Monitoring for Breast Cancer Recurrence Following Goldilocks Breast Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: The Goldilocks breast reconstruction utilizes redundant mastectomy skin flaps to fashion a breast mound; however, there is concern that imbrication of these skin flaps may predispose to fat necrosis and make detection of local breast cancer recurrence more difficult. Goldilocks patients follow a traditional postmastectomy screening pathway that includes clinical examination for locoregional recurrence, but it is unclear if this is sufficient. We evaluate our Goldilocks reconstruction case series to determine rates of diagnostic imaging, biopsy, and locoregional and distant recurrence. METHODS: Sixty-six patients (94 breasts) undergoing Goldilocks breast reconstruction were retrospectively reviewed. Any diagnostic postoperative imaging/biopsies performed and that confirmed local or distant breast cancer recurrence were noted. RESULTS: Average time of follow-up was 45 months. Most patients in this cohort had stage 0 (27.3%) or stage I (40.9%) breast cancer. There were a total of 11 (11.7%) concerning breast masses identified. Seven (7.4%) masses were biopsied, of which 5 were benign and 2 were invasive cancer recurrence. Four masses (4.3%) underwent diagnostic imaging only, all with benign findings. Five patients in this series were found to have either distant disease or a second primary cancer in the nonoperative contralateral breast. CONCLUSIONS: Rates of local recurrence following Goldilocks are not higher than expected after other types of postmastectomy reconstruction. Clinical monitoring successfully detected local recurrence in all affected patients in this series. More definite guidelines around the routine screening of Goldilocks mastectomy patients may aid in early detection of local breast cancer recurrence.

The Modified Frailty Index Predicts Major Complications in Oncoplastic Reduction Mammoplasty.

BACKGROUND: An important component of preoperative counseling and patient selection involves surgical risk stratification. There are many tools developed to predict surgical complications. The Modified Frailty Index (mFI) calculates risk based on the following five elements: hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, diabetes, and functional status. Recent literature demonstrates the efficacy of the mFI across multiple surgical disciplines. We elected to investigate its utility in oncoplastic reductions (OCR). METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients with breast cancer who underwent OCR from 1998 to 2020 was queried from a prospectively maintained database. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and surgical details were reviewed. The mFI was computed for each patient. The primary clinical outcome was the development of complications. RESULTS: 547 patients were included in the study cohort. The average age was 55 and the average body mass index was 33.5. The overall complication rate was 19% (n = 105) and the major complication rate was 9% (n = 49). Higher frailty scores were significantly associated with the development of major complications (P < 0.05). mFI scores of 0 had a major complication rate of 5.7%; scores of 1, 13%; and scores of 2, 15.1%. The relative risk of a major complication in patients with elevated mFI (>0) was 2.2. Age, body mass index, and resection weights were not associated with complications (P = 0.15, P = 0.87, and P = 0.30 respectively) on continuous analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated mFI scores are associated with an increased major complication profile in patients who are undergoing OCR. Hypertension and diabetes are the most common comorbidities in our population, and this tool may assist with preoperative counseling and risk stratification. Benefits of this risk assessment tool include its ease of calculation and brevity. Our study is the first to demonstrate its utility in OCR; however, further study in high-risk patients would strengthen the applicability of this frailty index.

The Effect of Bowel Anastomosis on Outcomes in Complex Abdominal Wall Reconstruction: A 10-Year Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: In patients who require complex abdominal wall reconstruction (CAWR), the need for a bowel anastomosis could impact procedure choice and outcome. In this retrospective cohort study, we examine the effect of bowel anastomosis on complications and hernia recurrence. METHODS: All patients who underwent CAWR between 2011 and 2021 by the senior author were reviewed in a retrospective cohort analysis. Patients were included if they met the above criteria. Patients were excluded if they did not undergo the above procedure or if they underwent a different procedure simultaneously. Univariate analysis was performed for patients who underwent bowel anastomosis, and multiple variable logistic regression analysis was performed with respect to overall complications. RESULTS: A total of 264 patients underwent CAWR over a 10-year interval. A total of 41 patients underwent bowel anastomosis (16%), and 223 patients (84%) underwent CAWR without bowel anastomosis. Mean patient age was 55.50 ± 11.55 years. Mean patient body mass index was 32.36 ± 7.31 kg/m 2 . Mean follow-up time was 10.20 months. There was a significant difference in hernia repair etiology, with higher rates of recurrent hernia repair among patients receiving bowel anastomosis (odds ratio, 2.98; 95% confidence interval, 1.49-5.95; P = 0.0018). Acellular dermal matrix was used more frequently in patients who required a bowel anastomosis (odds ratio, 3.74; 95% confidence interval, 1.75-8.00; P = 0.0018). Major and minor complications were also significantly higher in this cohort. Regression analysis for overall complications revealed the presence of bowel anastomosis, fascial repair technique, and follow-up time as independent predictors of overall complications. CONCLUSION: Bowel anastomosis performed at the time of CAWR significantly increased the rate of overall and major complications but did not predict hernia recurrence. Plastic surgeons should utilize this information in counseling patients and in deciding the most appropriate hernia repair technique.

