Interprofessional exchanges during COVID-19 at the Bichat Claude-Bernard Hospital: insights for research / Échanges interprofessionnels en temps de COVID-19 à l'hôpital Bichat Claude-Bernard : éclairages pour la recherche

The management of the COVID-19 epidemic has disrupted the organization of healthcare in hospitals. As part of a research project on the resilience of hospitals and their staff to the COVID-19 pandemic (HoSPiCOVID), we have documented their adaptation strategies in five countries (France, Mali, Brazil, Canada, Japan). In France, at the end of the first wave (June 2020), a team of researchers and health professionals from the Bichat Claude-Bernard Hospital organized focus groups to acknowledge these achievements and to share their experiences. One year later, further exchanges were held to discuss and validate the research results. The objective of this short contribution is to describe the insights of these interprofessional exchanges conducted at the Bichat Claude-Bernard Hospital. We show that these exchanges allowed: 1) to create spaces for professionals to speak, 2) to enrich and validate the data collected through a collective acknowledgment of salient aspects related to the experiences of the crisis, and 3) to account for the attitudes, interactions, and power dynamics for these professionals in a crisis management context.

La gestion de l'épidémie de COVID-19 a bouleversé l'organisation des soins dans les hôpitaux. Dans le cadre d'un projet de recherche portant sur la résilience des hôpitaux et des professionnel·le·s de santé face à la pandémie de COVID-19 (HoSPiCOVID), nous avons documenté leurs stratégies d'adaptation dans cinq pays (France, Mali, Brésil, Canada, Japon). En France, dès la fin de la première vague (juin 2020), une équipe de chercheur·se·s et des professionnel·le·s de santé de l'hôpital Bichat Claude-Bernard ont organisé des groupes de discussion pour prendre acte de ces accomplissements et pour partager leurs expériences vécues. Un an plus tard, d'autres échanges ont permis de discuter et de valider les résultats de la recherche. L'objectif de cette contribution courte est de décrire les apports de ces temps d'échanges interprofessionnels conduits à l'hôpital Bichat Claude-Bernard. Nous montrons que ceux-ci ont permis : 1) de créer des espaces de parole pour les professionnel·le·s, 2) d'enrichir et de valider les données collectées au travers d'une (re)connaissance collective d'aspects saillants relatifs aux vécus de la crise, et 3) de rendre compte des attitudes, interactions et rapports de pouvoir de ces professionnel·le·s dans un contexte de gestion de crise.

Long-Term Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Infectiousness Among Three Immunocompromised Patients: From Prolonged Viral Shedding to SARS-CoV-2 Superinfection.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines for stopping coronavirus disease 2019 patient isolation are mainly symptom-based, with isolation for 10 to 20 days depending on their condition. METHODS: In this study, we describe 3 deeply immunocompromised patients, each with different clinical evolutions. We observed (1) the patients' epidemiological, clinical, and serological data, (2) infectiousness using viral culture, and (3) viral mutations accumulated over time. RESULTS: Asymptomatic carriage, symptom resolution, or superinfection with a second severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 strain were observed, all leading to prolonged infectious viral shedding for several months. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding underlying mechanisms and frequency of prolonged infectiousness is crucial to adapt current guidelines and strengthen the use of systematic polymerase chain reaction testing before stopping isolation in immunocompromised populations.

Ultrasound Guidance and Risk for Central Venous Catheter-Related Infections in the Intensive Care Unit: A Post Hoc Analysis of Individual Data of 3 Multicenter Randomized Trials.

