RESUMEN
A study to evaluate the protection provided by permethrin-treated military fabric following cold-water washing against host-seeking mosquitoes is reported. The landing/probing of native mosquitoes on Australian Defence Force Disruptive Pattern Combat Uniform shirts treated by dipping in 0.6% permethrin emulsion (Perigen Defence®, containing 500 g/l permethrin), and commercial factory treatments in the USA (Factory A) and Europe (Factory B) were recorded after 0, 1, 3, 5, and 10 washes. The study showed that significantly shorter landing/probing times compared with untreated controls were recorded for shirts treated with Factory A treatment after 0 and 1 wash, and for the Factory B treatment after 0 washes, and there were no differences between permethrin treatment and control landing. The study concludes that better methods to assess protection from landing/probing mosquitoes in the field are needed.
Asunto(s)
Vestuario , Culicidae/fisiología , Repelentes de Insectos , Control de Mosquitos , Permetrina , Animales , Conducta Alimentaria , Lavandería , QueenslandRESUMEN
Field trials comparing repellent formulations containing IR3535 (ethyl butylacetylaminopropionate) and deet (N,N-diethyl-3-methylbenzamide) against mosquitoes in Queensland, Australia, were conducted. Two repellents were compared: Avon Bug Guard, containing 7.5% IR3535; and Australian Defense Force (ADF) deet, containing 35% deet in a gel. Two tests were conducted, one in February-March 2006, and the second in February 2007. In the 1st test, the predominant mosquito species collected were Mansonia uniformis (58.9% of collection) and Culex annulirostris (33.4%), and in the 2nd test, the predominant species was Aedes vigilax (85.7% of collection). In the 1st test, Avon Bug Guard provided >95% protection against all mosquitoes for only 1 h, and ADF deet provided the same level of protection for 5 h. In the 2nd field test, Avon Bug Guard provided only 85% protection against all mosquitoes 1 h after repellent application, while ADF deet provided 5 h of protection. The study showed that ADF deet provided significantly better protection against mosquitoes than Avon Bug Guard (IR3535).
Asunto(s)
Aedes , Culex , DEET , Repelentes de Insectos , Propionatos , Animales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Control de Mosquitos , QueenslandRESUMEN
The sodium transport properties of chick epiblast during gastrulation were studied by various techniques. It was found that the epiblast is capable of unidirectional apical to basal sodium transport, in towards the underlying intraembryonic space. The Na-K-ATPase was localized by [3H]ouabain binding and autoradiography near the basal surfaces of the cells, and the number of pump sites was quantified. The transport rate of sodium was determined with 22Na. Electrophysiological studies on embryos at primitive streak stages showed a transepithelial potential of about +16 +/- 5 mV (basal side positive) which was sensitive to strophanthidin. Applying similar voltages but of reverse polarity to isolated sheets of epiblast caused a rapid reversal of some of their morphological polarity markers as well as some of their physiological functions. The relevance of these results to development is discussed.