Physiologic changes in the hepatopulmonary syndrome before and after liver transplant: A longitudinal and predictor analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Hepatopulmonary syndrome (HPS) is a common complication of liver disease defined by abnormal oxygenation and intrapulmonary vascular dilatation, treated with liver transplantation. Little is known about changes in HPS physiological parameters over time. We sought to describe baseline clinical and physiological characteristics in HPS and their relationships, temporal changes in physiological parameters before and after transplant, and predictors of changes in oxygenation. APPROACH AND RESULTS: This was a retrospective cohort study in the Canadian HPS Program (n = 132). Rates of change after diagnosis were: -3.7 (-6.4, -0.96) mm Hg/year for partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO 2 ); -26 (-96, 44) m/year for 6-minute walk distance, and 3.3% (-6.6, -0.011) predicted/year for diffusion capacity. Noninvasive shunt of ≥ 20% predicted a slower PaO 2 decline by 0.88 (0.36, 1.4) mm Hg/month. We identified 2 PaO 2 deterioration classes-"very severe disease, slow decliners" (PaO 2 45.0 mm Hg; -1.0 mm Hg/year); and "moderate disease, steady decliners" (PaO 2 65.5 mm Hg; -2.5 mm Hg/year). PaO 2 increased by 6.5 (5.3, 7.7) mm Hg/month in the first year after transplant. The median time to normalization was 149 (116, 184) days. Posttransplant improvement in PaO 2 was 2.5 (0.1, 4.9) mm Hg/month faster for every 10 mm Hg greater pretransplant orthodeoxia. CONCLUSIONS: We present a large and long longitudinal data analysis in HPS. In addition to rates of physiological decline and improvement before and after liver transplantation, we present novel predictors of PaO 2 decline and improvement rates. Our findings enhance our understanding of the natural history of HPS and provide pathophysiologic clues. Importantly, they may assist providers in prognostication and prioritization before and after transplant.

Lung function decline is mitigated following liver transplantation in people with cystic fibrosis: A retrospective cohort study.

There is paucity of literature on the health outcomes following liver transplantation (LT) in people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF). We aim to evaluate changes in lung function following LT in pwCF. We performed a retrospective cohort study of pwCF who underwent LT between 1987 and 2019 in the United States and Canada. Simultaneous lung-liver transplants and individuals who had lung transplant prior to LT were excluded. We analyzed pre-LT and post-LT percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second, body mass index, rates of pulmonary exacerbation, and post-LT overall survival. A total of 402 LT recipients were included. The median age of transplant was 14.9 years and 69.7% of the transplants were performed in children less than 18 years old. The rate of decline in percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second was attenuated after LT from -2.2% to -0.7% predicted per year with a difference of 1.5% predicted per year (95% CI, 0.8, 2.2; p < 0.001). Following LT, the rate of decline in body mass index was reduced, and there were fewer pulmonary exacerbations (0.6 pre vs. 0.4 post; rate ratio 0.7, p < 0.01). The median survival time post-transplant was 13.9 years and the overall probability of survival at 5 years was 77.6%. Those with higher lung function pre-LT had a lower risk of death post-LT, and those with genotypes other than F508 deletion had worse survival. LT in pwCF occurs most often in children and adolescents and is associated with a slower rate of decline in lung function and nutritional status, and a reduction in pulmonary exacerbations.

Beyond borders: cystic fibrosis survival between Australia, Canada, France and New Zealand.

BACKGROUND: Life expectancy for people with cystic fibrosis (CF) varies considerably both within and between countries. The objective of this study was to compare survival among countries with single-payer healthcare systems while accounting for markers of disease severity. METHODS: This cohort study used data from established national CF registries in Australia, Canada, France and New Zealand from 2015 to 2019. Median age of survival for each of the four countries was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to compare risk of death between Canada, France and Australia after adjusting for prognostic factors. Due to low number of deaths, New Zealand was not included in final adjusted models. RESULTS: Between 2015 and 2019, a total of 14 842 people (3537 Australia, 4434 Canada, 6411 France and 460 New Zealand) were included. The median age of survival was highest in France 65.9 years (95% CI: 59.8 to 76.0) versus 53.3 years (95% CI: 48.9 to 59.8) for Australia, 55.4 years (95% CI: 51.3 to 59.2) for Canada and 54.8 years (95% CI: 40.7 to not available) for New Zealand. After adjusting for individual-level factors, the risk of death was significantly higher in Canada (HR 1.85, 95% CI: 1.48 to 2.32; p<0.001) and Australia (HR 2.08, 95% CI: 1.64 to 2.64; p<0.001) versus France. INTERPRETATION: We observed significantly higher survival in France compared with countries with single-payer healthcare systems. The median age of survival in France exceeded 60 years of age despite having the highest proportion of underweight patients which may be due to differences in availability of transplant.