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound (US) guidance is frequently used in critically ill patients for central venous catheter (CVC) insertion. The effect of US on infectious risk remains controversial, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have assessed mainly noninfectious complications. This study assessed infectious risk associated with catheters inserted with US guidance vs use of anatomical landmarks. METHODS: We used individual data from 3 large RCTs for which a prospective, high-quality data collection was performed. Adult patients were recruited in various intensive care units (ICUs) in France as soon as they required short-term CVC insertion. We applied marginal Cox models with inverse probability weighting to estimate the effect of US-guided insertion on catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs, primary outcome) and major catheter-related infections (MCRIs, secondary outcome).We also evaluated insertion site colonization at catheter removal. RESULTS: Our post hoc analysis included 4636 patients and 5502 catheters inserted in 2088 jugular, 1733 femoral, and 1681 subclavian veins, in 19 ICUs. US guidance was used for 2147 catheter insertions. Among jugular and femoral CVCs and after weighting, we found an association between US and CRBSI (hazard ratio [HR], 2.21 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.17-4.16]; P = .014) and between US and MCRI (HR, 1.55 [95% CI, 1.01-2.38]; P = .045). Catheter insertion site colonization at removal was more common in the US-guided group (P = .0045) among jugular and femoral CVCs in situ for ≤7 days (n = 606). CONCLUSIONS: In prospectively collected data in which catheters were not randomized to insertion by US or anatomical landmarks, US guidance was associated with increased risk of infection.

Individual and collective impact of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing K. pneumoniae in patients admitted to the ICU.

KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) raises major concerns in the context of intensive care, owing to limited treatment options and the ability to cause outbreaks in this specific setting. The objectives of this review are to give an overview of the burden of KPC-Kp in ICU patients and to discuss methodological issues and limitations regarding the quality of data available. Robust and reliable assessment of the KPC-Kp impact in the ICU should take into consideration not only characteristics of the individuals, but also of the health systems including length of stay, costs and hospital organization issues. Estimates of mortality reported in the current literature are weakened by the poor quality of adjustment for age-specific risks, co-morbidities, and appropriateness of therapy. All these confounding factors should be taken into account in models, with consideration of control groups and competing risks that is currently lacking in the published literature. Since development of antibiotic resistance is an unstoppable phenomenon and economic and human resources are facing progressive limitations due to budget constraints, cost-saving strategies targeted to avoid ICU closure, temporary limitation of admissions or delayed hospital discharge are necessary. The early identification of KPC-Kp-colonized patients through active screening strategies is likely to be the cornerstone of such a cost-saving strategy. However, there are still many open issues concerning which of these strategies are the most effective. Owing to extreme heterogeneity and several methodological flaws in current publications, future studies investigating the long-term sequelae and economic impact of KPC-Kp in the ICU are urgently needed.

Added value of rapid respiratory syndromic testing at point of care versus central laboratory testing: a controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Virus-associated respiratory infections are in the spotlight with the emergence of SARS-CoV-2 and the expanding use of multiplex PCR (mPCR). The impact of molecular testing as a point-of-care test (POCT) in the emergency department (ED) is still unclear. OBJECTIVES: To compare the impact of a syndromic test performed in the ED as a POCT and in the central laboratory on length of stay (LOS), antibiotic use and single-room assignment. METHODS: From 19 November 2019 to 9 March 2020, adults with acute respiratory illness seeking care in the ED of a large hospital were enrolled, with mPCR performed with a weekly alternation in the ED as a POCT (week A) or in the central laboratory (week B). RESULTS: 474 patients were analysed: 275 during A weeks and 199 during B weeks. Patient characteristics were similar. The hospital LOS (median 7 days during week A versus 7 days during week B, P = 0.29), the proportion of patients with ED-LOS <1 day (63% versus 60%, P = 0.57) and ED antibiotic prescription (59% versus 58%, P = 0.92) were not significantly different. Patients in the POCT arm were more frequently assigned a single room when having a positive PCR for influenza, respiratory syncytial virus and metapneumovirus [52/70 (74%) versus 19/38 (50%) in the central testing arm, P = 0.012]. CONCLUSIONS: Syndromic testing performed in the ED compared with the central laboratory failed to reduce the LOS or antibiotic consumption in patients with acute respiratory illness, but was associated with an increased single-room assignment among patients in whom a significant respiratory pathogen was detected.

The COVID-19 lockdown as an opportunity to change lifestyle and body weight in people with overweight/obesity and diabetes: Results from the national French COVIDIAB cohort.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: To analyze lifestyle habits and weight evolution during the COVID-19 pandemic-associated lockdown, in diabetes and overweight/obesity patients (body mass index (BMI) [25-29.9] and ≥30 kg/m2, respectively). METHODS AND RESULTS: We collected information on participants' characteristics and behavior regarding lifestyle before and during the lockdown, through the CoviDIAB web application, which is available freely for people with diabetes in France. We stratified the cohort according to BMI (≥25 kg/m2vs < 25 kg/m2) and examined the determinants of weight loss (WL), WL > 1 kg vs no-WL) in participants with a BMI ≥25 kg/m2, in both univariate and multivariate analyses. Of the 5280 participants (mean age, 52.5 years; men, 49%; diabetes, 100% by design), 69.5% were overweight or obese (mean BMI, 28.6 kg/m2 (6.1)). During the lockdown, patients often quit or decreased smoking; overweight/obese participants increased alcohol consumption less frequently as compared with normal BMI patients. In addition, overweight/obese patients were more likely to improve other healthy behaviors on a larger scale than patients with normal BMI: increased intake of fruits and vegetables, reduction of snacks intake, and reduction of total dietary intake. WL was observed in 18.9% of people with a BMI ≥25 kg/m2, whereas 28.6% of them gained weight. Lifestyle favorable changes characterized patients with WL. CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of overweight/obese patients with diabetes seized the opportunity of lockdown to improve their lifestyle and to lose weight. Identifying those people may help clinicians to personalize practical advice in the case of a recurrent lockdown.

Learning from public health and hospital resilience to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: protocol for a multiple case study (Brazil, Canada, China, France, Japan, and Mali).

BACKGROUND: All prevention efforts currently being implemented for COVID-19 are aimed at reducing the burden on strained health systems and human resources. There has been little research conducted to understand how SARS-CoV-2 has affected health care systems and professionals in terms of their work. Finding effective ways to share the knowledge and insight between countries, including lessons learned, is paramount to the international containment and management of the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this project is to compare the pandemic response to COVID-19 in Brazil, Canada, China, France, Japan, and Mali. This comparison will be used to identify strengths and weaknesses in the response, including challenges for health professionals and health systems. METHODS: We will use a multiple case study approach with multiple levels of nested analysis. We have chosen these countries as they represent different continents and different stages of the pandemic. We will focus on several major hospitals and two public health interventions (contact tracing and testing). It will employ a multidisciplinary research approach that will use qualitative data through observations, document analysis, and interviews, as well as quantitative data based on disease surveillance data and other publicly available data. Given that the methodological approaches of the project will be largely qualitative, the ethical risks are minimal. For the quantitative component, the data being used will be made publicly available. DISCUSSION: We will deliver lessons learned based on a rigorous process and on strong evidence to enable operational-level insight for national and international stakeholders.

Evaluation of the QIAstat-Dx Respiratory SARS-CoV-2 Panel, the First Rapid Multiplex PCR Commercial Assay for SARS-CoV-2 Detection.

