In vitro and in vivo activity of tebipenem against ESBL-producing E. coli.

OBJECTIVE: To determine in vitro and in vivo activity of tebipenem against ESBL-producing E. coli. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of tebipenem against 100 clinical isolates of ESBL-producing E. coli was performed by broth micro-dilution technique. Blood and urine samples from 10 healthy male subjects before and after receiving 300 mg of tebipenem pivoxil 3 times a day for 2 consecutive days were determined for inhibitory and bactericidal titers against a clinical urinary isolate of ESBL-producing E. coli by disk diffusion method and broth micro- dilution method. RESULTS: MIC50 and MC90 of tebipenem against ESBL-producing E. coli were both 0.06 mg/L with MIC range from ≤ 0.06 to 0.25 mg/L. The inhibition zones were observed around the disks inoculated with serum samples and urine samples collected from all study subjects after receiving tebipenem pivoxil for at least 1 hour and 5 hours, respectively. The inhibitory titer of 1:160 and bactericidal titer of 1:160 of serum samples were observed for at least one hour after ingestion of tebipenem pivoxil. Inhibitory titer of 1:640 and bactericidal titer of 1:640 of urine samples were observed after at least 14 hours after ingestion of tebipenem pivoxil. No subjects experienced side effects related to receiving tebipenem pivoxil. CONCLUSION: Tebipenem is very active against ESBL-producing E. coli. Oral administration of tebipenem pivoxil 300 mg 3 times a day for two days was well tolerated, safe and induced high inhibitory and bactericidal activity in serum and urine. Tebipenem pivoxil could be an oral agent for effective therapy of ESBL-producing E. coli infections.

Frequency and mortality rate following antimicrobial-resistant bloodstream infections in tertiary-care hospitals compared with secondary-care hospitals.

There are few studies comparing proportion, frequency, mortality and mortality rate following antimicrobial-resistant (AMR) infections between tertiary-care hospitals (TCHs) and secondary-care hospitals (SCHs) in low and middle-income countries (LMICs) to inform intervention strategies. The aim of this study is to demonstrate the utility of an offline tool to generate AMR reports and data for a secondary data analysis. We conducted a secondary-data analysis on a retrospective, multicentre data of hospitalised patients in Thailand. Routinely collected microbiology and hospital admission data of 2012 to 2015, from 15 TCHs and 34 SCHs were analysed using the AMASS v2.0 (www.amass.website). We then compared the burden of AMR bloodstream infections (BSI) between those TCHs and SCHs. Of 19,665 patients with AMR BSI caused by pathogens under evaluation, 10,858 (55.2%) and 8,807 (44.8%) were classified as community-origin and hospital-origin BSI, respectively. The burden of AMR BSI was considerably different between TCHs and SCHs, particularly of hospital-origin AMR BSI. The frequencies of hospital-origin AMR BSI per 100,000 patient-days at risk in TCHs were about twice that in SCHs for most pathogens under evaluation (for carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii [CRAB]: 18.6 vs. 7.0, incidence rate ratio 2.77; 95%CI 1.72-4.43, p<0.001; for carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa [CRPA]: 3.8 vs. 2.0, p = 0.0073; third-generation cephalosporin resistant Escherichia coli [3GCREC]: 12.1 vs. 7.0, p<0.001; third-generation cephalosporin resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae [3GCRKP]: 12.2 vs. 5.4, p<0.001; carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae [CRKP]: 1.6 vs. 0.7, p = 0.045; and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus [MRSA]: 5.1 vs. 2.5, p = 0.0091). All-cause in-hospital mortality (%) following hospital-origin AMR BSI was not significantly different between TCHs and SCHs (all p>0.20). Due to the higher frequencies, all-cause in-hospital mortality rates following hospital-origin AMR BSI per 100,000 patient-days at risk were considerably higher in TCHs for most pathogens (for CRAB: 10.2 vs. 3.6,mortality rate ratio 2.77; 95%CI 1.71 to 4.48, p<0.001; CRPA: 1.6 vs. 0.8; p = 0.020; 3GCREC: 4.0 vs. 2.4, p = 0.009; 3GCRKP, 4.0 vs. 1.8, p<0.001; CRKP: 0.8 vs. 0.3, p = 0.042; and MRSA: 2.3 vs. 1.1, p = 0.023). In conclusion, the burden of AMR infections in some LMICs might differ by hospital type and size. In those countries, activities and resources for antimicrobial stewardship and infection control programs might need to be tailored based on hospital setting. The frequency and in-hospital mortality rate of hospital-origin AMR BSI are important indicators and should be routinely measured to monitor the burden of AMR in every hospital with microbiology laboratories in LMICs.

