RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Past studies have reported associations between pesticide exposure and the risk of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Residential pesticide exposure has been less well studied than agricultural exposure. The purpose of this study was to assess SLE risk associated with residential pesticide exposure in an urban population of predominantly African-American women. METHODS: Adult women with SLE were identified from six hospital databases and community screening in three neighborhoods in Boston, Massachusetts, USA. Controls were adult women volunteers from the same neighborhoods who were screened for the absence of connective tissue disease and anti-nuclear antibodies. Subjects were considered exposed to pesticides if they had ever had an exterminator for an ant, cockroach, or termite problem prior to SLE diagnosis or corresponding reference age in controls. Risks associated with pesticide exposure were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression models, adjusted for sociodemographic factors. RESULTS: We identified 93 SLE subjects and 170 controls with similar baseline characteristics. Eighty-three per cent were African-American. Pesticide exposure was associated with SLE, after controlling for potential confounders (odds ratio 2.24, 95% confidence interval 1.28-3.93). CONCLUSION: Residential exposure to pesticides in an urban population of predominantly African-American women was associated with increased SLE risk. Additional studies are needed to corroborate these findings.
Asunto(s)
Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/inducido químicamente , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/epidemiología , Plaguicidas/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anticuerpos Antinucleares , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/efectos adversos , Contaminantes Ambientales/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Massachusetts/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Factores de Riesgo , Población UrbanaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Studies of the association between physical activity (PA) and weight maintenance have been inconsistent. METHODS: We prospectively examined the association between PA patterns and prevention of weight gain among 46 754 healthy premenopausal women, aged 25-43 years in 1989. Participants reported their PA and weight in 1989 and 1997. The primary outcome was gaining >5% of baseline weight by 1997 (62% of the population). RESULTS: Compared with women who maintained <30 min d(-1) of total discretionary activity over 8 years, women were less likely to gain weight if they sustained 30+ min d(-1) (odds ratio (OR)=0.68, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.64-0.73) or increased to 30+ min d(-1) in 1997 (OR=0.64, 95%CI=0.60-0.68). Among women whose only reported activity was walking, risk of gaining weight was lower in those who sustained 30+ min d(-1) over 8 years (OR=0.66, 95%CI=0.49-0.91), and brisk walking pace independently predicted less weight gain. For a 30 min d(-1) increase between 1989 and 1997, jogging/running was associated with less weight gain than brisk walking or other activities. Greater duration of PA was associated with progressively less weight gain, but even an 11-20 min d(-1) increase was beneficial; the benefits appeared stronger among those who were initially overweight. Sedentary behavior independently predicted weight gain. CONCLUSIONS: Sustained PA for at least 30 min d(-1), particularly if more intense, is associated with a reduction in long-term weight gain, and greater duration is associated with less weight gain. Sedentary women of any baseline weight who increase their PA will benefit, but overweight women appear to benefit the most.
Asunto(s)
Ejercicio Físico/fisiología , Actividad Motora/fisiología , Obesidad/prevención & control , Aumento de Peso/fisiología , Adulto , Índice de Masa Corporal , Ejercicio Físico/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Obesidad/fisiopatología , Obesidad/terapia , Premenopausia , Estudios Prospectivos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de Tiempo , Caminata/fisiología , Caminata/psicologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Ascribing quality to medical care rests in part on the expectation of physician behavior and the content of care. The adoption of functional outcomes of care as legitimate measures of quality will require greater attention to patient-provided assessments of health and add new dimensions to medical practice and quality assessment. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional, national population survey of adults to obtain estimates of the frequency with which physicians reportedly inquire about patients' functional health status and emotional well-being, patients' attitudes about such assessments, and the perceived use of data thus obtained in the therapeutic process. RESULTS: The majority of physicians rarely or never ask about the extent to which patients' health limits their ability to perform everyday activities (64.7% to 78.7%); neither do they inquire about limitations imposed by emotional problems (71.4% to 84.4%). Physicians are more likely to make such inquiries in the presence of chronic illness or diminished health status, or with older patients, although such assessments remain the exception to usual practice and a large portion of functional impairment is undiscovered. More than 60% of respondents want their physicians to assess their functional health status and well-being. CONCLUSIONS: While individuals want their physicians to assess their functional performance and emotional well-being as a part of medical care, by their reports this occurs infrequently. The content of care may be less comprehensive than physicians believe to be the case.
Asunto(s)
Emociones , Estado de Salud , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Investigación Empírica , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
When, as commonly occurs, a parent's and child's reports about the child differ, the lack of agreement usually leads to consideration of which information is objective and valid. Little attention has been given to understanding what meaning these differences might have in the context of parent-child relationships or to whether the existence or absence of these differences might be causally related to the child's psychosocial status and functioning. Third- through fifth-grade children (N = 178) in behavior disorder and regular classrooms were asked to complete a self-concept measure; parents were asked to independently complete the same instrument as they thought their child would. Parents of children without behavior disorders were significantly more accurate in their descriptions of their children's perceptions than were parents of children with behavior problems. They also tended to expect their children to have more positive self-concepts than the children actually reported. Parents who are able to accurately report their children's feelings and who err toward more positive assessments may be preventing behavior problems.