In the race to contain severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), efficient detection and triage of infected patients must rely on rapid and reliable testing. In this work, we performed the first evaluation of the QIAstat-Dx respiratory SARS-CoV-2 panel (QIAstat-SARS) for SARS-CoV-2 detection. This assay is the first rapid multiplex PCR (mPCR) assay, including SARS-CoV-2 detection, and is fully compatible with a non-PCR-trained laboratory or point-of-care (PoC) testing. This evaluation was performed using 69 primary clinical samples (66 nasopharyngeal swabs [NPS], 1 bronchoalveolar lavage fluid sample [BAL], 1 tracheal aspirate sample, and 1 bronchial aspirate sample) comparing SARS-CoV-2 detection with the currently WHO-recommended reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) (WHO-RT-PCR) workflow. Additionally, a comparative limit of detection (LoD) assessment was performed for QIAstat-SARS and WHO-RT-PCR using a quantified clinical sample. Compatibility of sample pretreatment for viral neutralization or viscous samples with the QIAstat-SARS system were also tested. The QIAstat-Dx respiratory SARS-CoV-2 panel demonstrated a sensitivity comparable to that of the WHO-recommended assay with a limit of detection at 1,000 copies/ml. The overall percent agreement between QIAstat-Dx SARS and WHO-RT-PCR on 69 clinical samples was 97% with a sensitivity of 100% (40/40) and specificity at 93% (27/29). No cross-reaction was encountered for any other respiratory viruses or bacteria included in the panel. The QIAstat-SARS rapid multiplex PCR panel provides a highly sensitive, robust, and accurate assay for rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2. This assay allows rapid decisions even in non-PCR-trained laboratory or point-of-care testing, allowing innovative organization.

The Insertion Site Should Be Considered for the Empirical Therapy of Short-Term Central Venous and Arterial Catheter-Related Infections.

OBJECTIVES: Little is known on causative pathogens of intravascular catheters infection according to the catheter insertion site. The present study aimed to describe the epidemiology of causative microorganisms of catheter-related infection and colonization according to the insertion site. DESIGN: Multicenter observational study using data from four large randomized controlled trials investigating different prevention strategies in which extensive prospective high-quality data collection at catheter insertion and catheter removal was performed. SETTING: Twenty-five ICUs in France. PATIENTS: Patients were recruited from 2006 to 2014 as soon as they required a catheterization with a short-term central venous catheter or peripheral arterial catheter with an expected duration of use of more than 48 hours. We described the distribution of microorganisms in central venous catheter and arterial catheter-related bloodstream infections and colonization according to the insertion type (femoral vs nonfemoral) included in the four studies. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 7,235 patients and 15,259 catheters were included. Among central venous catheter, the distribution of microorganisms associated with catheter-related bloodstream infection and colonization was significantly different between femoral and nonfemoral sites. Among central venous catheter catheter-related bloodstream infection, nonfermenting Gram-negative bacilli were more frequently detected at the femoral site (31% vs 4% for nonfemoral site; p < 0.01). After adjustment for confounding factors, the femoral site was still associated with an increased risk for catheter-related bloodstream infection due to nonfermenting Gram-negative bacilli (odds ratio, 6.33; 95% CI, 1.59-25.28; p < 0.01). Among colonized arterial catheters, the distribution of microorganisms was significantly different between femoral and radial site (p < 0.01). Colonized arterial catheters due to nonfermenting Gram-negative bacilli were more frequently observed at the femoral site (20% vs nonfemoral site 12%; p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of intravascular catheter infections due to nonfermenting Gram-negative bacilli was high for the femoral insertion site. Empirical antipseudomonal therapy should be considered if a femoral catheter-related bloodstream infection is suspected.

Chlorhexidine-impregnated sponge versus chlorhexidine gel dressing for short-term intravascular catheters: which one is better?

BACKGROUND: Chlorhexidine-gluconate (CHG) impregnated dressings may prevent catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI). Chlorhexidine-impregnated sponge dressings (sponge-dress) and gel dressings (gel-dress) have never been directly compared. We used the data collected for two randomized-controlled trials to perform a comparison between sponge-dress and gel-dress. METHODS: Adult critically ill patients who required short-term central venous or arterial catheter insertion were recruited. Our main analysis included only patients with CHG-impregnated dressings. The effect of gel-dress (versus sponge-dress) on major catheter-related infections (MCRI) and CRBSI was estimated using multivariate marginal Cox models. The comparative risks of dressing disruption and contact dermatitis were evaluated using logistic mix models for clustered data. An explanatory analysis compared gel-dress with standard dressings using either CHG skin disinfection or povidone iodine skin disinfection. RESULTS: A total of 3483 patients and 7941 catheters were observed in 16 intensive care units. Sponge-dress and gel-dress were utilized for 1953 and 2108 catheters, respectively. After adjustment for confounders, gel-dress showed similar risk for MCRI compared to sponge-dress (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.28-2.31, p = 0.68) and CRBSI (HR 1.13, 95% CI 0.34-3.70, p = 0.85), less dressing disruptions (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.60-0.86, p < 0.001), and more contact dermatitis (OR 3.60, 95% CI 2.51-5.15, p < 0.01). However, gel-dress increased the risk of contact dermatitis only if CHG was used for skin antisepsis (OR 1.94, 95% CI 1.38-2.71, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: We described a similar infection risk for gel-dress and sponge-dress. Gel-dress showed fewer dressing disruptions. Concomitant use of CHG for skin disinfection and CHG-impregnated dressing may significantly increase contact dermatitis. TRIALS REGISTRATION: These studies were registered within ClinicalTrials.gov (numbers NCT01189682 and NCT00417235 ).

