Functional movement assessment by means of inertial sensor technology to discriminate between movement behaviour of healthy controls and persons with knee osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: Apart from biomechanical alterations in movement patterns, it is known that movement limitations in persons with knee osteoarthritis (PwKOA) are related to an individual's perception and belief regarding pain and disability. To gain more insights into the functional movement behaviour of PwKOA in a clinical setting, inertial sensor technology can be applied. This study first aims to evaluate the ability of inertial sensors to discriminate between healthy controls (HC) and PwKOA. Secondly, this study aims to determine the relationship between movement behaviour, pain-related factors and disability scores. METHODS: Twelve HC and 19 PwKOA were included. Five repetitions of six functional movement tasks (walking, forward lunge, sideward lunge, ascent and descent stairs, single leg squat and sit-to-stand) were simultaneously recorded by the inertial sensor system and a camera-based motion analysis system. Statistically significant differences in angular waveforms of the trunk, pelvis and lower limb joints between HC and PwKOA were determined using one-dimensional statistical parametric mapping (SPM1D). The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and TAMPA scale for Kinesiophobia were used to evaluate the relationship between discriminating joint motion, pain-related factors and disability using spearman's correlation coefficients. RESULTS: PwKOA had significantly less trunk rotation, internal pelvis rotation and knee flexion ROM during walking. Additionally, the reduced knee flexion (i.e. at the end of the stance phase and swing phase) was related to increased level of perceived pain. During the sideward lunge, PwKOA had significantly less knee flexion, ankle plantarflexion and hip abduction. This decreased hip abduction (i.e. during stance) was related to higher fear of movement. Finally, PwKOA had significantly less knee flexion during the forward lunge, single leg squat and during ascent and descent stairs. No significant correlations were observed with disability. CONCLUSIONS: Inertial sensors were able to discriminate between movement characteristics of PwKOA and HC. Additionally, significant relationships were found between joint motion, perceived pain and fear of movement. Since inertial sensors can be used outside the laboratory setting, these results are promising as they indicate the ability to evaluate movement deviations. Further research is required to enable measurements of small movement deviations in clinically relevant tasks.

Midterm Performance of a Guided-Motion Bicruciate-Stabilized Total Knee System: Results From the International Study of Over 2000 Consecutive Primary Total Knee Arthroplasties.

BACKGROUND: The JOURNEY II Bi-Cruciate Stabilizing Total Knee System (BLINDED) is a second-generation guided-motion knee implant that has been used in over 100,000 primary total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) worldwide. However, performance information is limited. METHODS: Data for 2059 primary TKAs were abstracted at 7 US and 3 European sites. Estimates of cumulative incidence of revision were compared with registry data for cemented posterior-stabilized implants. RESULTS: Average age was 64.3 years (range, 18-91); 58.5% were females; and 12.3% TKAs were in subjects younger than 55 years. Patellae were resurfaced in 95.9%. Median time since primary TKA was 4.2 years; longest was 6.1 years; and 78.9% were 3 years or more since primary TKA. Of 67 revisions (3.2%), 20 (30%) involved femoral or tibial component removal compared to 42% in the Australian Joint Registry (Australian Orthopedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry). All-component revisions accounted for 15 of 67, femoral component only for 2 of 67, tibial component only for 3 of 67, patellar component with/without tibial insert exchange for 17 of 67, and isolated tibial insert exchange for 30 of 67. In addition, there were 18 reoperations without component exchange. Component revision indications were infection (33%), mechanical loosening (21%), fracture of bone around the joint (16%), and instability (15%). Kaplan-Meier revision estimate was 3.1 and 3.6 per 100 TKAs at 3 and 5 years, respectively, compared to Australian Orthopedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry estimates of 3.1 and 4.1 per 100 TKAs. CONCLUSION: The revision rate for the second-generation implant was similar to cemented posterior-stabilized registry controls.

The biomechanical fingerprint of hip and knee osteoarthritis patients during activities of daily living.

BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis is a highly prevalent disease affecting the hip and knee joint and is characterized by load-mediated pain and decreased quality of life. Dependent on involved joint, patients present antalgic movement compensations, aiming to decrease loading on the involved joint. However, the associated alterations in mechanical loading of the ipsi- and contra-lateral lower limb joints, are less documented. Here, we documented the biomechanical fingerprint of end-stage hip and knee osteoarthritis patients in terms of ipsilateral and contralateral hip and knee loading during walking and stair ambulation. METHODS: Three-dimensional motion-analysis was performed in 20 hip, 18 knee osteoarthritis patients and 12 controls during level walking and stair ambulation. Joint contact forces were calculated using a standard musculoskeletal modelling workflow in Opensim. Involved and contralateral hip and knee joint loading was compared against healthy controls using independent t-tests (p < 0.05). FINDINGS: Both hip and knee cohorts significantly decreased loading of the involved joint during gait and stair ambulation. Hip osteoarthritis patients presented no signs of ipsilateral knee nor contralateral leg overloading, during walking and stair ascending. However, knee osteoarthritis patients significantly increased loading at the ipsilateral hip, and contralateral hip and knee joints during stair ambulation compared to controls. INTERPRETATION: The biomechanical fingerprint in knee and hip osteoarthritis patients confirmed antalgic movement strategies to unload the involved leg during gait. Only during stair ambulation in knee osteoarthritis patients, movement adaptations were confirmed that induced unbalanced intra- and inter-limb loading conditions, which are known risk factors for secondary osteoarthritis.