The Activities of Antimicrobials Against Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Isolates and Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes Among Treatment Regimens in Patients with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Infections: A Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study.

Purpose: Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, a multidrug-resistant pathogen can cause hospital-acquired infections such as pneumonia, or bloodstream infection. S. maltophilia infection is associated with high mortality rates. This retrospective study examined the antimicrobial susceptibility profile of clinical S. maltophilia isolates and evaluated clinical outcomes, treatment regimens, and risk factors associated with 30-day mortality or treatment failure of S. maltophilia infections at three tertiary care hospitals in Central Thailand. Patients and Methods: The characteristics, microbiological data, and clinical treatment outcomes were derived from medical records obtained from three tertiary care hospitals in Central Thailand from January 2017 to October 2022. The primary outcomes were treatment failure and 30-day mortality. The antimicrobial susceptibility rates of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX), levofloxacin, and ceftazidime were determined by minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), which were based on broth microdilution and clear zone diameters using the disk diffusion method. However, we also report the susceptibility of minocycline and tigecycline in some clinical S. maltophilia strains (n = 149) and determined by MIC with E-test method. Results: The antimicrobial susceptibility rates to TMP-SMX, levofloxacin, and ceftazidime were 97.1%, 93%, and 55.3%, respectively. The treatment failure rate and 30-day mortality were 66.3% and 49%, respectively. Significant factors associated with treatment failure included APACHE II score ≥15 (OR 3.37, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.46-7.76), polymicrobial infections (OR 3.20, 95% CI 1.35-7.55). The significant factors associated with reduced treatment failure was treatment with TMP-SMX-based regimen (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.11-0.76). The 30-day mortality rate was associated with APACHE II score ≥15 (OR 3.27, 95% CI 1.45-7.39) and septic shock (OR 2.53, 95% CI 1.36-4.69). Conclusion: The results indicate a high mortality rate for S. maltophilia infection. The predictive factors for an unfavourable outcome were severity of illness, septic shock, and non-use of TMP-SMX. Therefore, a TMP-SMX-based regimen is recommended for the treatment of S. maltophilia infections.

Effectiveness and safety of polymyxin B for the treatment of infections caused by extensively drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria in Thailand.

BACKGROUND: Colistimethate sodium (colistin) has been used in the treatment of infections caused by extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Gram-negative bacteria in Thailand over the past decade, with a mortality rate of 50% and a nephrotoxicity rate of 40%. Polymyxin B has not been available in Thailand. We conducted a Phase II clinical study to determine the effectiveness and safety of polymyxin B, compared with colistin, for the treatment of XDR Gram-negative bacterial infections in Thai patients. METHODS: A total of 73 adult patients hospitalized at four participating tertiary care hospitals from January 2015 to December 2015 who had infections caused by XDR Gram-negative bacteria and had to receive colistin were enrolled in the study. Polymyxin B (100 mg/day) was administered intravenously every 12 hours for 7-14 days. RESULTS: Most of the patients were older males with comorbidities who had received antibiotics, particularly carbapenems, prior to receiving polymyxin B. More than half of the patients had pneumonia, and 51.5% of the infections were caused by XDR Acinetobacter baumannii, which was susceptible to colistin. Good clinical responses at the end of treatment were observed in 78.1% of cases, the overall 28-day mortality rate from all causes was 28.7%, the microbiological clearance of the targeted bacteria after therapy was 56.2% and nephrotoxicity occurred in 24.7% of cases. Neurotoxicity relating to reversible numbness was observed in two cases. CONCLUSION: Polymyxin B seems to be effective and safe for the treatment of XDR Gram-negative bacterial infections. Polymyxin B should be considered as an alternative to colistin for treatment of infections caused by XDR Gram-negative bacteria in Thai adult patients, especially those at risk of nephrotoxicity.