Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
J Clin Gastroenterol ; 56(3): 224-227, 2022 03 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34183618

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Endoscopic management of Zenker diverticuli (ZD) has traditionally been via septotomy technique. The recent development of tunneling technique has shown to be both efficacious and safe. The aim of this study is to evaluate the tunneling technique using per oral endoscopic myotomy (Z-POEM) versus septotomy. METHODS: Patients who underwent endoscopic management of ZD either by Z-POEM or septotomy from March 2017 until November 2020 from 9 international academic centers were included. Demographics, clinical data preprocedure and postprocedure, procedure time, adverse events, and hospital length of stay were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 101 patients (mean age 74.9 y old, 55.4% male) were included: septotomy (n=49), Z-POEM (n=52). Preprocedure Functional Oral Intake Scale score and Eckardt score was 5.3 and 5.4 for the septotomy group and 5.9 and 5.15 for the Z-POEM group. Technical success was achieved in 98% of the Z-POEM group and 100% of the septotomy group. Clinical success was achieved in 84% and 92% in the septotomy versus Z-POEM groups. Adverse events occurred in 30.6% (n=15) in septotomy group versus 9.6% (n=5) in the Z-POEM group (P=0.017). Reintervention for ongoing symptoms occurred in 7 patients in the septotomy group and 3 patients in the Z-POEM group. Mean hospital length of stay was shorter for the Z-POEM group, at 1.5 versus 1.9 days. CONCLUSIONS: A tunneling technique via the Z-POEM procedure is an efficacious and safe endoscopic treatment for ZD. Z-POEM is a safer procedure with a statistically significant reduction in adverse events compared with traditional septotomy technique.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo , Miotomía , Cirugía Endoscópica por Orificios Naturales , Divertículo de Zenker , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Miotomía/efectos adversos , Miotomía/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Divertículo de Zenker/cirugía
3.
Endosc Ultrasound ; 12(6): 472-476, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38948125

RESUMEN

Background and Objectives: Management of hepatic abscesses has traditionally been performed by image-guided percutaneous techniques. More recently, EUS drainage has been shown to be efficacious and safe. The aim of this study is to compare EUS-guided versus percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) of hepatic abscesses. Methods: Patients who underwent EUS-guided drainage or PCD of hepatic abscesses from January 2018 through November 2021 from 4 international academic centers were included in a dedicated registry. Demographics, clinical data preprocedure and postprocedure, abscess characteristics, procedural data, adverse events, and postprocedure care were collected. Results: Seventy-four patients were included (mean age, 63.9 years; 45% male): EUS-guided (n = 30), PCD (n = 44). Preprocedure Charlson Comorbidity Index scores were 4.3 for the EUS group and 4.3 for the PCD group. The median abscess size was 8.45 × 6 cm (length × width) in the EUS group versus 7.3 × 5.5 cm in the PCD group. All of the abscesses in the EUS group were left-sided, whereas the PCD group contained both left- and right-sided abscesses (29 and 15, respectively). Technical success was 100% in both groups. Ten-millimeter-diameter stents were used in most cases in the EUS group, and 10F catheters were used in the PCD group. The duration to resolution of symptoms from the initial procedure was 10.9 days less in the EUS group compared with the PCD group (P < 0.00001). Hospital length of stay was shorter in the EUS group by 5.2 days (P = 0.000126). The EUS group had significantly fewer number of repeat sessions: mean of 2 versus 7.7 (P < 0.00001) and trended toward fewer number of procedure-related readmissions: 10% versus 34%. The PCD group had a significantly higher number of adverse events (n = 27 [61%]) when compared with the EUS group (n = 5 [17%]; P = 0.0001). Conclusions: EUS-guided drainage is an efficacious and safe intervention for the management of hepatic abscesses. EUS-guided drainage allows for quicker resolution of symptoms, shorter length of hospital stay, fewer adverse events, and fewer procedural sessions needed when compared with the PCD technique. However, EUS-guided drainage may not be feasible in right-sided lesions.

4.
Clin Liver Dis ; 24(2): 189-196, 2020 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32245526

RESUMEN

Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) occurs in patients with acute-on-chronic liver disease. It has a wide progression of symptoms, with its initial presentation being subtle. The symptoms of HE mainly affect mental status, the musculoskeletal system, and mood/behavior. Its severity ranges from minor disturbances in sleep-wake cycle to the patient being comatose. HE is categorized based on 4 main features: the underlying disease, the severity of manifestations, the time course, and whether precipitating factors are present. The severity of the manifestations is classically identified using the West Haven Criteria. There are several other clinical tests, but they require further validation.


Asunto(s)
Discinesias/etiología , Encefalopatía Hepática/complicaciones , Encefalopatía Hepática/diagnóstico , Trastornos Mentales/etiología , Amoníaco , Trastornos del Conocimiento/etiología , Encefalopatía Hepática/clasificación , Encefalopatía Hepática/psicología , Humanos , Letargia/etiología , Cirrosis Hepática , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Trastornos de la Personalidad/etiología , Reflejo Anormal , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Trastornos del Sueño-Vigilia/etiología
5.
Clin Liver Dis ; 24(2): 231-242, 2020 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32245530

RESUMEN

Pharmacologic management of hepatic encephalopathy includes a broad range of therapies. This article covers the specific mainstays of therapies, such as antimicrobials and laxatives, with an established evidence base. This article also covers newer modalities of therapies, such as fecal microbiota transplant, probiotics, bioartificial support systems, small molecular therapies such as l-ornithine l-aspartate, branched chain amino acids, l-carnitine, zinc, and other forms of therapy currently under review.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Encefalopatía Hepática/terapia , Laxativos/uso terapéutico , Rifaximina/uso terapéutico , Acarbosa/uso terapéutico , Aminoácidos de Cadena Ramificada/uso terapéutico , Dipéptidos/uso terapéutico , Trasplante de Microbiota Fecal , Flumazenil/uso terapéutico , Moduladores del GABA/uso terapéutico , Glicerol/análogos & derivados , Glicerol/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Glicósido Hidrolasas/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Lactulosa/uso terapéutico , Fenilbutiratos/uso terapéutico , Probióticos/uso terapéutico
6.
ACG Case Rep J ; 6(7): e00120, 2019 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31620520

RESUMEN

A gastrostomy tube passes from a patient's stomach through the abdominal wall and allows for direct enteral access. An alternative to an open gastrostomy, a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is typically favored because it is a less invasive option. However, a thorough understanding of the anatomy involved is paramount to prevent complications, regardless of what technique is chosen for placement. We present a case of an incisional hernia, which developed after the removal of a PEG tube placed through the midline of an abdominal wall, which is both a rare and avoidable complication. Placement of a PEG tube lateral to midline and avoiding the linea alba, an inherent weak point, will decrease the incidence of incisional hernias.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA