Characterizing a CT esophagram protocol after flexible endoscopic diverticulotomy for Zenker's diverticulum: a retrospective series.

Background: Flexible endoscopic cricopharyngeal myotomy and septotomy offer a minimally invasive transluminal option for the treatment of symptomatic Zenker's diverticulum (ZD). There is currently no consensus regarding postoperative follow-up imaging. We suggest a standardized computed tomography (CT) esophagram protocol for radiographic evaluation of postoperative findings. Methods: Single center retrospective analysis of patients with symptomatic ZD who underwent flexible endoscopic diverticulotomy and postoperative imaging with CT esophagram from January 2015 to March 2020. An experienced radiologist blinded to the initial imaging reports prospectively interpreted all CT esophagram findings, in order to minimize bias. Results: Twenty-one patients underwent CT esophagram following flexible endoscopic diverticulotomy for ZD. Diverticulotomy was technically successful in all patients. Most common findings on imaging included: atelectasis (13/21; 62%), persistent esophageal diverticulum (7/21; 33%), pneumomediastinum (3/21; 14%), aspiration (2/21; 10%), and extraluminal air and contrast extravasation consistent with focal esophageal perforation (1/21; 5%). Conclusions: We describe a standardized, simple, and accessible CT esophagram protocol for postoperative imaging of patients with post-flexible endoscopic cricopharyngeal myotomy and septotomy for ZD. CT esophagram facilitates a definitive exclusion of focal esophageal perforation as a postoperative complication of flexible endoscopic diverticulotomy by ruling out extraluminal air and contrast extravasation.

A MEST up classification? Review of the re-classification of mixed epithelial and stromal tumor and adult cystic nephroma for the abdominal radiologist.

Mixed epithelial and stromal tumor (MEST) and the tumor formerly known as adult cystic nephroma (ACN) are uncommon renal tumors that have historically been described as separate entities in terms of histologic and imaging findings. However, these entities share many epidemiologic, radiologic, and pathologic features. While recent surgical and pathological literature has supported classifying MEST and ACN within the same tumor family, most radiologists and radiology texts continue to describe MEST and ACN as separate entities.

Association between nuclear grade of renal cell carcinoma and the aorta-lesion-attenuation-difference.

INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: Several features noted on renal mass biopsy (RMB) can influence treatment selection including tumor histology and nuclear grade. However, there is poor concordance between renal cell carcinoma (RCC) nuclear grade on RMB compared to nephrectomy specimens. Here, we evaluate the association of nuclear grade with aorta-lesion-attenuation-difference (ALAD) values determined on preoperative CT scan. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A retrospective review of preoperative CT scans and surgical pathology was performed on patients undergoing nephrectomy for solid renal masses. ALAD was calculated by measuring the difference in Hounsfield units (HU) between the aorta and the lesion of interest on the same image slice on preoperative CT scan. The discriminative ability of ALAD to differentiate low-grade (nuclear grade 1 and 2) and high-grade (nuclear grade 3 and 4) tumors was evaluated by sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and area under curve (AUC) using ROC analysis. Sub-group analysis by histologic sub-type was also performed. RESULTS: A total of 368 preoperative CT scans in patients with RCC on nephrectomy specimen were reviewed. Median patient age was 61 years (IQR 52-68). The majority of patients were male, 66% (243/368). Tumor histology was chromophobe RCC in 7.6%, papillary RCC in 15.5%, and clear cell RCC in 76.9%. The majority, 69.3% (253/365) of tumors, were stage T1a. Nuclear grade was grade 1 in 5.46% (19/348), grade 2 in 64.7% (225/348), grade 3 in 26.2% (91/348), and grade 4 in 3.2% (11/348). Nephrographic ALAD values for grade 1, 2, 3, and 4 were 73.7, 46.5, 36.4, and 43.1, respectively (p = 0.0043). Nephrographic ALAD was able to differentiate low-grade from high-grade RCC with a sensitivity of 32%, specificity of 89%, PPV of 86%, and NPV of 36%. ROC analysis demonstrated the predictive utility of nephrographic ALAD to predict high- versus low-grade RCC with an AUC of 0.60 (95% CI 0.51-0.69). CONCLUSION: ALAD was significantly associated with nuclear grade in our nephrectomy series. Strong specificity and PPV for the nephrographic phrase demonstrate a potential role for ALAD in the pre-operative setting that may augment RMB findings in assessing nuclear grade of RCC. Although this association was statistically significant, the clinical utility is limited at this time given the results of the statistical analysis (relatively poor ROC analysis). Sub-group analysis by histologic subtype yielded very similar diagnostic performance and limitations of ALAD. Further studies are necessary to evaluate this relationship further.

Validation of aorta-lesion-attenuation difference on preoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography scan to differentiate between malignant and benign oncocytic renal tumors.

OBJECTIVES: We previously noted that the aorta-lesion-attenuation difference (ALAD) determined on CT scan discriminated well between chromophobe RCC and oncocytoma. The current evaluation seeks to validate these initial findings in a second cohort of nephrectomy patients. METHODS: A retrospective review of preoperative CT scans and surgical pathology was performed on patients undergoing nephrectomy for small, solid renal masses. ALAD was calculated by measuring the difference in Hounsfield units (HU) between the aorta and the lesion of interest on the same image slice on preoperative CT scan. The discriminative ability of ALAD to differentiate malignant pathology from oncocytoma was evaluated by sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and area under curve (AUC) using ROC analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-one preoperative CT scans and corresponding pathology reports were reviewed and included in the validation cohort. ALAD values were calculated during the excretory and nephrographic phases. Compared to the training cohort, patients in the validation cohort were significantly older (62 versus 59 years old), had larger tumors (3.7 versus 2.7 cm), and higher stage disease (59% versus 79% T1a disease). Nephrographic ALAD was able to differentiate malignant pathology from oncocytoma in the training and validation cohorts with a sensitivity of 84% versus 73%, specificity of 86% and 67%, PPV of 98% versus 91%, and NPV of 33% versus 35%. The AUC for malignant pathology versus oncocytoma in the validation cohort was 0.72 (95% CI 0.63-0.82). Nephrographic ALAD was able to differentiate chromophobe RCC from oncocytoma in the training and validation cohorts with a sensitivity of 100% versus 67%, specificity of 86% versus 67%, PPV of 75% versus 43%, and NPV of 100% versus 84%. The AUC for chromophobe RCC versus oncocytoma in the validation cohort was 0.72 (95% CI 0.48-0.96). CONCLUSIONS: The ability of ALAD to discriminate between chromophobe RCC and oncocytoma was diminished in the validation cohort compared to the training cohort, but remained significant. The current findings support further investigation in the role of ALAD in the management of patients with indeterminate diagnoses of oncocytic neoplasm.