A national survey on current state and development needs of clinical and academic emergency medicine in China.

BACKGROUND: To characterize the current state of emergency medicine (EM) and the requirements for advancing EM clinical practice, education and research in China. METHODS: An anonymous electronic survey was conducted by Chinese Society of Emergency Medicine during September to October 2021. The survey contained 30 questions divided into 2 sections: the current state of EM development and the requirements for EM growth. RESULTS: 722 hospitals were included, of 487 were Level III and 235 were Level II hospitals. We found that after 40 years of development, EM had established a mature disciplinary system and refined sub-specialties including critical care, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, toxicology, disaster and emergency rescue. In Level III hospitals, 70.8% of EDs were standardized training centers for EM residents, but master's degree program, Doctor Degree program and post-doctoral degree program was approved in only 37.8%, 8.4% and 2.9% of EDs respectively and postgraduate curriculum was available in 1/4 of EDs. Only 8% have national or provincial key laboratories. In addition to advance clinical practice, there was also a high demand to improve teaching and research capacities, mainly focusing on literature review, research design and delivery, paper writing, residency training. CONCLUSIONS: EM has built a mature discipline system and refined sub-specialties in China. Teaching and research developed parallel with clinical practice. However, there was still a lack of EM master's and doctoral programs and research capacities need to be improved. More outstanding clinical and academic training should be provided to promote the rapid growth of EM in China.

Validation of a checklist to facilitate serious illness conversations in adult emergency in China: a single-centre pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Advances in emergency and critical care have improved outcomes, but gaps in communication and decision-making persist, especially in the emergency department (ED), prompting the development of a checklist to aid in serious illness conversations (SIC) in China. METHODS: This was a single-centre prospective interventional study on the quality improvement of SIC for life-sustaining treatment (LST). The study recruited patients consecutively for both its observational baseline and interventional stages until its conclusion. Eligible participants were adults over 18 years old admitted to the Emergency Intensive Care Unit (EICU) of a tertiary teaching hospital, possessing full decisional capacity or having a legal proxy. Exclusions were made for pregnant women, patients deceased upon arrival, those who refused participation, and individuals with incomplete data for analysis. First, a two-round Delphi process was organized to identify major elements and generate a standard process through a checklist. Subsequently, the efficacy of SIC in adult patients admitted to the EICU was compared using the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) score before (baseline group) and after (intervention group) implementing the checklist. RESULTS: The study participants presented with the most common comorbidities, such as diabetes, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular disease, moderate-to-severe renal disease, congestive heart failure, and chronic pulmonary disease. The median Charlson Index did not differ between the baseline and intervention cohorts. The median length of hospital stay was 11.0 days, and 82.9% of patients survived until hospital discharge. The total DCS score was lower in the intervention group than in the baseline group. Three subscales, including the informed, values clarity, and support subscales, demonstrated significant differences between the intervention and baseline groups. Fewer intervention group patients agreed with and changed their minds about cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) compared to the baseline group. CONCLUSION: The use of a SIC checklist in the EICU reduced the DCS score by increasing medical information disclosure, patient value awareness, and decision-making support.

Early Enteral Nutrition Could Be Associated with Improved Survival Outcome in Cardiac Arrest.

Background: Although the latest European and US guidelines recommend that early enteral nutrition (EN) be attempted in critically ill patients, there is still a lack of research on feeding strategies for patients after cardiac arrest (CA). Due to the unique pathophysiology following CA, it remains unknown whether evidence from other diseases can be applied in this condition. Objective: We aimed to explore the relationship between the timing of EN (within 48 hours or after 48 hours) and clinical outcomes and safety in CA. Method: From the MIMIC-IV (version 2.2) database, we conducted this retrospective cohort study. A 1 : 1 propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was also conducted to prevent potential interference from confounders. Moreover, adjusted proportional hazards model regression models were used to adjust for prehospital and hospitalization characteristics to verify the independence of the association between early EN initiation and patient outcomes. Results: Of the initial 1286 patients, 670 were equally assigned to the early EN or delayed EN group after PSM. Patients in the early EN group had improved survival outcomes than those in the delayed EN group within 30 days (HR = 0.779, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.611-0.994], p = 0.041). Similar results were shown at 90 and 180 days. However, there was no significant difference in neurological outcome between the two groups at 30 days (51% vs. 57%, odds ratio [OR] = 0.786, 95% CI [0.580-1.066], p = 0.070). Patients who underwent early EN had a lower risk of ileus than patients who underwent delayed EN (4% vs. 8%, OR = 0.461, 95% CI [0.233-0.909], p = 0.016). Moreover, patients who underwent early EN had shorter hospital stays. Conclusion: Early EN could be associated with improved survival outcomes for patients after CA. Further studies are needed to verify it. However, at present, we might consider early EN to be a more suitable feeding strategy for CA.

