Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 16 de 16
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
N Engl J Med ; 377(3): 246-256, 2017 07 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28636834

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: From 2011 through 2014, the Federally Qualified Health Center Advanced Primary Care Practice Demonstration provided care management fees and technical assistance to a nationwide sample of 503 federally qualified health centers to help them achieve the highest (level 3) medical-home recognition by the National Committee for Quality Assurance, a designation that requires the implementation of processes to improve access, continuity, and coordination. METHODS: We examined the achievement of medical-home recognition and used Medicare claims and beneficiary surveys to measure utilization of services, quality of care, patients' experiences, and Medicare expenditures in demonstration sites versus comparison sites. Using difference-in-differences analyses, we compared changes in outcomes in the two groups of sites during a 3-year period. RESULTS: Level 3 medical-home recognition was awarded to 70% of demonstration sites and to 11% of comparison sites. Although the number of visits to federally qualified health centers decreased in the two groups, smaller reductions among demonstration sites than among comparison sites led to a relative increase of 83 visits per 1000 beneficiaries per year at demonstration sites (P<0.001). Similar trends explained the higher performance of demonstration sites with respect to annual eye examinations and nephropathy tests (P<0.001 for both comparisons); there were no significant differences with respect to three other process measures. Demonstration sites had larger increases than comparison sites in emergency department visits (30.3 more per 1000 beneficiaries per year, P<0.001), inpatient admissions (5.7 more per 1000 beneficiaries per year, P=0.02), and Medicare Part B expenditures ($37 more per beneficiary per year, P=0.02). Demonstration-site participation was not associated with relative improvements in most measures of patients' experiences. CONCLUSIONS: Demonstration sites had higher rates of medical-home recognition and smaller decreases in the number of patients' visits to federally qualified health centers than did comparison sites, findings that may reflect better access to primary care relative to comparison sites. Demonstration sites had larger increases in emergency department visits, inpatient admissions, and Medicare Part B expenditures. (Funded by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.).


Asunto(s)
Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Medicare , Atención Dirigida al Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria/economía , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Planes de Aranceles por Servicios , Femenino , Gastos en Salud , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare/economía , Atención Dirigida al Paciente/economía , Atención Dirigida al Paciente/organización & administración , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Estados Unidos
2.
J Gen Intern Med ; 34(1): 82-89, 2019 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30367329

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Regular primary care visits may allow an opportunity to deliver high-value, proactive care. However, no previous study has examined whether more temporally regular primary care visits predict better outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between the temporal regularity of primary care (PC) visits and outcomes. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: We used Medicare claims for 378,862 fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries, who received PC at 1328 federally qualified health centers from 2010 to 2014. MAIN MEASURES: We created five beneficiary groups based upon their annual number of PC visits. We further subdivided those groups according to whether PC visits occurred with more or less regularity than the median value. We compared these 10 subgroups on three outcomes, adjusting for beneficiary characteristics: emergency department (ED) visits, hospitalizations, and total Medicare expenditures. We also aggregated to the clinic level and divided clinics into tertiles of more, less, and similarly regular to predicted. We compared these three groups of clinics on the same three outcomes of care. KEY RESULTS: Within each visit frequency group, beneficiaries in the subgroup with fewer regular visits had more ED visits, more hospitalizations, and higher costs. Among beneficiaries with the most frequent PC visits, the less regular subgroup had more ED visits (1.70 vs. 1.31 per person-year), more hospitalizations (0.69 vs. 0.57), and greater Medicare expenditures ($20,731 vs. $17,430, p < 0.001 for all comparisons). Clinics whose PC visits were more regular than predicted also had better outcomes than other clinics, although the effect sizes were smaller. CONCLUSIONS: Temporal patterns of PC visits are correlated with outcomes, even among beneficiaries who appear otherwise similar. Measuring the temporal regularity of PC visits may be useful for identifying beneficiaries at risk for adverse events, and as a barometer for and an impetus to clinic-level quality improvement.


