The scar: the wind in the perfect storm-insights into the mysterious living tissue originating ventricular arrhythmias.

BACKGROUND: Arrhythmic death is very common among patients with structural heart disease, and it is estimated that in European countries, 1 per 1000 inhabitants yearly dies for sudden cardiac death (SCD), mainly as a result of ventricular arrhythmias (VA). The scar is the result of cardiac remodelling process that occurs in several cardiomyopathies, both ischemic and non-ischemic, and is considered the perfect substrate for re-entrant and non-re-entrant arrhythmias. METHODS: Our aim was to review published evidence on the histological and electrophysiological properties of myocardial scar and to review the central role of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) in assessing ventricular arrhythmias substrate and its potential implication in risk stratification of SCD. RESULTS: Scarring process affects both structural and electrical myocardial properties and paves the background for enhanced arrhythmogenicity. Non-uniform anisotropic conduction, gap junctions remodelling, source to sink mismatch and refractoriness dispersion are some of the underlining mechanisms contributing to arrhythmic potential of the scar. All these mechanisms lead to the initiation and maintenance of VA. CMR has a crucial role in the evaluation of patients suffering from VA, as it is considered the gold standard imaging test for scar characterization. Mounting evidences support the use of CMR not only for the definition of gross scar features, as size, localization and transmurality, but also for the identification of possible conducting channels suitable of discrete ablation. Moreover, several studies call out the CMR-based scar characterization as a stratification tool useful in selecting patients at risk of SCD and amenable to implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation. CONCLUSIONS: Scar represents the substrate of ventricular arrhythmias. CMR, defining scar presence and its features, may be a useful tool for guiding ablation procedures and for identifying patients at risk of SCD amenable to ICD therapy.

Echocardiographic long-term follow-up of adult survivors of pediatric cancer treated with Dexrazoxane-Anthracyclines association.

AIMS: Cardiovascular disease is a well-recognized cause of increased late morbidity and mortality among survivors of childhood cancer treated with anthracyclines. Co-administration of Dexrazoxane has been shown to significantly reduce short-term and mid-term cardiotoxicity. Aim of this study was to assess cardiac function in long-term (>10 years) survivors of childhood tumors treated with dexrazoxane/anthracycline association. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty cancer survivors previously treated with co-administration of anthracyclines-dexrazoxane for childhood renal tumors or sarcoma and a control group of 20 healthy subjects were enrolled in the study. Echocardiographic measurements included 3D left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF) and LV and right ventricular (RV) global longitudinal strain (GLS). Among cancer survivors group the median age at diagnosis was 5 years (1-17) and they were evaluated at median follow-up time of 21.5 years (10-26). No evidence of cardiac toxicity, as defined by current guidelines, was reported in all survivors. No significant differences in standard and deformation imaging parameters were observed between survivors and controls (3D LVEF 58 ±â€¯3% vs 60 ±â€¯5% p = NS; LV GLS -21 ±â€¯1% vs -21 ±â€¯2% p = NS; RV GLS -23 ±â€¯2% vs -23 ±â€¯5% p = NS). No second tumor was registered in dexrazoxane-treated survivors. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings may support the role of dexrazoxane as a useful strategy for cardio-protection in children undergoing anthracycline based treatment. However, large randomized trials are needed to confirm the cardio-protective role of dexrazoxane in pediatric setting at long-term follow-up.