Asunto(s)
Padres , Autoimagen , Autoevaluación (Psicología) , Niño , Conducta Infantil , Trastornos de la Conducta Infantil/diagnóstico , Trastornos de la Conducta Infantil/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Responsabilidad Parental , Apoyo SocialRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To estimate the total prevalence of health-related work limitations among working people in the United States (US) as well as their condition-specific prevalence. METHODS: A new questionnaire measuring limitations in ability to perform specific work demands was administered to 940 employed people in a national household survey. The prevalence of specific work limitations is reported as are condition-specific risk estimates (odds ratios) based on logistic regression. RESULTS: In the US, 19.3% of working people (CI = 14.0, 24.6) were limited in their abilities to perform physical work demands; 24.1% (CI = 18.9, 29.2) were limited in performing psychosocial work demands; and 13.8% (CI = 8.3, 19.3) were limited in their abilities to function without difficulty within the ambient work environment. With successive increments in the number of conditions, the odds of having a limitation increased significantly. CONCLUSIONS: This study contributes new information concerning the implications of chronic health problems for working people and the significant risks for workers with multiple chronic conditions.
Asunto(s)
Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Salud Laboral , Adulto , Enfermedad Crónica , Estudios Transversales , Indicadores de Salud , Humanos , Oportunidad Relativa , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Chronic shortages of registered nurses (RNs) have stimulated interest in locating non-traditional sources of RNs. A statewide survey of 2,315 newly graduated RNs compared three non-traditional groups in nursing with their traditional counterparts, identifying differences that have implications for successful recruitment and retention. Second career nurses, former LPNs and minorities comprised 41.9% of the population. Compared to the traditional groups, more second career nurses, former LPNs and some minority groups were older, married and had children. Second career vs. first career nurses placed less emphasis on selecting schools at the highest levels of academic quality, holding out for the most lucrative jobs or working with the most "interesting" patients (i.e., the acutely ill). Former LPNs, compared to other RNs, placed greater value on easy access to schools and jobs. Compared to whites, minority RNs were more inclined to value nursing's socioeconomic rewards. However, compared to non-Asian minorities in nursing, Asian RNs had higher expectations for professional advancement and were less altruistic. Our results indicate that several of the new groups view nursing less as a "calling," finding the field appealing for practical socioeconomic reasons and accessibility.
Asunto(s)
Selección de Profesión , Enfermeras y Enfermeros/clasificación , Enfermería/tendencias , Adulto , Análisis de Varianza , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Demografía , Escolaridad , Empleo/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Licencia en Enfermería , Masculino , Massachusetts , Enfermeras y Enfermeros/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermeras y Enfermeros/provisión & distribución , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Recursos HumanosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this work was to develop a psychometrically sound questionnaire for measuring the on-the-job impact of chronic health problems and/or treatment ("work limitations"). RESEARCH DESIGN: Three pilot studies (focus groups, cognitive interviews, and an alternate forms test) generated candidate items, dimensions, and response scales. Two field trials tested the psychometric performance of the questionnaire (studies 1 and 2). To test recall error, study 1 subjects were randomly assigned to 2 different questionnaire groups, a questionnaire with a 4-week reporting period completed once or a 2-week version completed twice. Responses were compared with data from concurrent work limitation diaries (the gold standard). To test construct validity, we compared questionnaire scores of patients with those of healthy job-matched control subjects. Study 2 was a cross-sectional mail survey testing scale reliability and construct validity. SUBJECTS: The study subjects were employed individuals (18-64 years of age) from several chronic condition groups (study 1, n = 48; study 2, n = 121) and, in study 1, 17 healthy matched control subjects. MEASURES: Study 1 included the assigned questionnaires and weekly diaries. Study 2 included the new questionnaire, SF-36, and work productivity loss items. RESULTS: In study 1, questionnaire responses were consistent with diary data but were most highly correlated with the most recent week. Patients had significantly higher (worse) limitation scores than control subjects. In study 2, 4 scales from a 25-item questionnaire achieved Cronbach alphas of > or = 0.90 and correlated with health status and self-reported work productivity in the hypothesized manner (P < or = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: With 25 items, 4 dimensions (limitations handling time, physical, mental-interpersonal, and output demands), and a 2-week reporting period, the Work Limitations Questionnaire demonstrated high reliability and validity.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Crónica/clasificación , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Evaluación de Capacidad de Trabajo , Adulto , Artritis Reumatoide/diagnóstico , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios Transversales , Epilepsia/diagnóstico , Femenino , Cefalea/diagnóstico , Humanos , Modelos Lineales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos Piloto , Psicometría , Distribución Aleatoria , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Studies of the health effects of job strain have focused on morbidity and mortality as outcomes. This is the first study to examine the relationship of job strain to more comprehensive health status measures that encompass health-related quality of life. METHODS: In a national cross-sectional survey, 1319 working men and women, aged 18 through 64 years, completed a modified version of the Job Content Questionnaire that classified workers' jobs into four categories: high strain, passive, low strain, and active. Subjects also completed the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form Health Survey and a health distress scale. Logistic regression analyses were employed that controlled for age, race/ethnicity, gender, and education. Both work and nonwork variables were included. RESULTS: Job strain was significantly associated with five of nine components of health-related quality of life: physical functioning, role functioning related to physical health, vitality, social functioning, and mental health. Job strain made a modest yet statistically significant contribution beyond the effects of chronic illness and psychosocial variables. CONCLUSIONS: The results provide justification for further investigating the role of job strain as an independent risk factor for health-related quality of life.