Reviewing Outcomes and Complications with the Use of Mesh in Breast Reduction Surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Reduction mammoplasty is a common reconstructive and esthetic procedure with variable long-term outcomes regarding breast shape, projection, and nipple-areolar complex. One common complaint is recurrent breast ptosis, which may be mitigated by sufficient support of the inferior pole. This review will look at the effects of mesh in mitigating postoperative ptosis following reduction mammoplasty. METHODS: A comprehensive review of the literature was performed using the PubMed database. Manuscripts that provided data with respect to the effects of mesh on cosmetic outcomes, patient-reported outcomes, complications, and surveillance were utilized. RESULTS: Six studies with a total of 634 patients were included in this review. There is limited evidence to support a cosmetic benefit with the use of mesh in reduction mammoplasty patients. While subjective satisfaction was demonstrated in one paper, few others had objective measurements of the impact of mesh. Complications included infection, skin necrosis, and loss of nipple sensation. Mammography was found to not be affected by mesh placement. DISCUSSION: The use of mesh during reduction mammoplasty is a relatively modern innovation that does not appear to have a significantly different risk profile than that of traditional reduction procedures. There is limited cosmetic value based on currently available data. More objective future analysis is necessary in order to justify the use of mesh in reduction mammoplasty for its claimed cosmetic benefits. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine Ratings, please refer to Table of Contents or online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Defining the Ideal Reduction Mammoplasty: A Crowdsourcing Study.

BACKGROUND: Reduction mammoplasty relieves macromastia symptoms while improving breast aesthetics, though the ideal breast aesthetically has been shown to differ culturally in previous crowdsourcing studies. Better understanding these differences can aid in setting postoperative expectations. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to characterize the ideal reduction mammoplasty according to demographics such as gender, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and education. METHODS: A crowdsourcing platform was used to collect 10,169 de-identified responses. Users completed one of three surveys, either a preoperative, postoperative, or preoperative and postoperative paired survey. The preoperative and postoperative surveys addressed 10 breast measurements including upper breast slope, projection proportion, nipple position, breast width, and breast fullness. The paired pre- and postoperative survey assessed nipple areolar complex (NAC), chest fit, symmetry improvement, and scarring. RESULTS: Preoperative images were rated more aesthetic than postoperative images. This was consistent across all demographics evaluated. Female, African American, Asian, participants aged 55+, and participants with no high school degree or a graduate degree found the most improvement in breast symmetry (p = 0.001, p = 0.002, p = 0.027, p < 0.001, p = 0.01). Male and Hispanic participants were most likely to see no change in symmetry (p = 0.008, p = 0.04), and South Asian participants found breasts less symmetric postoperative (p < 0.001). There were significant demographic differences in aesthetic ratings of NAC, scarring, and breast fit. CONCLUSIONS: Perceived breast aesthetics after reduction mammoplasty vary significantly across demographics including gender, ethnicity, age, socioeconomic status, and educational achievement. Surgeons should consider demographics when planning each patient's reduction mammoplasty.

The Innovative and Evolving Landscape of Topical Exosome and Peptide Therapies: A Systematic Review of the Available Literature.

Topical antiaging therapies provide noninvasive delivery of active therapeutics. Exosomes, or extracellular nanovesicles, and peptides, small strings of amino acids, have shown promise as topical therapies in early trials, but neither is FDA approved. This review aims to elucidate the current and future landscape of topical exosomes and peptides as therapeutics for skin rejuvenation. A literature search was conducted using the keywords "peptides" OR "exosomes" AND "skin" OR "rejuvenation." Primary endpoints included mechanisms of action in humans or live animals as well as clinical data supporting the use of exosomes or peptides topically for skin rejuvenation or wound healing. Secondary endpoints were safety, side effects, and efficacy. The articles were collected, organized, and sorted using the Covidence software (Melbourne, Australia) for systematic review. Nine articles evaluating topical application of exosomes and 9 of peptides met inclusion criteria. Topical exosomes were found to increase collagen deposition, accelerate wound healing, and improve overall cosmesis. Several clinical trials are currently underway. Topical peptides were found to improve appearance of fine lines and wrinkles, elasticity and viscoelasticity, skin texture, skin thickness, and the potential for accelerated wound healing. Peptides are quite common in "cosmeceutical" products, and several patents have been filed for topical peptide products aimed at increasing skin rejuvenation. This could indicate a movement toward pursuing FDA approval. The future of topical exosome and peptide products for the purpose of skin rejuvenation appears promising. Preliminary data from the studies reviewed here indicates that these products have the potential to be safe and effective.

Oncoplastic surgery in the USA: a review of where we started, where we are today and where we are headed.