Asunto(s)
Gastos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Visita a Consultorio Médico/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
3.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 18(1): 41, 2018 Jan 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29370837

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have disagreed on whether patients who receive primary care from federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) have different utilization patterns than patients who receive care elsewhere. Our objective was to compare patterns of healthcare utilization between Medicare beneficiaries who received primary care from FQHCs and Medicare beneficiaries who received primary care from another source. METHODS: We compared characteristics and ambulatory, emergency department (ED), and inpatient utilization during 2013 between 130,637 Medicare beneficiaries who visited an FQHC for the majority of their primary care in 2013 (FQHC users) and a random sample of 1,000,000 Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) beneficiaries who did not visit an FQHC (FQHC non-users). We then created a propensity-matched sample of 130,569 FQHC users and 130,569 FQHC non-users to account for differences in observable patient characteristics between the two groups and repeated all comparisons. RESULTS: Before matching, the two samples differed in terms of age (42% below age 65 for FQHC users vs. 16% among FQHC non-users, p < 0.001 for all comparisons), disability (52% vs. 24%), eligibility for Medicaid (56% vs. 21%), severe mental health disorders (17% vs. 10%), and substance abuse disorders (6% vs. 3%). FQHC users had fewer ambulatory visits to primary care or specialist providers (10.0 vs. 12.0 per year), more ED visits (1.2 vs. 0.8), and fewer hospitalizations (0.3 vs. 0.4). In the matched sample, FQHC users still had slightly lower utilization of ambulatory visits to primary care or specialist providers (10.0 vs. 11.2) and slightly higher utilization of ED visits (1.2 vs. 1.0), compared to FQHC users. Hospitalization rates between the two groups were similar (0.3 vs. 0.3). CONCLUSIONS: In this population of Medicare FFS beneficiaries, FQHC users had slightly lower utilization of ambulatory visits and slightly higher utilization of ED visits, compared to FQHC non-users, after accounting for differences in case mix. This study suggests that FQHC care and non-FQHC care are associated with broadly similar levels of healthcare utilization among Medicare FFS beneficiaries.


Asunto(s)
Planes de Aranceles por Servicios/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicare , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Primaria de Salud , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
4.
J Gen Intern Med ; 32(9): 997-1004, 2017 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28550610

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patient-centered medical home (PCMH) models of primary care have the potential to expand access, improve population health, and lower costs. Federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) were early adopters of PCMH models. OBJECTIVE: We measured PCMH capabilities in a diverse nationwide sample of FQHCs and assessed the relationship between PCMH capabilities and Medicare beneficiary outcomes. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, propensity score-weighted, multivariable regression analysis. PARTICIPANTS: A convenience sample of 804 FQHC sites that applied to a nationwide FQHC PCMH initiative and 231,163 Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries who received a plurality of their primary care services from these sites. MAIN MEASURES: PCMH capabilities were self-reported using the National Committee for Quality Assurance's (NCQA's) 2011 application for PCMH recognition. Measures of utilization, continuity of care, quality, and Medicare expenditures were derived from Medicare claims covering a 1-year period ending October 2011. KEY RESULTS: Nearly 88% of sites were classified as having PCMH capabilities equivalent to NCQA Level 1, 2, or 3 PCMH recognition. These more advanced sites were associated with 228 additional FQHC visits per 1000 Medicare beneficiaries (95% CI: 176, 278), compared with less advanced sites; 0.02 points higher practice-level continuity of care (95% CI: 0.01, 0.03); and a greater likelihood of administering two of four recommended diabetes tests. However, more advanced sites were also associated with 181 additional visits to specialists per 1000 beneficiaries (95% CI: 124, 232) and 64 additional visits to emergency departments (95% CI: 35, 89)-but with no differences in inpatient utilization. More advanced sites had higher Part B expenditures ($111 per beneficiary [95% CI: $61, $158]) and total Medicare expenditures of $353 [95% CI: $65, $614]). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of PCMH models in FQHCs may be associated with improved primary care for Medicare beneficiaries. Expanded access to care, in combination with slower development of key PCMH capabilities, may explain higher Medicare expenditures and other types of utilization.


Asunto(s)
Atención a la Salud/economía , Planes de Aranceles por Servicios , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales/clasificación , Medicare/economía , Atención Dirigida al Paciente/economía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Transversales , Atención a la Salud/organización & administración , Femenino , Hospitalización/economía , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Atención Dirigida al Paciente/normas , Puntaje de Propensión , Análisis de Regresión , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
5.
Child Youth Serv Rev ; 63: 16-20, 2016 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26924868

RESUMEN

Men are increasingly the heads of single parent households, yet are often excluded from child welfare research and practice. To better serve all families in the child welfare system, it is necessary to understand the impact of primary caregiving men on children's wellbeing. In this study we investigated the longitudinal effects of primary caregiving fathers' mental health and substance use on child mental health, and examined possible differences by child age and gender. Regression analyses were conducted with the sample of 322 youth living with a male primary caregiver at the first wave of data collection from the National Survey of Child and Adolescent Wellbeing-II (NSCAW-II). We found that father depression at baseline consistently predicted child mental health outcomes three years later, even after accounting for demographics and baseline child mental health. Surprisingly, fathers' substance use did not predict child mental health, and interactions with child age and gender were not significant. Our findings are consistent with a small but growing literature suggesting that efforts to improve engagement of and attention to fathers within research, clinical and policy efforts are likely to be worthwhile.

7.
Int J Emerg Med ; 14(1): 22, 2021 Apr 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33853518

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The study was done to evaluate levels of missing and invalid values in the Michigan (MI) National Emergency Medical Services Information System (NEMSIS) (MI-EMSIS) and explore possible causes to inform improvement in data reporting and prehospital care quality. METHODS: We used a mixed-methods approach to study trends in data reporting. The proportion of missing or invalid values for 18 key reported variables in the MI-EMSIS (2010-2015) dataset was assessed overall, then stratified by EMS agency, software platform, and Medical Control Authorities (MCA)-regional EMS oversight entities in MI. We also conducted 4 focus groups and 10 key-informant interviews with EMS participants to understand the root causes of data missingness in MI-EMSIS. RESULTS: Only five variables of the 18 studied exhibited less than 10% missingness, and there was apparent variation in the rate of missingness across all stratifying variables under study. No consistent trends over time regarding the levels of missing or invalid values from 2010 to 2015 were identified. Qualitative findings indicated possible causes for this missingness including data-mapping issues, unclear variable definitions, and lack of infrastructure or training for data collection. CONCLUSIONS: The adoption of electronic data collection in the prehospital setting can only support quality improvement if its entry is complete. The data suggest that there are many EMS agencies and MCAs with very high levels of missingness, and they do not appear to be improving over time, demonstrating a need for investment in efforts in improving data collection and reporting.

8.
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf ; 46(9): 506-515, 2020 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32563625

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hospital crowding is a major challenge facing US health care systems, but few studies have evaluated the association between inpatient occupancy and patient mortality. The objective of this study was to determine how increasing hospital occupancy is associated with the likelihood of inpatient and 30-day out-of-hospital mortality using a novel measure of inpatient occupancy. METHODS: The researchers conducted a retrospective, observational study using secondary data from the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development, including nonfederal, acute care facilities from 1998 to 2012. Using measures of relative hospital occupancy, the researchers ran logistic regressions to assess the relationship between increasing hospital occupancy and inpatient mortality and 30-day out-of-hospital mortality among Medicare patients age 65 years and older with myocardial infarction, heart failure, or pneumonia. RESULTS: Higher admission day occupancy (odds ratio [OR] = 0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.94-0.99) and higher discharge day occupancy (OR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.60-0.64) were associated with decreased inpatient mortality. Thirty-day out-of-hospital mortality increased with higher discharge day occupancy (OR=1.28, 95% CI: 1.24-1.32) but was unrelated to admission day occupancy. CONCLUSION: This study found a counterintuitive relationship between admission and discharge day occupancy and inpatient mortality. Higher discharge day occupancy appears to displace deaths into the outpatient setting. Understanding why higher inpatient occupancy is associated with lower overall mortality merits investigation to inform best practices for inpatient care in busy hospitals.


Asunto(s)
Medicare , Alta del Paciente , Anciano , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Hospitalización , Hospitales , Humanos , Readmisión del Paciente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
9.
Psychol Trauma ; 11(3): 256-265, 2019 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29723029

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To understand how youth PTSD symptoms and externalizing problems emerge and change over time for youth with different profiles of victimization, including polyvictimization. METHOD: We conducted a latent class analysis (LCA) to identify empirically derived victimization profiles in a sample of 2,776 youth who participated in an evaluation study. We then conducted growth curve analyses to determine whether these victimization profiles predicted change in the course of PTSD symptoms and externalizing problems over a 1-year time period for youth engaged in a variety of community-based services. RESULTS: The LCA revealed three profiles: a low victimization profile defined by relatively low endorsement of victimization across types; a witnessing profile defined by particularly high endorsement of witnessing violence; and a polyvictimization profile defined by high endorsement of multiple types of victimization. We found that overall, despite differing initial levels of PTSD symptoms and externalizing problems, all three groups' symptoms improved over the year, but the polyvictimization class generally showed the steepest decreases, particularly in caregiver-reported PTSD symptoms. CONCLUSION: Polyvictimized youth participating in community-based services are at increased risk for developing PTSD and externalizing problems, but symptoms appear to decrease to levels similar to other victimized youth after one year. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).


Asunto(s)
Víctimas de Crimen/psicología , Salud Mental , Adolescente , Cuidadores/psicología , Niño , Preescolar , Víctimas de Crimen/clasificación , Víctimas de Crimen/rehabilitación , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Problema de Conducta , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/psicología , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/rehabilitación , Factores de Tiempo
10.
Rand Health Q ; 8(3): 1, 2019 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31205801

RESUMEN

An estimated 16 million workers use workers' compensation (WC) insurance annually in California. Many recent policy changes might have affected access to care for injured workers. For this study, the authors assess the various dimensions of access to care in the evolving policy environment to ensure that injured workers have adequate access to needed medical care and the opportunity to achieve better health outcomes. Access to care is an important domain to monitor, especially among vulnerable populations, as patients with better access to care systems are more likely to receive comprehensive, higher-quality care and are therefore more likely to experience better outcomes. The key objective of this study is to describe access to medical care among injured workers in the state of California, as mandated by Labor Code Section 5307.2. The authors analyze administrative and medical service bill data to examine changes over time for measures related to access to care for injured workers. The authors aim to highlight potential access-to-care barriers in the WC system and to understand whether changes in the WC system may be increasing access for injured workers. Overall, there were increases in claims, bill lines, and spending per provider. Although these increases were moderate to large in number, many of the differences were not statistically significant. These results suggest a concentration of treatment for injured workers, in which a relatively smaller number of providers furnished care to injured workers. Increasing concentration could offer opportunities for specialization in the treatment of work-related injuries. On the other hand, increasing concentration could lead to future access barriers related to scheduling.

11.
Int J Emerg Med ; 12(1): 4, 2019 Jan 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31179922

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Crowding is a major challenge faced by EDs and is associated with poor outcomes. OBJECTIVES: Determine the effect of high ED occupancy on disposition decisions, return ED visits, and hospitalizations. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of electronic health records of patients evaluated at an adult, urban, and academic ED over 20 months between the years 2012 and 2014. Using a logistic regression model predicting admission, we obtained estimates of the effect of high occupancy on admission disposition, adjusted for key covariates. We then stratified the analysis based on the presence or absence of high boarder patient counts. RESULTS: Disposition decisions during a high occupancy hour decreased the odds of admission (OR = 0.93, 95% CI: [0.89, 0.98]). Among those who were not admitted, high occupancy was not associated with increased odds of return in the combined (OR = 0.94, 95% CI: [0.87, 1.02]), with-boarders (OR = 0.96, 95% CI: [0.86, 1.09]), and no-boarders samples (OR = 0.93, 95% CI: [0.83, 1.04]). Among those who were not admitted and who did return within 14 days, disposition during a high occupancy hour on the initial ED visit was not associated with a significant increased odds of hospitalization in the combined (OR = 1.04, 95% CI: [0.87, 1.24]), the with-boarders (OR = 1.12, 95% CI: [0.87, 1.44]), and the no-boarders samples (OR = 0.98, 95% CI: [0.77, 1.24]). CONCLUSION: ED crowding was associated with reduced likelihood of hospitalization without increased likelihood of 2-week return ED visit or hospitalization. Furthermore, high occupancy disposition hours with high boarder patient counts were associated with decreased likelihood of hospitalization.

12.
J Hosp Med ; 13(10): 698-701, 2018 10 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29964276

RESUMEN

Few studies have evaluated the relationship between high hospital occupancy and hospital-acquired complications. We evaluated the association between inpatient occupancy and hospital-acquired Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) using a novel measure of hospital occupancy. We analyzed administrative data from California hospitals from 2008-2012 for Medicare recipients aged 65 years with a discharge diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, or pneumonia. Using daily census data, we constructed patient-level measures of occupancy on admission day and average occupancy during hospitalization (range: 0-1), which were split into 4 groups. We used logistic regression with cluster standard errors to estimate the adjusted and unadjusted relationship of occupancy with hospital-acquired CDI. Across 327 hospitals, 558,344 discharges met our inclusion criteria. Higher admission day occupancy was associated with significantly lower adjusted likelihood of CDI. Compared to the 0-0.25 occupancy group, patients admitted on a day of 0.51-0.75 occupancy had 0.86 odds of CDI (95% CI 0.75-0.98). The 0.76-1.00 admission occupancy group had 0.87 odds of CDI (95% CI 0.75-1.01). With regard to average occupancy, intermediate levels of occupancy 0.26-0.50 (odds ratio [OR] = 3.04, 95% CI 2.33-3.96) and 0.51-0.75 (OR = 3.28, 95% CI 2.51-4.28) had over 3-fold increased adjusted odds of CDI relative to the low occupancy group; the high occupancy group did not have signifcantly different odds of CDI compared to the low occupancy group (OR = 0.96, 95% CI 0.70-1.31). These findings should prompt exploration of how hospitals react to occupancy changes and how those care processes translate into hospital-acquired complications in order to inform best practices.


Asunto(s)
Ocupación de Camas/estadística & datos numéricos , Infecciones por Clostridium/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , California/epidemiología , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Infarto del Miocardio/epidemiología , Infarto del Miocardio/terapia , Oportunidad Relativa , Neumonía/epidemiología , Neumonía/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
13.
Am J Manag Care ; 24(7): 334-340, 2018 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30020753

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: We examined differences in patient outcomes associated with 3 patient-centered medical home (PCMH) recognition programs-National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) Level 3, The Joint Commission (TJC), and Accreditation Association for Ambulatory Health Care (AAAHC)-among Medicare beneficiaries receiving care at federally qualified health centers (FQHCs). STUDY DESIGN: We used data from CMS' FQHC Advanced Primary Care Practice Demonstration, in which participating FQHCs received assistance to achieve NCQA Level 3 PCMH recognition. We assessed the impact of the 3 recognition programs on utilization, quality, and Medicare expenditures using a sample of 1108 demonstration and comparison FQHCs. METHODS: Using propensity-weighted difference-in-differences analyses, we compared changes in outcomes over 3 years for beneficiaries attributed to FQHCs that achieved each type of recognition relative to beneficiaries attributed to FQHCs that did not achieve recognition. RESULTS: Recognized FQHCs, compared with nonrecognized FQHCs, were associated with significant 3-year changes in FQHC visits, non-FQHC primary care visits, specialty visits, emergency department (ED) visits, hospitalizations, a composite diabetes process measure, and Medicare expenditures. Changes varied in direction and strength by recognition type. In year 3, compared with nonrecognized sites, NCQA Level 3 sites were associated with greater increases in ambulatory visits and quality and greater reductions in hospitalizations and expenditures (P <.01), TJC sites were associated with significant reductions in ED visits and hospitalizations (P <.01), and AAAHC sites had changes in the opposite direction of what we anticipated. CONCLUSIONS: Heterogeneous changes in beneficiary utilization, quality, and expenditures by recognition type may be explained by differences in recognition criteria, evaluation processes, and documentation requirements.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus/terapia , Medicare , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Atención Dirigida al Paciente/normas , Atención Primaria de Salud/normas , Anciano , Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Estados Unidos
14.
JAMA Dermatol ; 152(8): 905-12, 2016 08 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27144986