Local signs at insertion site and catheter-related bloodstream infections: an observational post hoc analysis using individual data of four RCTs.

BACKGROUND: Little is known on the association between local signs and intravascular catheter infections. This study aimed to evaluate the association between local signs at removal and catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI), and which clinical conditions may predict CRBSIs if inflammation at insertion site is present. METHODS: We used individual data from four multicenter randomized controlled trials in intensive care units (ICUs) that evaluated various prevention strategies for arterial and central venous catheters. We used multivariate logistic regressions in order to evaluate the association between ≥ 1 local sign, redness, pain, non-purulent discharge and purulent discharge, and CRBSI. Moreover, we assessed the probability for each local sign to observe CRBSI in subgroups of clinically relevant conditions. RESULTS: A total of 6976 patients and 14,590 catheters (101,182 catheter-days) and 114 CRBSI from 25 ICUs with described local signs were included. More than one local sign, redness, pain, non-purulent discharge, and purulent discharge at removal were observed in 1938 (13.3%), 1633 (11.2%), 59 (0.4%), 251 (1.7%), and 102 (0.7%) episodes, respectively. After adjusting on confounders, ≥ 1 local sign, redness, non-purulent discharge, and purulent discharge were associated with CRBSI. The presence of ≥ 1 local sign increased the probability to observe CRBSI in the first 7 days of catheter maintenance (OR 6.30 vs. 2.61 [> 7 catheter-days], pheterogeneity = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Local signs were significantly associated with CRBSI in the ICU. In the first 7 days of catheter maintenance, local signs increased the probability to observe CRBSI.

Controlling the Diffusion of Multidrug-Resistant Organisms in Intensive Care Units.

The prevalence of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) in intensive care units (ICUs) is increasing worldwide, with very large variations across countries, microorganisms, and settings. Emerging MDR gram-negative bacteria and fungi raise particular concerns that require improved prevention and control strategies. Vertical approaches are mainly based on screening and contact precautions and/or decolonization of MDRO carriers. On the other hand, horizontal strategies are not pathogen-specific and include standard precautions (i.e., hand hygiene), universal decolonization, antimicrobial stewardship, and environmental cleaning. The impacts of the different strategies vary between MDROs and compliance with control measures, and are intermixed in most infection control programs. Based on historical data, hand hygiene remains the cornerstone to prevent transmission of MDROs in ICUs. In the context of high hand hygiene compliance, screening and contact precautions for carriers seem to have a limited additional effect, particularly for MDR gram-negative bacteria. Studies on skin decolonization with chlorhexidine bathing show conflicting results, impairing its widespread adoption. Selective oral and digestive decontaminations have shown positive impact on clinical outcomes in ICUs with low levels of antibiotic resistance, but raised ecological concerns in high-prevalence settings. Antibiotic stewardship programs have been associated with reductions in antimicrobial use, duration of stay, and costs with no negative impact on mortality and should be widely promoted in ICUs. Whatever the strategy, compliance with the recommended measures is of crucial importance and implementation should rely on behavioral approach and change in the institutional and safety culture.