Cystic fibrosis survival outcomes following second lung transplant: The north American experience.

INTRODUCTION: Re-transplant is an option for those who develop end-stage lung disease due to rejection; however, little data exist following re-transplantation in cystic fibrosis (CF). METHODS: Data from the Canadian CF Registry and US CF Foundation Patient Registry supplemented with data from United Network for Organ Sharing were used. Individuals who underwent a 2nd lung transplant between 2005 and 2019 were included. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the probability of survival post-second transplant at 1, 3, and 5-years. RESULTS: Of those people who were waitlisted for a second transplant (N = 818), a total of 254 (31%) died waiting, 395 (48%) were transplanted and 169 (21%) people were alive on the waitlist. Median survival time after 2nd lung transplant was 3.3 years (95% CI: 2.8-4.1). The 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates were 77.4% (95% CI: 73.1-82%), 52% (95% CI: 46.7-58%) and 39.4% (95% CI: 34.1-45.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Survival following second lung transplant in CF patients is lower than estimates following the first transplant. Over half of subjects who are potentially eligible for a second transplant die without receiving a second organ. This warrants further investigation.

Impact of a high emergency lung transplantation programme for cystic fibrosis in France: insight from a comparison with Canada.

BACKGROUND: France implemented a high emergency lung transplantation (HELT) programme nationally in 2007. A similar programme does not exist in Canada. The objectives of our study were to compare health outcomes within France as well as between Canada and France before and after the HELT programme in a population with cystic fibrosis (CF). METHODS: This population-based cohort study utilised data from the French and Canadian CF registries. A cumulative incidence curve assessed time to transplant with death without transplant as competing risks. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate post-transplant survival. RESULTS: Between 2002 and 2016, there were 1075 (13.0%) people with CF in France and 555 (10.2%) people with CF in Canada who underwent lung transplantation. The proportion of lung transplants increased in France after the HELT programme was initiated (4.5% versus 10.1%), whereas deaths pre-transplant decreased from 85.3% in the pre-HELT period to 57.1% in the post-HELT period. Between 2008 and 2016, people in France were significantly more likely to receive a transplant (hazard ratio (HR) 1.56, 95% CI 1.37-1.77; p<0.001) than die (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.46-0.66; p<0.001) compared with Canada. Post-transplant survival was similar between the countries, and there was no difference in survival when comparing pre- and post-HELT periods in France. CONCLUSIONS: Following the implementation of the HELT programme, people living with CF in France were more likely to receive a transplant than die. Post-transplant survival in the post-HELT period in France did not change compared with the pre-HELT period, despite potentially sicker patients being transplanted, and was comparable to Canada.

Clinical outcomes after liver transplant in people with cystic fibrosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Data on the impact of liver transplantation (LT) in cystic fibrosis (CF) on lung function and exacerbations are limited. The objective of this study was to summarize the literature on lung function, nutritional status, survival, and complications following LT in people with CF. METHODS: Three databases were searched until September 2023, to identify the impact of LT in CF. Lung transplant prior to LT and simultaneous liver-lung transplant were excluded. Pooled hazard ratios were calculated using random-effects models. RESULTS: Thirty studies were included in this review, with 3 and 9 studies included in meta-analyses for nutritional status and lung function, respectively. Eighty-three percent of the studies used data that was more than a decade old. There was a significant increase in percent-predicted forced expiratory volume with mean change of 7.16 % (2.13, 12.19; p = 0.005) one year post-LT. Pulmonary exacerbations decreased in the short-term, however there was no significant change in body mass index (BMI). One-year survival post-LT ranged between 75 and 100 %, while five-year survival was lower at 64-89 %. CONCLUSION: Existing data suggest that LT improves lung function in the short term and does not increase the likelihood of pulmonary exacerbations, despite ongoing immunosuppression in the setting of chronic lung infection.

Sleep breathing disorder frequency, risk factors, and treatment among adults with cystic fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: Our understanding of the epidemiology of sleep breathing disorders among adults with cystic fibrosis (CF) is limited. Our purpose was to describe the frequency, risk factors and treatment of sleep breathing disorders among adults with CF. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of linked data from laboratory-based diagnostic polysomnography (PSG) undertaken at St. Michael's Hospital (Toronto, Canada) and the Canadian CF Registry. Adults (≥19 years old) with CF that underwent a diagnostic PSG at St. Michael's Hospital between 2002 and 2021 were included. Sleep breathing disorder frequency, risk factors, and treatment were described, using descriptive statistics and logistic regression. RESULTS: There were 42 patients included (33.3 % women and median age at diagnostic PSG was 34.7 years). Obstructive sleep apnea [OSA] was the most commonly observed sleep breathing disorder (found in 64.3 %), followed by sustained nocturnal hypoxemia (16.7 %), and sleep hypoventilation (9.5 %). Only 41 % of individuals with an elevated total apnea-hypopnea index were receiving positive airway pressure [PAP] therapy. Corticosteroid use (either oral or inhaled) was the only factor with a significant positive association with presence of any sleep breathing disorder (odds ratio 5.00, 95 % confidence interval 1.28-22.78). CONCLUSIONS: Among adults with CF, OSA occurs more commonly than previously appreciated and the majority of sleep breathing disorders were not being treated with PAP or supplemental oxygen. Management of sleep breathing disorders among adults with CF reflects a potentially important care gap, but further research is needed to determine the health impacts of treating sleep breathing disorders in CF.

Contemporary cystic fibrosis incidence rates in Canada and the United States.

BACKGROUND: The availability of new diagnostic algorithms for cystic fibrosis (CF), changing population demographics and programs that impact family planning decisions can influence incidence rates. Thus, previously reported incidence rates in Canada and the United States (US) may be outdated. The objectives of this study were to estimate contemporary CF incidence rates in Canada and the US and to determine if the incidence rate has changed over time. METHOD: This population-based cohort study utilized data between 1995-2019 from the Canadian CF Registry (CCFR), Statistics Canada, US CF Foundation Patient Registry (CFFPR) data, and US Center for Disease Control (CDC) National Vital Statistics System. Incidence was estimated using the number of live CF births by year, sex, and geographic region using Poisson regression, with the number of live births used as the denominator. To account for delayed diagnoses, we imputed the proportion of diagnoses expected given historical trends, and varying rates of newborn screening (NBS) implementation by region. RESULTS: After accounting for implementation of NBS and delayed diagnoses, the estimated incidence rate for CF in 2019 was 1:3848 (95% CI: 1:3574, 1:4143) live births in Canada compared to 1:5130 (95% CI:1:4996, 1:5267) in the US. There was substantial regional variation in incidence rates within both Canada and the US. Since 1995, incidence rates have decreased at a rate of 1.6% per year in both countries (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Contemporary CF incidence rates suggest CF incidence is lower than previously reported and varies widely within North America. This information is important for resource planning and for tracking how programs (e.g., genetic counselling, modulator availability etc.) may impact the incidence of CF moving forward.

Validation of the French 3-year prognostic score for death or lung transplant in the United States cystic fibrosis population.

In 2017, Nkam et al. published a prognostic score to predict death or lung transplant within 3 years among adult cystic fibrosis (CF) patients. Their model was developed using French CF registry data and was subsequently validated in the Canadian CF registry. We evaluated this prognostic score using data from adult patients with CF in the United States (US) CF Foundation Patient registry, combined with lung transplant records from the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) Registry (2013 to 2016) (n=11,542). We found that the prognostic score had a very good discriminative index predicting death or lung transplant in the US CF population (AUC 0.88, 95% CI 0.88-0.89) with an odds ratio (OR) of 2.83 (95% CI 2.69 - 2.97) for each unit increase in the score. However, it did not provide significant additional utility over an FEV1 ≤30% of predicted as a predictor of death or lung transplant.

Real-world use of ivacaftor in Canada: A retrospective analysis using the Canadian Cystic Fibrosis Registry.

