversible hormonal male contraception (HMC). These data support further trials of novel oral HMCs such as 11ß-MNTDC.

Dimethandrolone Undecanoate, a Novel, Nonaromatizable Androgen, Increases P1NP in Healthy Men Over 28 Days.

CONTEXT: Dimethandrolone undecanoate (DMAU) is being developed as a male contraceptive. Daily oral administration of DMAU, a potent androgen that is not aromatized, markedly suppresses serum testosterone (T) and estradiol (E2) in healthy men. E2 deficiency can increase bone resorption in men. OBJECTIVE: This work aimed to assess changes in bone turnover markers with DMAU administration in a 28-day study. DESIGN: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted. SETTING: This study took place at 2 academic medical centers. PARTICIPANTS: Healthy men, age 18 to50 years (n = 81), participated. INTERVENTION: Men received 0, 100, 200, or 400 mg of oral DMAU for 28 days. Serum C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX; bone resorption marker) and procollagen type I amino-terminal propeptide (P1NP; bone formation marker) were measured on days 1 and 28. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in bone turnover markers and serum hormones over the treatment period were measured. RESULTS: On day 28, median serum T and E2 were markedly suppressed in all treatment groups vs placebo (P < .001 for both). Percentage change (%) in serum P1NP significantly differed across treatment groups (P = .007): Serum P1NP significantly increased in the 200 mg (5%, interquartile range [IQR] -7% to 27%) and 400 mg (22%, IQR -1% to 40%) groups relative to placebo (-8%, IQR -20% to 0%). Change (%) in serum CTX did not differ between groups (P = .09). CONCLUSIONS: DMAU administration for 28 days to healthy men leads to marked suppression of serum T and E2, yet increases P1NP, a serum marker of bone formation. Longer-term studies of the potent androgen DMAU are warranted to determine its impact on bone health in men.