Extension of Cold Static Donor Lung Preservation at 10°C.

BACKGROUND: Lung transplantation is performed on a 24/7 schedule to minimize organ ischemic time. Recent preclinical studies demonstrated superior graft preservation at 10°C compared with storage in an ice cooler (gold standard). METHODS: In this prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized clinical trial, we studied transplants from donors with overnight cross-clamp times (6:00 p.m. to 4:00 a.m.) that had an earliest allowed starting time of 6:00 a.m. Lungs meeting criteria for transplantation were retrieved, transported, and immediately transferred to a 10°C temperature-controlled incubator until implantation; 70 patients and 140 matched controls were included in this study. RESULTS: Total preservation times for lungs in the study group were 12 hours, 28 minutes (interquartile range, 10 hours, 14 minutes to 14 hours, 12 minutes) and 14 hours, 9 minutes (interquartile range, 12 hours, 3 minutes to 15 hours, 45 minutes) for the first and second lung implanted, respectively. Primary graft dysfunction grade 3 at 72 hours (primary outcome) was 5.7% in the study group versus 9.3% in matched controls (difference, −3.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], −10.5 to 5.3). No meaningful differences were observed in the need for postoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (5.7 vs. 9.3%), median intensive care unit stay (5 vs. 5 days), or median hospital stay (25 vs. 30 days) between the two groups. One-year Kaplan­Meier survival was similar between the two groups (94 vs. 87%; hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.26 to 1.6). CONCLUSIONS: Extension of cold static preservation times at 10°C appears to be safe and has the potential to improve transplantation logistics and performance. (Funded by the UHN Foundation; Clinicaltrials.gov number, NCT04616365).

Effect on the donor lungs of using abdominal normothermic regional perfusion in controlled donation after circulatory death.

OBJECTIVES: Controlled donation after circulatory death (cDCD) donors are becoming a common source of organs for transplantation globally. However, the graft survival rate of cDCD abdominal organs is inferior to that of organs from brain-dead donors. The rapid retrieval (RR) technique is used by most donor organ procurement teams. The abdominal normothermic regional perfusion (A-NRP) technique has been implemented to minimize warm ischaemic damage to the abdominal organs. However, there is limited information on the effect of A-NRP on the quality of the donor lungs. This study aimed to compare lung transplantation outcomes using lungs procured from cDCD donors using the A-NRP and abdominal RR techniques. METHODS: A single-centre retrospective analysis of consecutive transplant recipients of cDCD lungs from June 2013 to December 2019 was performed. The recipients were divided into 2 cohorts according to the abdominal procurement technique used. The recipient and donor characteristics (age, sex, cause of brain injury, warm ischaemic time, diagnosis, lung allocation score and other factors), incidence of primary graft dysfunction and early survival were monitored. RESULTS: Twenty-eight consecutive lung transplantation recipients were identified (median age 59 years; 61% male); 14 recipients received lungs using the A-NRP and 14 using abdominal RR for abdominal organ retrieval. There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics, primary graft dysfunction (P = 0.70), hospital mortality (P = 1.0) and 1-year survival rate (P = 1.0) between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: No difference was observed in lung transplantation outcomes irrespective of the abdominal organ procurement technique used (A-NRP or abdominal RR).