The surgical management of breast cancer has evolved tremendously over the last century and now includes oncoplastic techniques that improve both cosmetic and oncologic outcomes for patients. The purpose of this review is to provide the reader with a broad overview of the history of oncoplastic breast surgery in the United States (USA), and to summarize important patient factors and technical innovations for optimal operative planning in the era of multimodal treatment of breast cancer. The indications for oncoplastic surgery (OPS) have broadened significantly as more women pursue breast conservation with preservation of their native breast tissue. The operative philosophy of OPS is based on fundamental reconstructive principles, with technique selection based largely on tumor size and location. Reduction mammoplasty and mastopexy techniques have become some of the most utilized procedures in OPS due to their versatility to address tumors in almost all areas of the breast. Volume replacement techniques with locoregional perforator flaps continue to gain popularity as a single-stage reconstructive option for women with large tumor to breast ratios, especially with specialized plastic surgeons at high volume, academic centers. The oncologic advantages of OPS have allowed women to avoid mastectomy with improved margin control, re-excision rates, and equivalent overall survival all while preserving the aesthetic outcomes for these patients. Despite the proven benefits of OPS, numerous healthcare systems barriers including insurance status, geographic location, referral patterns, and racial disparities all continue to play a role in access to surgical sub-specialized breast oncology care demonstrating the need for ongoing research and education about oncoplastic principles.

Impact of Oncoplastic Surgery on Oncologic Outcomes in Patients with Breast Cancer.

Background: For patients with breast cancer, oncoplastic surgery (OPS) serves as a valuable technique that allows for immediate reconstruction at the time of resection. While the aim of OPS is to improve breast cosmesis, it is critical to ensure OPS does not negatively impact appropriate cancer treatment. Methods: Based on current literature, this study provides a broad overview on the potential oncologic advantages of OPS for patients diagnosed with breast cancer. Results: OPS has been shown to be a safe and reliable approach with oncologic advantages. More specifically, OPS broadens the indications for breast conservation therapy (BCT); allows for a more generous margin of resection, thus decreasing rates of re-excision; and provides the opportunity to sample additional breast tissue, which may detect occult disease. Reduction mammaplasty may also decrease the risk for developing breast cancer. Importantly, in the era of multimodality therapy, long-term oncologic outcomes and postoperative surveillance algorithms appear to be similar when comparing patients who undergo OPS and BCT. Conclusions: For patients with breast cancer, oncoplastic surgery has emerged as a valuable technique to improve breast cosmesis while achieving optimal oncologic outcomes. As the landscape of breast oncology continues to evolve, it is critical for a multidisciplinary team to be involved to guide management and reconstructive strategies.

Safe Reproducible Breast Reduction.

Breast reduction is a common operation performed by plastic surgeons. Patients can have significant improvement in physical symptoms in addition to increased self-esteem, body image, and quality of life as a result. The authors describe common techniques for breast reduction and provide representative photographs and videos of these techniques. An evidence-based review is provided for patient selection criteria, common surgical techniques, and methods to avoid and treat complications. Information is also provided on patient education about breast reduction. In most cases, breast reduction is safe to perform in the outpatient setting. The Wise pattern and vertical pattern are among the most common techniques for skin incisions, and the inferior and superomedial pedicles are two of the most common pedicles used in breast reduction. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols are helpful to effectively control pain and reduce narcotic use postoperatively. Patient satisfaction after breast reduction surgery is typically high. Multiple techniques are available to successfully perform breast reduction. The plastic surgeon needs to select patients carefully and determine the appropriate technique to use. Patient education about the operation, recovery, expected result, and risks is an important component of achieving an optimal result.

Radiofrequency Microneedling: Technology, Devices, and Indications in the Modern Plastic Surgery Practice.

Background: Since the initial invention of microneedling, advancements have been made to improve the desired effects. The addition of radiofrequency to microneedling devices was developed within the past decade as a way to induce thermal injury and increase dermal heating to enhance the dermal wound healing cascade. Objectives: With an overabundance of literature and mainstream media focused on microneedling and radiofrequency microneedling, this review aims to focus on the available high-quality evidence. Methods: A comprehensive review of the literature was performed across PubMed (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD) and Embase (Elsevier, Amsterdam, the Netherlands) databases. Attention was focused on manuscripts that provided objective data with respect to clinical application, innovation, anatomy, and physiology. Results: Optimal outcomes are achieved when needle depth is targeted to the reticular dermis. Needle depth should reflect the relative differences in epidermal and dermal thickness throughout the face. A depth of at least 1.5 mm should be used for the forehead and temporal skin, 1.0 mm for the malar region, 2.0 mm (maximum depth for radiofrequency microneedling) for the nasal side walls, 0.5 mm for the perioral skin, and 1.5 mm for the neck. Deeper settings can be used with care to provide some fat reduction in the submentum. Conclusions: The authors find herein that radiofrequency microneedling is a safe adjunctive tool to surgical aesthetic procedures. The addition of radiofrequency poses an advance over traditional microneedling devices for skin tightening, with improvements in both safety and efficacy over time.