Asunto(s)
Estado de Salud , Satisfacción en el Trabajo , Calidad de Vida , Estrés Psicológico/complicaciones , Adolescente , Adulto , Escolaridad , Femenino , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Masculino , Salud Mental , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis de Regresión , Apoyo Social , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
This report describes initial experience with a new self-report questionnaire, the 17 item Angina-related Limitations at Work Questionnaire. Forty employed individuals with chronic stable angina pectoris completed the questionnaire which retrospectively examined the subjects' difficulty in performing specific work activities during the preceding 4 week period. The questionnaire performed well in this study and there was initial evidence of its validity and reliability. More than one-half of the respondents (52.5%) indicated at least some difficulty in performing one or more of the 17 work items due to angina during the preceding 4 weeks, with the greatest difficulty experienced in physically exerting tasks, handling stressful situations and feeling a sense of accomplishment. In contrast, only one-quarter of the sample missed any work time. In tests of convergent validity, the degree of work limitation correlated significantly with SF-36 physical and mental health component scores and with self-reports of angina symptoms. The questionnaire had internal reliability, with item to total score correlations of 0.75 or higher for 14 of the 17 items. In summary, the Angina-related Limitations at Work Questionnaire offers promise for quantifying work limitations among individuals with chronic stable angina.
Asunto(s)
Angina de Pecho/psicología , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Psicometría , Calidad de Vida , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Angina de Pecho/rehabilitación , Boston , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reproducibilidad de los ResultadosRESUMEN
Data were collected on 228 consecutive back injuries in Boston's General Mail Facility and 228 non-injured controls drawn randomly from each case's work unit, matching on craft (clerk, mailhandler, maintenance), shift, and general supervisor. Data were collected on age, gender, duration of employment, 3 year history of injury claims, overtime work in the past 2 weeks, job change in the past 60 days, and machine vs. manual job. Risk factors for back injury were examined simultaneously in a conditional logistic regression for matched pairs. Risk factors included history of back injury claim (OR = 16.5, p less than 0.0001), younger age (OR = 3.0, p = 0.0001), shorter duration of employment (OR = 2.6, p = 0.0007), recent job change (OR = 2.5, p = 0.06), and history of non-back injury claim (OR = 2.0, p = 0.08). Among heavy lifters (vs. clerks) overtime and being female increased the risk of injury. In this setting, higher risk workers who may benefit from preventive education programs can be identified.
Asunto(s)
Accidentes de Trabajo/prevención & control , Traumatismos de la Espalda , Dolor de Espalda/etiología , Prevención Primaria , Accidentes de Trabajo/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Dolor de Espalda/prevención & control , Boston , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Empleo/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Recurrencia , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Indemnización para TrabajadoresRESUMEN
Our objectives were to: (1) develop a self-report questionnaire for measuring the impact of migraine headache on work; and (2) qualitatively assess aspects of its performance. Two samples of migraine sufferers provided the data. Sample 1 (n = 18) participated in a structured discussion group designed to elicit examples of migraine's on-the-job impact. Sample 2 (n = 11) completed a mail survey and participated in in-depth phone interviews. Interviews addressed item comprehensibility, consistency of interpretation, the cognitive processes by which certain answers were generated and response burden. The participants were currently employed men and women, at least 18 years of age, who met the International Headache Society (IHS) criteria for migraine headache [1]. Discussion group participants indicated that migraine attacks substantially diminished their job performance. Pain, photophobia, phonophobia, mental impairment and fatigue were perceived as interfering with even routine or relatively simple job tasks. The Migraine Work and Productivity Loss Questionnaire, Version 1.0 (MWPLQ) was written. Next, it was assessed in the context of the in-depth interviews. Result indicated that the MWPLQ was comprehended without difficulty, interpreted consistently and easy to complete. Thus, qualitative results provide initial support for the new questionnaire.