Tracking Clinical Staff Behaviors in an Operating Room.

Inadequate staff behaviors in an operating room (OR) may lead to environmental contamination and increase the risk of surgical site infection. In order to assess this statement objectively, we have developed an approach to analyze OR staff behaviors using a motion tracking system. The present article introduces a solution for the assessment of individual displacements in the OR by: (1) detecting human presence and quantifying movements using a motion capture (MOCAP) system and (2) observing doors' movements by means of a wireless network of inertial sensors fixed on the doors and synchronized with the MOCAP system. The system was used in eight health care facilities sites during 30 cardiac and orthopedic surgery interventions. A total of 119 h of data were recorded and analyzed. Three hundred thirty four individual displacements were reconstructed. On average, only 10.6% individual positions could not be reconstructed and were considered undetermined, i.e., the presence in the room of the corresponding staff member could not be determined. The article presents the hardware and software developed together with the obtained reconstruction performances.

Pneumocystis Cytochrome b Mutants Associated With Atovaquone Prophylaxis Failure as the Cause of Pneumocystis Infection Outbreak Among Heart Transplant Recipients.

Background: Although trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole is the more efficient drug for prophylactic and curative treatment of pneumocystosis, atovaquone is considered a second-line prophylactic treatment in immunocompromised patients. Variations in atovaquone absorption and mutant fungi selection after atovaquone exposure have been associated with atovaquone prophylactic failure. We report here a Pneumocystis jirovecii cytochrome b (cyt b) mutation (A144V) associated with such prophylactic failure during a pneumocystosis outbreak among heart transplant recipients. Methods: Analyses of clinical data, serum drug dosage, and molecular modeling of the P. jirovecii Rieske-cyt b complex were performed to investigate these prophylactic failures. Results: The cyt b A144V mutation was detected in all infected, heart transplant recipient patients exposed to atovaquone prophylaxis but in none of 11 other immunocompromised, infected control patients not treated with atovaquone. Serum atovaquone concentrations associated with these prophylactic failures were similar than those found in noninfected exposed control patients under a similar prophylactic regimen. Computational modeling of the P. jirovecii Rieske-cyt b complex and in silico mutagenesis indicated that the cyt b A144V mutation might alter the volume of the atovaquone-binding pocket, which could decrease atovaquone binding. Conclusions: These data suggest that the cyt b A144V mutation confers diminished sensitivity to atovaquone, resulting in spread of Pneumocystis pneumonia among heart transplant recipients submitted to atovaquone prophylaxis. Potential selection and interhuman transmission of resistant P. jirovecii strain during atovaquone prophylactic treatment has to be considered and could limit its extended large-scale use in immucompromised patients.

Trends of Incidence and Risk Factors of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in Elderly Patients Admitted to French ICUs Between 2007 and 2014.

OBJECTIVES: To assess trends and risk factors of ventilator-associated pneumonia according to age, particularly in the elderly admitted to French ICUs between 2007 and 2014. DESIGN: Multicenter, prospective French national Healthcare-Associated Infection surveillance network of ICUs ("Réseau REA-Raisin"). SETTINGS: Two-hundred fifty six ICUs in 246 settings in France. PATIENTS: Included were all adult patients hospitalized greater than or equal to 48 hours in ICUs participating in the network. INTERVENTIONS: Ventilator-associated pneumonia surveillance over time. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Overall and multidrug-resistant organism-related ventilator-associated pneumonia incidence rates were expressed per 1,000 intubation days at risk. Age was stratified into three groups: young (18-64 yr old), old (65-74 yr old), and very old (75+ yr old). Age-stratified multivariate mixed-effects Poisson regressions were undertaken to assess trends of ventilator-associated pneumonia incidence over time, with center as the random effect. Ventilator-associated pneumonia risk factors were also evaluated. Of 206,223 patients, 134,510 were intubated: 47.8% were young, 22.3% were old, and 29.9% were very old. Ventilator-associated pneumonia incidence was lower in the very old group compared with the young group (14.51; 95% CI, 16.95-17.70 vs 17.32; 95% CI, 16.95-17.70, respectively, p < 0.001). Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae were identified more frequently in very old patients (p < 0.001 and 0.014, respectively). Age-stratified models disclosed that adjusted ventilator-associated pneumonia incidence decreased selectively in the young and old groups over time (adjusted incidence rate ratios, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.82-0.94; p < 0.001 and adjusted incidence rate ratios, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.86-1.04; p = 0.28, respectively). Male gender and trauma were independently associated with ventilator-associated pneumonia in the three age groups, whereas antibiotics at admission was a protective factor. Scheduled surgical ICU and immunodeficiency were risk factors of ventilator-associated pneumonia in the old group (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Ventilator-associated pneumonia incidence is lower but did not decrease over time in very old patients compared with young patients.

Contact Precautions for Preventing Nosocomial Transmission of Extended-Spectrum ß Lactamase-Producing Escherichia coli: A Point/Counterpoint Review.

Contact precautions have been recommended for hospitalized patients colonized or infected with extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli (ESBL-EC). Despite such recommendations, a steady, worldwide increase of ESBL-EC has been reported. We discuss arguments in favor of and against contact precautions for ESBL-EC carriers. Healthcare settings with high ESBL-EC colonization pressure, extended hospital stay, and close contact between patients may serve as amplification platforms, further accelerating transmission. However, the evidence base for justifying the implementation of contact precautions for all ESBL-EC carriers remains weak. Until more high-level evidence is available, we support the attitude that hospitals and countries should carefully evaluate their decision on whether to implement contact precautions for ESBL-EC carriers. It is likely that a majority of patients and wards do not need to rely on contact precautions for preventing nosocomial ESBL-EC transmission in nonepidemic settings, without harming patient safety, providing sufficient compliance with standard precautions and ongoing surveillance.

Outbreak of Pneumocystis jirovecii Infection Among Heart Transplant Recipients: Molecular Investigation and Management of an Interhuman Transmission.

Background: An outbreak of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PCP) occurred among heart transplant recipients (HTR) at the outpatient clinic of a university hospital, from March to September 2015. Clinical, therapeutic, biological, and molecular data were analyzed to determine its origin and control the outbreak. Methods: Clinical and biological data regarding all HTR followed in the outpatient clinic were collected. PCP diagnosis was based on microscopy and real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Investigations were performed by building a transmission map, completed by genotyping Pneumocystis isolates and by a control of chemoprophylaxis observance. Asymptomatic exposed patients were screened for colonization using real-time PCR. Results: Among 124 HTR, 7 PCP cases were confirmed. Screening identified 3 additional patients colonized by P. jirovecii. All patients were cured, and no further cases were identified after trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis was introduced in the entire cohort. Genotyping demonstrated the same strain in all PCP cases and colonized patients. All cases were linked with possible transmission chains from 2 possible index patients. Interhuman transmission was significantly associated with more frequent visits in the outpatient clinic. Six cases were receiving atovaquone as a prophylaxis. The occurrence of PCP was significantly associated with atovaquone prophylaxis. Conclusions: This is the first outbreak with detailed molecular analysis in HTR so far. Genotyping and transmission chain confirmed interhuman transmission in all colonized/infected PCP cases. Outpatient clinic layout and high encounters probably caused this PCP cluster, which was controlled after systematic trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis in exposed patients.

Skin antisepsis with chlorhexidine-alcohol versus povidone iodine-alcohol, with and without skin scrubbing, for prevention of intravascular-catheter-related infection (CLEAN): an open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, two-by-two factorial trial.

BACKGROUND: Intravascular-catheter-related infections are frequent life-threatening events in health care, but incidence can be decreased by improvements in the quality of care. Optimisation of skin antisepsis is essential to prevent short-term catheter-related infections. We hypothesised that chlorhexidine-alcohol would be more effective than povidone iodine-alcohol as a skin antiseptic to prevent intravascular-catheter-related infections. METHODS: In this open-label, randomised controlled trial with a two-by-two factorial design, we enrolled consecutive adults (age ≥18 years) admitted to one of 11 French intensive-care units and requiring at least one of central-venous, haemodialysis, or arterial catheters. Before catheter insertion, we randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) patients via a secure web-based random-number generator (permuted blocks of eight, stratified by centre) to have all intravascular catheters prepared with 2% chlorhexidine-70% isopropyl alcohol (chlorhexidine-alcohol) or 5% povidone iodine-69% ethanol (povidone iodine-alcohol), with or without scrubbing of the skin with detergent before antiseptic application. Physicians and nurses were not masked to group assignment but microbiologists and outcome assessors were. The primary outcome was the incidence of catheter-related infections with chlorhexidine-alcohol versus povidone iodine-alcohol in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01629550 and is closed to new participants. FINDINGS: Between Oct 26, 2012, and Feb 12, 2014, 2546 patients were eligible to participate in the study. We randomly assigned 1181 patients (2547 catheters) to chlorhexidine-alcohol (594 patients with scrubbing, 587 without) and 1168 (2612 catheters) to povidone iodine-alcohol (580 patients with scrubbing, 588 without). Chlorhexidine-alcohol was associated with lower incidence of catheter-related infections (0·28 vs 1·77 per 1000 catheter-days with povidone iodine-alcohol; hazard ratio 0·15, 95% CI 0·05-0·41; p=0·0002). Scrubbing was not associated with a significant difference in catheter colonisation (p=0·3877). No systemic adverse events were reported, but severe skin reactions occurred more frequently in those assigned to chlorhexidine-alcohol (27 [3%] patients vs seven [1%] with povidone iodine-alcohol; p=0·0017) and led to chlorhexidine discontinuation in two patients. INTERPRETATION: For skin antisepsis, chlorhexidine-alcohol provides greater protection against short-term catheter-related infections than does povidone iodine-alcohol and should be included in all bundles for prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. FUNDING: University Hospital of Poitiers, CareFusion.

Colonization and infection with extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in ICU patients: what impact on outcomes and carbapenem exposure?

OBJECTIVES: It remains uncertain whether colonization and infection with ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-PE) affect the outcomes for ICU patients. Our objectives were to measure the effects of ESBL-PE carriage and infection on mortality, ICU length of stay (LOS) and carbapenem exposure in this population. METHODS: A cause-specific hazard model based on prospectively collected data was built to assess the impact of ESBL-PE colonization and infection on competing risks of death and ICU discharge at day 28 in a multicentre cohort of ICU patients. Carbapenem exposure during the ICU stay was compared between infected carriers, uninfected carriers and non-carriers. RESULTS: Among the 16,734 included patients, 594 (3.5%) were ESBL-PE carriers, including 98 (16.4%) with one or more ESBL-PE infections during the ICU stay. After adjustment for baseline and time-dependent confounders, ESBL-PE infections increased the probability of death at day 28 [adjusted cause-specific hazard ratio (aCSHR), 1.825, 95% CI 1.235-2.699, P = 0.0026] and the ICU LOS (aCSHR for discharge alive at day 28, 0.563, 95% CI 0.432-0.733, P < 0.0001). ESBL-PE carriage without infection extended the LOS (aCSHR, 0.623, 95% CI, 0.553-0.702, P < 0.0001), without affecting mortality (aCSHR, 0.906, 95% CI, 0.722-1.136, P = 0.3916). Carbapenem exposure increased in both infected and uninfected carriers when compared with non-carriers (627, 241 and 69 carbapenem days per 1000 patient days, respectively, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: ESBL-PE infections increased carbapenem consumption, LOS and day 28 mortality. ESBL-PE infections were rather infrequent in carriers; however, even ESBL-PE carriage without infection increased carbapenem exposure and delayed discharge, thereby amplifying the selective pressure and the colonization pressure in the ICU.