Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Facial Plast Surg ; 2024 May 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38677276

RESUMEN

Facial feminization surgery (FFS) improves gender dysphoria. The brows and eyes are crucial in perceived gender, yet brow and eyelid surgeries are relatively underutilized. This study aimed to determine rates of brow and eyelid surgeries as part of FFS and characterize pre- and postoperative periocular features. We conducted a retrospective review to identify all patients with the diagnosis of gender dysphoria who underwent FFS at a single academic institution from 2019 to 2022. Thirty-four patients comprising 38 surgical cases were included. Twelve (35%) eyelid surgeries and 27 (79%) brow lifts were performed. Baseline eyelid measurements did not differ between brow lift and nonbrow lift cases. Those undergoing brow lift and eyelid surgery were older in age (p = 0.022), had a higher rate of negative canthal tilt (p = 0.050), and smaller baseline margin-reflex distance 1 (p = 0.014) than patients who had brow lift alone. Brow lift increased tarsal platform show (p ≤ 0.001) and lash-to-brow distance (p ≤ 0.001), and upper blepharoplasty increased tarsal platform show (p = 0.01). Rates of brow lift are high at our institution, and patients are appropriately selected for eyelid surgery in FFS. Brow lift and upper blepharoplasty can feminize anatomical features when using standards described for cisgender cohorts. The impact of periocular features on gender perception in transgender patients warrants further study.

2.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38091604

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate the frequency of ocular imaging in patients with HHT at a large academic medical institution; characterize the choroidal vascular changes on indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) and optical coherence tomography (OCT); and explore the relationship of these ocular features with HHT genotypes and systemic manifestations. METHODS: Retrospective review of patients with HHT who were seen in the Mayo Clinic ophthalmology department between 2011 to 2021. RESULTS: Of the 71 patients with HHT identified, 7 (10%) individuals had qualifying imaging defined as radial or raster spectral-domain OCT scans and/or ICGA. 4 (57%) patients had enlarged choroidal vessels detected on OCT and/or ICGA. 3 (43%) patients had retinal telangiectasias. Patients with choroidal changes (mean age 67 years) had the endoglin gene mutation, gastrointestinal arteriovenous malformations (AVM), and facial and mucocutaneous telangiectasias. In contrast, patients without choroidal changes (mean age 45 years) included the activin A receptor type-like kinase 1 gene mutation. CONCLUSION: Only a small proportion of patients with HHT undergo ophthalmic imaging at our institution. The presence of choroidal abnormalities is associated with the endoglin gene mutation, older age, corroborating retinal vascular changes, and increased systemic manifestations.

3.
J Prim Care Community Health ; 14: 21501319221148795, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36651590

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES: Telehealth services expanded during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Student-run free clinics (SRFC) deliver important health care services to underserved populations, who may face barriers to telehealth use. This study characterizes telehealth usage, experiences, and attitudes among individuals working in SRFCs. METHODS: In November 2021, a survey adapted from the COVID-19 Healthcare Coalition Telehealth Impact Physician Survey was sent to all registrants who identified themselves as students at the 2020 Society of Student-Run Free Clinics Annual Conference. RESULTS: Thirty-eight individuals of 576 registrants (7%) representing 21 of 88 (24%) SRFCs completed the survey. Twenty-one (58%) individuals reported using telehealth in their clinic. Those that did not cited lack of infrastructure as a barrier (eg, broadband, Internet challenges, technology investments), were more likely to serve homeless (P = .01), and less likely to serve non-English speaking populations (P = .02). There were increases in telehealth and decreases in in-person visits after March 11, 2020 though changes did not reach statistical significance. At least 15 (68%) wanted to continue chronic disease management, preventative care, and mental/behavioral health via telehealth after COVID-19. Most felt that telehealth was easy to use and improved the health, safety, and timeliness of care of patients, but not work satisfaction or access to care. Difficulty accessing physical devices, Internet, and data was the most-cited barrier to maintaining and accessing telehealth. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly all participants cited significant benefits and barriers to telehealth that impacted perceived access to care and sustainability. SRFCs' experiences may be modulated by their underserved populations and role in student education. Addressing barriers, particularly patient- and clinic-level technology challenges, could work to improve inequities in telehealth uptake.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Clínica Administrada por Estudiantes , Telemedicina , Humanos , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Área sin Atención Médica
4.
Semin Ophthalmol ; 37(5): 661-667, 2022 Jul 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35403560

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To perform a retrospective characterization of one-star reviews of ophthalmologists on Yelp.com and to increase understanding of patient complaints on Yelp.com. METHODS: A search was performed for reviews on Yelp.com using the keyword "ophthalmologist" for the top 8 most population-dense metropolitan areas in the United States. One-star reviews were collected and classified as procedural or nonprocedural. Complaints were also categorized as clinical, nonclinical, or both. Clinical complaints cited issues such as complications, reoperations, uncontrolled pain, misdiagnosis, unclear treatment plan, etc. Nonclinical complaints included comments such as physician bedside manner, other staff interpersonal manner, wait time, brevity of appointment time, etc. RESULTS: 5,532 total reviews were assessed, of which 477 (9%) one-star reviews were included in the study for analysis. These reviews amounted to 1,120 distinct complaints. 287 (26%) were clinical in nature and 833 (74%) were nonclinical. Technical incompetence or error (50: 4%), unsatisfactory results (46: 4%), and complications (43: 4%) represented the most common clinical complaints while office staff interpersonal manner (182: 16%), wait time (174: 16%), and physician interpersonal manner (141: 13%) were the most common nonclinical complaints. Refractive surgery was the most frequently mentioned subspecialty (89: 8%). Patients undergoing an ophthalmic procedure (surgery, injection, etc.) wrote 64 reviews that resulted in 193 (17%) complaints. Nonprocedural patients wrote 413 reviews that resulted in 927 (83%) complaints. Compared with procedural reviews, nonprocedural reviews were less likely to include a clinical complaint (rate ratio, 0.3: P < .001). DISCUSSION: The majority of one-star reviews of ophthalmologists included in this study were nonclinical. Complaints referencing a procedural episode were more likely to include a clinical component in the review. In the era of intense medical consumerism and increased physician and health care institution competition for patient acquisition and retention, the characterization of excessively negative reviews allows identification of potential areas of concern for patients that use online review sites such as Yelp.com.


Asunto(s)
Oftalmólogos , Oftalmología , Humanos , Satisfacción del Paciente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA