Perioperative Narcotic Trends in Women Undergoing Minimally Invasive Myomectomy.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the perioperative narcotic utilization patterns at the time of myomectomy, specifically as they relate to the opioid epidemic. We also aim to evaluate the differences between conventional laparoscopy and robotic surgery in terms of narcotic utilization. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Single academic university hospital. PATIENTS: Women undergoing minimally invasive myomectomy. INTERVENTIONS: Laparoscopic or robot-assisted myomectomy. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We identified 312 minimally invasive myomectomies to be included in the final analysis. For the entire cohort, the mean age (± standard deviation) was 35.7 ± 5.1 years, and the mean body mass index was 28.3 ± 6.3. Of the 312 myomectomies included, 239 (76.6%) were performed using robotic assistance, and the remainder (23.4%) were performed by conventional laparoscopy. A statistically significant inverse relationship was found between year of myomectomy and perioperative narcotic administration (p <.001). Yearly morphine milligram equivalent (MME) administration decreased significantly for both intraoperative and postoperative administration (p <.001). The largest decline for intraoperative MME use was between 2016 and 2017, and for postoperative MME use, it was between 2012 and 2013. There was no statistically significant difference in perioperative narcotic administration between conventional laparoscopy and robot-assisted myomectomy. The time effect for intraoperative (p <.001) and postoperative (p <.001) narcotic administration remained significant after adjusting for covariates, including mode of surgery, race, insurance, age, and body mass index. None of the background variables assessed were associated with perioperative narcotic administration. CONCLUSION: Perioperative narcotic administration for minimally invasive myomectomy has decreased following widespread awareness of the national opioid crisis.

STop OVarian CAncer (STOPOVCA) young: Protocol for a multicenter follow-up study to determine the long-term effects of opportunistic salpingectomy on age at menopause.

BACKGROUND: Opportunistic salpingectomy comprises additional bilateral salpingectomy during abdominal surgery as a prophylactic method to reduce the risk of ovarian cancer. However, opportunistic salpingectomy may potentially damage (micro)blood circulation to the ovaries, resulting in earlier onset of menopause. PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term effects of opportunistic salpingectomy on the onset of menopause in women who underwent sterilization through salpingectomy compared with a control group who underwent sterilization by tubal ligation or no surgery at all. STUDY HYPOTHESIS: Opportunistic salpingectomy does not lower the mean age at onset of menopause. TRIAL DESIGN: In a multicenter observational noninferiority study, we will prospectively compare the age at menopause of women initially aged 35-45 who underwent sterilization through opportunistic salpingectomy with a similarly aged control group who underwent sterilization by tubal ligation or no sterilization. Participants will be asked to complete an annual questionnaire on onset of menopause to eventually determine whether there is more than a one-year decrease in mean age at onset of menopause in the opportunistic salpingectomy group. Follow-up will last until determination of menopause, with a maximum of 15 years. MAJOR INCLUSION/EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Inclusion criteria: pre-menopausal; age between 35 and 45; intact ovaries. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: post-menopausal; previous bilateral salpingectomy or oophorectomy; previous hysterectomy; abnormal karyotype; previous or current chemotherapy or pelvic radiation. PRIMARY ENDPOINT(S): Determination of age of menopause measured by annual questionnaire. SAMPLE SIZE: 1200 (400 intervention group; 800 control group). ESTIMATED DATES FOR COMPLETING ACCRUAL AND PRESENTING RESULTS: It is estimated that recruitment will be completed by 2023 and results will be published by 2039. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT04757922 PROTOCOL VERSION: : Version 1, February 2021.

Operative deliveries in low-risk pregnancies in The Netherlands: primary versus secondary care.

BACKGROUND: In The Netherlands, 35 percent of births take place in "primary care" to women considered at low risk and during labor, approximately 30 percent are referred to "secondary care." High-risk women and some low-risk women deliver in secondary care. This study sought to compare planned place of birth and incidence of operative delivery among women at low risk of complications at the time of onset of labor. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted of data about births in The Netherlands during 2003 that were recorded routinely in the Netherlands Perinatal Registry. Mode of delivery was analyzed for women classified as low risk at labor onset according to their planned place of birth (intention-to-treat analysis). The primary outcome was the rate of operative deliveries (vacuum or forceps extraction or cesarean section). RESULTS: Women at low risk who planned to give birth, and therefore labored and delivered in secondary care, had a significantly higher rate of operative deliveries than women who began labor in primary care where they intended to give birth (18% [3,558/19,850] vs 9% [7,803/87,187]) (OR 2.25, 95% CI 2.00-2.52). For cesarean section, the rates were 12 percent (2,419/19,850) versus 3 percent (2,990/87,817) (OR 3.97, 95% CI 3.15-5.01), irrespective of parity. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of operative deliveries was significantly lower for low-risk pregnant women who gave birth in a primary care setting compared with similar women who planned birth in secondary care. As with any retrospective analysis, it was not possible to eliminate bias, such as possible differences between primary and secondary care in assignment of risk status. In addition, known risk factors for interventions, technologies such as induction of labor and fetal monitoring, are only available in secondary care. These findings clearly demonstrate the need for a prospective study to examine the relationship between planned place of birth and mode of delivery and neonatal and maternal outcomes.

[Topical treatment of vulvar lichen sclerosus with calcineurin inhibitors]. / Lokale behandeling met calcineurine-remmers voor vulvaire lichen sclerosus.

OBJECTIVE: To provide an overview of the literature concerning the topical treatment of vulvar lichen sclerosus, a chronic inflammatory skin disease, with calcineurin inhibitors, such as pimecrolimus and tacrolimus. DESIGN: A literature review into the use of topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCIs) in the treatment of vulvar lichen sclerosus. METHOD: A literature search was performed using PubMed and EMBASE and the search terms 'tacrolimus', 'pimecrolimus' or 'calcineurin inhibitors' and 'lichen sclerosus et atrophicus', 'vulvar lichen sclerosus', 'vulvar dermatoses' or 'vulvar diseases'. RESULTS: The search produced 6 case reports, 5 patient series, 3 pilot studies, 2 open-label studies and 1 RCT concerning the use of TCIs for the treatment of vulvar lichen sclerosus. The literature shows that both medications are effective and well tolerated. However, glucocorticoids seem to be effective in more patients than TCIs. Tacrolimus has a stronger immunosuppressant effect than pimecrolimus and therefore seems to be more effective without having more observed side-effects. CONCLUSIONS: TCIs may represent a useful second-line therapeutic option for patients for whom treatment with glucocorticoids is not effective or who do not tolerate them well. Randomized clinical studies are required to determine the role of TCIs in the treatment of lichen sclerosus. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: none declared. Financial support: none declared.