Cardiac Arrest-Associated Coagulopathy Could Predict 30-day Mortality: A Retrospective Study from Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV Database.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac arrest (CA) can activate the coagulation system. Some coagulation-related indicators are associated with clinical outcomes. Early evaluation of patients with cardiac arrest-associated coagulopathy (CAAC) not only predicts clinical outcomes, but also allows for timely clinical intervention to prevent disseminated intravascular coagulation. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether CAAC predicts 30-day cumulative mortality. METHODS: From the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) database, we conducted a retrospective cohort study from 2008 to 2019. Based on international normalized ratio (INR) value and platelet count, we diagnosed CAAC cases and made the following stratification of severity: mild CAAC was defined as 1.4 > INR≧1.2 and 100,000/µL < platelet count≦150,000/µL; moderate CAAC was defined with either 1.6 > INR≧1.4 or 80,000/µL < platelet count≦100,000/µL; severe CAAC was defined as an INR≧1.6 and platelet count≦80,000/µL. RESULTS: A total of 1485 patients were included. Crude survival analysis showed that patients with CAAC had higher mortality risk than those without CAAC (33.0% vs 52.0%, P < 0.001). Unadjusted survival analysis showed an incremental increase in the risk of mortality as the severity of CAAC increased. After adjusting confounders (prehospital characteristics and hospitalization characteristics), CAAC was independently associated with 30-day mortality (hazard rate [HR] 1.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.41-2.25; P < 0.001); moderate CAAC (HR 1.48, 95% CI 1.09-2.10; P = 0.027) and severe CAAC (HR 2.22, 95% CI 1.64-2.97; P < 0.001) were independently associated with 30-day mortality. CONCLUSION: The presence of CAAC identifies a group of CA at higher risk for mortality, and there is an incremental increase in risk of mortality as the severity of CAAC increases. However, the results of this study should be further verified by multicenter study.

Systemic Characterization of the Gut Microbiota Profile after Single Mild Ischemic Stroke and Recurrent Stroke in Mice.

It has been estimated that one in four stroke patients may have recurrent stroke within five years after they experienced the first stroke. Furthermore, clinical studies have shown that recurrent stroke negatively affects patient outcomes; the risk of disability and the death rate increase with each recurrent stroke. Therefore, it is urgent to find effective methods to prevent recurrent stroke. The gut microbiota has been proven to play an essential role after ischemic stroke, while sudden ischemia disrupts microbial dysbiosis, and the metabolites secreted by the microbiota also reshape the gut microenvironment. In the present study, we established a recurrent ischemic mouse model. Using this experimental model, we compared the survival rate and ischemic infarction between single MCAO and recurrent MCAO, showing that, when two surgeries were performed, the mouse survival rate dramatically decreased, while the infarction size increased. Fecal samples were collected on day 1, day 3 and day 7 after the first MCAO and day 9 (2 days after the second MCAO) for 16S sequencing, which provided a relatively comprehensive picture of the microbiota changes. By further analyzing the potential metabolic pathways, our data also highlighted several important pathways that were significantly altered after the first and recurrent stroke. In the present study, using an experimental mouse model, we showed that acute ischemic stroke, especially recurrent ischemia, significantly decreased the diversity of the gut microbiota.

Effects of metaraminol and norepinephrine on hemodynamics and kidney function in a miniature pig model of septic shock.

Objective: To compare the effects of metaraminol and norepinephrine on hemodynamics and kidney injury in the treatment of septic shock, and calculate the conversion dose ratio between the two vasopressors. Methods: This randomized controlled study was performed on 15 Guizhou miniature pigs. Septic shock was induced by fecal peritonitis in 10 animals, and 5 were used as a sham-operated group (shams). Fluid resuscitation and vasopressors were initiated 30 min after the onset of septic shock. The septic shock pigs were randomly assigned to receive one of the two drugs to restore and maintain mean arterial pressure (MAP) ≥ 65 mmHg for 3 h. Hemodynamics and heart rate were continuously monitored. Results: There was no significant difference in MAP, heart rate, cardiac output (CO) and central venous pressure (CVP) between the two groups after treatment. No arrhythmias such as atrial fibrillation and ventricular fibrillation presented during continuous monitoring. After septic shock, the animals showed obvious kidney injury. In addition, compared with norepinephrine, the creatinine at 3 h was significantly lower with metaraminol. According to propensity score matching, the ratio of 6: 1 was considered appropriate for the dose equivalence calculation of metaraminol (µg·kg-1·min-1): norepinephrine (µg·kg-1·min-1). Conclusion: Metaraminol has a similar pressor effect to norepinephrine in septic shock; it does not increase heart rate and aggravate kidney injury after shock compared with norepinephrine. And our research may provide some laboratory evidence for the clinical usage of metaraminol.