BACKGROUND: Ivacaftor is a CFTR potentiator with demonstrated efficacy in clinical trials and has been rapidly adopted within the CF community. Given the uptake of ivacaftor in eligible people, identifying a comparator group not on modulators to measure effectiveness is difficult. We evaluated health outcomes in individuals with G551D and non-G551D genotypes on ivacaftor using real-world longitudinal data. METHODS: This population-based observational study compared clinical trajectories pre-post ivacaftor using the Canadian CF Registry from 2006 to 01-01 through 2018-12-31. Piece-wise linear mixed-effects models were used to compare lung function, nutritional status, pulmonary exacerbations, and Pseudomonas colonization pre- and post-ivacaftor. Multivariable models were used to adjust for confounding factors. RESULTS: Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) increased significantly by 5.7 percent predicted (95% confidence interval (CI) 3.9, 7.5; p<0.001) after initiation of ivacaftor. FEV1 decline rate was attenuated to -0.30% (95% CI -0.9, 0.29; p = 0.32) predicted/year post-ivacaftor, compared with -0.75% (95% CI -1.12, -0.37; p<0.001) predicted/year pre-ivacaftor, although this difference did not reach statistical significance. BMI percentiles also increased post-ivacaftor (6.57 percentiles, 95% CI 3.91, 9.24; p<0.001). Pulmonary exacerbations showed a nonsignificant reduction of 18% (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.61, 1.11; p = 0.19) and the odds of a positive sputum culture for Pseudomonas aeruginosa decreased in the post-ivacaftor period (odds ratio 0.44, 95% CI 0.30, 0.63; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This real-world, observational study demonstrated improvement in health outcomes in a broad population of people with CF. Additional studies are needed to evaluate the impact of ivacaftor on quality of life and survival.

Survival and Lung Transplant Outcomes for Individuals With Advanced Cystic Fibrosis Lung Disease Living in the United States and Canada: An Analysis of National Registries.

BACKGROUND: Understanding how health outcomes differ for patients with advanced cystic fibrosis (CF) lung disease living in the United States compared with Canada has health policy implications. RESEARCH QUESTION: What are rates of lung transplant (LTx) and rates of death without LTx in the United States and Canada among individuals with FEV1 < 40% predicted? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a retrospective population-based cohort study, 2005 to 2016, using the US CF Foundation, United Network for Organ Sharing, and Canadian CF registries. Individuals with CF and at least two FEV1 measurements < 40% predicted within a 5-year period, age ≥ 6 years, without prior LTx were included. Multivariable competing risk regression for time to death without LTx (LTx as a competing risk) and time to LTx (death as a competing risk) was performed. RESULTS: There were 5,899 patients (53% male) and 905 patients (54% male) with CF with FEV1 < 40% predicted living in the United States and Canada, respectively. Multivariable competing risk regression models identified an increased risk of death without LTx (hazard ratio [HR], 1.79; 95% CI, 1.52-2.1) and decreased LTx (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.58-0.74) among individuals in the United States compared with Canada. More pronounced differences were seen in the patients in the United States with Medicaid/Medicare insurance compared with Canadians (multivariable HR for death without LTx, 2.24 [95% CI, 1.89-2.64]; multivariable HR for LTx, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.47-0.61]). Patients of nonwhite race were also disadvantaged (multivariable HR for death without LTx, 1.56 [95% CI, 1.32-1.84]; multivariable HR for LTx, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.36-0.62]). INTERPRETATION: There are lower rates of LTx and an increased risk of death without LTx for US patients with CF with FEV1 < 40% predicted compared with Canadian patients. Findings are more striking among US patients with CF with Medicaid/Medicare health insurance, and nonwhite patients in both countries, raising concerns about underuse of LTx among vulnerable populations.

Bridging the survival gap in cystic fibrosis: An investigation of lung transplant outcomes in Canada and the United States.

BACKGROUND: Previous literature in cystic fibrosis (CF) has shown a 10-year survival gap between Canada and the United States (US). We hypothesized that differential access to and survival after lung transplantation may contribute to the observed gap. The objectives of this study were to compare CF transplant outcomes between Canada and the US and estimate the potential contribution of transplantation to the survival gap. METHODS: Data from the Canadian CF Registry and the US Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry supplemented with data from United Network for Organ Sharing were used. The probability of surviving after transplantation between 2005 and 2016 was calculated using the Kaplan‒Meier method. Survival by insurance status at the time of transplantation and transplant center volume in the US were compared with those in Canada using Cox proportional hazard models. Simulations were used to estimate the contribution of transplantation to the survival gap. RESULTS: Between 2005 and 2016, there were 2,653 patients in the US and 470 in Canada who underwent lung transplantation for CF. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 88.3%, 71.8%, and 60.3%, respectively, in the US compared with 90.5%, 79.9%, and 69.7%, respectively, in Canada. Patients in the US were also more likely to die on the waitlist (p < 0.01) than patients in Canada. If the proportion of who underwent transplantation and post-transplant survival in the US were to increase to those observed in Canada, we estimate that the survival gap would decrease from 10.8 years to 7.5 years. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in waitlist mortality and post-transplant survival can explain up to a third of the survival gap observed between the US and Canada.