RESUMEN

IMPORTANCE: Access to specialists such as dermatologists is often limited for Medicaid enrollees. Teledermatology has been promoted as a potential solution; however, its effect on access to care at the population level has rarely been assessed. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of teledermatology on the number of Medicaid enrollees who received dermatology care and to describe which patients were most likely to be referred to teledermatology. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Claims data from a large California Medicaid managed care plan that began offering teledermatology as a covered service in April 2012 were analyzed. The plan enrolled 382 801 patients in California's Central Valley, including 108 480 newly enrolled patients who obtained coverage after the implementation of the Affordable Care Act. Rates of dermatology visits by patients affiliated with primary care practices that referred patients to teledermatology and those that did not were compared. Data were collected from April 1, 2012, through December 31, 2014, and assessed from March 1 to October 15, 2015. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The percentage of patients with at least 1 visit to a dermatologist (including in-person and teledermatology visits) and total visits with dermatologists (including in-person and teledermatology visits) per 1000 patients. RESULTS: Of the 382 801 patients enrolled for at least 1 day from 2012 to 2014, 8614 (2.2%) had 1 or more visits with a dermatologist. Of all patients who visited a dermatologist, 48.5% received care via teledermatology. Among the patients newly enrolled in Medicaid, 75.7% (1474 of 1947) of those who visited a dermatologist received care via teledermatology. Primary care practices that engaged in teledermatology had a 63.8% increase in the fraction of patients visiting a dermatologist (vs 20.5% in other practices; P < .01). Compared with in-person dermatology, teledermatology served more patients younger vs older than 17 years (2600 of 4427 [58.7%] vs 1404 of 4187 [33.5%]), male patients (1849 of 4427 [41.8%] vs 1526 of 4187 [36.4%]), nonwhite patients (2779 of 4188 [66.4%] vs 1844 of 3478 [53.0%]), and individuals without comorbid conditions (1795 of 2464 [72.8%] vs 1978 of 3024 [65.4%]) (P < .001 for all comparisons). Conditions managed across settings varied; teledermatology physicians were more likely to care for viral skin lesions and acne (3405 of 7287 visits [46.7%]), whereas in-person dermatologists were more likely to care for psoriasis and skin neoplasms (10 062 of 27 347 visits [36.8%]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The offering of teledermatology appeared to improve access to dermatology care among Medicaid enrollees and played an especially important role for the newly enrolled.


Asunto(s)
Dermatología/estadística & datos numéricos , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicaid/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Primaria de Salud/normas , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos , Telemedicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Reclamos Administrativos en el Cuidado de la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , California , Niño , Dermatología/tendencias , Femenino , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/tendencias , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Visita a Consultorio Médico/estadística & datos numéricos , Visita a Consultorio Médico/tendencias , Atención Primaria de Salud/tendencias , Derivación y Consulta/tendencias , Telemedicina/tendencias , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
15.
Child Maltreat ; 21(4): 278-287, 2016 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27554362

RESUMEN

The goal of this study is to better understand the characteristics of men who act as primary caregivers of maltreated children. We examined differences between male primary caregivers (fathers) for youth involved in the child welfare system and female primary caregivers (mothers). We conducted secondary data analyses of the National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well-Being-II baseline data. Overall, primary caregiving fathers and mothers were more similar than different, though a few differences were revealed. Compared to mothers, fathers tended to be older and were more likely to be employed, with a higher household income and older children. Fathers and mothers did not differ in terms of depression or parenting behavior, but there was evidence that mothers have more problems with drug use compared to fathers. Compared to fathers, mothers reported higher levels of internalizing and externalizing problems in their children. Children with male primary caregivers were more likely to have experienced physical abuse but less likely to have experienced emotional abuse or witnessed domestic violence than children with female primary caregivers. These findings may help to inform researchers, practitioners, and policy makers on how to address the needs of male caregivers and their children.

16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24967150

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess the availability, completeness, and quality of the Behavioral Health Organization (BHO) encounter data in MAX 2009. DATA SOURCE: The Medicaid Analytic Extract (MAX) 2009. METHODS: We compared metrics of reporting completeness and quality for BHOs to similar metrics for six states that primarily cover MH and SA services on a FFS basis. For the IP file, number of encounters per 1,000 person months of enrollment were compared. In the OT file, we examined three completeness measures: the number of claims per PME, number of claims reported per BHO outpatient service user, and the number of OT claims per service user. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Out of the 15 states reporting enrollment in BHO plans in MAX 2009, 10 reported complete capitation data. IP encounter data were available in four states (Arizona, Colorado, Florida, and Iowa), compared well to FFS ranges, and appear usable for research. OT data are available for five states, but our analysis suggests data are only sufficiently complete for analysis in Arizona and Iowa. CONCLUSIONS: The initial assessment of the availability, completeness and quality of BHO encounter data in MAX 2009 suggests that only limited data are available and usable.


Asunto(s)
Medicaid/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Proyectos de Investigación , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA